Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Acquire RHP Sonny Gray from Reds for Chase Petty


    Seth Stohs

    The Minnesota Twins have announced that they have acquired RHP Sonny Gray from the Cincinnati Reds, along with RHP Francis Peguero, in exchange for 2021 top pick Chase Petty. 

    Image courtesy of David Banks-USA TODAY Sports

    Why would you trade your 19-year-old first-round pick from 2021? Well, it is to acquire your Opening Day starter. No, we don't know that officially yet, but Sonny Gray has an excellent track record of success.

    Gray is a 32-year-old right-hander. Last year with the Reds, he went 7-9 with a 4.19 ERA. In 135 1/3 innings, he had 155 strikeouts. He pitched for the Oakland A's from 2013-2017 before heading to the Yankees at the 2017 trade deadline. He remained in New York through the 2018 season. He signed with the Reds before the 2019 season. Overall, he his 82-72 with a 3.61 ERA over 1,267 1/3 innings in his career. 

    Gray was the 18th overall pick in the 2011 draft out of Vanderbilt University. 

    Francis Peguero is a 24-year-old who signed with the Reds from the Dominican Republic back in 2017. He has worked out of the bullpen throughout his career. In 103 innings in his career, he has struck out 116 batters while walking just 21 batters. He spent the full 2021 season at High-A Dayton.  

    To get something, you have to give up someone, right? Well, the Twins traded their top pick from last year's draft, Chase Petty, to the Reds. He pitched in just two games after being drafted last year. He was touted for his triple-digit fastball, and he's got some really good secondary pitches to go with it. The sky is certainly the limit, but that's the price for a quality, top-of-the-rotation arm. 

    For those who say that this is unlike the Twins to trade a top pitching prospect. Recall just a couple of years ago when the team traded a top 5 prospect in Brusdar Graterol to the Dodgers in the deal for Kenta Maeda

    In addition, Gray's contract was for $30.5 million over three years. However, there is also an option for the 2023 season at $12 million. It would seem a pretty easy decision unless things unravel for a pitcher with a great track record. 

    A quick search of how often Sonny Gray has been tagged in Twins Daily articles shows that he has been on fans' radars for awhile. 

    Share your thoughts on this trade in the COMMENTS below. 

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Just now, PseudoSABR said:

    What? Bundy? They bought low on Bundy, I'm sure they view him less as a placeholder, and more of a cheap gamble.  

    But the logic of signing free agents to promote minor league development is creative, if baffling. 

    Exactly not exactly a win now move.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the value is really good for the Twins, but I'm now very confused on the team's direction. Every move (or more accurately lack of moves) up to this point has been in the direction of the team not competing this year, so this is out of step with the rest of the off-season. By itself this doesn't get the starting rotation up to playoff caliber, so I'll be curious if there is a follow-up move to add another good starter.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Sielk said:

    I am honestly surprised to see so many negative reactions to this trade. Everyone wanted pitching, after all.

    Yes, Petty is a very good prospect but he is also not even 19 years old and this farm system has a TON of RHPs. Anytime you trade away a prospect there is a chance that he could become something. There is also a decent chance Petty is a bust and the Twins get Sonny Gray for free.

    You gotta give up something in a trade and I would rather give up Petty than someone like Winder who will probably help the Twins a lot in the near future. 

    I like this one much better than the Garver trade!

    Also, to give up just one single prospect when the Twins have 7-8 other SP prospects that are roughly the same tier as Petty? That's dealing from a position of strength and I would do that anytime. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, twins_89 said:

    I think the value is really good for the Twins, but I'm now very confused on the team's direction. Every move (or more accurately lack of moves) up to this point has been in the direction of the team not competing this season, so this is out of step with the rest of the off-season. By itself this doesn't get the starting rotation up to playoff caliber, so I'll be curious if there is a follow-up move to add another good starter.

    Agreed . If they are serious about this year, they need more. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    This makes the trade yesterday make more sense. Apparently they are trying to win? The Bundy signing makes less and less sense though. 

    Twins clearly think he's capable/ready to have a bounceback year, and at the very least hold down the fort until some of the younger guys are ready. (Or maybe he's a "get by" kind of guy until Maeda is ready to be back and the option is just hedging their bets in case he really jumps back into form?)

    Gray is a good fit for this team, though. He's used to pitching at the front of a rotation and you have to like how his K's have sat for the last three years. The only question I have about him is how deep in games he can still get and whether we're at risk of overtaxing our bullpen. But he's certainly a quality pitcher who improves the rotation greatly. Hope we hear about adding back Big Mike next!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, twins_89 said:

    I think the value is really good for the Twins, but I'm now very confused on the team's direction. Every move (or more accurately lack of moves) up to this point has been in the direction of the team not competing this season, so this is out of step with the rest of the off-season. By itself this doesn't get the starting rotation up to playoff caliber, so I'll be curious if there is a follow-up move to add another good starter.

    The Twins were rumored to be in on Jonny Cueto

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, a-wan said:

    Sorry, it is exhausting keeping track of what has annoyed you. 

    In not sure what this means? I said not doing anything in free agency indicated to me they weren't going for it this year. That they were playing for the future. Lots of other here have said the same thing. No one said they saved money for future years. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is a heart vs mind trade... my heart HATES IT!!!  my mind can justify it.

    Prospects are suspects until proven otherwise., especially HS pitchers, but still... DANG!!!

    I would be more of a fan if this was the move that would put us over the top vs just getting a SP when we need 2-3 of them.  I would be much more in favor if this was part of a bigger trade that would also get us Luis Castillo.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I saw Chase Petty pitch in a scrimmage at Hammond Stadium on Thursday. He was impressive, especially his secondary stuff. Petty is known for his big 100mph fastball, but he was striking out guys (Severino & Tatum) and drawing weak contact on sliders andchange-ups. I was looking forward to watching him blossom into a top-of-the-rotation starter. This one could haunt.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Baseball Trade values has Gray listed at a value of 28.3.  Peguero, the other pitcher acquired is only .10.  Petty on the other hand has a listed value of 4.80.  The Twins CRUSHED this trade.  Look, I hate to see Petty go.  He was an intriguing prospect.  But he's YEARS away.  For this season and next at a minimum Sonny Gray is a GREAT addition.  I agree with those who are disappointed we didn't add someone like Bassitt.  But when you STEAL Gray away from the Reds like the Twins did here, you can package something to Oakland for Montas.  Players in play for that type of move would include:  Arraez, Larnach, Lewis, Martin, some of our young pitchers.  The point is, we have the firepower, should we choose to use it, to acquire a SP like Montas to pair with Gray at the top of our rotation and certainly compete for a playoff spot.  Let's hope there is more to come.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

    Add Story for SS, 3 or 4 good relievers, and we're on to something here.

    Sort of funny in light of adding IK-F yesterday, but I was a big fan of adding Story and Starling Marte back in November.

    Now it is time to see the positive in the recent moves and there has just got to be one more big addition to the rotation and perhaps just one relief pitcher. I have thought since last November that the actual budget would be below $120 million, but if it goes higher a left fielder would be nice too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, Brandon said:

    This move is a head scratcher in that this is the first win now move they made all offseason.  All of the other moves  said this is a transition year.  We could have had Bassit for so much ch less

    Even having said that the Twins easily could've afforded the kind of value the Mets gave in the Bassitt trade, I don't think they really gave up more here.

    Getting Gray and IKF in two days without giving up any high-minors pitching seems to indicate that they're trying to be relevant for 2022 but also ramping up for the next few seasons.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

    This gives the Twins one quality MLB starter. Four to go.

     

    Add Story for SS, 3 or 4 good relievers, and we're on to something here.

    Ober & Ryan aren't quality? Guess we should never bother developing prospects.

    and the bullpen needs maybe 1-2 guys, not 3-4. Rogers, Alcala, Duffey, and Thielbar are quality by any reasonable standard and Cotton & Garza Jr are decent veteran options to start a season. Add 1 RHP option and let guys compete for the last spot and you're there.

    But this is about Gray, who is a great fit for the Twins with a very affordable option for next season if he continues to pitch well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, jmlease1 said:

    Very interesting. While I liked Petty as a prospect, he was 3 years away, minimum...and high school pitchers have a rough track record.

    Exactly. Let's put this into context a little... Petty's 50th percentile outcome is a decent reliever and he has a near-zero chance of seeing a Twins uniform before the 2025 season.

    So yeah, I'll trade that for two years of Sonny Gray all day, every day.

    Now go get Pineda.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wow, two days in a row of me defending this FO. I really liked this move. Obviously, Petty could turn into a HOF and burn us for generations but that's probably unlikely. But the FO is playing to win and not for the future. Good for them.

    The Twins have a strong offense. Adding IKF improved our up the middle defense. And as soon as that's done, the FO goes out and gets a solid starter who is also a ground ball pitcher. Makes sense. They aren't done but they are obviously not throwing in the towel on this year which makes me very happy. The staff still needs upgrades but they are making the right moves, IMO. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I get that there is a bit of flotsam on the 40 man roster - but +3 and -1 over the weekend means two spots needed?  Does a pause on the rule 5 draft work in the Twins favor in this case?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, Sielk said:

    I am honestly surprised to see so many negative reactions to this trade. Everyone wanted pitching, after all.

    Yes, Petty is a very good prospect but he is also not even 19 years old and this farm system has a TON of RHPs. Anytime you trade away a prospect there is a chance that he could become something. There is also a decent chance Petty is a bust and the Twins get Sonny Gray for free.

    You gotta give up something in a trade and I would rather give up Petty than someone like Winder who will probably help the Twins a lot in the near future. 

    I like this one much better than the Garver trade!

    I agree, I don't understand the angst of training a #26 overall pick years away from a mlb shot for an established controlled top 30 pitcher in baseball.  I feel Jay's gave up much more for Berrios.  Well done.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don’t like the move. Good for 2022 sure and might not be bad in the long run. But the problem is the Twins should be going into full on rebuild mode. This is the move of a FO that is insecure it won’t be around in two years or even one. Falvey and Levine don’t have the equity with the organization and fan base to go into a rebuild mode because their failings are the reason it’s needed. Thus a move like this done in desperation to “compete” this year. A competitive pitching staff is not going to be built here in 3 weeks, and the FO is making moves in hopes of saving their own jobs in the short term. These things never end well and are part of the cycles of organizations that spend full generations in the league’s doldrums 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    26 minutes ago, Sielk said:

    Also, to give up just one single prospect when the Twins have 7-8 other SP prospects that are roughly the same tier as Petty? That's dealing from a position of strength and I would do that anytime. 

    There is a non-zero chance Peguero has a better career than Petty.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the Twins are not in the playoff chase this year, will Sonny Gray survive the trade deadline?  With that option year they can abort this deal pretty easily and still get a good return.

     

    That seems to be the Twins mentality this offseason, make a soft run at a turnaround with an ability to do another small-scale selloff at the deadline if it fails.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, twinsfaninsaudi said:

    I don’t like the move. Good for 2022 sure and might not be bad in the long run. But the problem is the Twins should be going into full on rebuild mode. This is the move of a FO that is insecure it won’t be around in two years or even one. Falvey and Levine don’t have the equity with the organization and fan base to go into a rebuild mode because their failings are the reason it’s needed. Thus a move like this done in desperation to “compete” this year. A competitive pitching staff is not going to be built here in 3 weeks, and the FO is making moves in hopes of saving their own jobs in the short term. These things never end well and are part of the cycles of organizations that spend full generations in the league’s doldrums 

    I disagree. Our core - Buxton, Kepler, Polanco, Sano, Donaldson, even Larnich, Arreaz and Jeffers are 25 or older. They are in "win-now" territory. It's the FO's job to keep this window open and add to it. They are doing that. I'm still worried about the pitching but a staff of Gray, Ryan, Bundy is a start. I'm sure they'll add more. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, Sielk said:

    Also, to give up just one single prospect when the Twins have 7-8 other SP prospects that are roughly the same tier as Petty? That's dealing from a position of strength and I would do that anytime. 

    And depending on what they prioritize in the team's direction, other pitching prospects might be more valuable to them than Petty. If the front office believes the team is entering a stronger period of contention in a year or two with the next group of talent coming up, they should prefer to deal Petty rather than more advanced pitchers from a similar tier.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...