Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Vanimal46

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    17,338

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    71

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Tutorials & Help

Videos

2023 Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Free Agent & Trade Rumors

Guides & Resources

Minnesota Twins Players Project

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Vanimal46

  1. Vanimal46
    Come on Tom. Don't make me list out all of the Twins rookies who struggled mightily in their first 5-15 MLB starts over the last 3 years. You know this.
  2. Vanimal46
    Because the Twins have had so much success calling up a rookie from AAA and seeing immediate success in recent years.
  3. Vanimal46
    Just because the Twins are no longer ranked 30th in MLB in pitching doesn't mean it's good.
  4. Vanimal46
    https://twitter.com/MLBNetwork/status/1065230095231664134?s=19
  5. Vanimal46
    I don't know I'm not in the trade negotiation. I said in this thread no one in the Twins' organization is off the table for him IMO. There's probably less backlash trading Syndergaard than trading DeGrom who had a historically good season.
  6. Vanimal46
    The argument in this thread isn't signing free agents. It is about making a trade for Syndergaard. Who's projected to make a little less than $6 million this season with 3 years of control. There are folks here who want to wait until the stars align perfectly before thinking about making a trade such as this. I think I can speak for Mike too in the next sentence. Making trades like this, for top end pitchers with multiple years of control, helps immensely to open the window of contention.
  7. Vanimal46
    If you believe the core will take a step forward next season then you should want a top of the rotation guy like Thor already in place so he can help the team win more games. And who knows, make the playoffs because of that.
  8. Vanimal46
    When you aim low, you remain a mediocre team. It's really as simple as that. What are those bargain bin arms going to do for this team? Help them win 82 games instead of 78?
  9. Vanimal46
    I would for sure. Before it's determined whether or not he can stick at SS.
  10. Vanimal46
    They're trying to shed some salary since they're about to acquire Cano and Diaz from Seattle. No one in the Twins' organization is off the table for 3 years of Thor.
  11. Vanimal46
    I think whoever invests in Eovaldi long term will get a lemon. He made a heroic effort in the playoffs showing he can start and come out of the bullpen. However, there's no way that kind of usage is sustainable over the course of 162 games. Durability has always been in question with him.
  12. Vanimal46
    Did people forget that Rogers was a starter at one point and couldn't separate himself from the crowd of worse starting pitching options than we have today? He tops out at 91-92 in the pen. If he goes back to starting he'll go back to being an 88-90 MPH pitcher to conserve energy. This is a bad idea.
  13. Vanimal46
    Sounds like a better Sunday afternoon lineup than we've seen the last 3 years.
  14. Vanimal46
    I echo several others in here to keep May in the bullpen. It doesn't seem like the best use of his talent to have him as a primary pitcher. I'm going to cringe every time this opener concept is discussed. I accept that this isn't going away until they give it the ol' college try. Since it's here, use it to get rookie pitchers comfortable in the big leagues. May has been there and done that. He shouldn't need an opener before pitching 4-5 innings.
  15. Vanimal46
    Love your post. When it comes to Harper and Machado's contracts, I think they're going to include multiple out-years throughout the duration of the contract. My guess is the first player opt-out is 2-3 years into the contract. Perhaps at the end of the 2021 season when the CBA expires... The second opt-out 5-6 years into the contract. So there's a chance the team signing him now has to pay the final years if they opt out!
  16. Vanimal46
    Once upon a time on this very website there were 10+ pages of "wtf!" comments when they left Zach Jones unprotected in the Rule 5 draft. Remember Zach Jones? He was supposed to be good I think.
  17. Vanimal46
    How dare you forget our friends down I-35, the Royals! They're still starting a wet paper bag at 1B.
  18. Vanimal46
    Sonny Gray... Meh. MadBum... Hell yes. I am very curious what SF wants for him. Dude is a work horse and a unicorn in today's MLB.
  19. Vanimal46
    It does effect any other FA signing they make. $5 million of the offseason budget is tied to this player. It's not guaranteed, but you best believe it's being counted right now in the payroll. Instead of signing Andrew Miller for $12 million, they may resort to another reliever for $7 million because the other $5 million is tied to Cron. There is a ripple effect with every acquisition.
  20. Vanimal46
    Agreed. I don't think they needed to acquire a 1B at all. Especially someone who's out of options. It's one of the easiest spots on the field to fill. Why is it necessary to dedicate 2 players (both out of options) to the easiest spot on the field to fill? We're living in a world of 3 man benches. If both make the team, they're settling for a 2 man bench on days when Austin or Cron need a day off in the field. It's a poor use of limited roster spots.
  21. Vanimal46
    Wait.... How many HRs and RBI did Cron have last year? I have a hard time finding that out on this page.
  22. Vanimal46
    I will be thrilled and praise the FO the minute they acquire someone who's significantly better than what's already on roster.
  23. Vanimal46
    Cron established himself last year. That's it. Before that he was on the shuttle just like Austin. Who's to say Austin wouldn't be in CJ Cron's shoes in 2019 as a 28 year old established MLB player? If both players are in the lineup, boy, there goes your flexibility. You're stuck with 2 bench players on days when Cron needs a day off at 1B. I very much prefer a DH option that can play somewhere else besides 1B.
  24. Vanimal46
    Right, but how are they going to determine who's the better player in 2 weeks of spring training? They have to release him within the first 16 days of ST in order to pay him 30 days termination salary (~$500k) if they cut him anytime after the 16th day through the end of ST they will pay him 45 days termination pay (~$750k) Since Austin and Cron are mostly redundant I don't see the point in picking him up in the first place.
  25. Vanimal46
    I don't know if it's wrong to project Austin and Cron producing similar numbers in a scenario where they each have 500 ABs... Also, admittedly I'm still a little jaded from the past regime's handling of players without options remaining. Mainly, they stuck like glue, roster construction be damned. I haven't paid as close attention to how Falvine handles players without options. If there's redundancy, I want a quick resolution.
×
×
  • Create New...