Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • "Unwritten Rule" Gets Max Kepler Hit By A Pitch


    John  Bonnes

    If you didn’t stay up last night to watch the ninth inning of the Twins blowout 13-6 win over the Texas Rangers (hey, we’re not judging), you missed a little in-game drama. Jake Cave hit a 3-0 pitch for a single, violating an unwritten rule in a blowout win, and teammate Max Kepler paid the price. Tom Froemming documented the video and radio calls of the play for us on Twitter:

    Image courtesy of © Jesse Johnson-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    https://twitter.com/TFTwins/status/1162222346414878721?s=20

    It’s an interesting sequence. As color commentator Roy Smalley noted, there is no way Twins manager Rocco Baldelli gave Cave the green light on that pitch. It looks like first base coach Tommy Watkins said something to Cave when he reached first base, and Cave immediately seems to gesture towards the pitcher that he is sorry, and made a mistake.

    The Rangers pitcher (to his credit, I suppose?) threw the pitch at rib level at Kepler, but it was a 93 mph fastball. Hopefully this act of vengeance puts an end to any ill-will regarding Cave’s brain cramp. (And I hope Cave bought Kepler a big steak, possibly to soak on top of the bruise.)

    I’d sure love to hear what everyone thinks of the unwritten rule, and the apparent retaliation. Would your opinion be any different if a Twins pitcher was the retaliating pitcher?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Absolutely have to plunk one of their guys tonight, IMO.

     

    One AAAA batter swinging at another AAAA pitcher’s 3-0 pitch does not warrant hitting one of the best players in the league and opening him up to injury during a pennant race in late August.

     

    Cave is trying to establish himself in the majors. It could mean millions of dollars for him and his family. Why the hell shouldn’t he take any cookie the pitcher gives him?

     

    If the Rangers had a good player, I’d say throw at that guy. They’ll just have to pick someone else.

    Edited by Darius
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Yep. The pitcher is kind of a dumbass here, because you can't demand fidelity to unwritten rules if you ignore them yourself and the whole "hat tip" apology is one of the oldest ones out there.

     

    And of course, traditionally when enforcing an unwritten rule against a teammate of the rule-breaker the pitcher never would throw their best fastball, nor would it ever get near the head. Nor do you wait multiple pitches to do it...are we sure this pitcher doesn't just suck? :P

    In other words ... have we all just made a mountain out of a molehill? :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Alright, let's go down this road:

     

    If swinging 3-0 is unsportsmanlike, then both the Twins and Rangers are accepting the fact that the game is secured for the Twins. 

     

    So should the pitcher just lob balls into the zone?

     

    If the Rangers get a few runs back in the 9th and load the bases up, should they just stop swinging? The game was already decided for the Twins, so it's not fair that the Rangers win it after that.

     

    Should the game be played after that altogether?

     

    This isn't a timed game. Each team gets the opportunity to make 27 outs if they need it. The Rangers had only made 24 at that time. Unless Hunter Pence, the tying run in the 9th, would have let his bat rest on his shoulder and looked at strike 3, miss me with this "unwritten rule". 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Just checked the box score of the NYY/Cle game last night - no intentional HBP in the 8th while Cleveland ran up the score with 1 out. Apparently not everyone is keen on the unwritten rules.

    I heard Francona made Allen and Santana send written apologies to the Yankees for hitting HRs against a position player.

     

    Or maybe not.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Yep. The pitcher is kind of a dumbass here, because you can't demand fidelity to unwritten rules if you ignore them yourself and the whole "hat tip" apology is one of the oldest ones out there.

     

    And of course, traditionally when enforcing an unwritten rule against a teammate of the rule-breaker the pitcher never would throw their best fastball, nor would it ever get near the head. Nor do you wait multiple pitches to do it...are we sure this pitcher doesn't just suck? :P

    Kelley is a bit of a red-ass - I remember when he was pitching for Washington last year the manager came to take him out and he pitched a fit and threw his glove down.  Washington released him after that episode.    Also about a month ago he was called in to pitch and hurt his arm warming-up and had to come out before throwing a pitch - he also reacted angrily then coming into the dugout and throwing his glove (with his good arm - lol ).   So I am pretty sure this was on purpose.        

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've been critical of Cave's decision-making in the outfield, but I guess I have to broaden it to say that he periodically makes decisions that his peers would not make. Visionary? Or just not paying attention through 7 years of pro ball, as to how everyone else plays the game?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Notice that Bremer and Smalley were surprised Cave swung 3 and 0. They know the "rule." Tommy Watkins knows the "rule"--that's why he said something to Cave at first base. Cave knows the "rule"--he likely had the count wrong in his mind at that time, so he swung the bat at the pitch. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I personally love the unwritten rules and the history that they bring to the game.  If a player feels that an unwritten rule has been broken, I don't mind if he retaliates, within reason.  

     

    That said, I must be honest in saying that I have never heard of this unwritten rule.  It doesn't even make sense to me.  By swinging, Cave is moving the game along towards the end.  His BABIP is lower than his percentage to draw a walk from that count (especially considering that the next 3 pitches were out of the strike zone).  Also, what is gained by him waiting for one more pitch?  If it would have been out of the strike zone, is he obligated to swing so that the pitcher saves face from a 4-pitch walk?

     

    I also would believe that unwritten rules would require the Giants to wait until Cave is back up to the plate to exact justice.  Waiting until he was backed into another 3-0 count before plunking Kepler just points to the fact that Kelley wasn't primarily concerned with enforcing unwritten rules, he was just a frustrated pitcher who took out his anger on an opposing batter.  There's no place for that in my opinion.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I love how we're whining about players whining about how baseball is conducted.

     

    I love the unwritten rules. More fights. More brawls. Make the game more fun.

     

    Here's the baseball codes write up on the matter by Jason Turbow. Great book for baseball fans.

     

    https://thebaseballcodes.com/2019/08/16/twin-hacks-3-0-gets-teammate-plunked-reminds-us-that-people-still-pay-attention-to-this-kind-of-thing/

    So many head scratching details in that article.

     

    Here is one that particularly stands out to me:

     

    "Francona brushed it off as no big deal, saying that his mind had been wrapped around devising ways for the Red Sox to come back in the final frame and that he hadn’t even noticed."

     

     

    So, the opposing manager is devising a way to come back and win the game, but the other team isn't supposed to attempt to expand the lead?

    This is baffling logic to me.

     

    That article didn't make anything clearer to me. It's chock full of contradictory logic, such as the notion that taking a pitch is supposed to expedite the finish of the game.

     

    Really, the only thing that article did for me is leave me with an absolute disgust for Ron Gardenhire. Reading this completely explains why his teams had zero success in the playoffs.

     

    While Terry Francona is focused on scratching and clawing at any opening to come back and win the game, Gardenhire is dragging his young player to a back alley meeting with the opposing manager to apologize for having the audacity to try to play aggressive baseball.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The pitcher should have been ejected along with the manager. And both should be fined. And unwritten rules ain’t worth the paper they ain’t written on. I understand not doing a squeeze bunt up 8 runs, but not trying to hit a pitch down the pipe would be bush league, like not running out a ground ball out. It’s a matter of integrity. You try your best every play. Fans didn’t pay to watch you tank a play. Cave had nothing to apologize for.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Absolutely have to plunk one of their guys tonight, IMO.

    One AAAA batter swinging at another AAAA pitcher’s 3-0 pitch does not warrant hitting one of the best players in the league and opening him up to injury during a pennant race in late August.

    Cave is trying to establish himself in the majors. It could mean millions of dollars for him and his family. Why the hell shouldn’t he take any cookie the pitcher gives him?

    If the Rangers had a good player, I’d say throw at that guy. They’ll just have to pick someone else.

     

    Retaliate for a stupid move by the Rangers with a stupid move of our own, thus inviting a beanball war and putting our players at even more risk of injury? Brilliant.

     

    The Rangers have nothing to lose. They're not making the playoffs so I'm sure they'd be happy to oblige in that asshattery rather than actually playing the game. Beat the hell out of them on the scoreboard where it actually matters.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If throwing at players is not acceptable, then the umpires screwed up since apparently everyone on the field knew it was coming.

     

    If you are not trying to win, then don't shift.  And throw strikes if you want to get the game over with faster.

     

    When Cave's in arbitration will the team be willing to adjust his statistics for the at-bats where he wasn't supposed to try?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Absolutely have to plunk one of their guys tonight, IMO.

     

    One AAAA batter swinging at another AAAA pitcher’s 3-0 pitch does not warrant hitting one of the best players in the league and opening him up to injury during a pennant race in late August.

     

    Cave is trying to establish himself in the majors. It could mean millions of dollars for him and his family. Why the hell shouldn’t he take any cookie the pitcher gives him?

     

    If the Rangers had a good player, I’d say throw at that guy. They’ll just have to pick someone else.

    Disagree. More violence is not the answer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If throwing at players is not acceptable, then the umpires screwed up since apparently everyone on the field knew it was coming.

     

    If you are not trying to win, then don't shift. And throw strikes if you want to get the game over with faster.

     

    When Cave's in arbitration will the team be willing to adjust his statistics for the at-bats where he wasn't supposed to try?

    Everyone read that last part. Is Cave supposed to what? Take a strike and maybe then make an out?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think this escalates - especially if Texas blows out the Twins one of these next 3 games.

     

    If the Rangers are up 15-4 or something, I wouldn't put it past a guy like Trevor May or something to zip one into the rib cage of a guy like Hunter Pence or Elvis Andrus.

     

    Kepler's the best all around player the Twins have. I think if a score gets out of hand, someone on Texas will pay before Sunday's over.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't know why cave would swing at a 3-0 pitch under any circumstances without specific instructions to. He's not Cruz, he should get fined by the Twins or chewed out for losing track of the count if that was the situation.

     

    I don't care what the score was. The Twins have trouble with their pitching and no lead is safe as evidence by the the Yankees scoring 9 runs in the last 3 innings to win 14-12 a couple weeks back. If I was Baldelli I would be pissed if they were laying down at the end of game since they are trying to win the division.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Notice that Bremer and Smalley were surprised Cave swung 3 and 0. They know the "rule." Tommy Watkins knows the "rule"--that's why he said something to Cave at first base. Cave knows the "rule"--he likely had the count wrong in his mind at that time, so he swung the bat at the pitch. 

    I look forward to when this old style of thinking is dead and gone. 

     

    It is a common sense unwritten rule. You're up 8 in the 9th and the count is 3-0. You don't swing. Cave swung. The next better Kepler got beaned in the gentlest of possible ways. Kepler didn't get mad. Baldelli didn't get mad. It's baseball. This is how baseball is played. It's a great unwritten rule.

    Why don't you swing? You potentially hit the ball into play and get out, thus quickening the game. I just find it unbelievable where there is a situation in baseball where you are not allowed to swing at a pitch in the strike zone, and if you do, one of your batters will be hit with a 90+ MPH pitch. 

     

    Why would it suddenly be OK if Cave swung at a 3-1 pitch and got a hit - would the pitcher get pissy then, to? Why don't the batters just give up and get the game over with? What if the pitcher throws a ball out of the strike zone on the 3-0 count, and Cave swings and misses?

     

    Vanimal perfectly stated this - it'd be like if NBA players were not allowed to take shots in a blowout, or how about in soccer, you wouldn't be allowed to attempt shot on goals, you'd just have to kick the ball back and forth, or in hockey, you'd just have to pass the puck back and forth.

     

    But no, I guess "this is how baseball is played" - you're only allowed to try and hit in specific situations and appease bad teams and bad pitchers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As noted in the game thread, this unwritten rule is derived from a bunch of highly competitive professionals who do this over the course of six month and in many cases have to play each other again the next day/week/month. It's a little professional courtesy of "don't pile on when the game is out of reach" combined with "let's all get through this one without anyone getting hurt". And in baseball (as with many sports), the players/managers have assumed the duty of enforcing these unwritten rules on the field (and one of the reasons for that was so that things stayed on the field).

     

    If you think this is all stupid, you are entitled to your opinion. As with all unwritten rules, they do tend to evolve and change over the years (and new ones will be created) as player's attitudes about the game change. For example, players fraternizing with each other from different teams used to be a non-starter (and at one point crossed from unwritten rule to written rule) and it's completely gone away.

     

    Attitudes towards sportsmanship in this country are changing and evolving and that impacts how people perceive this. there are people who think the concept of sportsmanship is entirely outdated as it applies to professional athletics, because of the professional nature of the game. YMMV on whether that's true or not, or good or not.

     

    There are others who look at baseball's traditions as a way to preserve a cherished view of the past, where the things they liked about baseball's "glory years" are celebrated, including things like unwritten rules, while other aspects are ignored or discarded (racism, drug use, etc.).

     

    I will say some of the comps people have been providing from other sports are a little silly: being up by 8 in the 9th is NOT the equivalent to being up by 10 with 2 minutes left in a basketball game...even in today's homer-happy era.

     

    Part of me likes baseball's unwritten rules because they are often a little dumb. Keeping the sport a little weirder, a little goofy and so on isn't always a bad thing.

    well stated! I disagree with pretty much every word, but it’s very well said. We’ve seen this bullpen give up 5 and 6 run leads on a regular basis. No such thing as out of hand.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I look forward to when this old style of thinking is dead and gone.

     

    Why don't you swing? You potentially hit the ball into play and get out, thus quickening the game. I just find it unbelievable where there is a situation in baseball where you are not allowed to swing at a pitch in the strike zone, and if you do, one of your batters will be hit with a 90+ MPH pitch.

     

    Why would it suddenly be OK if Cave swung at a 3-1 pitch and got a hit - would the pitcher get pissy then, to? Why don't the batters just give up and get the game over with? What if the pitcher throws a ball out of the strike zone on the 3-0 count, and Cave swings and misses?

     

    Vanimal perfectly stated this - it'd be like if NBA players were not allowed to take shots in a blowout, or how about in soccer, you wouldn't be allowed to attempt shot on goals, you'd just have to kick the ball back and forth, or in hockey, you'd just have to pass the puck back and forth.

     

    But no, I guess "this is how baseball is played" - you're only allowed to try and hit in specific situations and appease bad teams and bad pitchers.

    if we’re reduced to plunking players over petty crap, then let’s institute the mercy rule like little league.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How about they just play the damn game and not deliberately try to injure each other? I don't buy tickets to watch umpires come center stage, and I don't buy tickets to watch grumpy men express their false machismo. Most of all, I don't buy "rules" that are so shameful that brave men are too chicken to write them down on paper. 

     

    I believe in specialties and division of labor. Let boxers and MMA guys punch and kick each other for money. Baseball players are supposed to play baseball, period. We don't need them to remind us of the good old days of barbaric social ineptitude. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...