Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins/Padres Finalize Deal: Rogers, Rooker to San Diego for Chris Paddack, Emilio Pagan


    Seth Stohs

    Rumors started last night. It appears both sides took the night to sleep on it, and on Thursday morning have finalized a deal that sends Twins top reliever Taylor Rogers and outfielder Brent Rooker to the Padres in exchange for starter Chris Paddack and reliever Emilio Pagan. 

    Image courtesy of Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports

    There is no question that the Twins prioritized adding starting pitching this offseason. To this point, they had added Sonny Gray in a trade with the Reds, and free-agent deals with veterans Dylan Bundy and Chris Archer. 

    On Thursday, they added Padres right-hander Chris Paddack and reliever Emilio Pagan in exchange for All-Star closer Taylor Rogers and outfielder Brent Rooker. The Twins are sending $6.6 million to the Padres (essentially paying Rogers' 2022 salary, per Ken Rosenthal), and the Twins will be getting a Player to be Named Later. 

    The trade adds a young, team-controlled, backend-of-the-rotation starting pitcher (Paddack) to the team. In return, the Twins downgraded their bullpen a notch (Rogers vs. Pagan) and traded away a prospect they were likely going to lose for nothing (Rooker). In addition, while losing Rogers is difficult, years of team control make the deal make some sense. Rogers can become a free agent at the end of the 2022 season. Paddack has three more years of team control, and Pagan has two more years of team control. 

    Emilio Pagan is a 30-year old with over four years of service time. He will make $2.3 million in 2022 and eligible for arbitration in 2023. He played for the Mariners in 2017, the A's in 2018, the Rays in 2019, and the Padres the last two years. Last year, he went 4-3 with a 4.83 ERA. In 63 1/3 innings, he walked 18 and struck out 69 batters. During his season with the Rays, he posted his best season (which will surprise no one). He went 4-2 with 20 saves and a 2.31 ERA and a career-high 12.3 K/9 (96 K, 13 BB in 70 IP). 

    Pagan's weakness throughout his career has been that he give up too many home runs. He's always maintained a solid strikeout rate, and his career walk rate is a decent 2.3 BB/9. But he's been susceptible to the long ball, which balances an outstanding ability to keep runners off base. (He has a 1.031! career WHIP).

    But he's not Taylor Rogers. The 31-year-old Rogers was the Twins 11th round pick in 2012 out of the University of Kentucky. In 2013, he was the Twins Daily Minor League Starting Pitcher of the Year. He made his debut in 2016 and has pitched in 319 games for the Twins over six seasons. He is 17-18 with 50 saves. In 314 2/3 innings, he struck out 361 batters (10.3). He is coming off of his best season in 2021. He went 2-4 with nine saves. In 40 1/3 innings, he walked just eight (2 intentional) and struck out 59 batters (13.2 K/9). He made his first All Star team, though he also missed the last two months of the season with a finger injury. He will also be a free agent at the end of the year. 

    In addition, Rogers has served as the team's player representative the past two seasons and led the Twins players through some rough years. He heads to the Padres where he will be able to compete against his brother Taylor and the Giants frequently. 

    The main target for the Twins in this trade is Paddack. He's only 26 years old. As a 23-year-old rookie in 2019, he went 9-7 with a 3.33 ERA. He had 153 strikeouts and 31 walks in 140 2/3 innings. Things haven't been real good since. In 2020, he went 4-5 with a 4.73 ERA. In 2021, he was 7-7 with a 5.07 ERA, though as people have pointed out, his FIP was just 3.78. While he throws a lot of strikes, his strikeout rate has dropped from 9.8 to 8.8 to 82 over his three seasons in the big leagues. 

    The other piece the Twins sent in return was Brent Rooker, who was drafted by the Twins in the Competitive Balance Round after the first round in 2017 after an amazing Triple Crown season in his final year at Mississippi State. The powerful slugger debuted in 2020 and hit .316 with two doubles and a homer in seven games before being hit by a pitch ended his season. In 2021, he played in 58 games with the Twins, but surprisingly wasn't called up until late July . He hit .201/.291/.397 (.688) with 10 doubles and nine home runs.

    It became increasingly clear that he wasn't going to get extended run with the Twins. In fact, the 'final' roster spot with the Twins appeared to be between Rooker and Kyle Garlick. With this move, we have our answer. In fact, it's possible that's the direction the Twins were already looking. If so, it's very possible that Rooker may have been DFAd to make room to add Garlick to the roster. 

    This story will continue to be edited as details and nuances are added. 

    What are your thoughts on this deal? 

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    5 minutes ago, nicksaviking said:

    I don't quite share Mike's enthusiasm about the bullpen, but most years, there's only about three teams that like the bullpen they have.

    Relievers tend to be unreliable by nature, even the good ones. There success is always based on small sample sizes and if they were reliable, they'd all be starters. To me, it always seems like predicting how good your bullpen will be was about as accurate as an early 20th Century weatherman.

    There's certainly variability, based I believe on the small sample sizes. A bad outing or three will have an outsized impact on a reliever's numbers. 

    But I do not believe that is the same thing as unreliable. 

    I believe in good telievers going forward over bad no matter if they had a bad game. And I DON'T believe in "just a guy" relievers no matter their streak of luck.

    Relievers vary in quality just as much as starters do, And there are strong pens and weak ones, just as there are starting staffs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, blindeke said:

    Again, Wes Johnson will have to be doing some amazing work.

    Aren't we still waiting on this? I think Wes is a probably a great guy, but I don't see the magic yet.

    Rogers, to me, should have been untouchable, at least until the deadline. The bullpen without a healthy Rogers was THE Achilles heel of this team last year. Seems likely it will be so again. Why risk it?

    With a fairly weak/untested rotation, we needed to shorten games. Period. Rogers can shorten games. Can others in the pen?

    Look, we'll see how this plays out, and I'm still excited for Twins baseball. But all of this scrambling to find-a-controllable-starter energy could have used on negotiating with Berrios last year on a long-term extension. Teams don't usually give up on a guy like Paddack unless they know first-hand that he's not going to bounce back.

    This is a "D" grade trade, with "A" grade upside, yes. But it could also sink the season early.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    43 minutes ago, chaderic20 said:

    one year of a good reliever

    I like your thinking, but Rogers was a "great" reliever. Elite, actually. And we likely will need an elite reliever in this bullpen this year, badly.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Three years of team control doesn't matter for Paddack is he doesn't start pitching a whole lot better. I'm excited for his potential. It could be a big win for the Twins if he improves. But yeah the fact is he hasn't been good the last two years and the team control doesn't matter if he pitches like that.

    Losing Rogers sucks but isn't shocking. Definitely need one of the young guys to step up in the bullpen

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, LastOnePicked said:

    I like your thinking, but Rogers was a "great" reliever. Elite, actually. And we likely will need an elite reliever in this bullpen this year, badly.

    They must be thinking somebody like Jhoan Duran will be pitching high leverage innings in that spot by the end of April. Duran's stuff is every bit as good as Rogers'

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, jccracraft said:

    Maybe they plan one starter to go like 4-5 innings, then one of the others the rest of the game? Basically like a long reliever of the past. 5 days in between starts to throw 5 innings is silly.

    With 16 pitchers on the roster they can have one pitcher throw 4 innings, the next throw 3 innings and then have 2 relievers finish the game. You can do that every game for 4 consecutive games and not use the same pitchers twice.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    I am hoping Bundy is good enough we can get rid of him at the deadline and make more room for Winder / Balazovic.

    I am hoping Bundy has the best year of his career, as do the rest of the Twins pitchers, and it's really difficult to decide who gets to start game 1 of the playoffs because they've all been so dominant.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Mike Sixel said:

    I'll be shocked if he's on the roster that long. 

    If Winder sticks on the big league club, hopefully they do some piggy-backing. If they do and Winder (or Duran) make it clear that they are the superior pitcher to the vet they are backing, that should make these decisions pretty easy. It will be an apples to apples comparison instead of the normal AAA batters to MLB batters comparison.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, LastOnePicked said:

    Aren't we still waiting on this? I think Wes is a probably a great guy, but I don't see the magic yet.

    Rogers, to me, should have been untouchable, at least until the deadline. The bullpen without a healthy Rogers was THE Achilles heel of this team last year. Seems likely it will be so again. Why risk it?

    With a fairly weak/untested rotation, we needed to shorten games. Period. Rogers can shorten games. Can others in the pen?

    Look, we'll see how this plays out, and I'm still excited for Twins baseball. But all of this scrambling to find-a-controllable-starter energy could have used on negotiating with Berrios last year on a long-term extension. Teams don't usually give up on a guy like Paddack unless they know first-hand that he's not going to bounce back.

    This is a "D" grade trade, with "A" grade upside, yes. But it could also sink the season early.

    This is wrong. The bullpen WITH a healthy Rogers was the Achilles heal of the first half. The bullpen WITHOUT Rogers was actually very good.

    Paddack's manager from last year is now the Twins bench coach. I'd think he has some first-hand knowledge of Paddack.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, nicksaviking said:

    If Winder sticks on the big league club, hopefully they do some piggy-backing. If they do and Winder (or Duran) make it clear that they are the superior pitcher to the vet they are backing, that should make these decisions pretty easy. It will be an apples to apples comparison instead of the normal AAA batters to MLB batters comparison.

    That's what I'd do, so it probably won't happen....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    This is wrong. The bullpen WITH a healthy Rogers was the Achilles heal of the first half. The bullpen WITHOUT Rogers was actually very good.

    Paddack's manager from last year is now the Twins bench coach. I'd think he has some first-hand knowledge of Paddack.

    Huh? 13.2 K/9. 1.8 BB/9. Rogers was excellent. The bullpen improved from the Colome disaster, yes, but a healthy Rogers would have only helped bolster that improvement. And he's healthy now.

    And is there any evidence that Tingler was even consulted on the trade? Maybe possible, but seems unlikely.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, Twins_Fan_For_Life said:

    Twins need more than 5 starting pitchers.  Look at the garbage arms they ran out there last year because nobody else could take the mound.   Now, with the recent signings and the young talent coming up, the Twins have plenty of depth.   Maeda comes back next year,  too.

    Pitching is a numbers game. No organization can look at 5 starters and declare themselves covered. Options 6 through 10 are going to play a role. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, LastOnePicked said:

    Huh? 13.2 K/9. 1.8 BB/9. Rogers was excellent. The bullpen improved from the Colome disaster, yes, but a healthy Rogers would have only helped bolster that improvement. And he's healthy now.

    And is there any evidence that Tingler was even consulted on the trade? Maybe possible, but seems unlikely.

    I didn't say Rogers was bad. I said when Rogers was in the bullpen the bullpen was bad. You stated that when he wasn't healthy the bullpen was bad. That isn't true. When he was healthy (the first half of the season) the bullpen was terrible. After he got hurt the bullpen did very well. I'm not saying no Rogers was why it was good, but your statement "The bullpen without a healthy Rogers was THE Achilles heel of this team last year." is factually incorrect. The bullpen without a healthy Rogers was very good.

    Your argument is that the FO's 2nd highest ranked coach was a trade target's manager the previous season and it's unlikely that they talked to said coach about that trade target? They should be fired if they didn't talk to him. This trade came together over 12 hours of time and you don't think they took the time to shoot Tingler a text at the very least and ask him if he thought Paddack could be coached up?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I share Nicksaviking’s surprise that the Twins are paying most of Rogers’ salary ($6.6 million). How often do the Twins send money in a trade? Is this money going to help get a blue chip player to be named later, or does it signal something else such as the value of the team control years for Paddack and Pagan? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...