I was one of the few people who a year ago thought Milone would / should be the 5th starter. That view was based, at least in part, on uncertainty surrounding May. A year removed from that, I believe most of the uncertainty around May has been laid to rest and I have yet to be compelled by any argument as to why a team with contending aspirations would be better served by starting a guy with 4th or 5th starter potential rather than a guy with 2nd or 3rd starter potential. Contributions to the bullpen are fine and dandy but if your starters have given up 4-6 runs before you get to that bullpen guy you're looking at a 4th or 5th place finish.