Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • One Twins Power Prospect Still Waiting to Breakout


    Cody Christie

    Every organization seeks a powerful bat to plug into the middle of its lineup. The Twins hoped one former first-round pick would follow this path, but the team is still waiting for him to break out.

    Image courtesy of William Parmeter

    Twins Video

    The 2020 season was unlike any other in baseball history on and off the field. Major League Baseball found a way to play a shortened season during a pandemic, but different facets of the game had to be altered. Front offices changed their scouting and development processes because limited high school and college games were played nationwide. Entering the 2020 MLB Draft, the Twins had a late first-round pick, which added even more uncertainty to their selection. 

    Minnesota took Aaron Sabato with the 27th overall pick in the 2020 MLB Draft, and he signed for $2.75 million. The slugging first baseman had spent two collegiate seasons pounding the ball for the University of North Carolina, a strong college team. In 83 games, he hit .332/.459/.698 (1.158) with 31 doubles and 25 home runs. Some evaluators questioned the pick because he was projected to provide little defensive value, which means his bat must produce at a high level. The Twins were betting on his bat, but he hasn’t put it all together in his professional career. 

    Sabato spent his first professional season between Low- and High-A. In 107 games, he hit .202/.373/.410 (.783) with 18 doubles and 19 home runs. Most of his offensive damage came following his promotion to Cedar Rapids, where he posted a 1.015 OPS in the season’s final 22 games. Even with college experience, he faced older pitchers in over 69% of his plate appearances. He ended the year on a strong note, so there was some hope for even better numbers in 2022. 

    The Twins had Sabato return to Cedar Rapids to start the 2022 season. In 80 games, he hit .226/.351/.448 (.799) with 13 doubles and 17 home runs. Sabato drew 49 walks to help his OBP, but he struck out 111 times in 288 at-bats. He posted a 1.084 OPS in July, so Minnesota promoted him to Double-A. In Wichita, he was over a year younger than the average age of the competition for the first time. His OPS dropped to .688 with nine extra-base hits across 23 games. There were brief signs of his powerful swing, but he lacked the consistency to rank among the team’s top prospects. 

    Sabato is going to feel pressure for multiple reasons during the 2023 campaign. College players taken in the 2020 Draft must be added to their club’s 40-man roster next winter to be exempt from the Rule 5 Draft. Unless Sabato has a monster 2023 season, the Twins are unlikely to add him to the 40-man roster prior to the Rule 5 Draft. He turns 24 years old at the beginning of June, and the Twins have other slugging prospects ahead of him on the organization’s depth chart. 

    Minnesota will likely send Sabato back to Double-A to start the 2023 season. He has yet to succeed at that level, and that follows a similar development path the team has used with him in his first two professional seasons. The current front office thought highly enough of Sabato to take him in the first round, so they will give him every opportunity to succeed. However, Sabato needs a solid start to the 2023 campaign to insert himself back into the organization’s long-term plans. 

    Can Sabato put it all together in 2023? How do you view his ceiling after two professional seasons? Leave a COMMENT and start the discussion. 

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    4 hours ago, adorduan said:

    Sabato and Cavaco were terrible 1st round picks. At least they look like they got last years pick right...

    Draft picks go bust all the time. The Twins got Wallner, Steer, Canterino, Headrick, Julien and Varland out of the 2019 draft which more than makes up for Cavaco. 2020 was a small draft but Raya makes up for missing on Sabato. I think they deserve some slack drafting based on a month's worth of data in 2020.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    53 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    10 years ago is a completely different game. People didn't swing for the fences, and pitchers threw like 93......

    So then to achieve roughly comparable numbers at the same age and league level, he must be more talented and/or accomplished than Duvall was.  Cool beans.  :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Losing that 2020 season was a pain. The Twins, no doubt, will wait until the last minute to add him to the 40-man. Or, they might just keep him at AA all year, especially if he puts up stats maybe slightly better than he did the past year, postponing a hard decision until the next season.

    They have a solid $2+m investment in the guy, so they don't want to see him walk in a Rule 5 claim. But that said, he could be leapfrogged by many others. Also, the Twins have no real first abseman in their system, unless they switch someone like, say, Julien to the position. Of course, a super season from someone like Kiriloff, or if Miranda shows that he is a longtermer for the Twins, will make Sabato expendable. 

    In that case, a solid season at AA could make him a solid tradechip to a rebuilding team.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, Rosterman said:

    They have a solid $2+m investment in the guy, so they don't want to see him walk in a Rule 5 claim.

    At this point I think they'd be happy to take the $100,000 for the Rule 5 claim.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I didn't understand the pick then, and I still don't now. Were the Twins trying to draft a slow DH that swings hard? Seems like they could find guys like that in later rounds. Or in beer leagues. Good luck to Sabato, I don't expect to ever see him in the bigs. Surprise me, dude. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, LonelyseatinMOA said:

    Trout was 25th, so there are some diamonds too

     

     

    2 hours ago, Monkeypaws said:

    And Judge was even later. Not saying it can't happen, but more often than not it doesn't.

    And Mike Piazza was drafter at #1390 in the 62nd round.  The draft if always a crapshoot. There are plenty of examples of #1 overall picks that don't work and players from late rounds having great careers. But generally, 27th overall is less likely to be a superstar.   

     

    I don't think I was upset with the Sabato pick when it happened.  He had good college numbers.  I was maybe a little concerned that he was a 1B, but I thought the bat and power might work.  I'm having a hard time seeing that these day, but sometimes guys take a bit of time to develop.  He still might have a decent MLB career, but it may not be with the Twins unless he starts that turnaround this year. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    At the time they were drafted I loved the Larnach and Lee selections and hated the Cavaco and Sabato picks. The biggest difference was that Larnach/Lee were guys who had dropped a little past their rannking, while Cavaco/Sabato were players that the Twins reached for. My main takaway is that Falvey is not smarter than the overall consensus on top draft prospects. With that said, the current front office has done a pretty good job with their 2nd-10th round picks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I look at his swing, in the minors, and don't understand where we are supposed to find a valuable MLB player. The bat seems slow. Maybe it has power, but slow and power is negligible. And he doesn't have anything else to offer on the bases or on the field. There was a lot going on, and I didn't judge the pick then, but I don't understand how he was projected to be worth a 1 or valuable in MLB now. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hinge sight is always 20/20 on these guys.  
     

    If you draft 1 or 2 tool plays and one or both of those tools isn’t elite you don’t have a guy who ever makes it. 
     

    He put up elite college # with the bat and he is a big strong guy it just hasn’t translated. 
     

    hoping something clicks this season and he becomes valued in 2023.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    44 minutes ago, High heat said:

    Hinge sight is always 20/20 on these guys.  
     

    If you draft 1 or 2 tool plays and one or both of those tools isn’t elite you don’t have a guy who ever makes it. 
     

    He put up elite college # with the bat and he is a big strong guy it just hasn’t translated. 
     

    hoping something clicks this season and he becomes valued in 2023.  

    Concur.  OTOH multi-tool players typically need for all their tools to click, unless you have the fabled 5-tool player like Correa or Buxton who go high in the draft and aren't available anyway where Sabato was chosen.  Nick Gordon is the poster child for having no one tool being bad when drafted but no one tool that stood out, and he almost got buried in the minors before finally putting it all together (arguably it was his high draft slot in the first place that caused him to get the long leash, otherwise he might be bouncing around).  There's more than one way to reach the majors, and also more than one way to not quite make it.  If the talent evaluator really believes in one tool that a player has, it can be a reasonable move to draft that player and hope that one or two additional tools emerge as at least adequate.  The "hit" tool, more so than "power" or any other single tool, would be the one I'd bank on, so in that light Sabato was kind of a reach.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Sabato pick was a head scratcher from the beginning, considering he is a one tool guy. No FO gets all picks right but this guy, with no defensive skills, was a mistake ready to happen, especially with the need to power arms. They must have hoped for a right handed David Ortiz.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 2/24/2023 at 8:38 AM, puckstopper1 said:

    Sabato is Sano 2.0 (2020-2022 version) at best.  Unfortunately the path he is on will have leave him as a first round bust.

    If I had to guess I would guess you are probably right. I see a lot of people rooting for him but I root for every Twins player. I don't want him to fail but he's way down the list of players I'm counting on. Actually he's not even on the list right now to be honest.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just to be clear, the scouting department makes these choices, not the FO. At least not directly. They undoubtedly have some input, at least on top choices, but they are more focused on the ML roster and have a scouting department and assistant GM in charge of these things for a reason. That being said, I think said department has generally done a pretty good job, overall, in what they do and their various drafts.

    What I remember most about the 2020 draft...obviously greatly affected by covid and the shutdown of baseball everywhere except for MLB...was that it wasn't considered a deep draft, especially with so much limited information to make decisions. But while there were really ZERO can't miss, top stuff arms available, it was still considered pretty deep in viable college arms with at least some potential. Even at 27, there were some arms available that might eventually play out, and I thought the Twins would go that route. They didn't. All things considered, the 2020 draft was a much greater crapshoot than normal.

    At pick 27, the Twins had a choice of a college arm or prospect with potential, and standard, obvious questions, or going for a bat that just might be dynamic. I wasn't crazy about the pick, but I didn't hate it. Sabato played for a major school in a big time league and produced some great numbers. Remember, he was only a 21yo sophomore when drafted. He had a HUGE 2019 season for the Tar Heels, and was on pace for an equally great 2022 before college baseball was shut down. 

    I won't use revisionist thinking about the pick today, without looking back at who they thought they were drafting, 1B/DH or not, he was one of the biggest and badest bats available at the time. And there is room for that kind of bat on a roster.

    Despite a poor BA, he's still had an OB% much higher, indicating he has some idea of the zone. And he's still shown great power. When you have that much power, and a knowledge of the zone, pitchers can't just throw "around you". Challenging you too much results in power shots. But at some point, you also have to actually show you can HIT a little bit. And Sabato hasn't shown he can do that, at this point. And that's really disappointing. He hit .344 as a Freshman, and .292 in his abbreviated Sophomore season, down some to be sure, but with an even higher OB% and higher OPS.

    He's still only 23yo with power and some patience. When the much debated Joey Gallo is ON, he's a .200-.220-ish hitter...which stinks...but maintains a .350-ish OB% and HUGE power which makes him dangerous, productive, and valuable, especially when you factor in quality defense. But a prospect like Sabato, he'd have to be GG caliber defensively with just as much OB and power, or more, to be considered a legitimate ML player/prospect.

    I think Johnson, and the scouting department really thought they drafted a certain player that just isn't the performer they thought he might become. And I wouldn't be surprised if 2020 turns out to be one of the strangest and worst drafts ever, overall. IMO, Sabato has 2023 at AA to prove he can actually HIT, while still being patient and powerful. Otherwise, he's an easy non 40 man candidate. He's been a huge, and I would say unexpected, disappointment pick thus far.

    Though battling some injuries in his young career, the talented Soularie has done little. Rosario has shown a little promise.

    Thank goodness we picked up Raya in the 4th round. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...