Examining Torii Hunter’s Hall of Fame Resume

I don’t think he has a chance, and I wouldn’t vote for him, though he can gladly start on my team as an excellent player. 

That said, I sent a note to a friend earlier this evening on the topic. Aside from Andruw Jones, an intriguing comparison is Omar Vizquel. In JAWS, Hunter is several points ahead of Vizquel. Vizquel is being carried by his defensive reputation and his 11 Gold Gloves, but he was a well-below average hitter, with an OPS+ of 82. By contrast, Hunter won nine Gold Gloves at a demanding defensive position with an OPS+ of 110.  Vizquel played for a long time and was on good-hitting teams that rolled through the lineup, so he accumulated more than 2800 hits, but he only had two seasons when he was above league average. 

With that, I’m not sure how one can vote for Vizquel and not give serious consideration to Hunter. And Vizquel has tracked at 37.0, 42.8, and 52.6 percent in his first three years, so he’s getting support. 

Personally, I think that says more about folks messing up on Vizquel than it does on people overlooking Hunter. By that same JAWS score, Vizquel is WAY below the shortstops that are represented. The three guys immediately below him are Rico Petrocelli, Andrelton Simmons, and Rafael Furcal. By contrast, Vizquel is well behind non-HOFers like Bert Campernaris, Jim Fregosi, and Nomar Garciaparra. 

Oh, and you referenced Kenny Lofton. He got jobbed in entering the ballot in 2013, along with first-year guys Biggio, Piazza, Schilling, Clemens and Bonds. Also on the ballot that year were Morris, Bagwell, Raines, Smith, Martinez, Trammell, and Walker, all of whom have since been voted in. Plus McGriff, Murphy, McGwine, Mattingly, Sosa, Palmeiro.

With all those guys and voters limited to 10 picks, there just wasn’t room for Lofton. He’s a HOFer in my book, and it will be interesting to see if he jumps in quickly when he gets a shot by the Veteran’s Committee.

I guess if Harold Baines can get in, Hunter could. I’d be really surprised if he did, though. That doesn’t diminish his stellar career.

Also, I want to mention how absurd it is that Lofton and Edmonds fell off the ballot. They both deserve to be in, and it’s not particularly debatable in my opinion.

The most important aspect of the HOF is the discussion it generates like this one.  Hunter was a wonderful player who deserves his Twins HOF - beyond that I never thought of him in a Mays, Clemente, Aaron level of player.  I am a small HOF person so it there is my bias.

But at the same time McGwire, Bonds, Clemens, Rose continue to get attention because they are not in.  Even old Shoeless Joe gets more attention than Simmons, Speaker, Heilmann who were his contemporaries and did get in.

I call it the Hall of Controversy.  Keep them out and they will be talked about for decades, but them in and we move on to the next one.  

Torii was an excellent player and had a long run where he basically didn't turn in a bad season (12 years or so in a row is impressive). He didn't have much of a decline period (last two seasons didn't add anything to his resume) and was a clubhouse leader for most of his career as well.

The problem Torii has is he wasn't quite good enough to get to a bunch of milestones as a hitter, and was a bit overrated as a defender. (He won 9 Gold Gloves and defense is a huge part of his reputation...but he probably only deserved about half of those) He also didn't really have any signature seasons where he really tore it up; there's just no serious MVP-caliber seasons in there.

There have been worse players elected, but Torii just doesn't quite fall into the same class. He was a wonderful player, very good for a long time. A deserving all-star a few times. But I wouldn't vote for him for the Hall, as much as I loved him as a player.

Let's comp him to Kirby Puckett, another beloved Twins CF: they're bWAR is almost identical, but Kirby amassed his in 7 fewer seasons. Torii won more GG's, but Kirby also had 6 Silver Sluggers to go with it. Kirby had a couple of MVP-caliber seasons (arguably was robbed in 1992) and Torii never got to that peak. Kirby was still a quality player when his career was cut short, and won two WS, having a legendary Game 6 that is inscribed in baseball lore. Torii never got there.

Torii's just a cut below the HoF for me.

Andruw Jones is an interesting comp as well: similar length of career, a bit similar in defensive reputation...but Jones was legitimately elite for the start of his career in ways that Torii just doesn't match. Jones has 62.7 bWAR vs 50.7 for Hunter, and again: Jones played fewer seasons (2). Hunter was a more consistent player, especially on offense, but Jones had a much higher peak. I think it's clear that Jones was a better player for most of his career. Jones fell apart after 30 and Torii kept rolling along well into his 30's, but Jones' 20's were so incredible that he stands a cut above.

Torii Hunter had a great career, was a wonderful player, but he wouldn't get my HoF vote.

This is what Schoenfield says on ESPN - "Hunter: In a different era, a nine-time Gold Glove center fielder who hit 353 home runs and drove in nearly 1,400 runs would be a slam-dunk Hall of Famer. Not in 2020. Hunter's 50.7 career WAR will be an important factor for voters, and that figure is short for even a low-end, modern-day Hall of Famer. Hunter also had just one top-10 MVP finish, a sign that he wasn't quite viewed as a big star, despite his all-around excellence. It's also worth noting that some recent comparable center fielders haven't fared well in Hall of Fame voting:

Jim Edmonds: 60.4 WAR, eight Gold Gloves, off the ballot after his first year.

Kenny Lofton: 68.4 WAR, four Gold Gloves, off the ballot after his first year.

Bernie Williams: 49.6 WAR, four Gold Gloves, off the ballot after his second year.

Every team's best non-Hall of Famer

FanGraphs' Jay Jaffe looks at the HOF cases of the best player for each team who hasn't yet gotten into Cooperstown. League: ALInsider | NLInsider

The one center fielder who did stay on the ballot is Andruw Jones, who was chosen by 19.4% of the voters last year, his third time on the ballot. He won 10 Gold Gloves and is credited with 62.7 WAR. He hit more home runs than Hunter (434), but is behind him in RBIs and hits (although Jones has the better OPS). What separates Jones? He is viewed as a transcendent defensive player, right up there with Willie Mays as the best center fielder of all time. Indeed, the advanced metrics view him as far superior to Hunter, with 235 runs saved versus 33 for Hunter. In this case, I do believe the perception is correct and is reason enough to consider Jones while Hunter falls short."

Who was the Twins best player not in Cooperstown?

Hunter is not MLB HOF level.  He was great defensively over his career, but at the plate he was never a difference maker really.  He never won an MVP or even up there in votes really.  He was 6th in voting in 2002, his best career year.  His longevity is something to admire.  He should be in hall of very good, but not HOF.  

His peak years were good, but never great.  He never had post season heroics that made him seem better than he truly was. Even when he hit in middle of Twins lineups he was never the feared guy you would never want to face.  Overall he was just steady and good.  Hunter was not normally considered the best player on his team either, being with Joe and Justin for years with Twins.  Then vlad, bobby Abrue and others in LA.    

As much as I liked him for the Twins, I never once thought he was a HOF or future HOF players.  The article states he is on par with McCutchen, who is still playing, and that writer suggest McCutchen is not HOF.  If they are on par under the JAWS system, I would say McCutchen is more HOF level than Hunter as his peak years were better overall than Hunter's peak years.  He has fallen off much more than hunter did, so that is where they are more on par now. 

Andruw Jones, Lofton, and Jim Edmonds probably deserve it over Torii. Great player, but not HOF worthy in my opinion. Of those mid 2000s teams, Johan Santana and Joe Mauer are the clear HOFers ti me, despite what the voters think

Torii was a great player for the Twins but not great enough to make HOF. The best Twins player (playing more than 4 seasons here) but not in Cooperstown would be Tony Olivia followed by Jim Kaat.

Torii Hunter was a wonderful player for the Twins but he is not a hall of famer.

If you want to get technical, the best Twins player not in the Hall of Fane is Joe Mauer. He will be there in his first few years of eligibility.

Who was the Twins best player not in Cooperstown?

Easy. Tony Oliva. Well, Mauer would be in that discussion as well but I think he'll get in. 

Who was the Twins best player not in Cooperstown?

Other than Joe Mauer (who will certainly get voted in), it’s Johan Santana. I get he had a short career, but his peak was very similar to Sandy Koufax. From 2003-2010, he was overall the best pitcher in baseball (in my opinion). 2 time Cy Young winner, and should have won a third.

Other than Joe Mauer (who will certainly get voted in), it’s Johan Santana. I get he had a short career, but his peak was very similar to Sandy Koufax. From 2003-2010, he was overall the best pitcher in baseball (in my opinion). 2 time Cy Young winner, and should have won a third.

I guess I would put Mauer, Morneau, Oliva, Kaat, maybe Nathan and maybe even Hrbek ahead of Hunter.   I only brought it up originally because Mikelink post vaguely implied it might be Hunter.    The best case for Hunter is still Baines.

I guess I would put Mauer, Morneau, Oliva, Kaat, maybe Nathan and maybe even Hrbek ahead of Hunter.   I only brought it up originally because Mikelink post vaguely implied it might be Hunter.    The best case for Hunter is still Baines.

If you're talking about the best Twin not in the HoF I'd say it's Mauer, Oliva, Santana, then maybe Hunter. The first three are worthy, IMHO and are a distinct cut above Torii, much as a I love him

Kaat is a complicated question...he's always felt borderline to me as a pitcher; a lot of his case hinges on his reputation as a great glove man, otherwise I think he doesn't get this kind of consideration. He wasn't a great run preventer and didn't have a lot of great seasons, but had quite a few good seasons and ate tons of innings. I might put Hunter ahead of him.

Nathan is also complicated: we still don't have great ways to measure relievers. Once he made the shift to the pen, Nathan wasn't just good, he was dominant. The only reason he's not talked about as the best reliever of his era was he overlapped with Rivera, who he matched fairly well with for more than the occasional season...but Rivera sustained it while Nathan really only had 9 great seasons as a reliever; Mariano had 17. I think it's a fair argument that Nathan didn't do it long enough. If SF had figured out that he should have been a reliever immediately...but they didn't, so Hunter is ahead of him too.

I loved both of these great 1Bs, Morneau and Hrbek but neither goes ahead of Hunter for me. Morneau got smashed down by that damn concussion and the injuries kept him from having the kind of length you'd need to go past Hunter. Hrbek was healthier and stayed consistently excellent at the plate for most of his career. (I still struggle with defensive numbers at 1B; bRef doesn't think much of Hrbek as a defender and would have Morneau about as good. Scouting and the eye test I think disagrees with that, especially early in their careers.)

Hunter was a heck of a player, just not quite HoF.

I want my HOF to be extremely inclusive.  It should consist almost entirely of names that every fan of the game knows, even if only in passing.  If an honest to goodness fan of the game can walk into the HOF, see a player's plaque, and go "Who?", then it's not a HOF.

To that end, some players who were not just good but excellent should be left out.  I would rather my HOF err on the side of exclusion rather than inclusion, to ensure that no one sneaks in as a "we had to elect someone" choice.  It is not a bad thing to have a year without anyone being elected.

Hunter remains one of my favorite players of all time. He's absolutely a Twins HOF and that's not even debatable. He was soon offensively and defensively for years and meant an awful lot to the Twins and no question he was very good to borderline outstanding most years. I wrote a piece in the forum a couple years back how his leaving the Twins had a trickle down affect on the Twins roster, trade moves, etc that really impacted the team with his loss. It took a long time to replace him. To a degree, you could argue they have yet to do so.

But despite all of that, I have to agree that no matter how good he was, he just isn't in that ML HOF category.

Troll Hunter was about 2 seasons short of the Hall of Fame. While he had the Gold Gloves and Silver Sluggers awards and gave lots of colorful interviews, the rest of his stats are just short of justifying getting him in. He had 2492 hits. I think being over 2700 minimum. 890 extra base hits. I think he needed to be at or near 1000. 1391 RBI. There are only a few players with more than 1525 RBIs not in. Also 5 stolen bases shy of 200. I think he was 800 to 1000 at bats away from accumulating enough counting stats to get him in. His career OPS was only 110. Above average but not great so he really needed the counting stats to help his cause.

Troll Hunter was about 2 seasons short of the Hall of Fame. While he had the Gold Gloves and Silver Sluggers awards and gave lots of colorful interviews, the rest of his stats are just short of justifying getting him in. He had 2492 hits. I think being over 2700 minimum. 890 extra base hits. I think he needed to be at or near 1000. 1391 RBI. There are only a few players with more than 1525 RBIs not in. Also 5 stolen bases shy of 200. I think he was 800 to 1000 at bats away from accumulating enough counting stats to get him in. His career OPS was only 110. Above average but not great so he really needed the counting stats to help his cause.

I think Torii needed 2 of his 3.5 bWAR seasons to be more like 7-8 bWAR seasons. and another 2 of those 3 bWAR seasons to be 5 bWAR. He was a 5-time all-star, and some of those were a little questionable. He never had a top 5 MVP finish, and frankly never deserved one. Torii only got MVP votes in 5 seasons and only once finished higher than 15th...and didn't really deserve to finish 6th that year, either.

Torii was very good and really valuable for a long time (having 12 straight seasons where you put up at least 3 bWAR is really valuable!), but the peak was never there. Not enough all-star quality seasons, no MVP caliber seasons...he's kind of the epitome of the Hall of Very Good.