Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • sat·ire | (/ˈsaˌtī(ə)r/) | noun
    the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.

    Worst Doctor We Can Find Thinks Unvaccinated Twins Are Getting a Raw Deal


    RandBalls Stu

    ‘The jury is still out on this vaccine,' he said, wobbling over the putt on 17.

    Image courtesy of Unsplash/NCI

    Twins Video

    Multiple unvaccinated Twins players must sit out this weekend’s series in Toronto due to Canada’s COVID policies. While the medical community almost universally hails the efficacy of the vaccines, the worst doctor we could find thinks the Twins are getting a raw deal.

    Dr. Gary Van Lowe, a retired family physician from Chanhassen, says the players (Max Kepler, Caleb Thielbar, Emilio Pagan, and Trevor Megill)  are probably in better shape than their vaccinated teammates.

    “I was doing my own research just this morning,” said Van Lowe, “And realvaccinetruth.biz said the vaccines have little microchips in them that allows the government to turn you into a human microwave. I got right up off the toilet to see if any of that was in the newspaper. Not a word.”

    The 61-year-old, whose frequent malpractice settlements earned him the nickname “Mal” from Fairview Southdale's attorneys, said the lack of further media coverage points to a larger conspiracy.

    “I don’t think they’re doing this just to screw over the Twins in a critical road series,” said Van Lowe, nursing his “seventh or eighth” Mich Golden Light on the 17th tee box at Deer Run in Victoria. “Could it be to mess with the Vikings and Wild, too? Good luck finding that out in the Red Star (sic) from Michael Bland (sic).”

    Van Lowe, who left medicine in 2015 after a series of lurid sexual harassment accusations from fellow doctors, nurses, and the entire front of house staff at the Eden Prairie Buca di Beppo, now runs a medical consultancy firm for insurance companies looking to deny benefits.

    “The jury is still out on this vaccine,” he said, wobbling over a putt on 17. “All I know is that Betty White was perfectly healthy before she got the jab. Makes you think.”

    Van Lowe ended the interview in order to ask the beer cart driver if she needed a ride home.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I’m so glad that the moderators here are not getting political about COVID - Following the examples of fairness and balance set by Facebook, Twitter, Google etc.  Keep up the good work.
     By the way, despite my oozing sarcasm, I have been very pro-vaccine here and indeed wish more efforts had been made  to approve reformulations faster to keep pace with the evolution of this virus.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Im doctor, and this line "now runs a medical consultancy firm for insurance companies looking to deny benefits.". *chef's kiss*. It is truly amazing how many times I order something, get told to do a "peer to peer", (where I have to talk to a doctor from the insurance company to get something approved), and just by calling them, "Oh yeah, its aprroved, we are good to go". It is such a scam, just meant to waste time and save some money by hoping people dont call.

     

    *gets off soapbox*

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Really lame attempt at humor. 

    from what I’m seeing, the most which can be said for the vaccines is they MAY reduce the severity of the symptoms, etc 

    while that’s “not nothing,” it’s hardly so significant that mandates are in order. 
     

    BTW - given how fascistic the Trudeau government has become, you do yourself no credit siding with them. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, BD57 said:

    Really lame attempt at humor. 

    from what I’m seeing, the most which can be said for the vaccines is they MAY reduce the severity of the symptoms, etc 

    while that’s “not nothing,” it’s hardly so significant that mandates are in order. 
     

    BTW - given how fascistic the Trudeau government has become, you do yourself no credit siding with them. 

    ? but it is worse then lame it is lazy and sad considering how many vaccinated Twins have gotten COVID.

    So congrats Stu at bad humor and breaking the rules of the site.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hilarious! Laughed all the way through it.

    I used to have trouble using Microsoft Word until I got my first vaccine shot. Now it's a piece of cake. Got my booster and damned if I can't do Excel spreadsheets like a pro now. I'm hoping the third shot will help me write code. Lots of money to be made designing video games with lots of first-person shooting and explosions in them. The only drawback I seem to have is this urge to face northwest every morning and bow multiple times while chanting "Bill is my Savior." Don't know where that comes from...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    45 minutes ago, strumdatjag said:

    I’m so glad that the moderators here are not getting political about COVID - Following the examples of fairness and balance set by Facebook, Twitter, Google etc.  Keep up the good work.
     By the way, despite my oozing sarcasm, I have been very pro-vaccine here and indeed wish more efforts had been made  to approve reformulations faster to keep pace with the evolution of this virus.

    Cool story, Stu is not a moderator or even a part of this community, really. He's paid to write for the site.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

    For all of you complaining about why you can't write what Stu just wrote, it's because Stu is paid by the site to write whatever he thinks is funny.

    You're not, get over it. If you don't like Stu's content, feel free to... *gasp* NOT READ IT.

    That’s not a very good answer. Exempting those in power from the rules often backfires.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Craig Arko said:

    That’s not a very good answer. Exempting those in power from the rules often backfires.

    Stu is paid to sometimes push boundaries through satire. It's basically his professional reputation.

    When we start paying someone with a similar reputation to do the same, they can be like Stu. Until then, they can keep their poor attempts at satire and boring agendas to themselves.

    I don't care how that comes across, that's the reality of the situation. Some people, due to reputation, experience, and ability are given different slack than the typical user.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

    Stu is paid to sometimes push boundaries through satire. It's basically his professional reputation.

    When we start paying someone with a similar reputation to do the same, they can be like Stu. Until then, they can keep their poor attempts at satire and boring agendas to themselves.

    I don't care how that comes across, that's the reality of the situation. Some people, due to reputation, experience, and ability are given different slack than the typical user.

     

    Would Stu have been allowed to mock the pro vaxers?  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

    For all of you complaining about why you can't write what Stu just wrote, it's because Stu is paid by the site to write whatever he thinks is funny.

    You're not, get over it. If you don't like Stu's content, feel free to... *gasp* NOT READ IT.

    Then pay me. My sarcastic response was just as “funny” as the overpaid guy.    Can I write a paid entry about the masked couple sitting outside at Target Field with nobody near them?   They could easily be mocked based on the science.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

    For all of you complaining about why you can't write what Stu just wrote, it's because Stu is paid by the site to write whatever he thinks is funny.

    You're not, get over it. If you don't like Stu's content, feel free to... *gasp* NOT READ IT.

    Methinks the powers that be knew exactly what type of response this post would get. Don’t act shocked when people respond to trolling

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

    Stu is paid to sometimes push boundaries through satire. It's basically his professional reputation.

    When we start paying someone with a similar reputation to do the same, they can be like Stu. Until then, they can keep their poor attempts at satire and boring agendas to themselves.

    I don't care how that comes across, that's the reality of the situation. Some people, due to reputation, experience, and ability are given different slack than the typical user.

    Are you suggesting that nobody anticipated the response this would provoke? I like to give y’all credit for more than that.

    But provoking a response and then beating up on it has a floor of passive/aggressive, and a ceiling of bait and switch. Maybe I’ve just overestimated people. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Craig Arko said:

    Are you suggesting that nobody anticipated the response this would provoke? I like to give y’all credit for more than that.

    But provoking a response and then beating up on it has a floor of passive/aggressive, and a ceiling of bait and switch. Maybe I’ve just overestimated people. 

    I was blissfully unaware of Stu’s piece until half an hour ago so you’ll have to talk to someone else about that.

    People seem to be under the impression that TD is some monolithic entity and that is far from the case. I am the community manager, most of the rest of the site is someone else’s problem. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, Puckettsprintstofirst said:

     

    Would Stu have been allowed to mock the pro vaxers?  

    If it was funny, probably. I’m vaxxed and pretty cautious about COVID and know plenty of people around me whose precautions are beyond ridiculous to the point of them almost satirizing themselves.

    Satire is almost always funny when you approach the fringes of any opinion or stance. That’s the point of it, really. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

    I was blissfully unaware of Stu’s piece until half an hour ago so you’ll have to talk to someone else about that.

    People seem to be under the impression that TD is some monolithic entity and that is far from the case. I am the community manager, most of the rest of the site is someone else’s problem. 

    And who might that be? I'll be happy to continue the discussion with a responsible party.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    36 minutes ago, Dave The Dastardly said:

    Hilarious! Laughed all the way through it.

    I used to have trouble using Microsoft Word until I got my first vaccine shot. Now it's a piece of cake. Got my booster and damned if I can't do Excel spreadsheets like a pro now. I'm hoping the third shot will help me write code. Lots of money to be made designing video games with lots of first-person shooting and explosions in them. The only drawback I seem to have is this urge to face northwest every morning and bow multiple times while chanting "Bill is my Savior." Don't know where that comes from...

    TD - Start paying this guy for his posts. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments

×
×
  • Create New...