Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Left Field In Need Of Upgrade


    Parker Hageman

    If there is one position that will be different for the Minnesota Twins in 2015, it appears that it will be left field. And if the team wants to reward it’s pitching staff, it should be a defensive-minded individual.

    Image courtesy of Image courtesy of Chris Humphreys, USA Today Sports

    Twins Video

    In 2014, the position originally was intended for the incumbent Josh Willingham but on April 7th he was sidelined with a fractured wrist from a Justin Masterson’s pitch. That forced Jason Kubel into duty. But before long the position turned over again when Kubel was DFA’d and Willingham was traded to the Royals at the non-waiver deadline. The Twins used a mixture of Chris Parmelee, Eduardo Nunez and Jordan Schafer to conclude the year.

    With the exception of Schafer, and a handful of games from Sam Fuld, this unit was not particularly good. In fact, you might say it was the worst in baseball, at least by advanced fielding metrics standards. According to Ultimate Zone Rating found at Fangraphs.com, the left field position held a -19.3 UZR, the worst in baseball. Over at BillJamesOnline.net, their Plus/Minus rating provided by BIS said the Twins left field was at -25.

    If you look toward Inside Edge’s scouted data -- how many balls which were hit to left field were converted into outs -- well, it gets just slightly better. Inside Edge assigns a catchability value to each play that is then loaded into their overall database. These are broken down into categories like 90%-to-100% catchable, 60%-to-90%, 40%-to-60% and so on. For the Twins, they managed to catch 98.7% (27 of 30) of all balls that fell within the 90%-to-100% range. In the 60%-to-90% range, they tracked down an MLB-worst 56% of those plays.

    Of course, advanced fielding metrics have flaws. Scouts have biases. In terms of just the raw counts, the Twins fared OK. A generous OK.

    According to ESPN/TruMedia’s data, the Twins left fielders faced 769 fly balls or line drives that traveled over 200 feet in the air and stayed in the ballpark. Of those, they managed to convert 59.9% into outs which was roughly comparable to the league average of 60.4%.

    For those following the playoffs and watching the Royals’ Alex Gordon, you might hear that he has been viewed as one of the best defenders in the game. Not just the best defender in left field: everywhere. According to Fangraphs.com’s UZR, his 25.0 mark is the best in baseball in all positions. He apparently did not just get that way by being born into in. Gordon has a pregame warmup routine in the field which is borderline psychotic:

    They call it "power shagging." Gordon will take his position in left field and react to every ball hit in his vicinity as if it occurred in a game situation, going through all the motions of his crow hop and chasing after every ball in the gap as if it were the ninth inning of a tied game.

    Center fielder Lorenzo Cain and right fielder Nori Aoki have started doing it, too. During Spring Training, video coordinator Mark Topping kept a camera on Gordon, broke the tape down into a three-minute highlight reel and sent it to all the affiliates as a teaching tool.

    "All right, boys, you want to win a Gold Glove in the big leagues? This is what it's going to take," Kuntz said. "Hit the tape, here we go, boom. And for three minutes they just sit there with their eyes going, 'Are you kidding me?!'"

    That’s how players go from good to great. If Aaron Hicks ultimately takes the left field role in 2015, he should adopt something similar to improve his game.

    Next to the Twins’ 769 total flies/liners hit in left field, the Royals are second in baseball. Whereas the Twins were below average in converting balls into outs, the Royals’ left fielders, headlined by Gordon, stopped 63.7% of those balls from becoming hits.

    For the visual learners, here is the ESPN/TruMedia spray charts associated with the two teams. Notice the significant real estate gap that does not contain hits from the Royals (right) compared to the Twins (left):

    MIN_KC Spray Chart.png

    Gordon has been a beacon of hope to his pitching staff when balls have been launched in his direction; he is particularly skilled at going back on balls. On the other hand, Twins pitchers have suffered due to the inability of getting back on plays such as this one.

    http://i.imgur.com/Lsdop8J.gif

    That Dayan Viciedo fly ball, which was catchable on the track, was turned into a triple thanks to the misplay. And if you look at the spray chart above, there are other examples of this happening. This was a far too common occurrence according to the data.

    While it may not seem critical to some, the defensive integrity of this position is important because of the nature of the Twins’ pitching staff. As high-contact, low-strikeout hurlers they tend to allow more batted balls in play. As mentioned above, the Twins had the highest number of liners and flies hit toward left field. Many of them were deemed catchable by Inside Edge’s scouts. At worst, failing to do so gives the opposing team more opportunities to score and at the very least it adds unnecessary pitches to a highly-compensated pitcher’s totals.

    Be it internal, through trade or free agency, employing a left fielder in 2015 who can turn more of these hits into outs should be a priority for the front office this offseason.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Hate to say this, but other than the 2 who are playing in the AFL right now (Buxton & Rosario,) the other high ranked Twins OF prospects (Harrison, Kepler, Walker) run about as well as Delmon Young. 

    As a professional Walker is 23 for 28 in stolen bases (82% success rate).   Thru College and Professional Career Walker is 63 for 69 in stolen bases (91% success rate.  He may not be a speed demon like Buxton, but he sure gets the most of his speed.  Not many get from 1st to 3rd faster or from 1st to home faster than Walker.  When he gets going he runs very well.  You won't find many who have seen him or even his coaches tell you otherwise.  Before you say that this is only "A" ball he is stealing bases in - Buxton is 72 for 96 in stolen base attempts (75% success rate).  Intangibles :).   Rosario is 69 for 106 in stolen base attempts thru AA (65% success rate).   And if you want to talk about his speed at a comparable level - Rosario was 4 for 11 in stolen base attempts while playing for the Miracle in his career.   In Low "A" Rosario was 11 for 22 while Walker was 10 for 10 (100% success rate).   Who did you say runs like Delmon Young again?  Intangibles

     

    Like most people - we all assume lighter in weight means faster.  Speed is about power and flexibility.  No one has longer strides than Walker other than maybe Goodrum and I would imagine no one has more powerful legs either.   He reminds me of a Cam Newton when he runs.  Deceivingly faster than he looks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Who thinks Daniel Ortiz should be looked at? I mean he actually plays all outfield positions played good amount of LF last year in AA and AAA. He hit very well in AA after struggling a little bit the year earlier, he then was promoted to AAA, struggled a little bit but held his own. If you don't know who he is, you should, look him up and his stats. Also just because he isn't even on the Twins Top Prospect list (at least I don't think so?)doesn't mean he shouldn't be looked cause he's got some tools.

     

    Ortiz

    -strong arm

    -some speed 7 SB

    -decent power 12 HR

    -needs to be more patient at the plate .303 OBP

    -young (24 yrs old)

    -good bat .285 AVG

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Who thinks Daniel Ortiz should be looked at? I mean he actually plays all outfield positions played good amount of LF last year in AA and AAA. He hit very well in AA after struggling a little bit the year earlier, he then was promoted to AAA, struggled a little bit but held his own. If you don't know who he is, you should, look him up and his stats. Also just because he isn't even on the Twins Top Prospect list (at least I don't think so?)doesn't mean he shouldn't be looked cause he's got some tools.

     

    Ortiz

    -strong arm

    -some speed 7 SB

    -decent power 12 HR

    -needs to be more patient at the plate .303 OBP

    -young (24 yrs old)

    -good bat .285 AVG

    I don't know about Ortiz winning a starting job, but I think he might get a shot as a fourth/fifth OF, depending on the exact roster makeup. From what I've seen and read about Ortiz plus a handful of PAs in Spring Training, he is a three-position OF who doesn't possess any one outstanding tool, but can do a little bit of everything. Right now, the Twins have LH hitters Schafer, Parmelee, and Rosario along with switch hitter Hicks all in the mix and probably ahead of Ortiz, but Parmelee and Schafer might not be retained. Hicks and Rosario are both coming off disappointing 2014 campaigns. Ortiz is a minor league free agent, but I have to believe the Twins will re-sign him.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    While the topic is left field, the reality is that both left and center are probably unsettled. The Twins have to decide about Danny Santana. If he goes to shortstop, two positions need to be filled. If the Twins decide that Santana is a shortstop, I think the club has to go outside the organization to get a major leaguer who is a plus fielder, most likely to play center. I think they should lean on internal options for left in that scenario.

     

    If Santana is your regular CF, then the competition should be wide open between several options. I really don't want to see Aaron Hicks in a Twins uni to start to 2015. He hasn't performed when the games count and he has shown the folly of believing in spring training numbers.

     

    I would peg the competition as between Schafer, if he is retained, Rosario, Parmelee and perhaps Daniel Ortiz. All but Parmelee would qualify as a step up defensively from the pretty bad defense we saw last year. All are LH hitters. It seems to me that the Twins could use a good defender who hits right handed. Peter Bourjos has been mentioned a lot, another guy to look at might be Craig Gentry. Gentry had concussion issues last year and would have to be acquired by trade unless Oakland cuts him loose.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To me, this is a futile discussion.  We don't yet have a manager, and the manager will have a big effect on the choice of outfielders.  We don't know if TR plans to bring in a high salary player, and if so, will it be a starter or an outfielder?  Will it be a FA or will it be obtained by trades.  Too many unknowns for this thread to be anything but the rankest of speculations.  :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A decent amount teams are going to go after the troubled but talented Colby Rasmus(28 yrs old) and he could cost more than we think so it might not be worth it, especially if he is most likely not apart of our future. But if we can't get him or decide not to we should go after Chris B Young(31 yrs old) or go after veteran platoon player Chris Denorfia(34 yrs old)

     

    Chris Young is actually a super realistic Free Agent for our Twins to sign , and could be a good fit. He is not that old yet (still a good athlete), fast, a (very) good defender, Ok patience at the plate, and has had pop in his bat since his debut. His defense is well needed in center or left and his bat ain't bad either his only issue is actually getting hits consistently (career avg is .230 something) but his short time with the yanks at the end of the season showed some promise. He's not our future but right now we need his DEFENSE and bat at low

    cost for high reward.

     

    Or

     

    Go sign free agent Chris Denorfia yeah he's a veteran but he's not our future but he would help this club in few areas like

     

    -veteran leadership (heart and hustle award for Padres)

    -good defense (Wilson award for Padres)

    -would be a great platoon player, hits Lefties good (platooned with Hicks in left)

    -isn't a liability hitting wise (look at stats with Padres)

     

    just a solid veteran player in everyway

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good post, ChrisKnutson. Yeah, lets bring in Denorfia and Young. We could have Herrmann, Colabello, Denorfia, Parmelee and Young. The Twins would lead the league in guys named Chris for sure.

    Seriously, I don't know much about either Denorfia or Young, but they would appear to be upgrades who could bridge the team to when the prospects are here. Of the current outfield candidates, Arcia, Schafer, Rosario, Daniel Ortiz, Parmelee, and Herrmann all hit left handed. It makes perfect sense to bring in a RH hitter who can play good defense. It looks like both Chrises fill the bill in that respect.

    Edited by stringer bell
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Haven't checked the stats, going off a bit of a gut feeling, but seeing as how the Royals pitching staff won them a game or two and has them poised to sweep every postseason game up till the WS, they might allow fewer balls to the OF.  The fact that the Twins recorded fewer outs in LF than the Royals is simply remarkable to me.  My guess is that Twins LFers had dozens more balls hit at them, but fewer recorded outs.  Again, just a guess that maybe more is going on here than simply Royals outs>Twins outs.

     

    The Twins had 696 chances in left field and the Royals had 683 chances which is roughly equal.  Looking at how pitching did impact the OF the Twins were roughly equal to the Royals in number of flyballs but the Twins had 21 more line drives hit to left field.  Maybe the Twins crappy pitching affected the Twins LF as much as the Twins crappy LF defense affected the pitching.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not sure if you heard, but Gardy was fired.  We may see a more modern baseball roster.

     

    I'll go out on a very short limb and predict that we see very little difference in the roster this year no matter who the manager is. 13 pitchers (on occasion) IS a modern baseball roster.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'll go out on a very short limb and predict that we see very little difference in the roster this year no matter who the manager is. 13 pitchers (on occasion) IS a modern baseball roster.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the position players aren't changed much. Basically the 12 who were on the squad when rosters were expanded and why not? That group scored runs as well as anyone. As others have pointed out, any additions need to help the team play better defense.

     

    On the other hand, the Twins need to shake up their pitching staff. I think the bullpen needs turnover and at least two starting jobs are wide open.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    From what I've read, Tomas is not getting the kind of offers the last guy got.....which isn't surprising to me. That might make is more likely they get in. My fear is that this market is no longer inefficient.....

    Edited by mike wants wins
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just want the Twins to get a player they can afford and can help the team.  The rumor I saw predicted 7yrs/$105M.  While the Twins SHOULD have money to spend, I don't see Ryan forking over that kind of money.  Honestly, I don't see that as a wise investment for the Twins.  Even a contract similar to Rusney Castillo's, I'm not sure I would be in.  Scouting reports make Thomas sound like another Arcia, big power and average speed at best.  I would have preferred they went after Rusney Castillo.  He sounds like a much better defensive player, something the Twins need.

    Edited by Physics Guy
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     Intangibles :).    Intangibles

    I'm not sure you know what "intangible" means. You quote a bunch of stats and then call them intangible. If they are measurable, then they are tangible.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Parmelee might end up being a good example of my biggest criticism of TR. There's perhaps hardly a team in baseball on which he'd represent an improvement, and guys like him are a commodity item, so he has almost no meaningful value. Not sure if he ever had a lot more value, but still, we may have another case of a guy being DFA'd for no return at all. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Parmelee might end up being a good example of my biggest criticism of TR. There's perhaps hardly a team in baseball on which he'd represent an improvement, and guys like him are a commodity item, so he has almost no meaningful value. Not sure if he ever had a lot more value, but still, we may have another case of a guy being DFA'd for no return at all. 

    Don't all teams end up having guys like this that don't pan out and aren't worth anything in trade?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Parmelee might end up being a good example of my biggest criticism of TR. There's perhaps hardly a team in baseball on which he'd represent an improvement, and guys like him are a commodity item, so he has almost no meaningful value. Not sure if he ever had a lot more value, but still, we may have another case of a guy being DFA'd for no return at all. 

     

    If there is "hardly a team in baseball in which he'd represent an improvement" how would he bring back much in meaningful return?

     

    Once he hit High A he never was that highly ranked as a prospect, so extremely doubtful he would have had any meaningful value in a trade at any point.

     

    As mentioned below, that happens to many prospects, and will happen again to some of the prospect corner guys we have some interest in right now - out of Walker, Harrison, Kepler, etc the odds are they probably won't make it, but 1 or 2 might. We'll look back and say it was a missed opportunity, but at the same time they have never really had trade value.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes, I agree completely that his value has been nominal for a long time, and maybe I'm being unfair using him as an example. I also recognize guys are going to have to be cut simply because the timing doesn't allow for a transaction to be pursued. Still, I just wonder if a deal couldn't be pursued more often by the Twins for guys like him. Maybe last year when he had marginally more value, off to a team with a more acute shortage of MLB OF options for their version of a Kanzler or Tanner English- a low level prospect like that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Still, I just wonder if a deal couldn't be pursued more often by the Twins for guys like him. Maybe last year when he had marginally more value, off to a team with a more acute shortage of MLB OF options for their version of a Kanzler or Tanner English- a low level prospect like that.

    I get your point, but is the odds of that hypothetical low level prospect even making it to MLB at all worth more than the odds of a guy already at MLB figuring it out to some degree?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I get your point, but is the odds of that hypothetical low level prospect even making it to MLB at all worth more than the odds of a guy already at MLB figuring it out to some degree?

     

    Odds maybe similar, but if you are going to cut Parmelee...you may as well try and trade him first.  Although i am guessing Terry does this regularly and in this case would not find anything.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Parm passed thru every team when he was outrighted to Rochester. At that point he had zero trade value. He added a third position (LF), hit very well against left handed pitching and pretty well as a pinch hitter. I think some National League team could look at that skill set and see something at this point. However, the yield in a trade would be pretty small or low percentage, I would guess.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Parm passed thru every team when he was outrighted to Rochester. At that point he had zero trade value.

    Actually, once he passed thru waivers, maybe he had a smidgen of value -- prior to that point, he required a 25 man roster spot, but once he cleared, he was basically a free nonroster AAA player for the season.  (Like Vance Worley was for the Pirates.)  Almost certainly not enough value to bring back a useful piece, of course, though (like Worley again).

     

    I certainly won't complain about not trading him -- my bigger complaint was how this mostly non-prospect on the easier side of the defensive spectrum was given so many chances over the last 3 years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Actually, once he passed thru waivers, maybe he had a smidgen of value -- prior to that point, he required a 25 man roster spot, but once he cleared, he was basically a free nonroster AAA player for the season.  (Like Vance Worley was for the Pirates.)  Almost certainly not enough value to bring back a useful piece, of course, though (like Worley again).

     

    I certainly won't complain about not trading him -- my bigger complaint was how this mostly non-prospect on the easier side of the defensive spectrum was given so many chances over the last 3 years.

    This has been typical for the Twins--many chances for marginal talent.  Especially if said player had "the mark of special" on his forehead (came in a trade, 1st round draft choice).  Plouffe owes his career to the "many chances" provided policy.  I think part of this is due to preferential treatment, part due to the overall lack of talent in the organization, and the rest to resistance to admit failure.  I don't expect this will change any time soon.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That's why I'm looking forward to (or hoping that) Eddie Rosario's bat plays in 2014 because I believe his defense in LF will be above average which could make him fairly valuable there if he can hit at all.

     

    I wish we were having that conversation before the 2014 season :)

     

    I see Rosario as a centerfielder in 2015.   The Twins OF defense war horrible in 2014 in all spots.  I kinda looked at that here, using, in addition to defensive metrics, batted ball data that are really revealing.   Hopefully the new manager will not play DHs or infielders in corner OF positions (Willingham, Colabello, Parmelee, Herrmann any more)   On the other hand, based on what Ryan said about Sano, I am not holding my breath...

     

    There is still hope for Arcia (and Hicks)  They are young.  If Koskie became an above average fielder, lots of things can happen, but it takes work.  And they three remaining aforementioned should go.  This team has enough DHs

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To me, this is a futile discussion.  We don't yet have a manager, and the manager will have a big effect on the choice of outfielders.  We don't know if TR plans to bring in a high salary player, and if so, will it be a starter or an outfielder?  Will it be a FA or will it be obtained by trades.  Too many unknowns for this thread to be anything but the rankest of speculations.  :)

    Of course it's a futile discussion at this point. But we have to have something to talk about before things actually heat up don't we? LOL

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Who thinks Daniel Ortiz should be looked at? I mean he actually plays all outfield positions played good amount of LF last year in AA and AAA. He hit very well in AA after struggling a little bit the year earlier, he then was promoted to AAA, struggled a little bit but held his own. If you don't know who he is, you should, look him up and his stats. Also just because he isn't even on the Twins Top Prospect list (at least I don't think so?)doesn't mean he shouldn't be looked cause he's got some tools.

    Ortiz

    -strong arm

    -some speed 7 SB

    -decent power 12 HR

    -needs to be more patient at the plate .303 OBP

    -young (24 yrs old)

    -good bat .285 AVG

    I like this.

     

    I've never dismissed Ortiz, but it is easy to forget about him with Hicks, Buxton, Rosario and Walker conversations. Always felt Rosario had more overall upside, but thought Ortiz could be a slightly lesser overall but similar talent option who could end being an excellent 4th OF option down the road. We might see a promotion at the end of that road with a solid season at Rochester this year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hopefully the new manager will not play DHs or infielders in corner OF positions (Willingham, Colabello, Parmelee, Herrmann any more)   On the other hand, based on what Ryan said about Sano, I am not holding my breath...

     

    Hard to disagree with this.  Colabello, Parmalee and Herrmann are AAAA players.  Stash them in Rochester if you want to and bring them up in a pinch for a short-term fill-in.  If somebody is hurt for an extended time, bring up somebody who has a potential future with the club (Rosario, Sano....).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...