Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Twins Daily

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Leaderboard

  1. Vanimal46

    Old-Timey Member
    Points
    17,338
    Posts
  2. mikelink45

    Verified Member
    Points
    7,531
    Posts
  3. Doctor Gast

    Verified Member
    Points
    3,665
    Posts
  4. nicksaviking

    Community Moderator
    Points
    18,707
    Posts

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/08/2023 in all areas

  1. While certainly jealous, I didn’t begrudge the Mets and their new owner and his crazy spending. This is totally unacceptable and unprofessional though. The Mets KNEW the Giants had medical concerns and still offered that deal. Now they want to renegotiate? Fine, they can ask, but spare us the dramatics. They have zero right to be indignant and passive aggressive. And if they think passive aggressiveness is going to get the job done, ha, good luck! Upper Midwesterners are the kings of passive aggressiveness. You’re playing on our turf now.
  2. This may be a soap opera, but if the Twins sign Correa they are a much better baseball team, both offensively and defensively, and they have a natural leader.
  3. It would be just about the most Minnesota thing ever to get the best free agent in franchise history largely because everyone else decided they don't want him.
  4. 5 points
    A recent report in The Athletic, which reads more like an off-hand comment than a groundbreaking revelation, purports that the Twins have expressed interest in RHP Michael Wacha. Now, “expressed interest” is a favorite baseball term that can loosely define every style of relationship a team can have with a player. Thad Levine vaguely dreaming about Wacha could lead to the team “expressing interest.” The Phillies have “expressed interest” in Mike Trout for a decade. The term means nothing. The connection makes sense, though. The Twins have yet to sign a major-league pitcher; Wacha is an arm capable of accruing outs between reasonable levels of runs scoring. With a bunch of theoretical payroll space and Carlos Correa probably still signing with the Mets, the Twins should spend their money on something. It’s a perfect pairing. But we’ve been down this path before. J.A. Happ, Matt Shoemaker, Dylan Bundy, and Chris Archer are four other arms who once possessed some nebulous upside, enough to convince a professional franchise to pay them money for their pitching labor. What happened after those players signed is well-known; we don’t have to tread that path again. Wacha is his own man, though; it would be unfair—and illogical—to believe he would match those past pitcher’s sins just because he loosely fits their outline. The Red Sox, Mets, and Rays, teams run by baseball people far brighter than us casuals, looked at Wacha, glanced at his numbers, and believed in him enough to guarantee millions of dollars to the former Cardinal standout. These weren’t teams chasing a false promise; they fairly gambled that, with a few alterations, Wacha could provide enough production to bring their franchise value. The bet didn’t work for the Mets or Rays, but it worked enough for the Red Sox that one could generously declare their deal a success. So, Wacha could do the same for Minnesota; that possibility remains tangible. The issue is a baseball-specific sunk cost fallacy mixed with classic roster manipulation. Those past deals—beyond turning sour as each pitcher failed to play well—failed because the Twins continued to send those arms out to die. Bundy inhaled 140 real major-league innings. He’ll now slither into baseball obscurity on a minor-league deal with *insert team here.* Or he’ll become an ace. Baseball is funny like that. The Twins told Bundy to go get 'em so often because, well, they were paying him $4 million, and people like seeing a return on their investment, but also because of flexibility. Or, rather, a lack of it. In a naturally conservative institution like baseball, hitting the eject button on a player is a nearly unalterable act. Without those tasty minor-league options, a franchise has to sneak a player by other teams, hoping that no one notices that a capable arm is now free for anyone to acquire. When that fails because the Diamondbacks need someone to throw slop for them, the team takes a vicious hit to their depth. So Bundy stays because he’s somewhat usable. In that sense, Bundy is useful; every team unwillingly hands out innings to players they’d prefer to avoid starting—hopefully, Adam Wilk is enjoying life. It’s the nature of pitching. But Bundy also blocks others. Louie Varland remains in the minors because Bundy isn’t terrible; he certainly earned a few victories for the Twins, but is he so much better than Varland that the Twins should eschew the youngster in favor of the veteran? This was the essential issue of the 2022 Twins; no one was truly horrifyingly bad, but instead existed in a mediocre haven, making it difficult for the team ever to cut bait. At least Shoemaker made it clear he was cooked. Wacha is probably not better than Varland; that’s the article. If you sign a pitcher with a good chance at being below-average—and without disrespect, Wacha fits that mold—you create fake depth; at least Varland can go to St. Paul if he starts pitching poorly. With Wacha, you just have to grin and bear it, only cutting bait once he reaches unforgivable status. Or, in Twins shorthand, if he “Shoemakers” it.
  5. Please Don't Sign Michael Wacha

    DocBauer and 4 others reacted to jmlease1 for a post in a topic

    5 points
    About the only reason to bring in Wacha is if the Twins don't think Mahle and/or Maeda will be ready to pitch on opening day. The rotation looks solid already with Gray, Ryan, Mahle, Maeda, and Ober with Varland, Winder, Woods Richardson and Balazovic waiting in AAA, and Paddack possibly back by midseason. Wacha doesn't move the needle, doesn't raise the ceiling on the starting pitching. Yes, injuries are an issue but at some point you have to let guys like Ober, Varland, Woods Richardson etc pitch. I'm a no on Wacha. Feels like spending money to spend money. Bundy's only real skill last season was health. Great, he took the ball every 5th day, but he wasn't GOOD. Would Wacha really do much more?
  6. 5 points
    I really hate the long term contracts. I think anything over 6 years is to long except in cases like Buxton where you have lower guarenteed money and great bonuses for great performance. That being said, I think that unfortunately this is the world we currently live in. And "that being said", I would like to see the Twins sign Correa but only if it doesn't prevent the Twins from giving extensions to some of our deserving young players in 4 or 5 years. If we don't get Correa, then go with what we have. I like alot of our young prospects and hope to see them do well.
  7. JUST. GET. IT. DONE.
  8. 5 points
    I have a tough time seeing Balazovic in a Twin's uniform this year. He needs to consistently get his ERA below 4 in the MINORS.....before the Twins can consider a call-up. His numbers were horrendous last year. Let's hope he can use the 2023 season to re-establish himself!
  9. Great point! Extending what you have is a FAR more effective practice than signing free agents. Obviously, those deals have varied returns just like free agents, but the return has been far greater per dollar spent and the extensions generally are not taking players to age 40. Therefore, they are not only more productive early, but they also don't have the huge downside at the end of the deal. Correa is a great way to be better this season but there will definitely be a long-term cost, especially in the last half of the contract. There have only been 10 of these 8+ year deals with position players. The list below shows the average WAR for the last half of all previous 8+ year contracts. Not the last couple years but the last half. The only one of these deals that worked out was Derek Jeter and he was 35 at the end of the contract. Eight of the ten averaged less than 1 WAR/year for the last half of the contract. If you are a team that can sign 5 contracts like Correa and have the twins budget left over, you can afford to make these deals. It's entirely another matter for a team with a $150M (roughly) ceiling to sign a deal that very likely prohibits them from signing extensions, especially given the number of candidates Ending fWAR bWAR Age Derek Jeter 4.42 4.16 36 Dave Winfield 1.98 2.22 38 Joey Votto 0.82 0.92 39 Alex Rodriguez 0.77 0.64 40 Robinson Cano 0.18 0.22 41 Albert Pujlos 0.15 0.21 42 Jason Hayward -0.05 0.30 33 Miguel Cabrera 0.33 -0.27 40 Prince Fileder -0.18 -0.18 36 Eric Hosmer 0.03 0.00 37 Average 0.84 0.82 38.20
  10. I don't get why so many are of the "I'm sick of it/don't care where he signs/etc". People...he is one of the best players in all of baseball. I know there's fear of effectiveness/health at the end of the deal, but if the Twins can add him I don't see any reason not to be just as excited as we were when they snagged him last spring. Let's say sign him for 8 years/$240 million and then he's "Carlos Correa" and is an all-star SS for the next five years. Front load the contract so he gets $35mil for the first five years and give him $20-25mil the last three. Maybe you have to move him to 3B for the rest of the deal. Five years from now that 20-25 mil won't be near the albatross it would be now.
  11. It wasn’t supposed to go this way for Carlos Correa. He spent the last offseason seeking a long-term deal over $300 million. He never got that and instead settled for a one-year contract that paid him the highest average annual value we’ve ever seen for an infielder. Now, still unsigned on January 8, his long-term prognosis has been scrutinized, and sources continue to indicate that Minnesota could be the benefactor. It has been multiple weeks since reports trickled in that Carlos Correa would be signing a 12-year, $315 million deal with the New York Mets. They were a late suitor to the party, but stood there with a wad of cash after the San Francisco Giants wanted to rework their 13-year, $350 million offer following a physical. We now know that the issues stemming from the physical all tie back to an ankle that was surgically repaired as a prospect, and the Twins have seen the same information. According to a source, Minnesota is now using the physical to their advantage. Correa was already cleared last March for what was a three-year contract. As recently as Saturday morning another offer was made. While the deal would still likely require a physical, the Twins have indicated they are comfortable with where Correa’s health and body are. Coming into the season, Minnesota knew that Correa would opt out after one season unless he played poorly or was injured. They sought to keep him on a long-term contract, ultimately offering 10-years, $285 million. That didn’t reach the same realm as either the Giants or Mets, and therefore left the Twins short. Prior to San Francisco making their last push, the Twins felt well positioned. Although that may have been shortsighted, it appears the chances may now be higher than ever. New York is looking to rework Correa’s deal, and a source indicated that language protecting the Mets meant his guaranteed money could be cut by as much as one-third. Correa is looking for long-term certainty, and the Mets adding conditions to exit the deal after seven years would be a non-starter. Although the Twins $285 million over 10 years was originally well short on dollars, it’s now in the ballpark of (or even exceeding) the truly guaranteed money. A source indicated the latest offer, which is thought to give Minnesota very firm footing, is in the range of that previous final offer. With New York reluctant on the length at this point, and with alternatives in top prospects Brett Baty and Mark Vientos, the Mets backing out altogether is not unfathomable. Mets owner Steve Cohen recently liked a tweet suggesting that the player needs his team more than the team needs him. Although that may be true for a franchise that has Francisco Lindor at shortstop and would be pushing Correa to the hot corner, it’s certainly not an ideal way to go about welcoming talent. From the get-go, Minnesota has made Correa and his family feel welcomed and a priority. Again, the front office has stood steadfast in holding close to an original offer despite multiple cutbacks from organizations that have since gotten cold feet. The Twins are growing increasingly comfortable that Boras is not simply playing with the Twins as leverage for the Mets. Instead, he has grown annoyed with the proceedings, wants resolution in the coming days, and Minnesota may even now be the frontrunner. It’s a wait-and-see game regarding Cohen and his unlimited amount of dollars. Whether general manager Billy Eppler wants to push forward or not remains to be seen, but the Mets have acted at the last minute multiple times during this saga. Knowing that players like Manny Machado and Shohei Ohtani will be free agents next offseason has helped to keep some of the biggest markets out of this race. Minnesota won’t be in consideration for those two, and this represents their best chance to make a splash of this caliber. Correa’s dollars could come in nearly $100 million more than Joe Mauer’s hometown extension, and seeing that type of commitment would be welcomed by Twins Territory. While it has always been unlikely that Correa would wind up back in Minnesota, and it remains unlikely, this is probably as close as it has felt to them looking like a front-runner.
  12. 4 points
    Correa's "treatment" by the Giants and the Mets is what needs to be explored in the next CBA????? Are you serious? The guy is being offered over $300M over a decade and the teams are not allowed to have a physical to make sure he has a reasonable chance to play later in his career? Surely you jest. What DOES need to explored in the next CBA is the Mets and other teams spending with total disregard of the soft cap, the lack of both a salary floor or a hard cap, the lack of parity, the poor treatment of minor leaguers, and on and on. Not how Mr. Correa is being treated as he receives his well-deserved hundreds of millions of dollars with some degree of medical scrutiny.
  13. My hope is that this fiasco reverses the trend of 12 and 13 year contracts. The ability for large market teams to carry years of dead money gives them a competitive advantage over medium and small market teams.
  14. 2022 Vikings Regular Season Thread

    Danchat and 3 others reacted to Vanimal46 for a post in a topic

    4 points
    Really fun regular season. Best since the magical 2017 run. Now we cheer for the Cardinals!
  15. "As recently as Saturday morning another offer was made, and Minnesota is not making the deal contingent upon a new physical." This seems like trouble.
  16. 4 points
    I think it would be a mistake for the Twins to offer a 9 year deal that was not contingent on a physical especially since both the Giants and the Mets had enough concerns to scuttle their deals with Correa.
  17. 4 points
    Will agree with those thinking a trade is on the horizon with Lee, Julien and Martin all vying for the same spots on the diamond. But that trade doesn’t need to be now. Maybe in July. Maybe next winter. will be interesting to see who the one who gets traded is. Doesn’t make sense to speculate as that decision is beyond us. Insofar as Martin is concerned, seems he hit better late last year when he abandoned the changes from when the Twins were tinkering with his swing. Good chance his bat and status returns in 2023.
  18. Good points mikelink45, but with Martin being a RH hitter and every OF'er we have not named Buxton being a LH hitter if Martin is playing and hitting well I could see him up by All Star game or before. He could play IF and OF. Wherever they need him. I'm not ready to give up on Balazovic, if he can just stay healthy he could turn a corner rather quickly. But that's a BIG if. Canterino wasn't mentioned either, but if HE can stay healthy he certainly has the stuff to be up sometime this year in a BP capacity. I for one wouldn't mind a trade of Polanco and Larnach to Miami to get one or two young pitchers depending on who the Twins prefer. To me, that kind of move deepens and strengthens the pitching staff while opening a spot for Julien who is the guy I'm most excited to see hitting leadoff or 2nd in our lineup. I think Julien is ready and I'm not afraid of sticking in there and letting him rake. Let's imagine for a moment that the Twins somehow luck out and reel in Correa. This would be a GOOD thing no matter what. Lewis get's all the time he needs to rehab and knock off the rust. If he's ready he can become the primary backup at SS and play other positions as needed. Julien is still the primary 2B-man. Lewis can play some 2B and 3B. Miranda 3B, 1B and DH. And if Brooks Lee rakes (and I think he will) he could be up by September. If all this happens then Farmer becomes depth and we let the kids play and see if any or all of them are up to it. If Correa ends up with the Mets, Farmer backs up Lewis who becomes the everyday SS.
  19. Julien has a problem in that 2B is occupied and when Lewis comes back it becomes even more crowded. Yet I would like to see him in Minneapolis. I know these things eventually work themselves out, but he has a road block for now - if Polanco is traded he will be up. Lee certainly started out his career on a really high note and I would love to see him on the team this year. If we end up with Correa then his path to the bigs may be blocked this year. Like Julien, it might take a trade to open up a path. Balazovic was my favorite prospect pitcher until AAA happened. I do not see him with the Twins in 23. I just hope he does not turn into the next Thorpe. Martin? Where does he play? OF is too full. Infield has the Julien and Lee and Lewis ready to move up. I can see him as part of a trade.
  20. 4 points
    I’m really not convinced Celestino will ever hit enough to be a regular outfielder. His hitting metrics were no better than in 2021. Beyond that, he was a poor base runner and made several poor throwing decisions. IMHO, he has a long way to be capable in all facets of the game. I’m especially disappointed with his supposedly good speed At midseason, he had grounded into as many double plays as he had RBI and he had stolen zero bases. The numbers got a bit better in the second half, but he’s still very substandard.
  21. The Twins were winning the division by a mile until the injuries stacked too high. If Correa does end up here you would think that could continue. Are they a WS contender with Correa, my guesses are not yet, but they are not boring...IMO.
  22. Gilberto Celestino’s Long-Term Upside

    roger and 3 others reacted to Doctor Gast for a post in a topic

    4 points
    Thanks Cody for a spot on article, contrary to the negative hype that's out there. I expect him take another step this year w/ the a little more seasoning in AAA. Celestino is a very good hitter, let him develop his power on his own w/o focusing on launch angle. We don't need another SO king- Sano, Gallo, Sanchez & Jeffers are more than enough.
  23. 4 points
    I hope Gilberto gets better year by year and day by day. I will not bet against him. However... He must start next season in AAA and play his way into a roster spot when his chance comes. It wasn't his fault but he was a long way from what we required of him last year.
  24. Prospect development is not a linear path. Some prospects reach the higher levels of the minor leagues and struggle, while others move quickly to the big-league level. Two of the prospects outlined below had a chance to reach the big leagues in 2022, but their performance didn't warrant a promotion. Injuries and poor performance can hurt a prospect's long-term outlook, but these players have the potential to impact the Twins in 2023. Brooks Lee TD Top Prospect Rank: 2 Debut Prediction: September Minnesota selected Lee as the team's top pick in the 2022 MLB Draft. He flew through three levels in the Twins system and ended the year at Double-A. In 31-games, he hit .303/.389/.451 (.839) with six doubles and four home runs. He likely spends most of 2023 at the Double-A level, but his performance will dictate his ultimate landing spot. There is no need to rush Lee to the big leagues, but his college experience and advanced bat can put him on track to be a late-season call-up. Austin Martin TD Top Prospect Rank: 6 Debut Prediction: July Martin entered the 2022 campaign as one of the Twins' top prospects, but his season went differently than planned. There was an opportunity for him to make his big-league debut in 2022 since he was repeating the Double-A level. Unfortunately, he struggled offensively with a .685 OPS while also dealing with a wrist injury. Martin ended September on a strong note and carried his hot hitting into the Arizona Fall League. If healthy, Martin is still part of the team's long-term plans while offering plenty of upside. Edouard Julien TD Top Prospect Rank: 10 Debut Prediction: May While Martin struggled in Wichita, Julien was one of the organization's breakout prospects in 2022. In 113 games, he hit .300/.441/.490 (.931) with 19 doubles, three triples, and 17 home runs. He posted an eye-popping 1.248 OPS this fall on the way to being named the AFL's Breakout Prospect. Julien is close to big-league-ready when it comes to his prospect development. He will play the year in the upper minors waiting for an opportunity to arise at the big-league level. Since he's on the 40-man roster, one injury is all it will take for a call-up. Jordan Balazovic TD Top Prospect Rank: 15 Debut Prediction: June Balazovic struggled through much of 2022 but ended the year on a high note. Minnesota needed many starting pitchers last season, but Balazovic never got the call. In 22 appearances (70.2 IP), he posted a 7.39 ERA with a 1.94 WHIP and a 76-to-35 strikeout-to-walk ratio. Multiple starting pitchers have passed him on the organizational depth chart, but there have been times when he was considered one of the team's best pitching prospects. His September might signify that he is ready to take the next step, which can set him up for a bounce back year in 2023. Will all of these prospects debut in 2023? Can Martin and Balazovic bounce back? Who are you most excited to see? Leave a COMMENT and start the discussion.
  25. 3 points
    I am on record that I still believe the Mets and Correa and Boras will work out a deal. But all the people on this Board who bashed the Twins FO for "lowballing" Correa and now valiantly defending their original opinions by rationalizing that the Twins FO had no way of knowing that both the Giants and Mets mega-deals would never be consummated to date. The Twins FO analyzed his value and made a very, very large offer. They were not "cheap" or "mis-read the market". They made their decision and extended their offer. If Correa ultimately signs a different deal with the Mets it will likely be for reasons that have plenty to do with elements the Twins FO has no control over: size of market; team competitiveness; comradery on team (Lindor); and marketing opportunities (which dovetails with market size). There is nothing to be angry about here, truly. It is a business negotiation.
  26. Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid keeps running through my mind as I follow the saga. It's a 12 year contract!!! The odds are that he will pick up an injury or two or seven along the way. It's a 12 year contract... that's what will kill ya. It's the fall that'll kill ya.
  27. As I've stated before, I'd take the risk on Correa. 10/$285? 9/$275? fine. Would do those deals. But I don't think it's going to happen, and I don't think the twins are any kind of front-runner. There's still a chance that the Twins will end up with Correa and the Mets will end up either backing out or throwing up enough conditions and clauses that Correa walks away, but the odds are still against the Twins. Correa is a great player, and I think he's going to be a great player for the next 3-4 years at an absolute minimum. I think he'll likely age better than most, as some of his best skills at SS (positioning, arm strength, consistent glove) should age better than ones that are speed or reaction-based. With his arm, he'll be able to slide down to 3B and provide superior defense even if his range declines to where he needs to move off SS. If he keeps hitting close to where he's been at, then he's an all-star at either spot. We know he's a good guy in the clubhouse and that players gravitate to him, which is good when you expect to have young players consistently coming up. That's all good. There's risk in any deal, and it gets higher the longer it is. But Correa is the kind of player that's a) worth the risk, and b) isn't often available for the Twins. Go for it. Hells bells, no one in Twins leadership is likely to be around at the end of this contract anyways.
  28. 3 points
    "The Twins are growing increasingly comfortable that Boras is not simply playing with the Twins as leverage for the Mets." The vic is always the last to know....
  29. Please Don't Sign Michael Wacha

    Stew and 2 others reacted to mikelink45 for a post in a topic

    3 points
    I agree with the other posters - Wacha is not going to move the needle. He is not better than what we have. If he was as good as his won - loss record last year Boston would resign him - they need help. But his history is not good. Check out his erratic performane on BR. When teams desperately need SP - the fact he is still available should raise red flags.
  30. I just hope we can avoid injuries ... If not , I hope the prospects earn the right to play in the show and not be rushed ... Wallner was rushed because of all the injuries , his defense needs a lot of work ... Break spring training with the best players and if someone isn't performing at the major league level , replace them with someone who is performing hot in the minors leagues ...
  31. 3 points
    Why back off of the 10 year, $285 million offer? Why would the Twins do that if they really are convinced the 10 year/$285 offer was fair a month ago and if the Twins have no new medical info to consider? Seems like a poor way to negotiate by the Twins. It is difficult to lower an offer "for no reason" and expect the player to jump, all over it. It would leave a bad taste in the player's mouth if that is the case.
  32. Please Don't Sign Michael Wacha

    DocBauer and 2 others reacted to cHawk for a post in a topic

    3 points
    What even is the point of bringing in Wacha? He's a mediocre pitcher on the wrong side of 30. Adding such a pitcher to "eat innings" will not improve the Twins in any way, shape, or form. If Falvine plan on employing this strategy every offseason, they can respectfully take a hike. I want a team that makes the playoffs consistently. Is that not what Falvine promised from the beginning? We've missed the playoffs in two consecutive seasons with this strategy. Employing this strategy for a third consecutive offseason is unlikely to yield different results.
  33. Trevor Bauer

    whosafraidofluigirussolo and 2 others reacted to Brock Beauchamp for a post in a topic

    3 points
    People can definitely change but they have to want to change. There's no indication Trevor Bauer has changed or wants to change. He's still the same divisive guy he was three years ago.
  34. 3 points
    Heck yeah. These four fire me up and are a big reason why I’m not too wrapped up in pining for Correa. Would love to see an article sometime on “young pitchers to be optimistic about” as well. I think there are a lot
  35. Here's my thing. We signed Donaldson to what a 120 million starting at age 34 or 35...not sure exact age but it was definitely past his prime years. This is our chance to sign a better player at age 27. That gives us AT least 8 years before he would be the age of what Donaldson was. Think about that. Also spend money on a star..or pay 3 different underperfoming old veterans every year for 10 million each. No thanks! Sign Archer, Bundy, and whoever for totally of 30 million. OR sign Correa for 35 million a year?
  36. 3 points
    Improving his baserunning awareness and throwing decisions will help.
  37. 3 points
    Celestino looks like a career replacement player to me. Modest defense, not enough bat. He'll never hold down a starting big league job, but he'll hang around with a job in AAA for a half decade and get occasional 5th OFer service time.
  38. 3 points
    I am always mystified by the criticism he receives. Force fed into the majors he has answered the call. If he were a starter his statistics might require some hard looks, but he is 23 (almost 24) and he is handling CF when called upon - 112 games there . Last year Buxton had only 57 games in CF and 60 the year before - 117 games - only five more than Celestino. Please no Gallo in CF! I look for him to continue to improve and I am happy to have him on the team.
  39. 3 points
    I hope they don't mess the guy up by forcing him to develop "power". Not every player has to be a HR hitter. He's done well at legging out doubles in his career. I long for the days when a guy who could play the game of baseball was appreciated.
  40. 2 points
    It was Zimmeresque
  41. Please Don't Sign Michael Wacha

    DocBauer and one other reacted to sun for a post in a topic

    2 points
    Fans have a right to be skeptical. But the reality is that some pitchers are worth the gamble. Carl Pavano was all but washed up, but when the Twins gambled on him he pitched with class. Guess what? Today is Pavano's birthday! The Twins are going to do what they're going to do. As fans all we can do it watch & root for the team. That Pavano was able to pitch 10 complete games for the Twins between 33 - 35 years of age wasn't too shabby. Starting pitchers only need to keep the game close. After that it's up to the hitters and the bullpen. Happy Birthday Carl, the Twins fans still love you! https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/p/pavanca01.shtml
  42. This was edited to better explain. Yes, there would be a physical, but they are comfortable with what they already know and have stated that to him.
  43. I continue to be concerned with what the dollars will mean when we need to extend Miranda, Royce, Lee, AK, Larnach and Rodriguez beginning in four or five years. For that reason I am fine waiting for Lewis to be our shortstop sometime this summer. On the other hand, it isn’t smart of Mr. Cohen to disrespect a young Latin man. Certainly not if he really wants him playing for the Mets.
  44. The injury risks provides the opportunity for a mid/small market team to sign an elite player. I would take the risk.
  45. Like I said if we wait until the 7 days had past, IMO Dodgers will find a trade partner before. If no one wants him in trade, what are our chances to receive him via waivers? I don't, do you? And thank you for correcting me, I meant $720K.
  46. Temp Check on Austin Martin

    Twins33 and one other reacted to Dman for a post in a topic

    2 points
    To use an extreme example look at Aaron Judge vs Luis Arraez. Judge can hit the ball out of the park. He walks a lot and he hits for a decent average. He also plays above average defense at his position. Which team would have more success a team full Arraez type players or Aaron Judge type players? I think you know the answer. Since Arraez doesn't have power it doesn't mean he isn't valuable it just means he isn't as valuable as players who have close to his skills at the plate plus power. If you are looking to make your team better you are looking for players that fill out the full spectrum of skill set and power is an important piece as with one swing you can change a game. In Summary encouraging players that make good contact to sell out for power can make them more valuable if they can do it. I would say developing power is very important in todays game and likely always will be.
  47. Trevor Bauer

    TopGunn#22 and one other reacted to JesusisLord7 for a post in a topic

    2 points
    It is hard to know looking from the outside how bad a situation can be. The Dodgers recently released Trevor Bauer. I wonder if the Minnesota medical community could stabilize this guy? I have no idea. From a baseball only point of view he would be a big upgrade. I'm a person who believes in forgiveness but for a team to take a chance on a guy there would need to be evidence of change and restoration. Not sure on this one, what does everyone else think?
  48. 2 points
    I liked this article, but like so many posts I think we have a large list of Twins with a lot to prove: Mahle - he needs to be healthy and be a #2 Maeda - he has to show that he is healthy and that the short season Cy Young year was not a fluke Buxton - see the other posts Pagan - so much that it is impossible to summarize Lopez - was he a half season fluke? Polanco - is he healthy? Has he peaked? Miranda - can he continue forward to be the number 4 hitter and drive in runs? Farmer - can he give us solid SS if we do not loop back to Correa? Gallo - can he become valuable or is he a 160 hitter (this is my number one need because I do not like his acquistion. Alcala - is he able to come back to health and production
  49. Rally Monkey? - Nope Target Field Squirrel? - Getting warmer Richie the Rally Goat? affirmative!
This leaderboard is set to Chicago/GMT-06:00

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.