4 Head Scratchers for Baldelli Against Astros

I generally agree with the points as well.  The least is the decision to pull Maeda, I would have let him try the 6th, and maybe if we had more than a single run lead he would have, but he is your ace, need to treat him like one.  

The other three make little sense to me.  I get Garver crushed lefties last year, but he has not this year.  Jeffers has been our best overall catcher this year, we are playing this year, not last year.  Then that moves compounds the strange moves after with the ending of astiduilo.  You could have left Garver in for a second at bat against the lefty or then pinch hit a lefty if you wanted to, but taking him out for a lefty means you need to hit a lessor right handed bat later on.  

Overall I defend Rocco, not today. 

Twins will hit the crap out of the ball today and win. No help from Berrios...as usual.

We will get all very optimistic........Twins will revert to the usual no-hit, bullpen-choking version and lose Game 3, 5-2.

Go Gopher football!!!

I am pretty sure Rocco threw this game so we can get the postseason losing record for all American sports. I think we have it in the bag now, so now we can win em all. I do think our chances are much improved today. They used their best starters and they only have one good bullpen arm. We just need to get to their starter early, then have a lead late, so we don't see their closer. 

Baldelli believes in the concept of repeating mistakes over and over and never learning from them. Kenta is a Superstar and Baldelli has pulled him all year as well as the other starters...Once again, we lose. I'm so glad he was not managing Jack Morris in the World Series, as he would have yanked him in the 7th.....

It almost feels like Baldelli intentionally managed to lose this game.

Sadly, I’ve felt that many times over the last two years. A miracle that he’s won as much as he has while booting away several games with his consistently questionable in-game management.

Actually we would have been lucky if were only 4 head scratchers....unfortunately there were more than that

For example, a solid case could be made to use Odorizzi in the 9th rather than the recently ineffective Sergio Romo.

As I said earlier in this thread, the pitching substitutions are gray areas for me. Let me defend Baldelli/Johnson with these rationales: Maeda after 5. Kenta pitched scoreless ball for 5 innings, but threw 91 pitches and was under stress about as much as he had been all year. He would be facing the Astros for the third time through the lineup in the sixth and would be on a short leash due to the score and his pitch count. I don't think Wes/Rocco wanted to bring in May with runners on mid-inning and thought the chances were good that Maeda would get in trouble or go high on his pitch count in the sixth. Maeda had only exceeded 94 pitches once and that was when he was chasing a no-no. May for one inning--maybe they believed since May flew through the sixth, that he would be available today (Tuesday). When Duffey labored to get the third out in the seventh, they decided that he was used up and that he wouldn't be available on Tuesday, so they let him continue. Romo-I know he has struggled lately, but he has tons of playoff experience and he's effective against right handed hitters with that slider. He gave up zero hard contact, but after the error, he walked in the eventual winning run. Thielbar-he has had good success against left handed hitters. He needed to get Brantley, a tough out. Brantley didn't hit the ball hard either, but hit it in a good spot. 

But he threw well over 100 pitches in that near no-no.  He should have been able to go 7 then maybe May and Rogers or Odorizzi. I’ve long thought I true that the more relievers you bring into a game, the greater the odds that one of them will not bring their good stuff to the mound.

Very good article. The one thing that wasn't mentioned when Jeffers was lifted for Garver that shows Baldelli's brain freeze is that Garver hits fastballs not curveballs. Valdez throws curveballs. Why then put Garver into that situation in the first place? He would be one of your worst options. 

Also would have liked to see Buxton bunt when they had guys on 1st and 2nd no outs. The announcers said later that you don't ask a player to do something they can't do. Buxton used to bunt. Don't think he tried it at all this year. Don't understand why they don't make that part of his game and why he doesn't WANT it to be part of his game. I've never understood why major league hitters can't bunt. High schoolers know how to bunt. With the shifts being deployed on almost every hitter nowadays there are base hit bunts available on almost every at bat. Evidently 2 hits in the first 8 innings, swinging for the fences, is acceptable. To me it's poor baseball.

Not just poor, it's dumb. Take what you are given and force the opponents to make changes and then change accordingly.

I agree with all of these and also wondered why Romo in the 9th?  Yes, the unearned run was the unraveling and the runs would not have scored had Polonco and Arraez made the play - but if we had to pitch Romo, I was not comfortable with him coming in a tie game in the top of the 9th when he has struggled the last two weeks.  I would have preferred Rogers and I can give benefit of the doubt if Baldelli felt Rogers is more comfortable in his old 7th-8th inning role, but there has to be better options in the 9th than Romo. 

Alcala should not be left out of the roster. Dobnak is not needed with this pathetic offense.

3 hits?

Then 4 hits.

Hard to score if you don't hit