Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Otto von Ballpark

Community Leader
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    20,620

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Tutorials & Help

Videos

2023 Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Free Agent & Trade Rumors

Guides & Resources

Minnesota Twins Players Project

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Otto von Ballpark

  1. Otto von Ballpark
    Seth, I am pretty sure the 10 day recall rule is position agnostic. That is, we could put a pitcher on the DL and recall a position player. The rules laid out here are pretty thorough: http://www.thecubreporter.com/book/export/html/3506 They state that the position player or pitcher distinction matters for injury replacements during a playoff series, but make no mention of that distinction applying to any regular season transactions.
  2. Otto von Ballpark
    I think you are missing the point. Sure, it's likely that Murphy surprised us with his retirement, but why did we want to add Murphy to this team anyway? A player who was already cut once, found few takers, and looked pretty toasty at AAA? Huh? You're talking about a lot of stuff I've never written on here, and certainly aren't the dominant themes of this thread. Here's an example of how a 2-man bench can hurt you: last night our bench was Rosario and the backup catcher. Rosario has a PH HR this year, and our starting catcher's performance screams for a pinch hitter in late innings, but guess what? Pinch hit Rosario for the catcher, and you have ZERO position players on the bench. Zero. So, as resistant as Molitor may have been to that idea before, it's an absolute impossibility now.
  3. Otto von Ballpark
    I think the Twinsiest move might be to wait indefinitely for Plouffe to return.
  4. Otto von Ballpark
    Check the other thread for Berardino's TR quote on Murphy, it is fairly damning. I'm not sure how this can be a one day roster thing, unless they add Beresford or Mastro tomorrow, and even if they do, why not add them today? Duffey isn't helping the pitching staff tonight or for the next few days at least, there is zero need to keep him in Minnesota as part of a 14 man staff right now.
  5. Otto von Ballpark
    Do you have a link? I don't think it is quite true. I think they could demote him, but if they found he was injured at AAA, they would have to retroactively put him on the MLB DL. I don't think every player to get demoted has to pass a physical examination first.
  6. Otto von Ballpark
    I'm not quibbling, just informing folks about the difference between PA and AB and how they are used to calculate K%. I am sure we all agree Buxton has been striking out a metric ton.
  7. Otto von Ballpark
    That is AB. Buxton has 49 PA, which is the common denominator for calculating K%.
  8. Otto von Ballpark
    Yup. If Murphy lets it roll foul, that's 2 strikes on Perez, and he's got an excellent chance of striking out / bunting foul for the third strike.
  9. Otto von Ballpark
    If Ervin Santana can't make his next start, they can retroactively DL him and they don't have to wait 10 days to recall Duffey. (The 10 day rule is waived for DL injury replacements.) As for Milone, they've got either Meyer or Berrios lined up to take Milone's next turn, they don't need to hang on to an inactive Duffey for that purpose.
  10. Otto von Ballpark
    Swapping Duffey OUT for David Murphy IN. Although I oppose adding Murphy simply due to name confusion.
  11. Otto von Ballpark
    Darnell is already off the 40-man roster, having been removed in January.
  12. Otto von Ballpark
    Does his effectiveness the first time through the order in his last 3 starts really mean anything?
  13. Otto von Ballpark
    On the subject of strong pitching, Chih-Wei Hu makes his 3rd start tonight for the Rays AA team. His first 2 have gone pretty well: 9 IP, zero runs, 14 K's. He has a better case that someone "gave up on him" in his 3rd year out of high school than Stewart...
  14. Otto von Ballpark
    Saying a player's performance needs to improve if he wants to advance is hardly "giving up on him." Some may have been pessimistic about his chances to improve that much, but I don't think anybody opposed giving him that chance. For that matter, his performance this year has covered all of 3 starts. He obviously needs to keep it up for a while longer if he wants to reclaim his earlier prospect rankings -- I hope you don't construe such a statement as "giving up on him" again...
  15. Otto von Ballpark
    He doesn't have great splits going through the order the first time, except for 3 starts this season. He's got 106 starts that say otherwise. If you want to demote him to the pen, fine -- he's scuffling, we could probably use a long man out there, and we've got Berrios and/or Meyer looking good in AAA. But he's not a prospective short relief weapon at this point.
  16. Otto von Ballpark
    I've been a Stewart skeptic, but this 3 game stretch is exactly the kind of results I was hoping to see. Hope he keeps it up!
  17. Otto von Ballpark
    Alex Burnett made the opening day roster in 2010, skipping AAA. Way back in 2001, I believe Grant Balfour skipped AAA to make his MLB debut too. We did that with a number of starters that year -- Rincon, Brad Thomas, Adam Johnson...
  18. Otto von Ballpark
    Actually, Chargois had 33 IP in AA last year too (plus another ~5 IP in the AA playoffs). Hopefully if his fast start is for real, he will be promoted soon, at least to AAA.
  19. Otto von Ballpark
    I think that says more about the run environment of Ft Myers and the FSL than it does about this group of pitchers. Although there are some interesting names in the bunch, we may not get a good read on them until they are promoted to Chattanooga.
  20. Otto von Ballpark
    I wonder what the protocol is league-wide. Obviously lots of hitters have come up early in recent years and have been fine -- heck, Sano seemed like one of them last year, K% and BABIP aside...
  21. Otto von Ballpark
    No, you are right there. It is worse. ashburyjohn had a good takedown on that point in another thread... way back when we were "only" 0-7. Ultimately, it may not be a ton worse, if it truly is some RISP voodoo curse that will soon expire, and obviously it is never good to lose 9 straight, but statistically, losing 9 straight to begin the season is a bit worse than losing 9 straight at some point midseason.
  22. Otto von Ballpark
    Sure, that sounds reasonable. But it also appears that Buxton's current MLB results are somewhat less than "less-than-stellar".
  23. Otto von Ballpark
    It is a fairly rare occurence for any MLB team to lose 9 consecutive games. If you go back in time and replay these 9 games in some alternate universe timeline, I would guess the Twins current roster wouldn't come out of them 0-9 again, Torii or not. Likewise, the 1991 Twins won 15 games in a row after they recalled Lenny Webster in June. If they went back in time and replayed them, I doubt those Twins would still win those same 15 consecutive games, Lenny Webster or not.
  24. Otto von Ballpark
    Not far behind:
  25. Otto von Ballpark
    You just did.
×
×
  • Create New...