Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Could Carlos Correa Opt Back in for 2023?


    Cody Pirkl

    Carlos Correa has been a good player in 2022, but far from the superstar type that makes $35m per year. In search of a long-term deal in the near future, it’s becoming more and more intriguing to ask: Could Carlos Correa opt back in for 2023?

    Image courtesy of Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Carlos Correa has had a weird 2022 season with the Minnesota Twins, who brought him in as a second superstar to hopefully pair with Byron Buxton at the top of the lineup. His wRC+ of 122 indicating he’s been 22% above league average is perfectly acceptable, but in a down offensive year league wide, that number stems from his first sub .800 OPS since the shortened 2020 season.

    The way the rest of the season plays out may play a big part in whether Correa opts into his $35m option for 2023. Thus far, the Twins haven’t really gotten the Carlos Correa they expected when they handed out so much money to him this spring.

    Lacking in the Clutch
    Correa has become a legend because of his incredible clutch play in the postseason year after year. He owns a career .849 OPS in the playoffs with 18 homers and 59 RBI. Historically there are few players in baseball history you’d want up in a big spot when a game is on the line. Unfortunately for the Twins, that hasn’t played out at all this season.

    Look no further than Correa’s 37 RBI to see that he simply hasn’t cashed in when given the opportunity. With runners in scoring position, Correa has posted a triple slash of .231/.316/.292. An OPS of .608 which is good for 33 percent below the league average hitter in those situations. With two outs and runners in scoring position, Correa has been a complete non-factor, slashing .097/.200/.129, a .329 OPS. If you feel like Correa hasn’t really had many big moments in a Twins uniform at the plate, it’s hard to blame you.

    Clutch stats can only be looked at so closely as they’re typically pretty random. That being said, Correa’s severe failures in big situations has undoubtedly cost him some counting stats. While teams don’t value things like RBI like they used to, Correa is on pace for some of the worst marks of his career in several areas. Not a great time for it considering he’s seeking a massive long-term contract this winter.

    Defensive Disappointment
    Personally, it’s felt like Correa hasn’t been the gold glove caliber defender we expected at shortstop, and upon further investigation, this turns up true in just about every defensive measure you can find. Fangraphs defensive value measurement pegs Correa at a perfectly neutral 0.0 value added on defense this season. He’s been well above average in this statistic in every season of his career since 2016. In addition, Correa scores a -3 Outs Above Average on Statcast, tied with Tim Anderson, Alcides Escobar, and Isaiah Kiner-Falefa for 26th among shortstops league-wide. He’s also on pace for his worst mark in Defensive Runs saved since his rookie season.

    The newer defensive metrics are tricky and many don’t trust them for good reason. Looking at base defensive measures, however, tells the same story. Correa’s fielding percentage of .975 is his worst since his rookie year and he’s on a full-season pace for a career-high in errors.

    It goes without saying that in search of a long-term deal at 27 years old, Correa can expect significantly less from teams if they suspect his defensive future at the premium shortstop position is going to be short-lived. At 6 foot 4, Correa had questions dating back to draft day about his ability to stick at shortstop. As he gets into his late 20s, a down season defensively would surely be cited in free agency to try to drive down his price by teams trying to lock him up for the next 8-10 years.

    Carlos Correa has been far from a bad player in 2022, but for the price tag he has and the number of holes the Twins roster has had for much of the season, it’s fair to be disappointed with the level of output he’s provided. He’s on a 162-game pace of 3.2 Wins Above Replacement on Fangraphs, and trails Buxton, Kepler, Polanco and Arraez. He’s only half a win ahead of Trevor Larnach, who hasn’t played since the end of June. He’s tied with Sonny Gray who’s thrown all of 79 innings so far this year. Since July 1, crunch time for the Twins who hold a one-game lead in the division, Correa is hitting .183/.287/.333. Yet another measure of the Twins' $35m man failing to meet expectations when they’ve needed him most.

    And so in consideration of Correa’s future with the Twins, it’s fair to say it’s still very possible he opts out. Hitting free agency at the age of 28, it’s possible a team completely disregards 2022 and signs the Twins' current shortstop away long-term in pursuit of a superstar. That being said, you can expect Scott Boras to put out some feelers, and if he gets the sense teams are going to try to cite Correa’s disappointing 2022 season to nickel and dime them on a long-term deal, another one year, $35m deal to recoup some value certainly won’t be out of the cards.

    Do you think it’s possible Carlos Correa could opt back into the Twins contract in 2023? Do you agree that this has become more likely as the season has gone on? Let us know below!

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    He is this year. Below average in some defensive metrics. Is it worth $35M to gamble that this year is an aberration?  Doesn’t matter as I was wrong about team option. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You run the risk of getting injured. So depending on the length or amount, he could depart for a longterm deal, anything over fve years and $125+ million at this point. I'm sure he would like more, with the opt outs depending on actualy amount paid at 3-5 years.

    But he has to put up better numbers than he is currently doing for the Twins. Even a short stint on the IL can hurt his progress to a much bigger contract. The Twins 3-year deal is a nice buffer as long as he stays healthy. He would still be a young free agent and could get a 5-7 year deal easily if he proves himself healthy, even after the Twins payouts.

    And it was a gamble for the Twins, too. They could be on the dcket for three years of money if something happened to Correa. But better than paying ut for 5-7 years at the same yearly average.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    36 minutes ago, Rosterman said:

    You run the risk of getting injured.

    Exactly.  That's the key thing about the contract the Twins offered him: a $70M guarantee beyond the first season, in case he's catastrophically injured this year, but with the opportunity to negotiate a better deal, in case he's not.

    But the calculation changes after each of the first two seasons.  So, this coming off-season, assuming he reaches it in full health, now his decision becomes to accept another $35M payday for 2023, but with only a $35M guarantee beyond that season, in case he's catastrophically injured.

    That is less of an inducement to stay.  Almost anyone will offer a better guaranteed total contract value than that.

    Maybe this past off-season he had visions of a $300M megacontract (which proved non-existent for him), but Boras will assist him in looking realistically at the potential market if he opts out for 2023, and if it's (say) only $200M after a non-All Star 2022, it is what it is.  Boras might also forecast that a 2023 similar to 2022 could reduce the expected contract to only $100M, a year hence - in which case he'd better grab whatever $200M contract is offered.  Boras is portrayed by many as some sort of charlatan, but to me he's nothing but a pragmatist.

    So Correa's chances of opting in are not greatly improved by 2022 being not among his best seasons (and we still have many weeks to play, before that is determined).  Only something really dire would make him see staying as the smart choice.  Something dire, or the Twins offering something nice of course.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I hope he stays. If he doesn’t stay they might look to Nick Gordon. Gordon had a long stretch of health trouble and had lost strength. That loss impacted his batting and I am guessing his play at shortstop also. I would prepare him for a lot of time in the middle infield in the off-season if Correa opts out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Reptevia said:

    A better question may be: “Should the Twins opt OUT of his contract?  Do we really want to pay $35M for an average SS?

    As I understand his contract, the Twins don’t have anything they can do.  He has a contract for $35.1M for 3 years.  He has the option to opt out after this year and next year.  The Twins are locked in.

    I suppose the fact Boras negotiated options for both this year and next increases the likelihood he stays for another year. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Actually, it might be better for us if he opts out.

    Here’s the thinking. We save $35MM. With Sanchez and Sano gone, we would have a total of about $50MM extra to spend. What does that get us?

    Let’s say a solid starter plus three relievers and a decent back up catcher.  The roster in ‘23 might look something like this:

    OF: Buxton, Kepler, Larnach, Gordon, and Celestino (Wallner and Martin on deck)

    IF: Kiriloff, Arraez, Polanco, Palacios, Miranda, Urshela, and Lewis (2nd half).

    Catcher: Jeffers, FA

    SP: Mahle, Gray, Ryan, Maeda, and FA (SWR, Winder and Ober on deck for injuries)

    RP: López, Duran, Jax, Megill (yes, I still have hopes for him), Fulmer (resigned as a FA), two more FAs, plus one player within the organization.

    That’s a pretty darn good lineup led by a really good starting staff, a solid relief corps, and good overall depth.

    So, if Correa does opt out, things will still be ok and possibly better.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, Nashvilletwin said:

    Actually, it might be better for us if he opts out.

    Here’s the thinking. We save $35MM. With Sanchez and Sano gone, we would have a total of about $50MM extra to spend. What does that get us?

    Let’s say a solid starter plus three relievers and a decent back up catcher.  The roster in ‘23 might look something like this:

    OF: Buxton, Kepler, Larnach, Gordon, and Celestino (Wallner and Martin on deck)

    IF: Kiriloff, Arraez, Polanco, Palacios, Miranda, Urshela, and Lewis (2nd half).

    Catcher: Jeffers, FA

    SP: Mahle, Gray, Ryan, Maeda, and FA (SWR, Winder and Ober on deck for injuries)

    RP: López, Duran, Jax, Megill (yes, I still have hopes for him), Fulmer (resigned as a FA), two more FAs, plus one player within the organization.

    That’s a pretty darn good lineup led by a really good starting staff, a solid relief corps, and good overall depth.

    So, if Correa does opt out, things will still be ok and possibly better.

     

    I like the plan. But … the Twins could still spend on all that AND Correa … I don’t think it’s an either/or here

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I see an awful lot of expectations that Lewis is pretty much a sure thing to come back, and just as strong or stronger than before.  I am lost as to the confidence; not the hope, but the confidence.  At 23 he has blown out his knee (big time) twice, and there is never a guarantee someone will be the same after that, especially at the SS position.  Look at Buck, for example.  Fragile would be a kind description of his career and, at 28, has what even the team acknowledges as "chronic" knee issues which keep him playing part time, at least for the near future.  What is it about Lewis that makes everyone so confident this will change in his career?  We have to plan on him not being the long term SS of the future, and if he is, God bless him.  Great.  But don't plan on it, especially if you can get a player of Correa's caliber.  A bird in the hand is better than 2 in the bush, as my grandpa was fond of reminding me (the bush being the minor leagues today, no matter how promising one or 2 may look).  Do what you can to keep Carlos.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    40 minutes ago, Squirrel said:

    I like the plan. But … the Twins could still spend on all that AND Correa … I don’t think it’s an either/or here

    They are at $110M for next year plus whatever incentives Buxton and Maeda earns so $115-$120M.  It makes no sense to add a SP unless its a top of the rotation guy (better than Gray / Mahle) which is $25M-35M.  How much do you think they will spend?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    They are at $110M for next year plus whatever incentives Buxton and Maeda earns so $115-$120M.  It makes no sense to add a SP unless its a top of the rotation guy (better than Gray / Mahle) which is $25M-35M.  How much do you think they will spend?

    I didn't say they would ... I said they could ... let's not turn this thread into a payroll discussion because that's not at all where it needs to go. And yes, along with pie, I want my cake and to eat it, too!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    They are at $110M for next year plus whatever incentives Buxton and Maeda earns so $115-$120M.  It makes no sense to add a SP unless its a top of the rotation guy (better than Gray / Mahle) which is $25M-35M.  How much do you think they will spend?

    See this year and say ditto.  :)  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think he stays. He gave the team advice at the deadline telling the team not to loose Miranda. That coupled with a less than allstar year should make him wait one more year. As for us using his money for a better pitching staff. We should have plenty of money. Bundy, archer , Duffy, pagan, dobnak , sano  and others will free up enough for one great pitcher. I like our starters, Ryan gray, Mahle , maeda gives us a great start for next year. Add a true ace and we are ready.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Nashvilletwin said:

    Actually, it might be better for us if he opts out.

    Here’s the thinking. We save $35MM. With Sanchez and Sano gone, we would have a total of about $50MM extra to spend. What does that get us?

    Let’s say a solid starter plus three relievers and a decent back up catcher.  The roster in ‘23 might look something like this:

    OF: Buxton, Kepler, Larnach, Gordon, and Celestino (Wallner and Martin on deck)

    IF: Kiriloff, Arraez, Polanco, Palacios, Miranda, Urshela, and Lewis (2nd half).

    Catcher: Jeffers, FA

    SP: Mahle, Gray, Ryan, Maeda, and FA (SWR, Winder and Ober on deck for injuries)

    RP: López, Duran, Jax, Megill (yes, I still have hopes for him), Fulmer (resigned as a FA), two more FAs, plus one player within the organization.

    That’s a pretty darn good lineup led by a really good starting staff, a solid relief corps, and good overall depth.

    So, if Correa does opt out, things will still be ok and possibly better.

     

    But who says they decide to not replace those dollars saved?  That's my fear.  Not calling them cheap...but very opportunistic.  There are definitely no promises made they will spend the dollars saved on other areas of team need.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've become a fan. From day one he's just been a great teammate and leader for the team in general, and the infield in particular. He's done and said everything right, even to the point of taking a real interest in the trade deadline. His offense has not been as expected or hoped for, and the numbers bear that out. Still, he's been good. I have learned to understand and appreciate various statistics and analytics. But my goodness, there are so many that at times I'm just wondering what new defensive or pitching metric comes out next! Not everyone even agrees or supports some of the ones in existence now. Errors may be up, and his metrics might be down, but I've just loved watching him play defense and have not been disappointed. I've been very happy to have him, despite a good season being a "down" one.

    He's said and done all the right things to the Nth degree. He and his family like it here. I'm sure those statements are true. And maybe, just maybe he DOES want to opt in, help the Twins win, and bet on himself for a 6-8yr deal following a better 2023. I can see a path where that could happen. 

    But here's the reality, he's getting paid almost $70M if he stays. He's getting over $100M if he stays all 3yrs and then hits FA near 30yo and will still probably get a solid offer of 4-5yrs from someone. But if he opts out for a new 7yr deal at "just" $25M...for conversation sake...that's still $175M GUARANTEED. Simple math shows he has an additional, approximate, $75M more locked in vs playing out his Twins deal and then looking at FA again. And I think my $25M is probably conservative. No matter what way he goes, he and his family are set for life and beyond. But I just don't see sticking around...making great $ to be sure...and then trying again in a year or two when he can opt out now and play the field for even more guaranteed money even if it's never going to be $35M per.

    COULD the Twins re-work his deal and add years? Absolutely. They could take on another 2yrs, keep the deal front loaded as it is now for around $35M, and then drop what would be years 4 and 5 to something around $30 and $25M. That means he can hit FA again at age 31. Is he still a viable SS then? Maybe. That gives roughly $160M in 5yrs with the Twins. So, again, he comes out ahead getting a new deal from someone else.

    He only stays if he and his family truly want to stay, and he's content with a deal re-worked for $160-175M because money doesn't always buy happiness and that's enough for him, with the opportunity to still sign another 3-4yrs elsewhere to finish out his career for $X, for age 31-34/35.

    I just don't see it happening. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Karbo said:

    His leadership and attitude has to be considered in with stats. I would love to see the Twins offer him a contract for 5-6 years.

    One thing we don't do around these parts is factor in leadership and attitude.  That's why a certain purple team whose TEs on this year's roster had a combined 9 NFL catches last year sat on it's hands while a guy with the 12th most TD catches by a TE in the history of the league and a great reputation as a leader signed with another team.  That's why the same team saw a handful of it's un-vaccinated "leaders" miss time with Covid last year.  Same team will see another one of it's leaders on the other side of the line of scrimmage when the Cowboys come to town in November.  That team will probably stumble to another rudderless 8 win this year.  I know, I digress from the team at hand.  However, I've seen the team at hand play with a lack of heart this year and last while a certain Eddie (and Ehire) won a World Series in Atlanta last year.  The stuff you can't measure matters.  Somebody should tell the decision makers around here.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, FlyingFinn said:

    No, Palacios is really playing well at AAA and is a great fielder. He would be used until Lewis returns. And maybe beyond that if he plays well with Lewis also playing SS and OF.

    The OP is about Correa, but I think bringing in discussion of Lewis and Palacios is relevant. 

    IMO...and it's a combination of hope and belief in the kid...Lewis will recover and be an excellent ML player for years to come, even if he doesn't achieve the grandiose level of SUPERSTAR. If Correa is one and done, I could still see the Twins brining in a placeholder. Why wouldn't you? You'd be crazy not to have depth and options.

    A refresher on Palacios. He was traded for Odorizzi before 2018 as a good glove SS who could hit. Except, he didn't for 2yrs and was released after those 2yrs, and re-signed by the Twins following the missed 2020 season. And suddenly, he had learned to hit again. 

    2021 at AA: .259/ .340/ .439/ .779 with 17dbls, 19hr, and 18-8sb

    2022 at AAA, so far: .297/ .360/ .477/ .837 with 24dbls, 10hr, and 10-7sb.

    His glove appears to be legit from reputation and what we saw in limited action. He's actually improved as a hitter despite jumping up a level in 2022. Really, only his SB % has dropped. All of that coming off a very strong winter league performance. 

    Is he a late bloomer after 2 failed years and a missed season? Kind of looks that way. You could knock 40-50  points off each of his quad slash line numbers and still have an effective "contributor" offensively while playing great defense. I know I'd take that over what we saw in Simmons in 2021. 

    Understand, I'm a fan of Correa and NOT saying I wouldn't like him back. I just don't, as of now, see a reality where he is. And I'm not trying to blow goofy smoke of illusions to anyone that a late blooming Palacios is a long term answer or that the Twins shouldn't look at a veteran fill in option should Correa actually leave. I am only trying to look beyond tomorrow to say that if he does, indeed, move on, a single spot in the lineup doesn't have to mean automatic depression or incompetence. There may be options and the $35M saved, plus Sano $ saved, plus Rogers $ saved, and possibly Sanchez $ saved, just might be better spent on extensions and additions.

    It would be great to have Correa back, somehow, some way.  I'd be happy. But the sky won't fall if he does leave. It might even open up some new opportunities.

    In the meantime, I'm going to enjoy having him around and hope his recent struggles reverse themselves and he will help the Twins win the ALC and some playoff games and then we will see what happens from there.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Still think the chance he stays is near zero. Somebody will give him a mega deal and the last thing he wants to do is go into the free agent market any older than he has to.
     

    Also for people wanting to sign him to a five year extension that just ain’t happening. He doesn’t have to take that and he won’t. 
     

    I like the idea of taking the $35 million and spending it on pitching but our front office just sat out a bountiful free agent pitching market last winter. Why would we expect them to dramatically change course this off season?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, darin617 said:

    Maybe we need someone to start banging on a garbage can in BP to get his mind back in sync so he can start smashing the ball like in Houston.

     

    56 minutes ago, se7799 said:

    Well....thats original.

    Not to mention, unsupported by facts.  His lifetime OPS on the road is .817, versus .846 at home - not a big split at all since the average batter does better at home.  All but this season was as an Astro, but this year as a Twin his home-road split is even larger, .839-.724. 

    You can look up the individual seasons when the scandal was in operation, and if anything his road numbers were better than at home those two years.

    So, is there more can-banging actually going on at Target Field?

    But, hey, don't let facts get in the way of a comfortable narrative.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, ashbury said:

     

    Not to mention, unsupported by facts.  His lifetime OPS on the road is .817, versus .846 at home - not a big split at all since the average batter does better at home.  All but this season was as an Astro, but this year as a Twin his home-road split is even larger, .839-.724. 

    You can look up the individual seasons when the scandal was in operation, and if anything his road numbers were better than at home those two years.

    So, is there more can-banging actually going on at Target Field?

    But, hey, don't let facts get in the way of a comfortable narrative.

    Back when he signed with us, he and Boras both commented on how well he had done at TF, with Correa himself saying ‘I see the ball really well there.’ 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Correa has been a huge disappointment. At the plate and in the field. Worth about 10 million. He isn't a bad player, but not that far above average this year. Time to step it up. Character? Well, without immunity, his character would have certainly been suspended.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...