Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Darius

Verified Member
  • Posts

    2,085
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Tutorials & Help

Videos

2023 Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Free Agent & Trade Rumors

Guides & Resources

Minnesota Twins Players Project

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Darius

  1. The Astros model used as an example is great. But that can't always be done. 1) There has to be someone good enough to take at #1 at a discount. You can't just take any schmuk for the sake of paying less. 2). There has be a very good player that you can make a deal with before the draft, and inform a bunch of other teams he won't sign with them in the first round. I don't think it's as easy as some think, or team would do it every year that there isn't a Strasburg or Harper. 3). If the first two stars align, which isn't likely, then.....and this might be the rub....they have to want to come to Minnesota, instead of San Diego, Miami, etc. I wouldn't do things like this just to be cute. I'd imagine for every Astros story, there's going to be a story of someone passing a generational talent, getting burned, and looking extremely foolish. Getting the best player at #1, paying the kid, and moving on is going to work out much more often, I would think.
  2. I think we're already seeing the regression. The pitching is spiraling out of control.
  3. It's got to be embarrassing for the people who didn't get turned over, or even those who did, to be regarded as so incompetently behind in terms of thought process and technology. You have to think they get pats on the head and held back laughter in the weekly staff meetings. If this were any other line of business but professional sports, the Twins would be out of business. It would be like a company competing with Samsung, LG, etc, who are producing cutting edge 4k+ technology and revolutionary ideas for streaming and virtual reality, refusing to accept the death of the VCR market for two decades.
  4. Now watch Colorado move him over to third, and get him in. Something the Twins seemingly can never do.
  5. Belisle is awful. You know you're bullpen is a joke when you take one team's washed up 6th inning guy and make him the set up man. It still blows my mind that they didnt bring a real reliever in here. After watching two different sets of FO personnel, the latter being fronted by a pitching-centric sabregeek, the only logical explanation isnthsg ownership hamstrung them and wouldn't sign off on any proposed signings.
  6. Shocking. Rosario takes a garbage at bat with a runner on third and less than one out.
  7. That's what happens when you can execute with runners in base and no outs. That's something the Twins haven't been even remotely competent at in 7-8 years.
  8. Looks like it's going to be a long night for Phil. Or, probably a short night, more accurately.
  9. Walks are still a little concerning. But only 6 hits and 10 Ks means his "stuff" was probably good. It can't be emphasized enough how huge it would be if he could figure some things out, and come back up and pitch well for a sustained period of time. Could be the difference between pretender and contender.
  10. I would say no. I wouldn't call Porcello an ace either. I think it's just as much based on ability, and stuff, as stats and past performance. The ability to rack up strike outs generally is a common thread with true "aces." I don't think being a #1 on a staff constitutes ace either. I don't think there are more than 5-10 "aces" in the game at a time. They're good pitchers, but to me, an ace is a guy who you want to give the ball to twice in a 7 game series, or be the proverbial "stopper." As good as he's been, I don't think it's sustainable, and wouldn't be real confident going into a playoff series with him as the #1 pitcher, going against a Chris Sale or Max Scherzer type. I guess it all just depends on ones definition of "ace."
  11. Is Steven Strasburg without the 80 fastball really Steven Strasburg, or just some guy that physically looks like Steven Strasburg? Not snark, honest question. I wouldn't be overly disappointed if they take him, it might be the right move. But, it's really hard to not to like the kid with the 80 fastball as a 17 year old, especially if we're throwing potential arm issues out the window. If we're not throwing arm issues out the window, it's even tougher to turn down a plus bat at a middle infield spot as a plan B.
  12. What I know: This offense and defense are for real, and could be here for a very long time. You can add Wade as the fourth OF, Gordon At SS/2B, another year under the belt of Sano, Kepler, Rosario, Buxton, Vargas, and Polanco...,and things are looking elite there going forward. There are high-end bullpen arms very close to being here (Burdi, Melo, Jay, plus some). I've been disappointed about how they handled it this year...but it's looking pretty bright for the bullpen going into next year as well. I'm my estimation, the missing part of this equation, obviously, are some starting pitchers. Maybe Santana has one more good year in him. Berrios is going to be good, I'm convinced of that. Mejia should be capable near the middle-back-end. There are guys like Romero and Gonsalves who could fill some holes. So, in reality, why wouldn't this team go make a move in free agency for a decent starter? We don't need a Max Scherzer move to compete in this division. Guys like Alex Cobb, Tyson Ross, Tyler Chatwood, etc could all be affordable, and could offer some upside. I think there are plenty of options to get a rotation out there that is serviceable enough to make a run. Trading a potential perennial MVP caliber guy like Sano at this point is insane. I'd give it a couple years before considering something like that. The bottom-line here: the Pohlad's need to keep their promise they sold everyone to get that new stadium (need it to compete for free agents) and pony up at some point. The, "Kansas City," approach is insane plan. That almost never works. That's like making your retirement plan the lottery.
  13. I'm only listening to the game, but I'll assume that was Mauer's fault, because everything is Mauer's fault.
  14. I think we're far enough along in the season where Molly can stop turning games over the what is, on paper, one of the worst bullpens in the MLB, most of AAA, and some of AA. Honestly, is it much of a stretch to say Chatanooga's bullpen is better than the Twins' at this point in time?
  15. I'm out doing some scouting for tomorrow, so I'm listening on the radio....but that is flat out ridiculous. Sounds about right for Richard.
  16. Great follow up Star Wars reference, that is. Very nice, that was.
  17. Knock on wood, because he's not done yet, but really nice to Ervin rebound. He's like Luke Skywalker....our only hope.
  18. There are plenty of outings in which Belisle has been bad, but not given up any runs. For instance, last night, he was on the verge of giving up the lead in the 8th, when they brought Kintzler in to attempt a 5 out save. Kintzler K'd the subsequent two batters, stranded Belisle's runs, and bailed Belisle out a blown lead or a loss. It goes both ways, ERA can be deceiving when it's on the low end also. In Belisle's case, his ERA should probably be higher than 9.00....and the fact that he's only given up runs in two outings is the deceiving part. Im of the opinion that it's rather ridiculous that the FO has put the team in the position that they're having to run a guy like Belisle out in high-leverage situations, and have to use Kintzler in that way (he's literally the only guy in the bullpen that you can rely on to get an out). Hopefully we'll see a guy like Hildenberger, Burdi, or Melo up soon to help that train-wreck of a bullpen. Another observation: At some point they have to move Wade up to AAA, right? Since there is no room for him in the everyday lineup, is imaging they'd want him to stay down and play everyday, but I'd love to see him fill the Grossman role pn the big club as the fourth outfielder eventually (who can actually be serviceable in the outfield).
  19. Polanco came from high-A to sit on the bench for a few weeks, largely due to asbuedly bad 40-man management. I wouldn't call that a shining example of the Twins spotting a guy who was ready for the majors, and taking a leap. The thing that boggles my mind about this (pitchers v hitters, and the early call up), is the backwards logic in the way they have historically go about it. Most pitchers have a certain number of live bullets in their arm before it blows. When you have an uber talented reliever like Burdi...what good does a load of AA/AAA inning do for the guy? Same for Berrios right now, who might be the best pitcher in AAA ball right now (I say with negative connotation, as in other teams don't leave those guys down this long). I can understand if you're loaded at the MLB level....but 7-8 of the Twins most talented arms, are currently not with the big club, in a wide open division. The big club's pitching staff is absolutely horrendous, while the wunderkinds carve AA/AAA. On the flip side, they bring position players up to flounder and/or sit on the bench, and play the back and forth yo-yo game for years, while preaching different philosophies at different levels. The effectively jerk with their approach and confidence level to the point where if they succeed, it's despite their development methods....not because of it. Of course, this is mostly referencing the prior FO regime. But, even considering the roster moves so far this year, it's mind-boggling. In my opinion, some of these GMs, managers, and FO personnel get so haughty with some of these decisions, that they get overthought and analyzed to a detriment. They turn checkers into chess, and create an heir that it's highly complex stuff, that only the best and brightest can understand, like they're astrophysicists at NASA putting a rover on a moon of Jupiter. It's a child's game....take the best baseball players and put them on the field if you want to win baseball games. It's no more complicated than that.
  20. Just making sure I have things straight: Too old to be a proespect. Pedestrian stuff, at best. Bad career numbers ....with putrid AAA numbers this year as a 30 year old.... ....So, this guy will immediately be signed to an extension and given a two-year leash, be next year's opening day starter, and will bump Berrios to the bullpen? The sad part is, given this club's track record, I can't even come up with a scenario ridiculous enough to be unbelievable.
  21. Berrios just keeps using up those bullets in AAA. Not a huge fan of that right now. Honestly, what's the deal, here? Are they just praying he throws a clunker so they have excuse to hit some beneficial service time bench mark? There can't possibly be anything he can do in AAA to become a better pitcher, that he can't do in the MLB while simultaneously helping a pitching staff going down like the titanic. Is there? Honest question.
×
×
  • Create New...