terrydactyls

Since the chart shows the Yankees getting the "goldilocks" ball from August to the end of the season, they only had 34 home games.

This article raises questions about it's methodology and validity. They claim the "goldilocks" ball was only used in Yankee games. How did the Yankees get them into their road games? I think that the home team is responsible for providing the balls. If both teams provide balls, how did the Yankees get them into the game only when they were hitting? If the article meant at Yankee home games, wouldn't both teams get the benefit of using a non-dead ball? And if both teams use the "goldilocks" ball, how is that favoring the Yankees? While the usage of different balls is appalling, I don't think the Yankees received any help by this on the field. It may have helped the ownership a little if there was an increase in attendance because of the possible increase of offense; although the article does not mention what impact there was because of the usage of the "goldilocks" ball except to hint that the ball travelled further. And even then, the article doesn't provide any data on how much further the ball traveled. The usage of multiple types of baseballs by MLB is stupid but to say the Yankees benefited is unfair. And I haven't liked the Yankees since Yogi Berra retired.

So much said above and so much worth commenting on. But I'll just say that the Twins should jump in right now and offer Correa (and Boras) 3 years at $15M/year. That's he's worth now that ankle, knee, and/or leg may give out at any time. This is sarcasm. Please don't respond.

Eventually?? I've been advocating this approach since the off-season began!

I hear that to get Bauer you would have to be willing to commit him to 3 to 5 years (maybe at Stillwater?).

I heard an interesting comment on MLB Radio this morning. Two commentators we're having a discussion about the disparity in team payrolls and whether or not it's good for baseball. One point that came up was that all the owners are billionaires so teams shouldn't worry about how much they spend on signing players. The counterpoint argument was that some owners run their team to make a profit every year and others are trying to win. Commenting on that premise, the first guy said: "If they don't want to win, they need to sell the team to someone who does. If not, they are doing a disservice to the players, the fans, and the community". I agree. Anyone else?

If Gray doesn't like the offer, send him packing at the trade deadline. I heard a rumor that Cincinnati has a minor leaguer named Chase Petty???

How about starting with Miranda, Gray, and Mahle? If any of Kirilloff, Larnach, or Wallner next year? Maybe Lewis, Martin, and Lee the year after that. There are possibly better ways to spend money than signing one guy (who might have a medical problem). Just my opinion and I know you think I'm wrong! ☹️

Use it for extensions of the young's. As for Correa, once the Mets got involved, any offer from the Twins would be beaten by Steve Cohen. Luxury Tax is not a real thing in his mind.

The Twins should re-sign Sano and put him at SS? Gets them a power RH bat and a SS. Defense doesn't matter!!!

I'm pretty sure you just proved my point. Even though all the metrics you quoted were horrible, someone in the organization ignored them and relied on instinct instead. Thanks.

With all that data, all the research, "investigators", scouts, etc., the Twins still signed guys like Happ, Shoemaker, and Smith. Sure seems like an old fashion eye test would have netted better results.

Isn't that what all the pop-up ads are for?

Another unapologetic effort to sell the Caretaker plan. It's like being asked over for drinks and finding yourself at an Amway recruiting session. Nice tease though. I thought I might learn something.

As has been often pointed out (and accurately IMHO), why would a top free agent sign to play in Minnesota when they could sign with a team that plays in a state with no state income tax or with a team that plays in year-round sunshine? Therefore, I think the best strategy for the Twins is to push the younger players more aggressively and get them to the major leagues as soon as possible. After a couple years, extend all the younger players who they feel will be of positive value. When the extension expires, the next move is either trade them for good prospects, try to extend them again, or cut them loose. That would provide a stable, known budget for the core of the team and help the front office sign players to help in areas of weakness. This strategy could result in a roster similar to this: 5 young guys at $.7M = $3.5M 5 pre-arbitration guys at $2.5M = $12.5M 5 extended guys at $8M = $40M 7 post-arbitration guys at $12M = $84M These signings would provide the front office with a base budget of $1404M The remaining 4 roster spots would be filled with players (internal or external) to cover areas of need. The difference between a suggested budget and the baseline of $140M is their discretionary money to acquire those players. For example, a suggested budget of $160M would provide $20M of discretionary money to acquire 4 additional players to fill areas of need. The number of players and estimated salary at each category are primarily based on the current roster I found at MLB.com.

Isn't he the blind singer who was popular 25 years ago?

My feelings exactly! That's why I think the Twins should invest any money or prospects trying to improve the 2023 team. Put up the "We Are Sellers" sign right now and get ready for a very busy July.

Just because it is "largely not really a thing" doesn't mean you shouldn't do it.

I also think it's a year to be a seller. But I would like to see them use the rest of the off-season signing free agents that might be assets for deadline trades. Fill the Saints lineup with near ready, high-end young players and plan for 2023.

IMHO, the best move for the Twins between now and spring training is to sign as many players as they can that they believe can be traded in late July.

I heard a rumor today that Rodon is now looking for a seven year deal. If that is true then NO THANKS!!! Also, the 1956 Sci-fi classic was about Rodan, not Rodon.

When Correa signs with SF, this off-season can be officially labeled a Titanic-size failure. But the payroll will be under $100M and the Pohlad's can celebrate (with KFC takeout to save money).

The shelves are nearly empty and all the Twins have done is talk. Time to act. Offer Correa 13/$390M and offer Dansby 10/$250M. First one to accept their offer is our new SS. Then use the remaining budget (plus a little extra) to sign either Bassitt or Eovaldi, Duvall and Narvaez. If neither Correa or Dansby sign, Farmer is then crowned the interim SS and additional acquisitions continue. A successful off-season is now complete and spring training is coming soon.

Thanks

The Mets 2023 payroll now is at $343M. I guess some teams aren't hesitant to go after what they feel they need to win.