Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Daily 2019 Top Prospects: 11-15


    Nick Nelson

    The 2018 season was a turbulent one for the Minnesota Twins, and for some of their heralded upcoming talents as well. Two prospects who ranked among our top five a year ago now find themselves outside of the top ten.

    But that's not necessarily damning in a robust system that shows well here in the 11 through 15 range.

    Twins Video

    15. Yunior Severino, 2B

    Age: 19 (DOB: 10/3/99)

    2018 Stats (Rookie): 218 PA, .263/.321/.424, 8 HR, 28 RBI

    ETA: 2022

    2018 Ranking: 18

    It feels like a lifetime ago that the Atlanta Braves were handed severe sanctions for circumventing MLB's international signing rules, with GM John Coppolella banned for life and nine of the organization's signings released back into free agency. (Especially since Atlanta's internal rebuild coalesced so beautifully anyway in 2018.) But it was just last offseason that the Twins were able to capitalize and scoop up Severino, who enjoyed a solid rookie-level debut with his new franchise.

    In 49 games at Elizabethton, Severino posted a .745 OPS that was nearly identical to the Appalachian League average (.746). He did so as an 18-year-old switch-hitting middle infielder, in a setting where the average player was two years older. His eight home runs tied for the league lead among second basemen.

    Already closing in on 200 pounds as a teenager, Severino doesn't have much speed to speak of (he hasn't stolen a base in 107 games as a pro) and will probably end up at a corner spot defensively, so his bat will probably have to carry him. But there's plenty of potential in that department.

    "He’s like Alex Kirilloff—his swing stands out from the others,” VP for player personnel Mike Radcliff told Baseball America when the Twins signed Severino. Not a bad comp.

    14. Ben Rortvedt, C

    Age: 21 (DOB: 9/25/97)

    2018 Stats (A-/A+): 353 PA, .262/.331/.379, 5 HR, 43 RBI

    ETA: 2021

    2018 Ranking: 16

    Since being drafted by the Twins as a second-rounder in 2016, Rortvedt's offensive game has lagged behind his relatively advanced defense. In that scope, his 2018 season has to be viewed as a success; between two levels of A-ball, the lefty-swinging Wisconsin native posted a .710 OPS, improving by more than 100 points on 2017's underwhelming mark (.599) at Cedar Rapids.

    He certainly wasn't dominant at the plate following his midseason promotion to Fort Myers, but his approach was exemplary, with a 0.72 BB/K ratio that ranked second-best among Florida State League catchers with 100+ PA. At this point we're just waiting for a bit more power to emerge, which seems feasible as he keeps growing and adding strength. He totaled four home runs with the Miracle after hitting one in Cedar Rapids, the last a grand slam in late-August as part of a six-RBI outburst.

    As a receiver, Rortvedt draws high marks. His excellent arm continues to control opposing run games, as he threw out 37% of base stealers last year following 2017's 36%. He figures to compete for a spot at Double-A this spring, but will have to fend off the next guy on this list.

    13. Ryan Jeffers, C

    Age: 21 (DOB: 6/3/97)

    2018 Stats (Rookie/A-): 284 PA, .344/.444/.502, 7 HR, 33 RBI

    ETA: 2021

    2018 Ranking: N/A

    I noted in recapping last year's list that while the system was generally balanced, "the notable area of concern is catcher." Rortvedt and Mitch Garver were the position's only representatives in the Top 20, and Garver would soon lose his prospect eligibility. So Jeffers immediately took on a great deal of importance when the Twins drafted him out UNC Wilmington in the second round, 59th overall, last June. He was the fourth catcher to come off the board, and the second collegiate backstop.

    Answering the call, Jeffers arrived with a thunderous debut in pro ball. Although you'd generally expect a successful college hitter (Jeffers put up a 1.095 OPS with 16 homers in his final season at Wilmington) to catch on quickly in the low minors, Jeffers surpassed all expectations offensively, slashing a ridiculous .422/.543/.578 in 29 games at Elizabethton before moving up to Low-A, where he finished at .288/.361/.446 in 36 contests.

    His bat looks legit. The key question is whether he'll stick at catcher. He's a big guy (6'4", 228) with a good arm (threw out five of 12 runners last year) but there are many raw aspects of his game behind the plate. For his part, he has no intentions of moving: "“The Twins haven’t even asked me to play anything else,” he told the Pioneer Press. “For me, that’s a good sign. They trust me behind the plate and want me to stick there. I want to stick back behind the plate. I don’t really want to play any other position.”

    Jeffers and Rortvedt are two sides of the same coin, inspiring plenty of confidence in one dimension with less polish in the other. They're at roughly the same stage of development. It's tough to say at this point which one's more likely to emerge, but the Twins are much better off for having both of them in the system.

    12. Nick Gordon, SS

    Age: 23 (DOB: 10/24/95)

    2018 Stats (AA/AAA): 591 PA, 248/.298/.355, 7 HR, 49 RBI

    ETA: 2019

    2018 Ranking: 3

    In the plot line of Gordon's career, you can pinpoint the moment where his prospect stock absolutely peaked, and then embarked upon an abrupt nosedive. It was on May 22nd, 2018, when he was promoted to Triple-A and suddenly everything began to fall apart. Gordon had torn it up in Chattanooga over the first two months, slashing .333/.381/.525 to back up his preseason #3 ranking on Twins Daily's prospect list, but at Rochester his limitations took center-stage.

    Gordon's offensive potential was always based more on projection than production. That he was able to remain a regular fixture in national prospect rankings despite never cracking a .750 OPS through four years speaks to the prestige of his pedigree. In Triple-A, the lack of power and patience caused him to tank. He endured multiple long hitless stretches. In his final 40 games he batted .166 with three extra-base hits in 170 plate appearances. Even with the context that a 22-year-old Gordon was young for the International League, it was tough to find silver linings.

    Meanwhile, the questions about his viability at shortstop gained more weight, as Gordon ceded a higher percentage of playing time than ever before – nearly one out of every three starts – to second base. An eventual move across the bag was generally assumed, given his lack of standout arm strength, but if Gordon can't play short in the majors his need to add offense is magnified.

    To that end, Gordon is said to be focused on gaining weight (and strength) this offseason. The Star Tribune reports that he's spent significant time at the team's facility in Fort Myers. If it all comes together at the plate, he'll have no trouble providing value at either middle-infield spot. Added to the 40-man roster in November, his options clock will start ticking this season.

    11. Stephen Gonsalves, LHP

    Age: 24 (DOB: 7/8/94)

    2018 Stats (AA/AAA): 120.2 IP, 2.76 ERA, 120/65 K/BB, 1.17 WHIP

    ETA: 2019

    2018 Ranking: 4

    In the plot line of Gonsalves' career, you can pinpoint the moment where his prospect stock absolutely peaked, and then embarked upon an abrupt nosedive. It was August 20th, 2018, when he arrived in the majors following an unconscious stretch at Triple-A and delivered the first in a series of clunkers.

    Over his first four MLB starts, every flaw in the left-hander's game was exploited. Batters teed off on his low-velo arsenal, batting .414 and pushing across 16 earned runs in 12 1/3 innings. He constantly struggled to find the zone, with 13 walks and a 57% strike rate. He threw 287 pitches and induced 17 swings and misses (6%).

    To his credit, Gonsalves turned things around and finished on a strong note, allowing two earned runs and four hits over 12 1/3 innings in his last three appearances, all following an "opener." During this stretch his strengths were more visible – namely a long-standing ability to limit hard contact – but he still was wild and unable to miss bats, reminding us of the tightrope he walks with limited stuff.

    Despite his impeccable numbers throughout the minors, which were as good as ever as he climbed past the top rung, it was always difficult for analysts to envision Gonsalves as an overpowering major-league starter. In August and September, we saw why.

    Gordon and Gonsalves in 2018 were both prime examples of weaknesses being exposed at the highest levels. But they're also both under 25, with ample development time ahead of them before options run out. It's important to keep in mind the positive attributes that earned each a spot in the top five a year ago.

    At least each one now has a precise idea of what needs improvement. In the words of Henry Ford: "Failure is simply the opportunity to begin again, this time more intelligently."

    Twins Daily 2019 Top 20 Prospects

    Honorable Mentions

    20. Jose Miranda, 2B/3B

    19. Jorge Alcala, RHP

    18. LaMonte Wade, OF

    17. Zack Littell, RHP

    16. Gilberto Celestino, OF

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Our individual rankings, if anyone is interested:

     

    Gonsalves - Seth (10), Nick (10), Tom (9), Cody (12)

    Gordon - Seth (12), Nick (9), Tom (8), Cody (13)

    Jeffers - Seth (14), Nick (14), Tom (18), Cody (9)

    Rortvedt - Seth (24), Nick (13), Tom (12), Cody (15)

    Severino - Seth (15), Nick (19), Tom (14), Cody (17)

     

    Seth is giving up on Rortvedt!

     

    :P

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Even a worse idea most of the time. Increase your odds of giving up one or more major league talents, and again, most likely for a fairly marginal incremental improvement. 

     

    I'm not saying you don't do it. You do. But trade from surplus, not from areas of future need. 

    The Twins could have traded just about every prospect for the last 6 or so years and not really missed out on anybody but Berrios. Yes, there are major league players and some pretty good ones, and some we are still hoping (fingers crossed) figure it out.

    But prospects are just that until they prove otherwise.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think there's a massive difference between peak fan hype and peak value, Vanimal, and I think we tend to conflate the two things without really having a very solid idea about how much real trade value these prospects have.

     

    Think of it this way: Gonsalves was picked after 109 other guys were selected. You're right in saying 9 times out of 10 these players picked from. say #40 and after flame out, and that's the case in 2013, where maybe 5 of the 70 players selected in front of Gonsalves look to be amounting to anything.

     

    But even with his surprising success, and even if one could somehow ascertain his peak minor league value, what kind of MLB talent do you think he fetches? Probably a Blake Parker. Is it worth giving up on a gamble like Gonsalves for that?

    I think you're selling Gonsalves too short if you think he was only worth a Blake Parker while on national publication top 100 lists. Good, established MLB players are traded for top 100 prospects all the time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Interesting to see the discrepancy of how Rortvedt is viewed...both among the staff and the posters.

     

    Probably has to do with how his big offensive improvement from 2018 is interpreted. Can he build on it? How much?. He was drafted young, small and athletic (by catcher standards), and very raw out of a northern climate. Taken 56 overall in the 2nd round. Given his background, I'd say his bat is right about where we could reasonably expect it to be (he's actually 'still' a couple months younger than Jeffers)...right on track to being 'decent'. That would go a long way to usefulness at the major-league level, given he swings it left-handed and given his defensive prowess. I remain a believer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Gordon was a top 75 or higher prospect on several lists. I don't think this is about fans......not even a little.

     

    Gordon has been over-hyped by fans, list makers, Twins FO, and himself. He has been a consensus equal opportunity over-hype. He's the man.

    Edited by h2oface
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The Twins could have traded just about every prospect for the last 6 or so years and not really missed out on anybody but Berrios. Yes, there are major league players and some pretty good ones, and some we are still hoping (fingers crossed) figure it out.

    But prospects are just that until they prove otherwise.

     

     

    What would they have gotten for Rogers? Polanco? Kepler? So that's an utterly silly claim. I think you're going to be dead wrong about a dozen times real quick-like.

     

    And sorry, I think some commenters become delusional on BOTH sides of an argument to trade a prospect or not. I used Gordon as an example of how preposterous it is for any of us to 1) think we can really be at all certain about a prospect's ceiling when he's 21 and getting his feet wet at AA, or to 2) conclude that we have a good idea about what kind of MLB talent a prospect like Gordon can attract. 

     

    It's hard enough for the pros to gauge this. 

     

    But my point is simply this: when you trade a big-time prospect with Gordon's clear athletic talents, you're doing so knowing there can be a wide variance of future outcomes regarding his skill development. Even when his minor league performance has gone from super encouraging to abysmal, like Gordon's has, there is a much narrower variance in his trade value. This risk should be acknowledged and managed, IMO. The way I would manage it is to trade from positional surplus so that when you DO lose on a trade it hurts you less because you have another option, and to avoid trades involving multiple high-profile prospects so as to decrease your chances of giving up the next Tatis Jr. for the next James Shields. That's all I'm saying.

     

    Edited by birdwatcher
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Gordon has been over-hyped by fans, list makers, Twins FO, and himself. He has been a consensus equal opportunity over-hype. He's the man.

     

     

    I wouldn't know, but I'd sure plunk down a $5 bet that you, right now, are under-hyping him.

    Edited by birdwatcher
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Gordon has been over-hyped by fans, list makers, Twins FO, and himself. He has been a consensus equal opportunity over-hype. He's the man.

    May 22, 2018. I believe this is going to be remembered in the end as when Nick Gordon turned his career around. Everything that I have heard from Nick suggests that he now knows the hard work he will need to put in to fulfill the hype. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I wouldn't know, but I'd sure plunk down a $5 bet that you, right now, are under-hyping him.

     

    You're on. I don't know that I am under-hyping him to say I believe, according to his current status, that he has been universally over-hyped. I am just noticing his over-hype. I haven't even weighed in on my expectations, or predicted whether he will make it or not. That is because I have no opinion on that. I hope he becomes a star. I hope they all do. I would love to lose a pocket portrait of Lincoln. But to fall from 3rd on the team (wasn't he even higher at one point?) to 12th, and out of the national top 100's as well, is not a convincing counterpoint to the over-hype claim. At some point, his family pedigree and tools have to convert to a player that can't be kept out of the show. It is nothing, however, that "The Man" can't turn around with a season and performance that makes it impossible not to play him in the show, and that would be very welcome. I don't know what the criteria of success would be for a Number 1 draft pick (number 5 overall) for him to have reached and achieved a career that matches his "hype". Seems it would be more than just making it to the show. It would be to become a very good everyday MLB position player (not just a utility guy), too, wouldn't it?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    What would they have gotten for Rogers? Polanco? Kepler? So that's an utterly silly claim. I think you're going to be dead wrong about a dozen times real quick-like.

    What would they have gotten for Buxton, Romero, Rosario, Sano, Stewart, Meyer, Jay and Gordon?

    We can play that game all day.

    There is no arguing trading from excess, but there really is no such thing of excess prospects. Remember when Lewis, Gordon and Javier were excessive.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    You're on. I don't know that I am under-hyping him to say I believe, according to his current status, that he has been universally over-hyped. I am just noticing his over-hype. I haven't even weighed in on my expectations, or predicted whether he will make it or not. That is because I have no opinion on that. I hope he becomes a star. I hope they all do. I would love to lose a pocket portrait of Lincoln. But to fall from 3rd on the team (wasn't he even higher at one point?) to 12th, and out of the national top 100's as well, is not a convincing counterpoint to the over-hype claim. At some point, his family pedigree and tools have to convert to a player that can't be kept out of the show. It is nothing, however, that "The Man" can't turn around with a season and performance that makes it impossible not to play him in the show, and that would be very welcome. I don't know what the criteria of success would be for a Number 1 draft pick (number 5 overall) for him to have reached and achieved a career that matches his "hype". Seems it would be more than just making it to the show. It would be to become a very good everyday MLB position player (not just a utility guy), too, wouldn't it?

    There is a lot of work that has been posted at Fangraphs and other websites about the expected value for both draft picks and prospect rankings. 

     

    Draft picks:

    A model by Jeff Zimmerman predicts that the #5 overall pick on average produces ~6 WAR over the first 6 years of the players' careers.

    Looking at the 25 #5 picks prior to Gordon, only 11 achieved > 1 WAR for their career.

     

    Prospect Ranking:

    Gordon has primarily been in the 50-100 range of prospect list. That lines up pretty close with his draft capital. Research by Craig Edwards (and others) suggests that players in that range, on average, produce ~6 WAR over their first 7 years of team control. Further, ~50% bust (less than 1 WAR), and only 10% turn into stars (>3 WAR per year).

     

    Anyway, if we just look at what history would predict Gordon should produce at any point in his profession career (based on his draft position and prospect rankings), the expected value isn't that high. I think getting one or more average or better seasons from him would be a huge win in all honesty, and greatly exceed any hype he has had in the past.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I would not be excited about his ST invite.  With all the arms needing work, we always have extra catchers around - lots of them.  I think some marginal catchers have made a career of ST catching.  

     

    Here is an example from 2016

    Catchers (5)
    Name Pos 2016 Age 
    Juan Centeno C 26 MLB
    Mitch Garver C/1B 25 A+
    Carlos Paulino C 26 AAA
    Alex Swim C/1B/OF 25 A+
    Stuart Turner C 24 AA

    On the other hand, the youngest player on your list is Stuart Turner at 24. Rortvedt is just 21. I see the ST invite as a definite positive.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think you're selling Gonsalves too short if you think he was only worth a Blake Parker while on national publication top 100 lists. Good, established MLB players are traded for top 100 prospects all the time.

     

     

    I don't know, Van, Gonzo was what, #96 one year? So maybe he nets slightly better, like someone's Addison Reed from 2017? Teams give up a prospect like this at the deadline in exchange for a good, established relief pitcher, don't they? These guys don't get you a decent rotation piece or a 2 WAR position player with control benefits.

     

    It took TWO premier prospects to land Pressly. Maciel started out the previous year as Houston's #5 prospect, which is what Gonzo is to the Twins now. And they had to add Alcala, who might just end up being as good as Pressly or better in his own right.

     

    I think I want my club to be adding prospects at the deadline, not the other way around. Off-season, trade prospects who are redundant, sure.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I'm assuming Luke Raley and Jhoan Duran aren't going to be listed in the top 10 but I would put both ahead of Ben Rortvedt.  He is probably outside my top 20.

    Unless there is a surprise prospect out there, Duran will be in the top 10 along with Lewis, Kirilloff, Graterol, Larnach, Thorpe, Javier, Rooker, Enlow, and Baddoo. I would rank them in that order, with Duran between Enlow and Baddoo. We'll find that out tomorrow. Raley was listed as an honorable mention.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's always too early to give up on a prospect. If you remember, we had a young prospect back in the day that was tearing up the lower minor leagues and even had a decent half season at AA. But when he played the next year at AA he missed a large chunk of time and hit .237/.277/.396. He had his pop but his BB/K numbers went to hell. The next year, the 23 year old started in AAA but he was even worse - .242/.280/.379. A lot of posters had given up on him. But Eddie Rosario turned out ok.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don't know, Van, Gonzo was what, #96 one year? So maybe he nets slightly better, like someone's Addison Reed from 2017? Teams give up a prospect like this at the deadline in exchange for a good, established relief pitcher, don't they? These guys don't get you a decent rotation piece or a 2 WAR position player with control benefits.

     

    It took TWO premier prospects to land Pressly. Maciel started out the previous year as Houston's #5 prospect, which is what Gonzo is to the Twins now. And they had to add Alcala, who might just end up being as good as Pressly or better in his own right.

     

    I think I want my club to be adding prospects at the deadline, not the other way around. Off-season, trade prospects who are redundant, sure.

    Not me. For once in my lifetime I'd like my team, the Twins, to be buyers at the trade deadline because we are shooting for a higher goal than dumping vets to add prospects. This mid-July I'd like to see us trade for Arenado for instance, headlined by Graterol and Rooker and whoever else it takes. Then see us immediately sign Nolan to a 7/245 mil deal. And in late Oct be celebrating the WS due in large part to this deal. Isn't that a big reason for having a farm?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    On the other hand, the youngest player on your list is Stuart Turner at 24. Rortvedt is just 21. I see the ST invite as a definite positive.

     

    Teams need and excessive amount of catchers in spring training. Many catchers get invited. Many, many. Still, it is good that he is one of them, for sure. It can't hurt, unless he just totally stinks it up while he is there.

    Edited by h2oface
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not me. For once in my lifetime I'd like my team, the Twins, to be buyers at the trade deadline because we are shooting for a higher goal than dumping vets to add prospects. This mid-July I'd like to see us trade for Arenado for instance, headlined by Graterol and Rooker and whoever else it takes. Then see us immediately sign Nolan to a 7/245 mil deal. And in late Oct be celebrating the WS due in large part to this deal. Isn't that a big reason for having a farm?

    The Rockies won 91 games last year. It's pretty difficult to imagine them being sellers at the deadline.

    And if they are, you aren't getting an MVP caliber player like Arenado without including Lewis or Kirilloff.

    And finally, I can't possibly see him signing an extension if he's 2 months from free agency. Maybe there are more examples than I think, but I can't imagine that's ever happened, with a premiere player.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The Rockies won 91 games last year. It's pretty difficult to imagine them being sellers at the deadline.
    And if they are, you aren't getting an MVP caliber player like Arenado without including Lewis or Kirilloff.
    And finally, I can't possibly see him signing an extension if he's 2 months from free agency. Maybe there are more examples than I think, but I can't imagine that's ever happened, with a premiere player.

    Point is its getting about time to stop looking at ourselves as sellers every year. As far as what it takes to snag a player like Arenado in July I'm not so sure the price is as high as you think. This season the LAD got an expiring Machado for 1 top 100 prospect and 4 wild cards. Hats off to the LAD, they used their farm for what its intended for.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    On the other hand, the youngest player on your list is Stuart Turner at 24. Rortvedt is just 21. I see the ST invite as a definite positive.

     

    It's simply the difference between being drafted out of high school and being drafted out of college. Turner, Swim, Garver were all college guys. Rortvedt and Brian Navarreto, who is going to big league camp for the 2nd time, were high school picks. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don't know, Van, Gonzo was what, #96 one year? So maybe he nets slightly better, like someone's Addison Reed from 2017? Teams give up a prospect like this at the deadline in exchange for a good, established relief pitcher, don't they? These guys don't get you a decent rotation piece or a 2 WAR position player with control benefits.

     

    It took TWO premier prospects to land Pressly. Maciel started out the previous year as Houston's #5 prospect, which is what Gonzo is to the Twins now. And they had to add Alcala, who might just end up being as good as Pressly or better in his own right.

     

    I think I want my club to be adding prospects at the deadline, not the other way around. Off-season, trade prospects who are redundant, sure.

     

    Think you meant Gilberto Celestino and not Maciel.  

    Celestino came over in the deal for Pressly.   

    Maciel in the Eduardo Escobar trade with the D-Backs.

     

     

    Your point still stands - just wanted to correct the return.

     

    Edited by nater79a
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    At the current time Pressly is probably among the top 15 relievers in baseball as Houston unlocked his talent.  Your point of trading prospects may be correct if your origanization cannot unlock the top end talent, and Twins have not been able to do that among pitchers for a long, long, time.  Alston seems to have started some process last year and I hope that Wes Johnson can turn these prospects into very good pitching.  That will go a long way toward the sustainable process the new FO is hypeing. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Gonsalves for me will have to harness everything he has just to be a #4, #5 starter in the major leagues.  That is a tough path.  I would  rank him more toward where you have Stewart now.  On the other hand some other pitchers should be higher, but do not know if you rank on status plus closeness to the major leagues or just pure upside.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    .

     

    I do know that the Twins really like Jeffers behind the plate, like his pitch framing.

     

    Then why do YOU only have Jeffers at #14? And Rortvedt @ 24?

     

    With as much as you value catchers in your overall assessments of prospects, it sure seems you don't value either's potential as much as the Twins do of both?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...