Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    18,707
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    85

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Tutorials & Help

Videos

2023 Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Free Agent & Trade Rumors

Guides & Resources

Minnesota Twins Players Project

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by nicksaviking

  1. I like Sano a lot. I also desperately want significantly better starters at the top of the rotation. I'd consider moving Sano for an elite arm, but I'd rather first try to package Gordon, Gonsalves, Kepler and just about every other young player.
  2. With how often Teixeira was traded and how he was always in demand, it would be interesting to see what kind of pieces the Twins would have gotten back for him after his inevitable trade. The roster would have likely had some serious reconfiguration.
  3. It took awhile but I now prefer the smaller divisions, but I'm pretty easy, I don't fuss much about change. Just so long as the Twins don't get shafted and end up in a division where everyone else is in a different time zone.
  4. I like Busenitz, I was surprised all year that his stuff didn't translate to more strikeouts, I think we see a big jump in that in 2018.
  5. All I'm concerned about is him being capable of pitching game 163 and beyond. How would Cobb or Lynn even contribute in a one game playoff? They probably don't start over Berrios or Santana.
  6. If the arguments are personal how could anyone possibly prevent the threads from devolving into finger-pointing, name-calling, rage-inducing anarchy, a la every other message board in the internet? I guess I also don't know how we could have true debates without facts.
  7. Where do you see that rumor? Rhett Bollinger's new article implies the opposite: https://www.mlb.com/twins/news/twins-miguel-sano-progressing-after-surgery/c-263909332 The Twins aren't looking for a full time DH as they plan on splitting Sano's days between 3B and DH. Sounds to me interest in Napoli might have been overstated or just a product of due diligence.
  8. Hmm, seems wise to at least wait to make sure they don't end up signing Darvish and Davis before getting out the pitchforks. Not that such signings will happen but it seems odd to me that few seem content to wait to post their criticisms until after we know what will happen this off season. Why is there so much impatience? Venting angst in February is just as cathartic; I'll be there too if the team doesn't put together a rotation to compete with the big boys.
  9. I'm just not interested in the lack of versatility. A right handed bat would be useful but doesn't that bat have to have a viable path to platoon with Kepler? If they want an old vet who wasn't good last year to DH, get Jose Bautista, at least he can stand out in RF.
  10. McCann, Reddick and Beltran were all coming off of strong years and were supposed to be key additions ON the field.
  11. Any trade for a starter is going to be painful. I'd pay extra to get the better pitcher for four years than the lesser pitcher for two. No more half measures.
  12. My only concern is that being the only current reliever not on a rookie contract, that the manager might cling to him in clutch situations too long even if it turns out he doesn't belong there. I don't have a problem with the signing at all, just the possibility of mis-use.
  13. Outside of Reed and Davis, I'm not too excited about the remaining free agent relief arms. I was all for getting some strikeout monsters in free agency but that doesn't look to be in the cards. No one wants to hear the "Trust the young guys" approach, but it looks like that's the hand this team is being dealt. Outside of performance issues, my biggest worry with this approach is that even if the fans are forced to watch this tactic, the team still is going to need Molitor to use it. If say Chargois and Busenitz start using their gas and are mowing guys down, what are the odds that Molitor would even run them out there in clutch situations in May or even June? I'd guess low, he likes his veterans, it's still likely to be Rodney and whoever this year's veteran spring-training invitee on a minor league deal is.
  14. It wasn't really Kinley OR Bard and Burdi though, they had the roster spots for all of them. I think we're missing an entire thread of logic (or foolishness) that just hasn't been made available to us. Kinley didn't cost the team Burdi and Bard, those actions were not cause and effect, their only relation is that they all were transactions during the same event.
  15. I'm rather indifferent on Rodney, I'm still going to be disappointed if they don't go bigger and better with free agency. But who cares if they paid more than market rate? It still ain't much. Also Rodney isn't going to determine if this team makes the playoffs, that will hinge on the starters. AZ got to the playoffs with Rodney as the closer.
  16. OK, now Zach Britton has torn his achilles and is likely out until late in the season. He's a free agent after this year but the O's would be on the hook for about 12M in arbitration salary if they keep him, so odds are they'll release him. If the Twins happened to make the same move with Britton I assume it will come with the same derision?
  17. If I was a wiseacre I'd point to their record last year. They're only getting a pass from me through the offseason. The new personnel hires have me hopeful, but if they fail to get Darvish inked and/or make a huge trade to make the front of the rotation able to match the big boys of the AL, I'm not going to be happy.
  18. No idea how this Kinley business will play out, my guess is not successfully, but fingers crossed. If I had to guess why the Twins were turned on to Kinley, my money would be on the idea that the new guy, Josh Kalk, turned them on to him. He's the Pitch FX/analytics/injury prevention wiz kid the Twins stole from Tampa. Conventional data isn't giving this guy the thumbs up, it has to be something found on a deep dive.
  19. Craig Edwards at Fangraphs had his take: https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/four-deserving-hall-of-famers-omar-vizquel-new-to-ballot/ It caught my eye what he said about Johan Santana. Basically his claim is that the Sandy Koufax argument doesn't work because Koufax was much better than Santana. I could go either way on Santana objectively, while hoping he gets in some day based on my fandom, but his Koufax argument is just terrible. Koufax was one of the game's greatest pitchers ever, in context, perhaps the greatest, he's not the cutoff line for admission. His argument would be like saying Ken Griffey Jr. doesn't belong in the HOF because he's no Willie Mays.
  20. I like the idea of an Escobar extension. Not only is he a pretty good player, but giving him an extension makes any and all future plans regarding resigning, trading or extending Dozier, Polanco, Gordon and even Sano very, very flexible, and he wouldn't be so expensive that if he ended up as a bench bat that it would ever be regrettable.
  21. Well they've never signed one, if we're talking about contending in 2018 there's no reason not to break the seal now that one appears to be interested.
  22. I don't think Mauer's contract has hamstrung this club in anyway. This team isn't getting to the World Series without significantly better starters, is there another option? If Darvish is good for the next 3-4 years and the Twins have a shot at winning, I don't care if he isn't living up to his contract at the end of the deal. Got to take a shot sometime and this club might not be another chance to get a front line free agent. They don't tend to WANT to come to Minnesota even if the front office is willing.
  23. I don't know, I'd hope the front office gets the pieces they covet right off the bat and then sort out the left over pieces in the aftermath. Personally, Danny Duffey would be my top trade target as he's good and he's a lefty. If the Twins got a reliable lefty Mejia would be more available and probably a pretty decent trade chip. Gibson's got pretty good velocity on his four-seamer, that might play up quite a bit if he were to be moved to the pen.
  24. I don't know, a trade and a free agent signing are basically using two different resources, one uses prospects and one uses money, it's not like these two dis-similar moves are going to double down and deplete either of those resources extensively. I guess my view is that if the Twins were to sign a big time free agent (Darvish is the only one I see as big time this year) you'd think it would indicate that the team thinks their window of opportunity is open now. Wouldn't you want to give yourself the best chance to win now? Why waste 2018 and only next year move to shore up the remaining rotation holes? Especially when there is a trend this year where the bottom feeders are open for business. I don't recall a year where this many quality arms are available for trade. The aggressive teams aren't just making one move, they are making them in bunches and for the most part they are working in tandem.
  25. I actually think the front office miscalculated the pace of free agency. There doesn't seem to be much reason to leave four open 40-man spots unless they intended to start signing free agents or making trades prior to the draft. Ohtani slowed down all the big ticket free agents and the relievers nearly all waited until the winter meetings to start moving. I'd also guess that there would be a better chance of exposing players to the Rule V and keeping them than adding them to the 40-man and being forced to remove them later exposing them to waivers.
×
×
  • Create New...