Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • What Should The Twins Expect From Byung-Ho Park?


    Parker Hageman

    On Monday, the world learned that the Minnesota Twins had outbid all of the 29 other clubs and secured the rights to negotiate with 29-year-old Byung-ho Park, a KBO superstar who has put up video game numbers over his career.

    For most, Park is a complete mystery. For the Twins, they have scouted Park endlessly in order to feel confident in spending at least $12.85 million. More likely than not, they have done exhaustive due diligence on him. The Twins are plopping down more upfront than they will pay any of their current players next year outside of Ervin Santana and Joe Mauer. And, if Park and the Twins do come to terms on a contract, they will pay him even more (which will be the true test in the organization’s confidence in their evaluators).

    Park’s home run totals have caught the attention of Major League Baseball but the question is, will his power play at the game’s highest level and will Target Field be a suitable venue for his swing?

    Twins Video

    When the Twins signed Josh Willingham, the team acquired a hitter who was almost built for the configuration of their ballpark. As other right-handers had experienced, a ball driven into center or the right-center gap was met with resistance and died in the outfield. Willingham, meanwhile, yanked almost every pitch he swung at and did so with authority. He eventually passed the wisdom down to some of the current Twins. As he told Brian Dozier “the fences are a lot closer in left.” Both Dozier and Trevor Plouffe have since passed Willingham for the home run lead at Target Field but each has credited Willingham with the power guidance.

    So, does Park fit into that pull-power mold? Thanks to the contributors of YouTube, we have access to several seasons worth of Park's home run compilations that, if you are a Twins Daily writer with no life, you can chart each one of those available and analyze the data to answer that very question.

    There is little doubt that Park has power, inferior competition of not. At age 25 in 2012, he launched 31 home runs -- a career-best and the most in the league that year -- but that would just be an appetizer for the coming main course. After 37 in 2013, he socked 52 in 2014 and 53 in 2015. Even with the league's caveats (lower velocity, smaller ballparks, juiced baseballs), hitters do not reach those totals that consistently without being a special talent.

    In 2012 (which you can watch the compilation of home runs here), Park was much more of a standard power hitter: He pulled the majority of his home runs and most of the pitches were located belt-high in the zone but he also showed the propensity to turn on pitches down-and-away and middle-away. The zone chart below (from the pitcher's perspective) shows the location of each of his home runs that year.

    BYP_Z_2012.png

    The top video shows the level swing that Park displayed to destroy pitches in the middle (horizontal) of the zone while the lower clip demonstrates how he would turn on some pitches down and away.

    http://i.imgur.com/cz84gzr.gif

    http://i.imgur.com/My1IwUo.gif

    More importantly, he punctuated nearly every round-tripper with a majestic bat flip.

    Despite having fly ball tendencies, Park’s swing was much more level in 2012 than its current iteration. Plus 51.6% of his home runs were pulled, which would play decently at Target Field, but this changed drastically over the next few years. The home runs were not all skyscraping bombs, some were actually wallscrapers that needed assistance over the fence.

    By 2014 (video here), there was a transformation in his swing. Park developed a steep upper-cut, giving his bat much more tilt in order for it to meet pitches on the same plane as they descended in the zone, creating towering flies that cleared fences (

    ) by great distances. Bat flip enthusiasts were disappointed to see that he was no longer flipping his bat shortly after contact, instead following through the entire swing.

    What remained constant was how he kept his hands inside and close to his body before firing the barrel at the ball. He allowed the ball to travel deeper into the zone and drove balls into the middle of the field where the majority of his home runs left the field.

    BYP_Z_2014.png

    As you can see in the zone chart above, in addition to power coverage throughout the zone, Park was hitting more home runs down in the zone than before. In 2012 he did not have a home run on any pitch down-and-in. In 2014, he smacked 10. He also managed to redirect a lot of his pitches on the inner half into center or opposite field. While most hitters like Willingham would yank pitches down-and-in, Park actually hit a number of those pitches out in center. Watch this home run on a breaking ball on the inner-half. Since 2010 in the major leagues, according to ESPN/TruMedia’s data 94.7% of home runs on breaking balls inside were pulled, 5.1% went to center while just 0.2% went the other way. Meanwhile Park’s ability to keep his hands back and inside allows him to muscle this 80-mph pitch out towards right field:

    http://i.imgur.com/yLnWVC5.gif

    Take a closer look at how Park keeps his hands in next to his body in order to pull this 82-mph breaking ball down the left field line:

    http://i.imgur.com/XY9K89S.gif

    What’s interesting about Park’s 2014 numbers is that he hit 52 home runs but managed just 16 doubles. That speaks volumes towards his fly balls methods. If the ball wasn’t launched 100 feet past the fence, it was probably getting caught. In 2015 this changed a bit as he hit 53 home runs but followed that up with another 35 doubles leading to his absurd .714 slugging.

    While only 30 of Park’s 53 home runs this past season would be available for video review, the trends for Park in 2015 (video here) were very similar to 2014. He had excellent power across all zones with the bulk of his home runs coming in zones that aligned with his downward bat tilt.

    BYP_Z_2015.png

    What did change, however, is that Park shot an even higher percentage of his charted home runs out to center field. As one scout noted, Park was given a 80-power grade on an 80-scale. Different evaluators will undoubtedly rate players differently but, for comparison’s sake, over the years Baseball America has rated Cubs’ Kris Bryant and Royals’ Mike Moustakas as 80-grade power. Among the Twins’ regulars only Miguel Sano was labeled with that kind of power tool but Baseball America rated Sano’s power at “just” a 70 (with Bryant and Texas’ Joey Gallo ahead of him). As we’ve seen, there are few ballparks of any size that can contain Sano’s power in any direction. That said, Target Field has been ultra tough on right-handers when it comes to home runs to center or right field.

    HR Distribution.png

    If he is signed by the Twins, Target Field will indeed act as a deterrent to Park’s big flies to center. As one of the toughest venues to hit balls out toward center-right center, this should significantly reduce his home run expectations before even factoring in the jump in competition.

    What about velocity? There is no question that the average velocity of pitchers in the KBO are well below the increasing average velocity of their MLB counterparts. In fact, most of that league’s velocity maxes out at the high-80s/low-90s. The same scout who suggested Park had 80-grade power, also said that he would struggle with fastballs inside. While facing little in the way of major league-caliber velocity, Park hit most of his home runs on fastballs below 90 MPH.

    BYP_HR.png

    Park also showed in 2014 that he would use several different leg kicks depending on what the situation required. One, a big leg load with everything on his back leg before firing forward, the other a simple toe tap load that is just as effective:

    http://i.imgur.com/0myGe9g.gif

    http://i.imgur.com/FEdfYuX.gif

    When Park’s former Nexen teammate Jung-ho Kang made the transition from the KBO to the Pittsburgh Pirates in 2015, he initially shelved his bigger leg kick in spring training. Like Park, Kang had a big leg kick but would use a muted version when faced with two-strike situations. Stateside, the added velocity and lack of familiarity with the new pitchers forced Kang into going with his muted kick more frequently. As his rookie season progressed, as he adapted to the speed of the game and grew more familiar with the competition, he deployed the big kick more often. Because of that, it is no surprise to see that Kang hit just four home runs in his first 74 games but 11 over his last 52. More likely than not, Park will have an adaptation process like that of Kang.

    In all, don’t expect a huge translation in home run numbers from Park’s KBO seasons if he signs with the Twins -- both immediately and down the road. That’s not going far out on a limb but because of his straightaway power and heavy fly ball tendencies, plenty of those that would have become souvenirs in KBO’s smaller stadiums will remain in play, particularly at Target Field. Likewise, the need to acclimate to the improved competition will likely stifle his numbers at the season’s onset. Long term, he possesses an amazingly athletic swing with an 80-grade power tool and over time he should contribute to the Minnesota’s lineup.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Great work. I wish I didn't have a life like you, Parker. Would love to dive this deep into something like this (of course I'd also have to understand hitting as well as you)! If your assessment is accurate and Target Field isn't the best place for him, maybe he's just another asset for the Twins' Tradin' Terry to flip for something more suitable.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    " Even with the league's caveats (lower velocity, smaller ballparks, juiced baseballs), hitters do not reach those totals that consistently without being a special talent." Agreed! You have to be able to make solid contact, and have an obvious power stroke. But will he be able to overcome those three caveats, in a non HR friendly park, and still put up numbers that will be any better than cheaper options? To me, one of Arcia, Vargas, or Walker will turn into a DH power threat. And IMHO for less money and less risk.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Great article Parker, always a fun read.

     

    I think if Park can hit .250 with 25 - 30 HR, I would be pleased. But I also believe Arica can put up those numbers, but I have kind of given up with him. He has so much potential and it seems like he doesn't care if he plays in the majors or stays in AAA. At least this guy seems like he wants to come here and work to become a great player.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    IDKHe looks to be overwhelming some underwhelming pitchers.

     

     

    For sure a fair point. He's doing what an elite hitter is expected to do with the given competition. There's certainly the possibility he can adapt quickly but as we've seen with Jung-ho Kang, who overwhelmed the same underwhelming KBO pitchers in 2014, there is a development curve in transitioning to MLB. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "Even with the league's caveats (lower velocity, smaller ballparks, juiced baseballs), hitters do not reach those totals that consistently without being a special talent."

     

    This is the part I disagree with.  As was noted on a different thread, this dude hit 48 home runs (to Park's 53):

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.cgi?id=navarr001yam

    And Eric Thames hit 47.

     

    Are those guys "special talents?"

     

    Don't get me wrong- I hope it works out with Park, but I think given the lower level of competition in Korea, 20-25 home runs might be the best we could hope for.  And how many strikeouts would we have to put up with to get that?  I feel like any number of Twins could do that a lot cheaper: Vargas, Arcia, ABW...

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I really enjoyed the story and you have the best job in the world ... covering baseball!

     

    The only concern I have is the contact rate. Obviously, he will have to improve that to crack the 2016 lineup. I think we will hear from Bert, "He just missed that homer with his upper cut swing that has become so popular lately."

     

    I worry that the other teams did not think he was a very special talent, but maybe this time we will be correct and the others will be going to their bullpen more often than they hoped.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is the part I disagree with.As was noted on a different thread, this dude hit 48 home runs (to Park's 53):

    http://www.baseball-...id=navarr001yam

    And Eric Thames hit 47.

     

    Are those guys "special talents?"

     

     

    In terms of power? Sure. Let's be clear: Having this type of power in Korea does not necessarily translate into a good overall hitter in MLB but the fact that he has led the league for four straight years in home runs means something. 

     

    In the case of Thames, while his power never translated to the major league level, he did have power in the minors. He shows much more of a pull hitter, much more of an upper cut swing in the KBO. Not to mention, it is 318 feet down the right field line at his home park -- that's four feet further than Yankee Stadium's short porch and the power alley is 24 feet closer than the Yankees. Given the competition and how Thames' upper-cut swing seems built to handle the abundance of breaking balls and offspeed stuff...

     

    I haven't seen much of Yamaico Navarro's swing on video so...no comment.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Great article Parker, always a fun read.

     

    I think if Park can hit .250 with 25 - 30 HR, I would be pleased. But I also believe Arica can put up those numbers, but I have kind of given up with him. He has so much potential and it seems like he doesn't care if he plays in the majors or stays in AAA. At least this guy seems like he wants to come here and work to become a great player.

     

    Not trying to hijack the Park thread, but I wonder where people say he doesn't care.  This is one possible explanation for his struggles.  Yet another would be that he cares too much and thus doesn't handle adversity well at this stage.  From what I've actually seen of him, he seems to care more about his team's success than pretty much anyone else on the team.  He played super-hard when the team was terrible.  I'm sure it was tough to have a good year going only to watch his team make a great run without him as he rehabbed injury.  Then he got jumped by four, FOUR other prospects in the organization.  The team needed his left-handed power bat, but he could do nothing to help.  I'm sure he was beyond frustrated by that point, and I don't think he was ever healthy.  He's simply better than what he showed last 2nd half.  Something had to be wrong, and I do not see any evidence to suggest that the problem was that he didn't care enough.

     

    Regarding Park, you can point to other average players with big success in Korea, and you can point to Kang's late run at rookie of the year before his injury. There's evidence on both sides.  His swing seems quick to the ball for a power hitter, while gaining some length when he deploys the kick and upper cut.  The short quick swing should allow him to catch up to some high heat, BUT his shorter swing seems to be a compensation for him liking to let the ball travel deeper.  This would indicate that he'd struggle with higher velos unless he can adjust and start his swing earlier in order to catch the ball in front.  I know that Bruno has really worked with Mauer and Hicks on this with decidedly mixed results.  

     

    Bottom line, there's nothing to say he won't be able to put up huge MLB numbers, nor is there any reason to assume he will be an impact player.  He has the tools to adjust if he can remake his swing a little (which Parker shows that he's already done), but his success hinges on his ability to adjust.  A statement like that is so obvious that it would not make for very interesting forum debate, although you'd probably get a lot of 'likes' for it.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "Willingham, meanwhile, yanked almost every pitch he swung at and did so with authority. He eventually passed the wisdom down to some of the current Twins. As he told Brian Dozier “the fences are a lot closer in left.” Both Dozier and Trevor Plouffe have since passed Willingham for the home run lead at Target Field but each has credited Willingham with the power guidance."  

     

    This kind of anecdote always bums me out.    Willingham had a great natural pull swing but in 2013 he didn't force it.   He was very balanced and he always stepped toward the pitcher as Park does on that low outside pitch above.   Whether in an effort to pull the ball or by trying to cheat because of injuries to me it looked like Willingham steeped a little left of center and the results dropped dramatically.   Its like a long hitter in golf opening up too soon or starting out with shoulders and stance open.  The result is less solid contact and less pull...Plouffe is at his best when using all fields and Dozier was exposed in the 2nd half as well.    I have nothing against pulling the ball but you should't be going up there trying to pull the ball.

    I would not want Park to try to pull the ball like I do not want Sano to try to pull the ball.  Good balance in their stance and striding toward centerfield is going to work for them and they will pull plenty of balls.   I have seen highlights of several of Parks home runs and if those are any indicators he doesn't need to fear any parks dimensions.     Are there any stats about how far he hits his home runs on average?   If so, how does it compare to Thames?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This kind of anecdote always bums me out.

     

     

    I don't know why it would -- the top three home run leaders at Target Field as Plouffe, Dozier and Willingham. Clearly that method works for some. In 2013, Willingham battled a knee injury which hindered his natural pull swing.

     

    And by "pull swing" it does not mean pulling away, just that he was getting to the point of contact well ahead of his body. Willingham, according to some HitFX data, did this better than almost all other hitters. 

     

    In the case of Plouffe, he got away from going away like he did in 2014 but also jumped from 14 to 22 home runs. Pull power. 

    Dozier we all know loves to shoot the foul pole. 

     

    In the case of Park, that isn't his style. He lets the ball travel deep and uses his hands to get to the point of contact. That's one reason he looks good at handling non-fastballs. I'm certainly not suggesting he get away from that but home runs are simply harder to hit to center at Target Field. 

     

    Bottom line, I don't think you should be bummed out.

     

    I have nothing against pulling the ball but you should't be going up there trying to pull the ball.

     

    Looking to pull and trying to pull are two different approaches. Going up there pulling everything no matter where pitched is not a great approach. Looking for a pitch to pull is different. This is more of what guys like Willingham and Dozier were doing. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

     

    Looking to pull and trying to pull are two different approaches. Going up there pulling everything no matter where pitched is not a great approach. Looking for a pitch to pull is different. This is more of what guys like Willingham and Dozier were doing.

    Dozier kept looking for a pitch to pull all the way to a Mendoza line avg in the second half. To the extent that he likely hit more GB to SS than Mauer hit to 2B. Or so it seemed. The fact is, Dozier is really not a power hitter, and his affection for that left field foul pole will end up diminishing his career, not enhancing it. What I find interesting is that even while Bruno talked about how they try to get Dozier to go the other way, he was given Carte Blanche to pull his way to irrelevance at the plate, and it cost him no playing time, in fact he achieved virtual iron man status. Yet the guys with true power are forced to go the other way or forced to go to Rochester. I will preempt any comments about Doziers defensive chops, by acknowledging them and agreeing they are a mitigating factor. But that still does not make the way some players are handled vs others any less confusing.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Dozier kept looking for a pitch to pull all the way to a Mendoza line avg in the second half. To the extent that he likely hit more GB to SS than Mauer hit to 2B. Or so it seemed.

     

     

    Yes, he hit a ton of grounders to short in the second half of last year. He struggled to get under all pitches at that time (http://twinsdaily.com/articles.html/_/minnesota-twins-news/for-brian-dozier-its-deja-vu-all-over-again-r4179) and, it turns out, he was hindered by an injury.

     

    There's no question Dozier should use the entire field more to increase his on-base presence -- particularly if he is at the top of the order -- but I still want him to hunt those fastballs and pull them down the line.

     

    Yet the guys with true power are forced to go the other way or forced to go to Rochester.

     

     

    What makes you think that Dozier doesn't have "true power"? Last year, 48% of his hits went for extra bases -- that was 4th highest in the AL. Look, some of the power hitters, like Kennys Vargas as an example, get too focused on pulling the ball and that leads to teams just feeding them pitches away. They need that ability in order to not get eaten alive by good pitching.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Love this guy's swing. Elite level movements and he violently controls the barrel. It  should easily adjust to MLB velocity. The real test will be if he can adjust to the MLB off-speed and have a good approach. Approach more than anything separates MLB from Quadruple A players. A 1B with 20+ home run power would be a nice bonus in the lineup.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Please explain to me how a guy who strikeout 161 times in 528 at bats facing 85 mph fastballs is supposed to have transferable success facing 93 mph plus fastballs and breaking pitches the same speed as fastballs in the Korean league? 3 - 5 mph difference in pitch speed is a lot of reaction time.If you can't make consistent contact against 86 mph how can you make consistent contact against 92 mph?

     

    As the article stated - You have the Target Field center right field factor - not to mention that he hit most of his HR on fastballs and only 7 against 90 plus fastballs - isn't this enough to diminish his plus power factor? If his power is diminished then how do you justify the strikeouts? I just don't see it with this guy it seems like a big long shot and someone just looked at his HR numbers.   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Please explain to me how a guy who strikeout 161 times in 528 at bats facing 85 mph fastballs is supposed to have transferable success facing 93 mph plus fastballs and breaking pitches the same speed as fastballs in the Korean league? 3 - 5 mph difference in pitch speed is a lot of reaction time.If you can't make consistent contact against 86 mph how can you make consistent contact against 92 mph?

     

    As the article stated - You have the Target Field center right field factor - not to mention that he hit most of his HR on fastballs and only 7 against 90 plus fastballs - isn't this enough to diminish his plus power factor? If his power is diminished then how do you justify the strikeouts? I just don't see it with this guy it seems like a big long shot and someone just looked at his HR numbers.

     

    Totally agree. The number of times Park struck out in Korea against inferior pitching does not seem to bode well for his MLB success. I really wonder what Adam Brett Walker would've done over there.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Please explain to me how a guy who strikeout 161 times in 528 at bats facing 85 mph fastballs is supposed to have transferable success facing 93 mph plus fastballs and breaking pitches the same speed as fastballs in the Korean league? 3 - 5 mph difference in pitch speed is a lot of reaction time.If you can't make consistent contact against 86 mph how can you make consistent contact against 92 mph?

     

    Without more footage, I can't answer what is leading to his strikeout issues. It's not velocity. That is not a current issue as he hasn't seen a ton of it. And I don't expect velocity to be an issue once he comes to MLB. As was the case with Jung Ho Kang, he had not see much high velocity (95+) in the KBO but he managed to do well against MLB fastballs. In fact, he hit .451 against fastballs that were 95+ or higher -- that led baseball. He struck out at a high rate (21%) and still did so with the Pirates but velocity was not a problem. 

     

    Park's strikeout totals in a lesser league is not an indication of him not being capable of hitting major league pitching. In AA ball -- a league that is more similar to the KBO (although AA has much better velocity) -- Miguel Sano struck out in 27% of his plate appearances. That's not far different from Park's 26% in the KBO last year. They both walked at about the same rate. What is likely the case is that Park, like Sano, was not seeing a ton of pitches in the zone. As a middle of the order guy, I am assuming he was being aggressive and likely expanded the zone when he shouldn't have. 

     

    On the other hand, Park's more prolific upper cut swing does not allow the barrel to be on the same plane as the ball for an extended period of time which could explain why he his strike rate would rise from 2012 when he showed a more level swing. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Totally agree. The number of times Park struck out in Korea against inferior pitching does not seem to bode well for his MLB success. I really wonder what Adam Brett Walker would've done over there.

    If he does not progress to at least a September call up you might find out in 2017

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...