Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • A Look At The Free Agent Catcher Market


    Nick Nelson

    Free agency officially kicked off on Tuesday morning. The Twins are very much in the market for a catcher, so today I thought we'd take a closer look at what is available.

    Image courtesy of Evan Habeeb, USA Today

    Twins Video

    Yesterday, Parker unveiled our new Free Agent Tracker feature. This interactive database gives you a dynamic real-time look at players that are out there. By drilling the list down to catchers, we can get a specific view of the market for backstops.

    Each of these player is covered in the Offseason Handbookwhich you've got grab if you haven't. (Donation-based download, free if you like!)

    Let's take a deeper look at the pages concerning this position:

    gmhbfac1.png

    Just a terrible break for Wilson Ramos. A qualifying offer would have been a no-brainer prior to his devastating September knee injury, but now the Nationals had no choice but pass. His recovery will stretch well into next season, and his long-term future behind the plate is somewhat in doubt. His agent has suggested Ramos will seek a four to five year deal. Will that offer come? Probably not from the Twins.

    Matt Wieters is more plausible. The Orioles declined to extend a QO so he hits the open market unencumbered. The switch-hitter had one of the worst seasons of his career, with terrible timing, but was still a very solid player who's not that old.

    gmhbfac2.png

    Jason Castro is my personal favorite among the free agent catchers. He was our choice in in the Twins Daily offseason blueprint. He ranks as one of the game's very elite pitch-framing specialists, and he's a capable hitter who can put the ball over the fence. Mike Berardino of the Pioneer Press tweeted on Tuesday night that the Twins have expressed preliminary interest in Castro and plan to meet with his agent on Wednesday.

    But if the Twins want to take a less emphatic dive into the market, and aren't ready to give up on John Ryan Murphy quite yet, Alex Avila makes sense. As a lefty swinger he complements Murphy well and as a guy who's been around for eight years – many of them spent with dominant Tigers clubs – he might bring some of the veteran leadership that the Twins seem to be pursuing.

    gmhbfac3.png

    The remainder of this free agent class doesn't really possess anyone who could be viewed as a starter or even a primary timeshare partner. The Twins need to be aiming higher than a backup. That's just the reality.

    What are your thoughts? Who would you target among this crop? Or would you shift your focus to another acquisition avenue in addressing this critical spot?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    sounds like you are in full rebuild mode.....and, if you are punting next year, you are saying they have a 3 year window, good luck with that all working out.

    what I am saying is that half measures are what the Twins have been doing the last several years.  Also the Wild, just good enough to compete not good enough to win it all.  I am endorsing a path that has a chance of winning it all.  Twins have enough talent that while painful could punt the second round draft pick.  Do not see Twins developing enough pitching internally to get to the next level(hope they not be realistic about the chances).  You have to trade or buy pitching to compete and how many of the Twins current pitchers could you see on a pennant winning team.  My estimate at the current time is 2 maybe 3.  That leaves 9 -10 spots to fill and hope maybe half will be filled internally.  That leaves about 5 to sign or trade for. That is a big task, so we need to get going.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    what I am saying is that half measures are what the Twins have been doing the last several years.  Also the Wild, just good enough to compete not good enough to win it all.  I am endorsing a path that has a chance of winning it all.  Twins have enough talent that while painful could punt the second round draft pick.  Do not see Twins developing enough pitching internally to get to the next level(hope they not be realistic about the chances).  You have to trade or buy pitching to compete and how many of the Twins current pitchers could you see on a pennant winning team.  My estimate at the current time is 2 maybe 3.  That leaves 9 -10 spots to fill and hope maybe half will be filled internally.  That leaves about 5 to sign or trade for. That is a big task, so we need to get going.

     

    And how does signing Castro hurt that, assuming he stays a very good defensive catcher? that's what we are talking about...right?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    MLBTradeRumors reports that were going to talk to Castro's representatives today! They predicted he'd get two years for $15MM. from the White Sox. \m/

    I have to call this out because it irks me when I see it. MLB Trade Rumors didn't report anything, they are an aggregator. Let's give credit to the guy who actually did the reporting work, Mike Berardino. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    And how does signing Castro hurt that, assuming he stays a very good defensive catcher? that's what we are talking about...right?

    Because he becomes a block to finding out what you have in either Garver or Murphy.  Both need to play next year with the Twins.  If neither work out then you look for a catcher.  I much rather put dollar assets into pitching that is both younger and with several years of control.  The Twins hitting could be ready to compete by 2018, but pitching looks like a much longer track.  My moves would be to bring both at the same time.

    Twins payroll at the end of 2018 will be very low, so putting major assets into the staff should be a priority, not into a 2 or 3 year aging catcher.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Because he becomes a block to finding out what you have in either Garver or Murphy.  Both need to play next year with the Twins.  If neither work out then you look for a catcher.  I much rather put dollar assets into pitching that is both younger and with several years of control.  The Twins hitting could be ready to compete by 2018, but pitching looks like a much longer track.  My moves would be to bring both at the same time.

    Twins payroll at the end of 2018 will be very low, so putting major assets into the staff should be a priority, not into a 2 or 3 year aging catcher.

     

    They can sign Castro and not break the bank doing it, and also if Garver or Murphy play and earn time, then they will play. The coaches have seen both of them and scouted both of them for years. If they are not ready, they are not ready. Garver isn't going to magically become Johnny Bench by playing in the pros when he hasn't shown enough in the minors to earn a call-up yet.

    Plus, you realize, they can spend 20-30 million on Castro, and still not even get close to the amount of resources they have to pursue pitching in every/all avenues. Pursuing a major league caliber catcher (which they don't currently have) doesn't mean they can't also pursue pitching.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    what I am saying is that half measures are what the Twins have been doing the last several years.  Also the Wild, just good enough to compete not good enough to win it all.  I am endorsing a path that has a chance of winning it all.  Twins have enough talent that while painful could punt the second round draft pick.  Do not see Twins developing enough pitching internally to get to the next level(hope they not be realistic about the chances).  You have to trade or buy pitching to compete and how many of the Twins current pitchers could you see on a pennant winning team.  My estimate at the current time is 2 maybe 3.  That leaves 9 -10 spots to fill and hope maybe half will be filled internally.  That leaves about 5 to sign or trade for. That is a big task, so we need to get going.

    I completely agree with the half measure sentiment, but I don't think the catching situation falls into that category. I have zero confidence that Murphy will be anything other than a fringe backup at this point, and Garver hasn't seen any time with the Twins. If he can force his way into a platoon in the lineup then great, but signing an everyday FA catcher would be huge for this team. Filling the need at catcher doesn't preclude the Twins from finding help for the pitching staff.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Because he becomes a block to finding out what you have in either Garver or Murphy.  Both need to play next year with the Twins.  If neither work out then you look for a catcher.  I much rather put dollar assets into pitching that is both younger and with several years of control.  The Twins hitting could be ready to compete by 2018, but pitching looks like a much longer track.  My moves would be to bring both at the same time.

    Twins payroll at the end of 2018 will be very low, so putting major assets into the staff should be a priority, not into a 2 or 3 year aging catcher.

     

    Garver has, what, 20 games in AAA? And less than a full year in AA?

     

    That's the plan, one guy that can maybe hit but isn't much defensively, and a guy that was in AA last year? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    yes, we should all spend time trying to properly source items. It's our obligation, or something. 

    Sarcasm? If so it seems unwarranted. I don't mean to scold but I certainly think we should give due credit to the guys who are out there grinding to get the info that feeds this and all other fan sites. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Sarcasm? If so it seems unwarranted. I don't mean to scold but I certainly think we should give due credit to the guys who are out there grinding to get the info that feeds this and all other fan sites. 

     

    so, no more links to mlbtraderumors unless I say the original source? same with every other link?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    so, no more links to mlbtraderumors unless I say the original source? same with every other link?

    It's not a rule as much as a courtesy. You can link to MLB Trade Rumors as a source. I just took issue with the phrase "MLB Trade Rumors reports", and I know dang well Mr. Berardino would too.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    It's not a rule as much as a courtesy. You can link to MLB Trade Rumors as a source. I just took issue with the phrase "MLB Trade Rumors reports", and I know dang well Mr. Berardino would too.  

     

    fair, but asking people to worry about this seems, um, unlikely to be a priority for them.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Castro will be a hot property and will go where he has an opportunity to win which excludes the Twins.  What about some DEFENSIVE  metrics on the remaining MLB free agent catchers: Avila, Ellis, Hanigan, Hundley, Mathis and Soto?  Maybe a reunion with Drew?  Otherwise, what is available through minor league free agency and the Rule 5 Draft?

     

    Defensive metrics here.   It really is Castro or bust as far as FAs go.  Otherwise not worth it.  I do understand that having a good framer catching a young pitching staff might help.  Intriguing name on that defensive metrics list:  Travis d' Arnaud.  If I were the Twins, I'd try to see what can make it happen, in a package probably with one of the Mets' pitchers...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    With how popular Castro is here, the dearth of free agents to spend money on and the Twins annual unlucky timing in terms of need vs supply, I'm guessing Castro is going to command more money and/or years than we expect.

     

    Not that the Twins won't be or shouldn't be the team to bite.

     

    Ha, it is fun to picture the Twins fans who only know back-of-the-baseball-card stats seeing his career .232 avg and flipping out about signing him to a multi-year deal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Defensive metrics here.   It really is Castro or bust as far as FAs go.  Otherwise not worth it.  I do understand that having a good framer catching a young pitching staff might help.  Intriguing name on that defensive metrics list:  Travis d' Arnaud.  If I were the Twins, I'd try to see what can make it happen, in a package probably with one of the Mets' pitchers...

    d'Arnaud was one of the Mets targets listed in my "Dealing Dozier" section of the Offseason Handbook. The idea of acquiring him along with a quality arm or two is highly appealing. Unfortunately, with the Mets extending a QO to Neil Walker (which he'll almost certainly accept) I don't know that they're going to be a potential partner. At least not for BD... 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    With how popular Castro is here, the dearth of free agents to spend money on and the Twins annual unlucky timing in terms of need vs supply, I'm guessing Castro is going to command more money and/or years than we expect.

    Could be, although I don't know that there's any consensus on what "we expect." In the Handbook we estimated 3 years and $21 million but many seem to think that's on the high side. It's important to note that he hasn't really been a full-time player in either of the past two years, getting only ~375 PA in each. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Josmil Pinto is available again.  Cleared waivers and sent to AAA Colorado Springs.  Split time between catcher and first base while hitting a strong .308/.362/.517 in 315 plate appearances with 11 home runs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Castro will be a hot property and will go where he has an opportunity to win which excludes the Twins. What about some DEFENSIVE metrics on the remaining MLB free agent catchers: Avila, Ellis, Hanigan, Hundley, Mathis and Soto? Maybe a reunion with Drew? Otherwise, what is available through minor league free agency and the Rule 5 Draft?

    These are human beings and have many different reasons for choosing to sign with a team in free agency.

    Sometimes (though certainly not always), it's mainly about the money.

    Unless you know him personally, there is no way you can make a declarative statement like this.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just one man's opinion.....

     

    Overall, I'm not a believer is this whole "blocking" thing. If the "up and comer" can't get playing time due to someone else "blocking" them, I'd have to question the skills of that "up and comer".

    After couple of thoughts on this.

     

    1) Baseball is not a sport in which rookies come up and play very well often. Some do, sure, but not the majority. Often you need to give a guy plenty of opportunity and experience before they make the necessary adjustments at this level.

    How are guys supposed to make those adjustments if they are expected to play well immediately to earn the experience?

     

    2) It's not that simple. Sometimes you have a stubborn manager (cough, cough) who refuses to play a young player unless forced to by multiple injuries.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    No, but do not spend resources on players that will not be here in 3 years.  That is why I am in favor of signing an ace reliever and an ace starter next offseason.  Do not waste money on players just to get a little better next year.

    I read a couple of your posts and spot on, but with a caveat.  If the player is worth and may not be here in 3 years because you have an prospect to replace him and get value in return.

    But for the love of God and the Hamm's Bear, don't throw money at fringe players...

    Which is why I am against Castro unless he can hit at least 1/4 of the time.  .215 average, we have that kind of impact already.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I read a couple of your posts and spot on, but with a caveat.  If the player is worth and may not be here in 3 years because you have an prospect to replace him and get value in return.

    But for the love of God and the Hamm's Bear, don't throw money at fringe players...

    Which is why I am against Castro unless he can hit at least 1/4 of the time.  .215 average, we have that kind of impact already.

     

     

    Here is Castro's stat line from last year when he only faced right handed pitching...

     

    231/331/426 for a .757 OPS. That is really good for a catcher especially. He also had a 12.9% walk rate, something this team could absolutely use more of.

     

    He was not good against left handed starters. He hit lefties (as a right handed hitter) to the tune of 149/237/241, with an ops of .478.

     

    If Castro starts the majority of games (because there are more right handed pitchers in baseball than left handed) and is paired with another catcher who can hit lefties well, the catching position will be just fine on the offensive side of the ball. What Castro brings to the table in terms of defense and pitch framing makes this a no brainer.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Castro is the way to go. Then you can platoon him with Garver or Turner or whoever. Castro's hitting against RHP is perfectly adequate.

    Or platooned with Murphy.

     

    This is one of the things we were hoping for from new management, right?  Finding creative ways to get more production?

     

    You're going to carry two catchers anyway.  Catcher is an obvious place to look for a platoon situation that ups production without costing as much as one player who can do it all.  

     

    Neither C would get all their ABs against opposite hand pitching, but it's relatively simple to give them that advantage in the bulk of their PAs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I absolutely disagree with this. Someone like Castro can come in and help the young pitching staff improve over the next two years or so (maybe 3) and then he can also help work with Murphy/Garver etc. It's not like the catcher position is only one guy. But, trusting every single position on your team to young players, especially when they don't have quality veterans to look up to and work with, that doesn't help.

    Centeno does not belong on a MLB roster.

     

    Yes.  Regardless of the readiness of Garver and Murphy, bringing in a veteran would be money well spent.  Young Mauer had the benefit of several veteran catchers to back him up and provide guidance, and that seemed to work out OK.  No?

     

    And if Murphy isn't ready (likely) and Garver isn't ready (the Twins might not be ready to promote him just yet, regardless of whether or not he can do it), the Twins would have something other than an open tire fire behind the plate.  

    Edited by Doomtints
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is anyone else optimistic about platooning suggestions that actually have a chance to be implemented?

     

    If we do go a one or two year route on a veteran I would like to see it accompanied with a move to acquire a catcher in the minors.  Their has to be a team out there who has depth and would want one of our million prospects.  I am not comfortable with handing Turner/Garver the reins.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...