I considered posting this under last night's game wrap, but didn't want to get too far off topic. It's more appropriate here I think. IMO the Twins can't consider themselves legit contenders for anything until they figure out how to win at home. Sure, they have a great road record, but is it sustainable with essentially 2 starting pitchers and a good, but inconsistent offense? I submit no. History agrees. The only MLB team with a better road record is the Astros. Both the Twins and Astros are on pace to win 50 or more road games, which is historically difficult to do. 2010 is as far back as I felt going. No team has win 50 road games since then. Only two teams even won 48. In the last 8 seasons. Good teams strive for 40-45. The flip side as we all know is the Twins terrible record at home. How bad is it? Only 4 MLB teams have sub .500 home records. The Mets, Phillies, Giants and the Twins. Only the Phillies home record is worse than the Twins current mark. The Phillies are well on pace to matching the Twins 103 loss mark of last year. So, let's say the Twins fall back to Earth on the road and end the season with 45 road wins, which would still be spectacular. That would mean going 21-24 the rest of the year on the road. Let's say they also normalize at home to win .525 of home games the rest of the way. That would be 21-19 at home. See the problem? 41 more wins won't get the Twins into the playoffs. No way, no how. Probably need 45-46. At least. So that likely means winning 4 or 5 more home games to go 25-15 or even 26-14 at home the rest of the way. That's a winning percentage of over .600, which is double what they have in the first half. I don't see it happening.