Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • The Minnesota Twins, Zach Duke and Best Practices


    Parker Hageman

    Thanks to KFAN’s Paul Lambert, who leaked out on Christmas morning that the Minnesota Twins and 34-year-old relief pitcher Zach Duke had reached an agreement, people like me spent the remainder of the holiday ignoring their family and going over scouting reports and video of Duke.

    On Tuesday, the Twins made it official, announcing they have signed Duke to a reported one-year, $2 million deal with a potential to earn another $1.5 million with performance bonuses. As far as free agent relief arms go, it’s a modest sum and notably less than the $5 million per year deal he signed with the White Sox three years ago.

    On the surface, a one-year contract to a Tommy John surviving journeyman left-handed reliever who can’t crack 90 appears uninspired. However, if you look closer, there is the possibility this becomes a very savvy, very valuable move by this front office.

    Image courtesy of Jeff Curry-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    When Duke transitioned into a reliever, he noticed that the majority of the bullpenners were chucking mid-90s heat. Duke never averaged a season over 90 miles per hour in his entire career. He needed something that would help him get hitters out, he needed deception. It was while with the Brewers, Duke began occasionally dropping his arm slot and alternating from a three-quarter and sidearm look.

    Sometimes hitters got his normal look…

    CpPQdNw.gif

    ...And sometimes they got his drop-down slot.

    KcNBory.gif

    It launched his best statistical season of his career. Duke’s ground ball rate shot up to near 60 percent and he struck out over 30 percent of hitters faced. That offseason, the Chicago White Sox signed him to a three-year, $15 million deal. Duke continued to post those solid numbers (with an unfortunate spike in home runs allowed with Chicago but, hey, it’s windy there) and he was ultimately traded to St. Louis where he tore his UCL and required Tommy John surgery in October 2016.

    Written off for the 2017 season, Duke made a hard-charge comeback from the surgery and was back in the Cardinals’ bullpen by the end of July of this past year -- a little over ten months removed from his UCL rebuild. The 266 recovery days is the shortest turnaround in the Tommy John era.

    If Duke is healthy -- and his medical tests by the Minnesota Twins prior to signing a one-year deal suggests that he is -- there is no reason to think that he cannot replicate a similar level of production as he provided the Brewers, White Sox and Cardinals.

    That being said, there is a way Duke might actually be *better* going forward because of this one simple fact: He has been infinity better when throwing from the lower arm slot.

    The numbers, courtesy of Statcast, between Duke’s regular three-quarter slot and his sidearm slot are stark. Since 2015, Statcast has tracked 2,351 pitches from him -- 1,249 have been thrown from the three-quarter slot (53%) and 1,023 (44%) were thrown from the sidearm slot. Now, take a look at the difference in results:

    Zach Duke.PNG

    That’s huge. Everything from the lower arm slot is getting better results: More ground balls, more strikeouts, less solid contact. Imagine instead of saying “Three-Quarter” and “Sidearm” that chart said “Pitcher A” and “Pitcher B”. Wouldn’t you want to have “Pitcher B” on the mound for you? Given the data, it makes one wonder why Duke wouldn’t transition to the lower arm slot full-time.

    Some would argue that Duke’s multiple and varied arm slots actually enhances his lower arm slot -- something like throwing a fastball from the three-quarter slot sets up his slider from down below. The logic is that with the variation, hitters will have to look for a wider release window for the pitch. However, hitters appear to be able to pick up the ball fairly effortlessly from the three-quarter slot so it is safe to assume that Duke’s lower arm slot is not enhancing his three-quarter slot (or, if it is, marginally so).

    In many ways, asking Duke to favor the sidearm slot is akin to the development teams have had over the last few seasons of encouraging pitchers to lean heavily on their breaking balls. According to Fangraphs, Yankees pitchers threw a league-low 44% fastballs last season. Not far behind them were the Indians, Rays and Astros -- all forward-thinking, data-driven front offices. Hitters made more contact against fastballs. They were having more success against that pitch. Why not have your pitchers throw their best pitch more often?

    Same thing should be asked about Duke. Why not focus on pitching the way which provided the most success?

    Duke’s deception isn’t that he gives them different looks. His deception is releasing the ball from an angle that hitters don’t see that often. In 2017, there were 180 left-handed pitchers who released the ball within the similar vertical window as Duke did from three-quarter slot. There were just 43 who threw from the same vertical window as he did from the sidearm slot -- and most of those pitchers did it less than a handful of times. In the first group hitters saw 154,000 pitches come from that angle. From the latter, they saw just 6,200.

    The more you dig into the numbers, the clearer it is that Duke should be throwing from the lower slot at a higher rate than he has been in the past. Save the three-quarter slot to mess with a hitter’s vision.

    This Twins have beefed up their front office, including adding Josh Kalk (a pitching data pioneer in the PitchFX era) to the analytics team, and have plenty of sharp individuals who have reviewed this exact data and possibly came to the same conclusion. If the organization’s analytics arm actually identified this potential, ran it by the decision-makers, and they were able to secure a low-cost reliever who has a decent upside with a minor modification, that would be a super savvy maneuver never seen in these parts.

    Either way, even if they don’t get Duke to reduce his reliance on the three-quarter arm slot, the Twins still have themselves a decent bullpen arm at a substantially low cost.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    You have got to be kidding! I liked Duke when he first came up but he has never been successful yet has lasted a long time- probably because he is a lefty. The only thing this signing does is cost the team a roster spot for a young prospect. Why can't Rogers do what Duke is proposed to do? And now I read they may be going after Napoli. Yuck! Bring back Park instead. It's the same difference. Maybe these signings would make sense if someone gets hurt but I can't see it helping at all.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Not much cost, not much upside.  I just hope if he sucks, he doesn't clog the system to save face to the F.O. signing him.  Will he block Jay from moving up by July? 

     

    I just hope that Jay gets to the show, period. He was horrible in the AFL.

     

    And hey..... Nolasco is still on the market......

    Edited by h2oface
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don’t think the ideas that this was a shrewd signing as well as mildly disappointing are mutually exclusive. My response was that it was a solid move but not the impact move so many of us have been waiting for and thus a little underwhelming. The small moves of this offseason will be viewed vastly differently depending on the rest of the offseason. For my part I am nervous that so much of our offseason speculation has revolved around signing YD. Realistically this is a low probability scenario given the multiple suitors with cash and a WS opportunity. It is probably good to remember that not long ago we thought we had a real shot at Ohtani.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Another signing that, if it was the icing on the cake—the 5th or 6th best upgrade to the staff—it would be a nice gamble.

     

    As a featured move? Something they appear to be depending on? Consider me underwhelmed.

     

    Either all those other GMs paying for actual bullpen help are wrong...or Falvine are wrong. I guess we’ll see.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Another signing that, if it was the icing on the cake—the 5th or 6th best upgrade to the staff—it would be a nice gamble.

    As a featured move? Something they appear to be depending on? Consider me underwhelmed.

    Either all those other GMs paying for actual bullpen help are wrong...or Falvine are wrong. I guess we’ll see.

    This move would appear to be so minor in the eyes of the management that it was not leaked to any of the usual people.  A producer of a morning talk show that occasionally does baseball gets the "scoop".  Duke at worst is competition for Boshers, at best insurance that Taylor Rogers does not get run into the ground. Any Twins fan who would think of this as a "signature move" has already forgotten about Rodney. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This move would appear to be so minor in the eyes of the management that it was not leaked to any of the usual people. A producer of a morning talk show that occasionally does baseball gets the "scoop". Duke at worst is competition for Boshers, at best insurance that Taylor Rogers does not get run into the ground. Any Twins fan who would think of this as a "signature move" has already forgotten about Rodney.

    The only chance Duke doesn't start the season in the Twins bullpen is injury.

     

    This isn't "minor," this and Rodney are the 2 biggest moves of the off-season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The only chance Duke doesn't start the season in the Twins bullpen is injury.

    This isn't "minor," this and Rodney are the 2 biggest moves of the off-season.

    This is a one year deal for very little money. It is not a major deal. That it is one of the few moves so far this off season is no big deal unless you hobby is making mountains out of molehills.  Nobody has signed front line starters yet other than Ohtani. Other than the Miami sell offs, Longoria and Kinsler have been the only major trades.  Santana, Cozart and relief pitchers are what have been signed. The very few Miami fans that exist should be the only ones upset at this point.  Colorado fans can be happy they have a bullpen.  Yankee fans can be happy with their gift. Everybody else is still waiting. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The only chance Duke doesn't start the season in the Twins bullpen is injury.

     

    This isn't "minor," this and Rodney are the 2 biggest moves of the off-season.

    Concur. Minor league contracts with an invite to Spring Training are minor. Filling a 40-man roster spot means, at minimum, some kind of decision would have to be made in order to change course later. Especially the last 40-man spot. The evident intention with this signing is to include the pitcher on the active roster on Opening Day. It's not a signature signing, but it's not a thoughtless/offhand one either.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Love these kinds of signings, bullpen is such a funny thing I hate to throw money at guys.  I just want options and if you hit on 2 more then you did last year the bullpen will be in good shape.  If you have to release a guy making 2.5 million in the middle of June I don't care.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Love these kinds of signings, bullpen is such a funny thing I hate to throw money at guys. I just want options and if you hit on 2 more then you did last year the bullpen will be in good shape. If you have to release a guy making 2.5 million in the middle of June I don't care.

    Like Chief said, these kind of signings are fine, even great if you're filling out the 6th/7th option in a bullpen.

     

    Is it too much to ask to have one proven, great reliever or starter? Because as it stands right now the back end of the bullpen looks like Duke/Hildenberger in the 8th, and Rodney closing it out. There's not a lot of room for error...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Like Chief said, these kind of signings are fine, even great if you're filling out the 6th/7th option in a bullpen.

     

    Is it too much to ask to have one proven, great reliever or starter? Because as it stands right now the back end of the bullpen looks like Duke/Hildenberger in the 8th, and Rodney closing it out. There's not a lot of room for error...

    It's not clear there was a great option out there.

     

    Certainly there were *better* options, but not clear they are good investments considering the years. I'm glad they passed on Davis at that price and years (assuming it is instead spent on a starter).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's not clear there was a great option out there.

     

    Certainly there were *better* options, but not clear they are good investments considering the years. I'm glad they passed on Davis at that price and years (assuming it is instead spent on a starter).

    I felt Bryan Shaw was a good bet considering his track record, durability, and live arm.

     

    Unless bullpenning in the playoffs fades away, the years and salary rate is only going to increase.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I felt Bryan Shaw was a good bet considering his track record, durability, and live arm.

     

    Unless bullpenning in the playoffs fades away, the years and salary rate is only going to increase.

    Considering the champion wasn't bullpenning and basically ended up with no relivers they trusted at the end, I'm not sure the strategy is completely set. I think it's a little overstated.

     

    I do agree costs will rise, but that it's also a fool's game to chase them in free agency.

     

    (I actually was on board with signing a more established reliever for multiple years, but after more research I changed my mind). I support this method of bargain, short term buys and throwing numbers at it more than dollars.

     

    That said, the money "saved" needs to be invested in at least one starter, if not two, and perhaps a bat too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Like Chief said, these kind of signings are fine, even great if you're filling out the 6th/7th option in a bullpen.

    Is it too much to ask to have one proven, great reliever or starter? Because as it stands right now the back end of the bullpen looks like Duke/Hildenberger in the 8th, and Rodney closing it out. There's not a lot of room for error...

     

    I like several prospects to become as big or bigger successes then Hildenberger.  Yeah I would like a proven free agent but there were only 2 or 3 of those guys and even they had a chance to fall flat.  I think we're very close to a good bullpen and you make the moves to make it great at the deadline not now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...