Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Mailbag: New Rules, Roster Cuts, Leadership


    Cody Christie

    A big thank you to everyone that sent in mailbag questions throughout the off-season. It has been fun to write on a variety of baseball related topics. This concept has generated some great discussion here at Twins Daily.

    With the season starting, I will be shifting away from the mailbag and diving into some regular season stories. Thanks again to everyone that submitted questions. Enjoy the off-season’s final mailbag article.

    Image courtesy of Seth Stohs, Twins Daily

    Twins Video

    https://twitter.com/Hey_Yo_Its_GMan/status/1106268868765462536

    Baseball’s new rules are certainly going to take some adjustment time. The three-batter minimum for pitchers is going to be one of the toughest adjustments but there are some ways to avoid the problem. An end of an inning can also signal the end of a player’s time on the mound. This could be helpful for the LOOGY (left-handed one out guy). If there are two outs in the inning, come in and get the out you need, and your day will be done.

    “I think without question it is the most significant strategic on-field change relative to the changes that were announced,” Falvey said. “That one’s going to be interesting for a subset of players. We’ve all long thought that there might be a player that’s a left-on-left situational guy and you worry a little less about his exposure against right-handed hitters. Well, that will change.”

    There are going to be situational players that are hurt by this rule. Front offices are going to have to change roster construction and managers are going to have to change what they do on the field. I don’t like that it takes away a strategy from teams. I also don’t think it will save that much time, since the ultimate goal is to speed up the pace of play.

    https://twitter.com/StevoFromSD/status/1106391527973113858

    Minnesota is slowly whittling down the roster. Over the weekend, Tyler Duffey was optioned to Triple-A and Chase De Jong was reassigned to minor league camp. Monday saw Tomas Telis, Brian Navarreto, and Randy Cesar sent to the backfields. This left 41 players in camp including 21 pitchers. There are also 10 non-roster invitees among the 41 remaining players.

    If I was creating the roster today…

    Rotation (5): Jose Berrios, Kyle Gibson, Jake Odorizzi, Michael Pineda, Martin Perez

    Bullpen (7): Trevor May, Blake Parker, Taylor Rogers, Trevor Hildenberger, Adalberto Mejia, Matt Magill, Addison Reed

    Catchers (3): Jason Castro, Mitch Garver, Willians Astudillo

    Infielders (5): CJ Cron, Jonathan Schoop, Jorge Polanco, Ehire Adrianza, Marwin Gonzalez

    Outfielders (4): Eddie Rosario, Byron Buxton, Max Kepler, Jake Cave

    DH (1): Nelson Cruz

    This will leave some players like Michael Reed open to waivers. Reed has the possibility of latching on with another team as a fourth outfielder, but it wouldn’t surprise me if he made it through waivers.

    https://twitter.com/nater79a/status/1106990948133883904

    On the offensive side of things, Adam Rosales has been having a great spring. Tom wrote about him as a possible winner of the Sire of Fort Myers. He’s 35-years old and the Twins seem to have some younger options ahead of him on the depth chart. Lucas Duda could have a shot too, but CJ Cron and Tyler Austin are ahead of him.

    The most likely non-roster choice might be on the mound. Ryne Harper has been outstanding this spring and Minnesota’s bullpen could offer him an opportunity. A player like Trevor Hildenberger has options left. Addison Reed has seen some rough spots this spring. Harper has certainly looked like he has earned a big-league job.

    https://twitter.com/dwj1965/status/1106987052887928834

    Things are definitely going to be different in the Twins clubhouse this season. Spring training already saw some of those changes with workouts and schedules changing. Baldelli is not that far removed from his own career. This should help him relate to his players. He’s also coming from a Tampa organization that was very forward-thinking.

    As far as leaders in the clubhouse, Nelson Cruz was signed to fill some of that veteran leadership role. He’s been one of the best home run hitters of the last decade and he brings instant credibility. Kyle Gibson is a strong leader in the rotation, and I think he could serve in that capacity for the entire pitching staff. Minnesota is entering the Byron Buxton and Miguel Sano era, so it would be nice to see them take on leadership roles as well.

    What are your thoughts on this week’s questions? Leave a COMMENT and start the discussion.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Be interested to see the fate of Austin. Will he get a temporary roster spot? And Reed, too, since Cave has options. I see Romero will probably start in the minors (and hopefully start). Curious to see how the AAA/AA rosters break out. A lot of names down there for those two teams, and looking at the Twins current minor league system, it is really really pitcher heavy!

     

    Also, Adrianza. Is he on the bubble? Could anyone not on the 40-man be added. That is a big hurdle. The Twins aren't exactly rich in release candidates with nearly a dozen minor league prospects on the 40-man. 

     

    And the death of the situational left, or a pitcher now appearing in more games than innings pitched...that will be a thing of the past!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Romero was awful/wild on Sunday, though he wasn't helped by a ball off of Austin at 1B and a bad play by Rosales at 3B. But did I miss something, somewhere, about him going to Rochester to begin the year? I could see it, for various reasons but he's also one of the best arms we have.

     

    I am NOT convinced Addison Reed makes the opening roster. After some solid appearances late in 2018 I thought he would be ready following the off season. But he has looked really bad.

     

    If you want to put your best team on the field, I'd say Reed is cut over Cave with hope Reed goes unclaimed. But Cave having an option means they could decide to give Reed a little more time.

     

    Speaking of options, there are various scenarios where Austin makes the club for an extended audition, especially with Sano beginning the season on the IR. Austin hasn't walked once the entire spring! And he struck out THREE TIMES on Sunday before his HR. But his BA and production and potential are interesting.

     

    I think Adrianza is safe. Poor Torreyes, he's destined for Rochester to begin the season.

     

    As to the THREE BATTER RULE...i just don't know. Seems a strange attempt to add interest. But a few points:

     

    1] It affects everyone, not just the Twins.

     

    2] Strategy doesn't go away, it just changes. Potentially, it's an interesting change.

     

    3] The end of an inning caveat changes the complexion. EXAMPLE: SP starts an inning and gets 1 out. LHRP comes in to face a LH batter. Gets him out we will say. Then he has to face a RH batter who walks or gets a hit. Unfortunately, it could be a run scoring hit. (Again, the rules affect BOTH teams). Then he faces another LH batter. Three batters, he's done, plus the inning is done. If he can get proposed RH batter out, the inning is done after only two batters.

     

    NOT saying I like it, but I don't think strategy is gone, just changed.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think Cave gets optioned and they keep Michael Reed.    Reed was a "cagey" move by the front office and I don't think they want to let him go yet.    I also think letting Austin go will end up being a 7-8 year regret.....so they find a way to keep him as well (more HOPING they keep him.)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Personally I won't be upset if Austin doesn't make it and is even lost. IMO he'd likely be a one year asset with Kiriloff, Rocker, and Larnach (forgive the sp) being close and have the ability to play OF. Nice as a bench bat maybe, but what else do you do with him?

     

    On the 3-bat rule, which happens next year, how in the world did teams manage before the LOOGY?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I also think losing Austin would lead to some regret. If he has a chance to start, he'd hit 35 HR and could be dangerous in the middle of the lineup somewhere. I bet a lot of teams would be interested in the guy if their 1st baseman goes down for the year. Speaking of which, lord forbid we don't keep Austin and Cron goes down with an injury...going to be some tough decisions in Fort Myers over the next week.

     

    As for Addison Reed, I'd be fine if the Twins just cut the guy. I prefer Jake Cave over Reed in the outfield and I think Cave earned his spot after what he did last year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Would love to have both at Rochester as injury insurance. I think we have to DFA them on the last possible day, hope they get through, and, if not, try to work a trade.     

     

    From what I understand the consensus is there's no way Austin clears waivers. The Twins will lose him if they don't bring him north.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Curious as to the source of the consensus that there's no way Austin clears waivers. I haven't really seen that said anywhere other than on this board. Of course, I don't read everything and haven't specifically been looking for that information either.

     

    It wouldn't really change my opinion on keeping him though. I just don't think he'll develop playing part time and that's all he'll get with the Twins. He really needs to be on a team like Baltimore, Seattle, KC or Detroit and play every day. Maybe a trade is a possibility?

    Concur. Even if it's true that he'll be picked up, I don't really care. He won't be a big loss.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I'd be looking to trade a number of our Bench players, for some minor league players.   We have back-ups to our back-ups with young guys on the way. 

     

    I think it's pretty normal for fans of teams like the Twins to take solace in the fact that our farm system is stacked. But that said: you never know which of these minor leaguers will actually work out. The odds highly unlikely that Kiriloff, Larnach, Lewis, Gordon, and Rooker are all going to be future all-stars. In fact some of them may not even get more than a cup of coffee. Like it or not, none of these prospects I just mentioned have proven anything in the bigs, and out of the 5 I listed the odds are that 1 of them becomes a long-term every-day player. That's why you can't just "trade your bench guys".

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the teams like Baltimore with a high waiver claim will wait to see who is available on waivers.

     

    Why make a deal for Austin? Wait and claim him or claim a similar player.

    If the Orioles are the only team who would have an interest, then that is that. But if some other team, with a lower waiver claim, also would like a first baseman, then our FO can talk turkey with them.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If the Orioles are the only team who would have an interest, then that is that. But if some other team, with a lower waiver claim, also would like a first baseman, then our FO can talk turkey with them.

     

    Orioles are in first position for waiver claims, right?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Orioles are in first position for waiver claims, right?

    Unless there's a recent change, up through the first month of the season it's the previous season's records that determine the waiver claim order. So, yes.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Addison Reed has shown NOTHING this Spring. Either DL him and send him to the Mayo Clinic or release him and let him count his 8 Million.

    Meanwhile, try to trade Austin, Reed, and/or Cave for whatever you can get; Out of options pitching or minor league talent.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'll throw my hat in the ring on Austin. The power he has doesn't come around every day and he's exactly the type of guy that we should turn into a "project", similar to a big guy with potential on a basketball team. I'm sure we're trying some things, but why can't we spend some time on him and deploy our new technology towards fixing some of his issues? Small sample size (and I acknowledge the 42 SO as something needing to be addressed by the technology referenced above) but 9 HR in 35 games is hard to ignore... 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Personally I won't be upset if Austin doesn't make it and is even lost. IMO he'd likely be a one year asset with Kiriloff, Rocker, and Larnach (forgive the sp) being close and have the ability to play OF. Nice as a bench bat maybe, but what else do you do with him?

     

    Austin isn't Babe Ruth but he is a proven MLB caliber player who can play every day at the top level in the sport. Wade, Kiriloff, Rooker, and Larnach are prospects - nothing more. We're biased and we see them as 4 future all-stars, but the odds are highly stacked against that. In reality, very few top prospects truly become long-term contributors. Like everyone else, I really hope these guys work out but we have to keep our expectations realistic. Even if they do become contributors, it'll probably take a few years for some of them to even hit above .230 at the major league level. Saying "just ditch Austin because Kiriloff is going to be better" isn't a good strategy.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Austin isn't Babe Ruth but he is a proven MLB caliber player who can play every day at the top level in the sport. Wade, Kiriloff, Rooker, and Larnach are prospects - nothing more. We're biased and we see them as 4 future all-stars, but the odds are highly stacked against that. In reality, very few top prospects truly become long-term contributors. Like everyone else, I really hope these guys work out but we have to keep our expectations realistic. Even if they do become contributors, it'll probably take a few years for some of them to even hit above .230 at the major league level. Saying "just ditch Austin because Kiriloff is going to be better" isn't a good strategy.

    Big hat I agree with your basic tenet here. However I did not refer to those prospects as future all-stars, but one of the three has a good chance to be a capable replacement. The fact that Austin is on the bubble indicates to me he could be easily replaced. There seems to be a sentiment that he'll become another Ortiz if we lose him. That as misplaced optimism as is the 3 prospects being all-stars.

    And again I did not say or even inferred Kiriloff would be better and they should just ditch him. Please don't put words in my mouth/comments. The fact remains Austin has warts, SO's, and is limited to one position. With that his value decreases and could be replaced fairly easily, i.e. Duda, and that's my point.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    IMO, Austin is a legitimate major league player on a team with a roster that can't utilize him well. There are several teams where his skill set would be a better fit. The question in my mind is what is longer-term value. What is his likely upside in the next couple of years. If he truly is a strong breakout candidate, the Twins should be able to find a team willing to give up something of real value. If it comes down to waivers, Austin's upside is probably considered pretty limited by MLB scouts. Even without much upside, I'm thinking that there are other rosters where he could hold a solid spot this season, so a trade would still be in order. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I guess I don’t see what Austin brings to the table that Kennys Vargas (a guy this organization and most on this board wrote off completely 2 years ago) didn’t.

    IMO they are literally the same player.

    btw, Vargas still has a career OPS + of 102 at the MLB level.

     

    I always liked Vargas! It seemed like he had such a small window and such a short leash. He hit a huge walk-off HR for the Twins in '17, great moment. But it almost seemed like the Twins didn't want him to succeed. He'd be immediately pulled if he went 0-3. Meanwhile the Twins let Buxton go up there and strike out 4 times per day for weeks in a row. It kind of shows how top prospects are treated vs. just "regular guys". I always thought Kennys had something to bring to the table but he just never got regular playing time. When the Twins re-claimed Vargas after Cincy grabbed him last year I kinda felt bad for the guy. I hope he hits 40 HR in Japan and comes back and gets another shot in the bigs.

     

    I think part of the reason I'm high on Austin is that I'm still chasing the Ghost of Aaron Hicks. Part of me wants to see Austin become the next Edwin Encarnacion and belt 38 HR per year for the Twins for the next 5 years. In your face, Yankees. My motivation is admittedly flawed.

     

    Man, the things we talk about in March, it's been a looonggg off-season. Can't wait 'til a week from now when we can get off these tangents and talk about what's happening at Target Field.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Despise the "3 batter rule" - clearly intended to suck more strategy out of the game.

     

    Will they pair it with "no pinch hitting"?    Of course not - but why not? 

     

    If the defense can't change pitchers for "match ups," why should the offense be allowed to?

     

    Bottom line, "management" thinks they need more offense, so they're trying to make defense more difficult.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...