Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Conceptualizing a Creative, Realistic, Winning Contract for Carlos Correa


    Nick Nelson

    With the Winter Meetings now less than a week away, the Twins appear fully invested for the moment in their pursuit of top free agent target Carlos Correa. 

    As they vie for his services against big-market titans with bottomless coffers, there's been much talk of the front office's efforts to 'get creative' in frameworks for a deal. 

    What might a contract look like that Correa would actually accept?

    Image courtesy of Tommy Gilligan-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

     

    The mutual affinity between Carlos Correa and the Twins does seem genuine. He appears very open to returning, and is at the very least giving Minnesota the time of day by entertaining offers, which is something we've rarely been able to say about top-tier free agents in past years. 

    There have been reports of the Twins submitting multiple different proposals to Correa's camp, as the front office gets creative in trying to put forth a framework that entices him away from other monster offers he's sure to receive – while also not being so risk-filled and player-friendly as to defy their sensibilities.

    That's a very difficult line to walk. Signing Correa would obviously be a precedent-shattering move for this franchise, at any level, and by all accounts they are ready to take that step. But it doesn't mean they'll hand Scott Boras a blank check. 

    Is there a way the Twins could win the bidding for Correa without actually having the largest guaranteed offer? Is there are practical structure for a deal that doesn't force Derek Falvey and Thad Levine to abandon their regard for long-term planning?

    I think maybe I've got something. But you tell me if it works for both sides.

    Hypothetical Twins/Correa contract: 10 years, $325 million with two player opt-outs.

    Here's how it breaks down, year by year:

    Year 1: $40M
    Year 2: $40M
    Year 3: $40M
    Year 4: $40M
    *opt-out*
    Year 5: $30M
    Year 6: $30M
    Year 7: $30M
    *opt-out*
    Year 8: $25M
    Year 9: $25M
    Year 10: $25M

    It's a frontloaded contract that is essentially broken down into three parts. After earning $160 million in the first four years, Correa can opt out of six years and $165 million at age 32, or three years and $75 million at age 35.

    The reason this feels like a realistic concept is that I can look at it from both sides and talk myself into it, even while accounting for the front office's known tendencies and preferences.

    Why the Twins Like It

    In trying to come up with this theoretical contract, I presupposed two things from the team's point of view:

    1. They're willing to dish out huge salaries in the short term (they'd have happily paid out Correa's full three-year, $105 million contract), but they're deathly afraid of being burdened by gargantuan commitments for aging mid-30s players down the line.
    2. They recognize that player opt-outs are an effective mechanism for making contracts more appealing to players and their agents, but don't want to include them in a way that robs all of the team's upside from a deal.

    I believe the above framework satisfies their preferences on both fronts. The highest salaries are concentrated at the front of the contract, during Correa's prime years, so they'd be ostensibly paying most for his peak production. The diminishing salaries in the latter part of the deal reduce team downside to some extent should things go awry.

    Meanwhile, the opt-outs probably aren't too inhibiting. If Correa chooses to re-enter the market after four or six great years the Twins will have been happy to have gotten them. 

    Why Correa and Boras Like It

    Well, for one thing, it's a legitimate all-time MLB free agent contract. Correa would tie Giancarlo Stanton and Corey Seager for the sixth-biggest guaranteed sum ever. His salary next year would be the highest for any position player in history, and second overall only to Max Scherzer ($43.3M).

    These things matter to Correa and Boras – not sheerly out of greed, as some would proclaim, but to pave the way for future players and contracts. It's no coincidence the past contract made Correa the highest-paid infielder ever, just by a hair.

    I also could see the frontloaded makeup of this framework having appeal to Correa, if he wants to be on himself an truly maximize his earnings. Should he tear it up while earning $160 million over the next four years, he could easily re-enter the market at 32 and seek another deal approaching $200 million.

    Could It Really Happen?

    Let's be clear: this contract would not only shatter precedence for the Twins, but for baseball at large. Of the 10 contracts that have ever been signed for $300 million or more, none came from teams outside of the major markets in Southern California, New York, Texas and Philadelphia. 

    For Minnesota to be the first flyover mid-market club to break that barrier would be almost hilariously surreal, and yet, if ever there was a time I could see it happening, it's now. The Twins are ushering in a new era with a comprehensive rebrand and ownership shift. Out of sheer circumstance, they stumbled into getting acquainted with Correa and now have a verifiable IN with one of the most talented players in the world. They also have tremendously clear books going forward.

    Do I think it will happen? No, I still don't. But I've talked myself into there being a path. What say you all?

     

     

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share

    The Players Project

    Brooks Lee

    Test content here. ...

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

      On 11/30/2022 at 3:42 PM, EGFTShaw said:

    In my opinion it should not.  I am a fan of C4 AND this proposal, but he is getting the $$s.

    No to a NT clause

    And I still would like to see a Mutual Option put in there.

    Expand  

    Correa would have an automatic no-trade clause after the first four seasons (10-5 rule) so I think it's kind of immaterial. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 11/29/2022 at 6:04 PM, gman said:

    My problem with this is I think the Twins will need to start replacing Correa at shortstop after about 4 years. I don't think he hits well enough to be a DH or first baseman. He may last longer than 4 but does anyone see him playing shortstop in 10 years? 9? 8? 7?. There is a point in this contract like all long contracts that you will wish the player would just retire. 

    You could also kick in a limited no trade clause, with a choice of say 10 teams.

    On the other hand you could look at drafts for the next 5 years as simply looking for the best starting pitcher options. We have drafted a lot of middle infielders and corner outfielders the past 5 years.

    Expand  

    It's a possibility to be sure, but the skill set that makes Correa great at SS isn't based just on speed, which should age better. His superior defense is also based on his great arm and sure hands. he sets up deeper which a) gives him more time to react, and b) allows him to get to more balls in short left. He's also such a student of the game that he always positions himself well. There's a real possibility that his defense at SS ages much more like Cal Ripken, who was still playing great SS at age 34.

    Correa's one of those players that could easily keep playing shortstop into his mid-30's, and with his arm would have no trouble sliding down to 3B if his range slips to the point where a replacement is needed. Set the over/under on his remaining years at SS at 4 and I would bet the over, which makes a longer term deal with him more palatable.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 11/29/2022 at 3:42 PM, WinTwins162 said:

    All sounds good. Bottom line is they need to pay what it takes to get/keep him. They can afford it if they want.

    Don't lump in San Diego with Southern CA major markets. San Diego is actually a smaller market than the Twin Cities and quite separate than LA. However, the owner wants to spend money- whatever it takes to win. They can afford Machado, Tatis, and maybe Soto, plus Musgrave, Darvish, etc. The Twins and Pohlads could do this if they want and be heroes- they just don't want to that much.

    Expand  

    San Diego drew 1.2 million more fans in 2022 than the Twins and their TV contract makes ours look like tip money. Their total revenue is at least $100 million a year more than the Twins. The size of the market, as measured by population, (hint: see the Green Bay Packers) means less than a Dan Gladden statistic. 

    Ps. I am bummed that the Fire Dan Gladden moniker is taken. If you want arrogance, incoherence, bad grammar; Dan is the smorgasbord for you.  I can only figure that Dan got into the Twins HOF because a) they were desperate to sell tickets and b) they had to bump Wally the Beerman for specific reasons.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 11/30/2022 at 5:01 PM, Johnny Ringo said:

    San Diego drew 1.2 million more fans in 2022 than the Twins and their TV contract makes ours look like tip money. Their total revenue is at least $100 million a year more than the Twins.  

    Expand  

    Herein lies a crucial item for Joe to look into.

    TV revenue.  The Twins TV contract is pathetic.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 11/30/2022 at 5:01 PM, Johnny Ringo said:

    San Diego drew 1.2 million more fans in 2022 than the Twins and their TV contract makes ours look like tip money. Their total revenue is at least $100 million a year more than the Twins. The size of the market, as measured by population, (hint: see the Green Bay Packers) means less than a Dan Gladden statistic. 

    Ps. I am bummed that the Fire Dan Gladden moniker is taken. If you want arrogance, incoherence, bad grammar; Dan is the smorgasbord for you.  I can only figure that Dan got into the Twins HOF because a) they were desperate to sell tickets and b) they had to bump Wally the Beerman for specific reasons.  

    Expand  

    Happy to be proven wrong but according to what I could find from FanGraphs the Twins and Padres have nearly identical TV contracts. The Padres contract is longer but the value per year is almost the same ($46m vs $43m). 

     

    https://blogs.fangraphs.com/lets-update-the-estimated-local-tv-revenue-for-mlb-teams/

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There's a lot of reasons I prefer Correa over the other 3 possible SS, including age, a defensive set of tools that should age pretty well, leadership, being one of the smartest players I may have ever watched, etc. But I agree Boegarts could be a great 2nd choice.

    While no means should these numbers be taken as gospel, it's  interesting to see how MLBTraderumors list expected contracts:

    Correa      9 @ $288M

    Boegarts  7 @ $189M

    Turner     8 @ $268M

    Swanson 7 @ $154M

    My hunch? For whatever reason, Turner doesn't seem to be a target. And for a little more, why not Correa? I think Swanson is as good, or better, defensively as anyone, comes cheaper, and is still a top of the order hitter. My gut tells me he wants to stay in Atlanta and they will re-sign him.

    What's interesting to me is the projection on Correa. And I may be 100% wrong about this, but as I mentioned in a previous post, the whole 10yrs and $330M...to me...has to be weighed against being 1yr older than last year, having already earned $35M in 2022, so I'm just sure I fully buy in to the SAME 10yrs and $330M being tossed around here and there. There's nothing wrong with Correa. He's still a super star player, but doesn't 1yr removed still change the complexion of impending deal options?

    Again, what do I know?

    I do think Boegarts is a very good second choice. I think he fits need and opportunity. The terms of a potential deal fit a little more "easy". But I'd still pick Correa as the #1 target, especially if we can keep the deal at $300M or less and 9yrs. I like Nick's proposal very much and find it to be very smart and workable to both parties with advantages both ways. I just wonder if the numbers shouldn't  maybe be shaved just a little. I think Correa and Boras, if they received Nick's proposal from the Twins, should grab a pen and ask where to sign. I just don't believe they will get anything better than a GUARANTEED 10yrs and $325M WITH a pair of opt outs to use if they wish.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 11/29/2022 at 3:44 PM, roger said:

    Agree that this is creative and expect there is a real chance it would get the job done.  But I sure hope that it doesn't get done.  Why, I cringe when I think of paying this type of money for 10 years.  

    I believe that Royce Lewis is and should be the Twins shortstop over the next 5-8 years.  I don't see the need to break the bank to sign Correa.  And this contract would break the bank.

    Expand  

    Agreed.  He is not the missing piece, just one of many. 

    Gio played SS for the Yankees.  He could have held that position down

    until Lewis was ready giving him all the time he needed to recuperate.

    I truly hope that Correa turns down every offer the Twins present him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    From a marketing standpoint for Boras & Correa, if they sign with the Twins, they can fold last year's money into the total package if hitting a bigger overall number is especially meaningful to them. Sure it's nothing but marketing fakery, but why would they care? I hope someone from the Twins makes sure to mention that idea, because why the hell not?

    9/$285M + 1/$35M still gets them to a bigger number than Seager...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think your 10 year plan makes sense to both sides. The only tweak might be to have an option that gets CC involved also as a coach and, later, some kind of FO presence if the honeymoon doesn't crash to an end and if he stays the course despite the opt outs. Most long-term Twins segue into some sort of relationship with the team, whether it be spring training consultants, commentators, or what-have-you. Correa, aka Dior, wants more than money; he wants respect that's flagged with precise acknowledgments of his expertise. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 year deal

    first five years: $25 MM
    next five years: $20 MM

    Free agent after that....with deferred payments of $10MM per year for the next ten years. Biggest contract this year (until Judge signs) total dollar wise. I'd be happy to go to $30MM per year the first five years, and drop the deferred if needed (that would make it $7.5MM per year those ten dead money years).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 12/5/2022 at 9:29 PM, Mike Sixel said:

    Another option is to say "Hey, the owners have told us to use $20 million of our BAM money as a bonus for CC."

    Expand  

    Doesn't every team have that to add, as a sweetener?

    Though, we could throw in Brian Duensing, if he thinks he can find a use for a reliever.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 12/5/2022 at 9:46 PM, ashbury said:

    Doesn't every team have that to add, as a sweetener?

    Though, we could throw in Brian Duensing, if he thinks he can find a use for a reliever.

    Expand  

    I don't understand your point at all. Most teams aren't signing him, and I'm offering a way for the Twins to do so. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 12/5/2022 at 10:24 PM, Mike Sixel said:

    I don't understand your point at all. Most teams aren't signing him, and I'm offering a way for the Twins to do so. 

    Expand  

    I’d guess as usual, at minimum 10 teams won’t spend 20M in new money free agency for their 2023 payroll.

    Which frankly is disgusting.

    The extra money won’t impact the payrolls of top ten or so teams one bit. It likely won’t impact the miserly bottom ten or so teams either. The middle spending teams, like the Twins, should be able to take advantage of this.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 12/5/2022 at 10:24 PM, Mike Sixel said:

    I don't understand your point at all. Most teams aren't signing him, and I'm offering a way for the Twins to do so. 

    Expand  

    Well, maybe I didn't understand the point I was responding to.  There will be teams bidding for him, and aren't they all receiving this windfall too?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...