Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • 4 Things We Know After the Stunning Twins-Yankees Trade


    Nick Nelson

    Late on Sunday night, the Twins traded Josh Donaldson, Ben Rortvedt, and newly-acquired shortstop Isiah Kiner-Falefa to the Yankees in exchange for Gary Sanchez and Gio Urshela. 

    Fans were blindsided and bewildered by this move, which upended the team's entire offseason.

    We don't know much right now, and probably won't get the full picture until more moves are made. But here are four things we DO know.

    Image courtesy of Kim Klement, USA Today Sports

    Twins Video

    1. The Twins REALLY wanted to get out from under Josh Donaldson's contract.

    I'm not at all surprised that the Twins were looking to trade Donaldson. Personally I've been on board with that course of action for some time, and wrote as much last July. At the time, I hoped they might be able to leverage the trade deadline or cover some of his remaining salary to lessen the blow of unloading such an undesirable contract. Alas, they did not. 

    The front office was able to eventually finder a taker for Donaldson, and New York even took on the full remainder of his deal – all $50 million in guaranteed money. To make it happen, the Twins needed to part with Mitch Garver (via Isiah Kiner-Felafa) and Ben Rortvedt in addition to Donaldson, decimating their catching depth while reopening a total vacancy at shortstop.

    Minnesota also brought on two buy-low reclamation projects in the swap. It's hard to imagine that either Gio Urshela or Gary Sanchez were players the Twins coveted, coming off bad years with dwindling team control. But that was part of the deal.

    It's a deal the Twins made purely out of eagerness to escape Donaldson's contract. And I get it. He didn't fit here anymore and his big salaries at 36 and 37 were likely to be a hindrance. Now the Twins are free of that commitment, albeit at the expense of clearly downgrading the current roster. 

    To what end?

    2. They Twins now have, like, no catching depth.

    Garver, gone. Rortvedt, gone. Even our sweet baby boy Willians Astudillo is gone. It was notable that the our recent top 20 prospects breakdown included zero catchers, and now the Twins have suddenly parted with two of their three big-leaguers in one fell swoop. 

    What are we doing here? This system has no depth to be wiping out the top shelf like that. Yes, Sanchez is here, but we're talking about a guy who's widely regarded as one of the worst defensive catchers in baseball. He's a terrible pitch-framer and borderline DH. Did the Twins just abandon their whole philosophy around the value of defense and catching depth?

    Oh, and:

    3. They also have no shortstop (again).

    We'd all spent about 24 hours talking ourselves into Kiner-Falefa. "Yeah, the Andrelton Simmons thing didn't work out, but that doesn't mean the concept of a glove-first shortstop was bad. IKF is young and hungry! He's gritty!" 

    And then, poof. The solution at shortstop was gone nearly as fast as he arrived, and thus, the Twins are back to square one. Meanwhile, every free agent option has dried up – Simmons and Jose Iglesias both signed over the weekend. The middle tier is gone.  

    I mean, there are still a couple of big names out there. And, the biggest takeaway from all this is...

    4. The Twins now have all kinds of flexibility to make at least one HUGE move.

    The front office freed up $50 million in future payroll commitments, on the same day they traded their 2021 first-round draft pick for a veteran front-line starter. These signs clearly point toward the Twins setting up for one or more extremely significant moves.

    It's fascinating to think about what that might look like. By this point all high-end free agent pitchers are gone. Two big-name shortstops remain, and I'm confident Minnesota is not signing Carlos Correa.

    So, are they going to sign Trevor Story? They are reportedly in contact with his camp, so it's definitely a possibility. But it can hardly be considered a lock, right? If the Twins don't land Story, what's the backup plan? And even if they do, how will they address their multiple remaining needs in the rotation, bullpen, and outfield?

    How are the Twins going to spend all this newly freed up money, with spring training already underway and Opening Day bearing down fast?

    Like I said, a lot of unknowns. But it's gonna be fun to find out.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    What I know for sure:

    1. We've downgraded 3B

    2. We've downgraded C and also have no depth

    3. We still don't have a SS

    4. We still don't have enough pitching, despite the trade for Gray, and will make that a bad trade if they do nothing else.

    Until/Unless other moves are made, we traded Garver, Donaldson and Rortvedt for Urshela, Sanchez and Henriquez. That's what I know for certain. As I said in another thread, yes, these moves are likely precursors to other moves, but what if they other moves they want to make don't happen because, you know, the price goes too high for Story or too high for a potential trade with Oakland because now we are in a situation of 'we must have'. I hope that they had some kind of agreement in place with Story before making these moves because, well, now we are in a 'have to do this' mode, and everyone knows it. I mean ... this waiting until it all sorts itself out is excruciating, but what I said above is what we know for sure. Having payroll flexibility doesn't mean we will flex.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, rv78 said:

    I can understand the desire to get out from under Donaldsons contract. But doesn't that directly point to the FO making a mistake signing him in the first place? Did they think he would bring them a ring and just now realize he is deteriorating quickly? 

    I think there was consensus when JD was signed that the window was open and adding another slugger to a team that set a record for home runs might get them not only in the postseason, but a favorite to win it all. It didn't pan out, thanks in large part to the funkiness of the pandemic season and the injury Donaldson suffered just before the playoffs. Then came Part II, the unexpected flop of a season in which Donaldson wasn't able to lift the team to be in position to even sniff a wildcard berth. 

    Giving a player in his mid-thirties a four year contract was a bet that the first two years production would blunt the ultimate falloff in the last two years. The pandemic and (very predictable) injury woes that Donaldson suffered limited what he could offer when the window was open. 

    I suspect Priority #1 at the trading deadline last year and this off-season has been to get out from under Donaldson's contract. The front office has succeeded at the expense of catching depth and huge holes at shortstop and the pitching staff. They have the payroll space to buy their way to respectability or maybe better than that. I'm interested to see what happens next.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think one thing that also influenced the decision to move on from Donaldson has been the emergence of Miranda.  Two years ago the Twins had no 'elite' prospects at 3rd base.  Now they do.  

    Urshela is insurance at short or 3rd if they can't land someone like Story or Miranda doesn't do well.  If they do, then Urshela is a utility guy.

    It's a huge if, but IF they did use the money saved from Donaldson to sign Story to a long term deal then that would make Lewis(and Martin to a lesser extent in my opinion) and maybe even Arraez(with Urshela/Gordon as utility) trade chips for pitching.

    Sanchez platoons better(offensively) with Jeffers than Garver and since he can also DH(maybe 1st base) you have the bench space to find a true backup catcher.

    Long story short-I can see several possible plans.  And no, Falvey saying he doesn't "know" what will happen doesn't make him an idiot.  It makes him a realist.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    One thing that is clear is that this FO is going to hang on to players past their prime while they still have value. You saw that with Cruz. We got to witness it again with Donaldson and Garver. 

    Ultimately, I'm not sure how much I like what they've done so far. This is not looking good from where I stand. Perhaps they go out and get Story and then get one of the A's pitchers, who knows. But even then, their depth is looking shaky with a lot of counting on guys like Jeffers and Miranda. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, stringer bell said:

    I think there was consensus when JD was signed that the window was open and adding another slugger to a team that set a record for home runs might get them not only in the postseason

    Was that really the consensus? Some believed it was a signing to save face because they didn't bring any pitching, and coming of the year they did, not spending money would have looked real bad. My biggest issues is they didn't do a trade like Gray on top of the signing JD. That would have made more sense, then trading for him now. I don't like the idea of trading JD to free up money for Story, because that means they will never sign more than one guy, now if trading JD was to sign  Story and free up money to bring on a pitcher, I can agree with that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    26 minutes ago, bighat said:

    Good grief. If the Twins would've kept him, as soon as Donaldson pulled a calf muscle this year everyone would be sitting here complaining that the Twins didn't get rid of him when they could have.

    I don't agree with that, I think the people that have been begging to trade him and punt 2022 on prospects would have been the ones saying that, which is no different then they have been saying for months.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 minutes ago, bighat said:

    About 20 teams in MLB would be happy to have Sanchez splitting time at the C position on their teams. Having a catcher with 30+ HR power who can DH on off days - along with a blossoming Jeffers - isn't exactly "blowing up" the position. That's my opinion, at least.

    I respect your opinion and don't totally disagree, but the problem in my opinion is Sanchez can't catch and he is a redundant offensive player in this lineup (strikeouts and the occasional home run). The Yankees don't really have anything special behind him to take his spot and they are a team trying to win now, so them letting him go is a red flag in my opinion. 

    At this point, to me, it looks like the Twins took on the Yankees garage sale items in exchange for saving a few bucks. Hopefully this is proven wrong by whatever moves the Twins make moving forward. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Too many nags on this site.

    Garver is not God's gift to catching.  When was the last time he threw out a runner?  His bat had plenty of holes in it, for prolonged periods of time.

    And go back and look at how many posters ripped Roertvedt's bat.

    Donaldson, he pulled his muscle in the first game of the year last year, in his first AB.  Would he even play 100 games this year?  That's like $300K a game.

    Get a life.  Urshela is better than most people realize.  He's gutty and a hell of a defender.  I personally don't like Sanchez, but I'm not sure he will be around, and as a Part Time catcher, he is probably fine.

    Twins have payroll flexibility, Buxton in center, some solid veteran contributors, a young nucleus coming up.  No, i'ts not a perfect team, but, it's a fun one to watch, with a lot of upside potential.  

    Covid is over, we hope there won't be a World War, but goddamit, let's play some baseball.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The more I think about the Donaldson trade, the angrier I get. I am of the opinion this trade has made them worse off and it didn't have have to be made. Beyond that, I won't rehash the many reasons detailed by others above.

    I do want to comment more on Gary Sanchez.  Where does he fit on this roster?  He can't catch. He is NOT a DH as some have suggested. I assume the Twins had to take on him and his $8 million as a condition of completing the deal, because I can't think of why the Twins would want him. I would much rather have kept Rordtvedt.  Oh...and he and Sonny Gray have a history...https://www.nj.com/yankees/2018/05/gary_sanchez_responds_to_sonny_gray_comments_then.html

    Lovely...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Major League Ready said:

    Calling the Cruz trade a salary dump is extremely simplistic thinking.  Trading a rental in a 90+ loss season for a good pitching prospect is a great trade.

    I agree that Cruz wasn't technically a salary dump, and was 100% the right thing to do. I also don't think Berrios was technically   a salary dump, but with that said per sportrac last year's Twins payroll was 120 million and it currently sits at 72 and change. Which IMO means they didn't re-invest that savings (Yet, hopefully) which at the end of the day is dumping salary. So even if they add Story and 20 some million, they have reduced payroll this year by approx 25%. Which isn't a good look, and as of right now made the team much worse.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, rv78 said:

    I can understand the desire to get out from under Donaldsons contract. But doesn't that directly point to the FO making a mistake signing him in the first place? Did they think he would bring them a ring and just now realize he is deteriorating quickly? That his contract will be a detriment going forward? Short-sightedness is again, a mistake. Is trading for Sonny Gray really that good of a move? He's 31 and has had only 1 good season, 2019 in the last 6 and even then he only pitched 175 innings. Hardly a work horse or an Ace. Bailey Ober is the only Starter that is in the rotation this Front Office has drafted. Can we admit, so far they have failed. They had to trade for Maeda and Joe Ryan, have signed worthless Free Agents in Shoemaker, Happ, Martin Perez, Bartolo Colon, and others who are washed-up veterans. You will probably be able to add Dylan Bundy to that list. I feel that Falvine has taken the Terry Ryan approach and has decided to try to "Catch Lightning in a Bottle" or use the old "Hope and a Prayer" method. Now we trade away the best hitting catcher in the league and a first round pick in Petty for a decent SS and another prospect and then turn around and get a terrible hitting and fielding catcher and average 3B/SS in return for that SS, losing a really good young defensive catcher in the process. Seems we have gone backwards and for what? Money. Unless that money is spent for a top SS or Starting Pitcher "IN THEIR PRIME" and not some aging veteran this FO is making really bad moves and doesn't know what they are doing.

    It's okay to admit a mistake.  I trust you more if you admit your mistakes.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, bighat said:

    Anyone consider that maybe the Twins simply don't think Donaldson has much left in the tank? Or they believe his injuries are only going to get worse? Or both? If someone told you that Donaldson would play 90 games this year, would you take the over or under?

    It wasn't just Donaldson's contract the Twins were unloading. Josh is an aging superstar who is both extremely vocal and injury prone. What I'm saying is, maybe unloading Donaldson didn't "downgrade" the Twins lineup as much as you think it did. At least consider it.

    Are you assuming the Yankees are dumb?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, AKTwins said:

    ESPN+ likes the trade for the twins.  If they sign Story, this makes sense.  Reading between the lines, it does not appear other teams are willing to give Story the huge contract to play SS.  Seems to be a perfect match, he can play SS in MN and the Twins have the money.  Maybe a little discount for him to play SS.  In a way they would trade Donaldson contract for Story’s contract, but would obviously owe more the long run for Story.  But story is around 7 years younger.  Seems like a good swap.
     

    If they trade for, and extend, Manaea or Montas it makes even more sense.  For catcher, I think the FO believes a veteran defense first catcher is the same as Rortvedt.  Maybe they think Chris Williams will be ready.

    Don't under estimate Chris Williams.  He may be one of the at least 3 catchers which will be necessary for the Twins, even assuming there are no serious catcher injuries this season. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Nick - you nailed it.  I am completely on board with you. Now we have a question at 3B and I hope Urshela is not the new SS. We are weaker at C which is a premier position, we have now done all kinds of maneuvers in hopes of getting someone as good as Berrios and have failed, even losing our number one draft pick.  We have a catcher that NY was happy to get rid of who has seemed to lost his hit tool and is a lousy catcher.  

    Will the Twins splurge on Story and then look to dump his contract in the future?  Is Story really that good when he is not at Coors field?  "For his career, Story is hitting.302/.367/.605 at Coors Field and.242/.310/.437 on the road." 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    An interesting article and a wide variety of comments that all omit a most important point of inquiry. Baseball will have record revenues, a new CBA was signed, and the curse of Covid looks to be completely lifted. This should result in terrific optimism for businesses involved in the entertainment industry, including baseball.

    The omission is any reference to the Twins expected potential budget. Target Field was built with public funds with the express promise by Jim Pohlad that the Twins would use the increased revenues to field a competitive team. The franchise has had strong earnings and slowly increased the budgets with a particularly increased expenditure after the Falvey and Levine hires. A low budget from the conservative Twins fans put a 2022 roster at around $130 million. It would be easy to justify a $150 million team. The Josh Donaldson signing was the first foray into spending for the Twins and before the trade with the Yankees their bottom line was near $100 million. This left room for an additional $30+ million to spend using the conservative numbers. I myself built my version of a 2022 team at $120 million. All of the talk about the problems with a contract such as Donaldson's doesn't work when you look at the numbers. When I read these comments I wonder if the Twins are tipping toward $150 million and look at the numbers. Nope, they are not. If the Pohlads had paid for Target Field with their own money it would be entirely their own deal. There should be some minimum of consideration of this history. 

    There were a number of free agents available this year. The Twins signed Dylan Bundy. While it is possible that Trevor Story could be signed, this seems unlikely if Story sticks to leaked numbers like 6/$120 million. It is totally possible that solid trades could be made, yet no two pitchers would add any more than $18 million (Manaea, Castillo) as a maximum and the best trades would only add near $9 million (Montas, Lopez) to the expense sheet. All of these moves and keeping Donaldson would have still left the team with a roster around $130 million, the preferred number by Twins Daily. 

    What is the direction or plan for the Twins in consideration of their possible budget? What are the numbers and justification? It is impossible to have any suggestions or justify any cuts unless there is some idea of a general range of where the limits of spending stand.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Nick, I agree 100% with your article about this fluid situation which the Twins FO has created.  Trading Donaldson was a necessary salary dump. Even though Donaldson had some good numbers, I feel there was more going on. I also feel the Yankees were looking for a trade to part ways with Sanchez. I feel that the 2022 Yankee dugout will provide plenty of fodder for the NY and national sports reporters. In fact, this would be a wonderful season to be writing a "tell-all" book about this 2022 Yankee team. It should be a dramatic season in the Bronx, if one  likes middle school drama, which I don't.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Dman said:

     

    The other thing is why make this deal if you don't already have a deal for Story in place?  Given what I am seeing although Story's market it thin there are no rumors he is close to a deal with the Twins.  If Story was the option they were looking for to fill short wouldn't you wait until you had agreement and then make the trade with Yankee's?  I have seen other rumors of a possible Montas or Manea trade that involve taking on the Elvis Andrus contract so there are other ways to get there but still just hanging out there with nothing seems like a bad idea IMO.  Unless of course you don't care that much about 2022 feeling like you can fall back on 2023 if needed?

     

    No way of knowing from my chair but the one that thing that seems (almost) obvious is this:

    The Twins have been trying to move Donaldson's contract for probably awhile now and they finally found a taker.   

    The other assumptions that I have (with no way of knowing) are not quite as obvious: 

    Does this scenerio seem possible -

    1. The Twins were looking for a SS

    2. The were talking with the Rangers about IKF and probably were not talking about Garver originally.

    3. The Yankees were looking for a SS and also talking with the Rangers about IKF. 

    4. In order for the Twins to beat the Yankees offer for IKF (Whatever it was) Garver became the new ask.  

    5. Once the Twins acquired IKF... The Yankees started talking to the Twins about IKF. 

    6. The Yankees were probably well aware of the Twins desire to move the Donaldson contract and agreed to take on the money in order to acquire the shorter term SS they needed.   

    7. The Twins would have insisted on Urshela being part of the deal because someone would have to play SS if they couldn't replace IFK. 

    8. After this new found opportunity and abupt change in gameplan... Falvey and Lavine quickly realize that they needed to make a phone call to the agent of Trevor Story because they were not expecting to move the Donaldson contract and now they have the money to fill the SS spot.  

    9. The agent of Trevor Story probably knows that the Twins really need a SS now. 

    10. Knowing the Twins need a SS. The agent of Trevor Story is probably trying to drive the price up and is having conversations with the media to float the impression that other teams are also interested in Trevor Story when there will be very few teams interested in him at the contract he is trying to get. 

    11. We will have to wait this out but the Twins pretty much have to sign Trevor Story now and I don't believe Story has a lot of options left that will allow him to stay at SS. 

     

    BTW... the inclusion of Andrus in a deal to lessen the price of a Starting Pitcher with Oakland was something that I thought about. It's a possible solution however... there are some things that really bug me about that idea. 

    Andrus is really struggling and simply doesn't look like an MLB player anymore. Taking your financial gains and giving up 15M to Andrus just to get a deal done for a SP cheaper doesn't address SS and the Twins were clearly trying to address SS to contend. 

    After giving up Garver to solve the SS problem and not trading Garver for a prospect. Then trading a highly ranked future pitcher for Sonny Gray are the actions of a team that is trying to contend.

    If they are trying to contend and they clearly are. The newly found money from the Donaldson trade has to go somewhere and Story is the most obvious answer in the current team context.       

    If Story does sign with someone else. Then... I don't know how the Twins dig themselves out of it.    

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I won't quote Brian, but I will comment on a couple of things that he mentioned. The Twins (under Falvey & Levine) have been known to try to wait out free agents to get more reasonable contracts, with less than great results (e.g. Lance Lynn and Logan Morrison). I think they are trying to do the same with the remaining free agent pitching pool and Story. Given their track record, I wish they wouldn't 

    I've wondered if there is an alternative to Story who makes sense for the Twins. Perhaps Andrus needs to leave Oakland to again be a decent major league hitter, I don't know. While I'd like to see Story in Minnesota, I would have liked much more to see proven pitching with the salary room that is now available.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, bighat said:

    About 20 teams in MLB would be happy to have Sanchez splitting time at the C position on their teams. Having a catcher with 30+ HR power who can DH on off days - along with a blossoming Jeffers - isn't exactly "blowing up" the position. That's my opinion, at least.

    I’ll take the under on 30+ HRs this year - no matter how many ABs Sanchez gets at C or DH. On the other hand, if something happens to Jeffers and Sanchez is forced to play a lot of innings at C, I might take the over on 30+ passed balls.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    No way of knowing from my chair but the one that thing that seems (almost) obvious is this:

    The Twins have been trying to move Donaldson's contract for probably awhile now and they finally found a taker.   

    The other assumptions that I have (with no way of knowing) are not quite as obvious: 

    Does this scenerio seem possible -

    1. The Twins were looking for a SS

    2. The were talking with the Rangers about IKF and probably were not talking about Garver originally.

    3. The Yankees were looking for a SS and also talking with the Rangers about IKF. 

    4. In order for the Twins to beat the Yankees offer for IKF (Whatever it was) Garver became the new ask.  

    5. Once the Twins acquired IKF... The Yankees started talking to the Twins about IKF. 

    6. The Yankees were probably well aware of the Twins desire to move the Donaldson contract and agreed to take on the money in order to acquire the shorter term SS they needed.   

    7. The Twins would have insisted on Urshela being part of the deal because someone would have to play SS if they couldn't replace IFK. 

    8. After this new found opportunity and abupt change in gameplan... Falvey and Lavine quickly realize that they needed to make a phone call to the agent of Trevor Story because they were not expecting to move the Donaldson contract and now they have the money to fill the SS spot.  

    9. The agent of Trevor Story probably knows that the Twins really need a SS now. 

    10. Knowing the Twins need a SS. The agent of Trevor Story is probably trying to drive the price up and is having conversations with the media to float the impression that other teams are also interested in Trevor Story when there will be very few teams interested in him at the contract he is trying to get. 

    11. We will have to wait this out but the Twins pretty much have to sign Trevor Story now and I don't believe Story has a lot of options left that will allow him to stay at SS. 

     

    BTW... the inclusion of Andrus in a deal to lessen the price of a Starting Pitcher with Oakland was something that I thought about. It's a possible solution however... there are some things that really bug me about that idea. 

    Andrus is really struggling and simply doesn't look like an MLB player anymore. Taking your financial gains and giving up 15M to Andrus just to get a deal done for a SP cheaper doesn't address SS and the Twins were clearly trying to address SS to contend. 

    After giving up Garver to solve the SS problem and not trading Garver for a prospect. Then trading a highly ranked future pitcher for Sonny Gray are the actions of a team that is trying to contend.

    If they are trying to contend and they clearly are. The newly found money from the Donaldson trade has to go somewhere and Story is the most obvious answer in the current team context.       

    If Story does sign with someone else. Then... I don't know how the Twins dig themselves out of it.    

     

     

    Yeah I don't love Andrus either but given what they got with Simmons they can probably work around him.  That 15M next year is gonna hurt though and from what I see he actually has negative trade value right now which tells you just how bad he is.

    I agree it is a waiting game right now.  Story can't sign until Correa does because teams that miss out on Correa could up the ante for Story.  Once Correa and Freeman sign things should move pretty fast on the FA side I would think.  

    Have to believe Oakland has a lot offers to choose from on Montas and I doubt the Twins win that one but it is fun to dream.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not that anyone cares or thinks about or remembers my comments on the TD, but I have been very vocal about moving JD and using the cash to sign a SS.  I was happy if it happened before the season or if we kept JD until the deadline to tutor Miranda or to see if we could get into contention.

    If Story (or Correa lol) is signed (which I fully expect), this trade could work out well. Essentially our left side is Urshela and Story replacing JD and IKf. In both cases we have Miranda on the way at 3B. I think that in 2022 and certainly in 2023 that we are better off.

    The cost was losing our defensive catching depth. I was ok with losing Garver for IKF as I envisioned Jeffers and Rortvedt as a strong complimentary duo behind the dish for several years. No we have a hole. Hopefully it gets solved.

    Now on the other hand, if the plan is Urshela at SS, well …..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Nashvilletwin said:

    Not that anyone cares or thinks about or remembers my comments on the TD, but I have been very vocal about moving JD and using the cash to sign a SS.  I was happy if it happened before the season or if we kept JD until the deadline to tutor Miranda or to see if we could get into contention.

    If Story (or Correa lol) is signed (which I fully expect), this trade could work out well. Essentially our left side is Urshela and Story replacing JD and IKf. In both cases we have Miranda on the way at 3B. I think that in 2022 and certainly in 2023 that we are better off.

    The cost was losing our defensive catching depth. I was ok with losing Garver for IKF as I envisioned Jeffers and Rortvedt as a strong complimentary duo behind the dish for several years. No we have a hole. Hopefully it gets solved.

    Now on the other hand, if the plan is Urshela at SS, well …..

    I too felt Donaldson was no longer a fit and Story's OPS and Donaldson aren't that far off and Story is younger and plays a position of need.  If they do manage to get Story spending on an up the middle position makes more sense than spending at 3rd where we have several prospects who can play there in the future and as noted Miranda could be ready this year,.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I upgraded my whirlwind summary in the forums - day 5 - I put in the NYT reflection on the Yankees which has them giddy over their infield rebuild (with our players) and then from today's tribune - Baldelli says Urshela will be given a chance to be SS.  So we have an infield rebuild too and I think the Yankees are happier. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    One cannot read any posting here and elsewhere without seeing Story's name mentioned in probably more than half of the comments.  I ask, what is the love affair with Story?  The numbers I have seen indicate he is average to mediocre away from Coors Field.  If that is true, why would the Twins want to tie themselves to a contract both bigger and longer than Donaldson's?  I just don't understand the love affair many of you have with this guy and hope like heck the Twins don't sign him.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here's a quote from Aaron Boone just before the trade. I know that it suggests that they were still looking but it also suggests that there were some faith that Gio could handle the SS job if necessary. 

    “Gio,” Boone said Sunday when asked about his shortstop right now — one of the biggest questions facing the team all offseason. “Gleyber [Torres] will have to mix in there. Obviously we’ve got some young guys that are knocking on the door that we’re really excited about, [Oswald] Peraza and [Oswaldo] Cabrera that are here. We’ll just let that situation shake out. I’m sure there’s still things to be done across the game and certainly with us that are going to change that landscape potentially along the way.”

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The FO is thinking a year ahead. Their goal for again being competitive is 2023, not 2022. Dumping Donaldson and his contract had to happen in order to open up opportunities for younger players like Miranda and underused players like Gordon and Arraez; the guys they'll need to be competitive in 2023. We weren't going to be competitive in 2022 with or without Donaldson.

    Now if they can dump Sano, and with the DH coming to NL they should be able to find a taker, Kirilloff can settle in at first, and Larnach, Celestino and Rooker get more AB's and experience in the Bigs and we find out which players are going to help in 2023 and which ones aren't.

    Players and managers have to think in the "Now". Executives have to think in the "Future". So I'm cutting the FO some slack. One last time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4. The Twins now have all kinds of flexibility to make at least one HUGE move.

    Can we please put a stop to this argument? The Twins had this flexibility even without paying NYY to take Donaldson. Besides the incredibly affordable Buxton extension, they made no other free agent signings this offseason. We could have strengthened our infield defense and our catching considerably just by not making that trade, and then possibly even added Story to boot. We should be looking at these transaction from this lens as well, because these C and INF holes are going to bite us hard in 2022 - right when we're trying to get our much-promised "pitching pipeline" ready for MLB success.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, bighat said:

    maybe unloading Donaldson didn't "downgrade" the Twins lineup as much as you think it did.

    That's possible, sure. But losing Kiner-Falefa (or Garver) and Rortvedt undoubtedly did downgrade us. Defensively and offensively. People seem to forget that Urshela also has hamstring issues, which is no doubt why the Yankees unloaded him on us. And Sanchez can't hit or field.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Riverbrian said:

    7. The Twins would have insisted on Urshela being part of the deal because someone would have to play SS if they couldn't replace IFK. 

    You have many interesting thoughts in your comments but it was likely the Yankees who  suggested  Urshela because he is an expensive utility player. Both Polanco and Gordon on the current roster are better at shortstop than Urshela and we  want Polanco at 2B and we want to use Gordon as a utility if/of. The Twins could have, at the very least, held back Rortvedt whom I believe to hold potential going forward. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, Dave The Dastardly said:

    The FO is thinking a year ahead. Their goal for again being competitive is 2023, not 2022.

    Dumping Rortvedt and Kiner-Falefa for nothing is not a move that strengthens our chances in 2023, no. If Donaldson wasn't performing, he could have been put on the IL, which would still give Miranda an opportunity. Plus, Donaldson possibly could have mentored him. If Donaldson did do well but the team stunk in 2022, he could have been traded at the deadline (maybe even for a lottery ticket prospect) and the Twins could have eaten the final year of salary.

    I fail to see how anything that happened in this last trade was forward thinking. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...