I get the calls for patience, but this article is really cherry-picking the data here. Sure, the Royals gave up two blue chip prospects, but let's check in and see how they're doing now. Manaea looks like he might be a good player, but Finnegan has a career ERA of 4.11 and a career WHIP of 1.393, building up 2.7 WAR in 5 seasons. That's not a trade that hurt the Royals, but screams to me of another case of Twins fans way overestimating the value of prospects. But the bigger problem is that this article posits you have to go on an extended losing streak if you trade for high-impact talent (not at all a given) and ignores how often the Twins go on extended losing streaks without ever acquiring high-impact talent or winning anything of importance. Perhaps you missed the past decade of Twins baseball? You know, when they lost 99, 96, 96, and 103 games in various seasons? I'd sure rather go all in and win something real and then become a basement dweller for years than go just in enough to win the Central and get swept out of the playoffs and then become a basement dweller for years.