Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Trade Lewin Diaz for RHP Sergio Romo, 2 Minor Leaguers


    Seth Stohs

    According to Jeff Passan of ESPN.com (And now many others), the Twins and Marlins are nearing a deal that would bring veteran relief pitcher Sergio Romo to the Minnesota Twins.

    Twins first base prospect Lewin Diaz is heading to the Marlins in return. The Twins will also receive a minor league pitcher Chris Vallimont and a Player to be Named Later in return.

    Image courtesy of Jeff Curry, USA Today

    Twins Video

    The Twins and Marlins reached an agreement. The Twins will send 1B Lewin Diaz to the Miami Marlins in exchange for veteran Sergio Romo.

    Per Passan: "The Minnesota Twins are deep into talks with the Miami Marlins on a deal that would send reliever Sergio Romo to Minnesota, sources with knowledge of the situation tell ESPN. The expectation is a trade will soon be finalized."

    Moments later, Passan tweeted: "One Marlins source says the deal should be completed soon. It would add a much-needed bullpen piece to the Twins, who continue to be aggressive in pursuit of help to their pitching staff."

    The 36-year-old Romo is in his 12th MLB season. He has 17 saves this season in 18 opportunities and a 3.58 ERA.

    Want a Winner? Romo was part of three World Series championship teams with the San Francisco Giants.

    Romo is excited to join a team that is making a pennant push.

    https://twitter.com/DaniAlvarez_16/status/1155291606402179072

    Lewin Diaz had a tremendous 2019 season, returning to his prospect status. He began the year in Ft. Myers and has continued to mash since being promoted to the AA Pensacola Blue Wahoos.

    https://twitter.com/MarianaGuzzy/status/1155289081351430145

    Chris Vallimont is a 22-year-old right-handed pitcher who was 4-4 with a 2.99 ERA in 13 starts with the Clinton LumberKings. He has now made six starts for Jupiter, the Marlins High-A Florida State League affiliate, and is 2-3 with a 3.75 ERA. Combined, he has 122 strikeouts in 105+ innings this year. He is likely to join the Kernels in Cedar Rapids. He was the Marlins 5th round pick in 2018 out of Mercyhurst.

    ANALYSIS... OK, Opinion

    While I believe that Lewin Diaz can be a solid MLB 1B starting sometime in 2020, I don't have any problem with this trade.

    Diaz has had a nice bounce-back season in 2019 after a disappointing 2018 ended early with an injury. However, he is behind CJ Cron, Miguel Sano, Brent Rooker, Zander Wiel and Alex Kirilloff in the Future 1B pecking order.

    Sergio Romo isn't dominant, by any means, but he is a successful veteran who has won a lot of games and even three World Series championships (if you think that matters anymore). He's not a hard-thrower anymore, but he is crafty and gets the job done, especially lately.

    Chris Villamont is an intriguing prospect. He can throw pretty hard, especially if he were to be moved to the bullpen at some point. He may be a similar prospect (Ranking-Wise) to Diaz, and yet he doesn't need to be added to the 40-man roster for two more years.

    And hey, if he goes to the Miracle, it's possible that they could lose a starting pitcher or two over the next four days.

    Finally, the Twins will also get a Player to be Named Later, a lottery pick, if you like.

    So to summarize, for Diaz (who likely wouldn't have been added to the 40-man roster this coming offseason), the Twins will get 2+ months of a competent, quality veteran reliever, a hard-throwing pitcher currently starting in the Florida State League after being drafted just a year ago, and another minor leaguer.

    Hard to argue with that.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Initially the article only stated Romo in the trade and not Valimont or player to named later. I don't think that Diaz for Romo would have been a good trade. I deleted my post after more info was added. Nick Andersson would have been nice to have right now but the Marlins got him for a prospect who hasn't done much for us yet so if it would have been Romo for Diaz straight up we would have been fleeced two out of three IMO.

     

    The Twins are chock full of 1Bs and OFs and not enough 40 man spots, while the Marlins are blessed with an abundance of pitchers in their farm system. The Twins should have pushed harder with the Ms to get more immediate major league help- Anderson would have been a nice throw in, Smith should have been brought up for a more robust deal. At least they were/are talking with one of the right teams to get a good deal from.

     

    Regardless, on first impressions, the Twins still made a good deal here- but not nearly enough unless there're more impactful moves coming.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    What an uninspiring trade. People are excited about adding a FIP near 4 to the back end of an already unstable pen? Mike Morin’s was 4.20 (Morin actually has a higher WAR on the season - .2 to .1).

    Meanwhile, the lead is down to one single game. Not only is this move not enough, it’s way too late (I guess we had to wait for the market to get set on Sergio freaking Romo?).

    There better be more coming.

     

    Yep, This third-tier-type deal should have been do-able in early June.

     

    But to be fair, Romo has been:

    FIPping at 1.79 over his last 15 games... with a

    0.61 ERA, and a

    K/BB of 12/1, K/9 of 7.4 and a

    WHIP of 0.89.

     

    Over the exact same time frame, Morin's:

    FIP is 5.28

    5.40 ERA

    K/9 of 3.09!

    WHIP of 1.11

     

    The Twins did their homework, and identified a playoff-experienced veteran riding a "Hot-Hand", that can potentially provide some "stability" to the pen; and, who they can possibly ride for maybe 2 months>>>

    and only gave up a guy they likely were going to be unable to protect, anyway.

     

    But yeah, there better be better names than Romo on the roster by next Wednesday night.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Yeah I love the deal. I don't get why people don't like it.
    He's clearly better than our worst reliever, and for net prospects exchanged, we gave up very little.

    I think people are letting perfect be the enemy of good.

    If this is all they get, it's not enough and they should be ripped.
    But that's independent of THIS trade. This trade in no way prevents them from continuing to improve the roster.

    "He's clearly better than our worst reliever." 

     

    That's why the move isn't popular. The goal is to improve the bullpen. The easiest way to do that is to add to the top and push everybody down, not vice versa. Sure, they have a few more days to add actual impact arms, but that doesn't mean anybody needs to like the Romo addition. If nothing else the deadline continues to creep closer and the Twins have yet to make a significant move. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "He's clearly better than our worst reliever."

     

    That's why the move isn't popular. The goal is to improve the bullpen. The easiest way to do that is to add to the top and push everybody down, not vice versa. Sure, they have a few more days to add actual impact arms, but that doesn't mean anybody needs to like the Romo addition. If nothing else the deadline continues to creep closer and the Twins have yet to make a significant move.

    So no move will be acceptable to you if the player isn't better than Taylor Rogers?

    I hope they get 1 arm that is as good as, or better than Rogers, but IMO, expecting 3 guys better than Rogers isn't reasonable.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    So no move will be acceptable to you if the player isn't better than Taylor Rogers?
    I hope they get 1 arm that is as good as, or better than Rogers, but IMO, expecting 3 guys better than Rogers isn't reasonable.

    Maybe this is splitting hairs, but as far as I'm concerned, the Twins need to get two guys better than their previous second-best option. Rogers, Romo and a third reliable arm would make this club much better protecting leads and allowing the offense to do its thing. Further, I'd certainly like the next acquisition to be a better option than Romo, who I expect to be OK, but not a world beater.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Maybe this is splitting hairs, but as far as I'm concerned, the Twins need to get two guys better than their previous second-best option. Rogers, Romo and a third reliable arm would make this club much better protecting leads and allowing the offense to do its thing. Further, I'd certainly like the next acquisition to be a better option than Romo, who I expect to be OK, but not a world beater.

    This is exactly how I feel about it as well. I'm not looking for another Rogers - though that'd be nice, it may be unrealistic - but I want someone significantly better than Duffey, May, and even a step better than Romo (who is now the second-best arm in the pen).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The FO reputation is under the radar moves. This fits in precisely with the off season signings of Cron, Schoop and Gonzalez. Those work nicely. I feel the same as many...this can’t be the only deadline trade, but to think the Twins MUST make the big splash just because it garners the big headlines is foolish.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I guess it's all about the spin rate on his slider and good control of his breaking balls.  His experience will be important as well in the pen. If he can hold his own as he has in Miami, should give Rogers what he needs in avoiding overuse.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Love adding a cagey veteran to the pen. We need experience for pressure situations and hopefully he can give some wisdom to the young guys in the pen.

    That is supposed to be one of the roles of the veteran catcher on the roster.

     

    Which brings up a completely unrelated topic. How comfortable should the Twins be with only Garver and Astudillo as catchers next year? They have combined for fewer than 200 games caught at the MLB level. Veteran MLB catchers aren’t particularly hard to find and stash at AAA however.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Twins are chock full of 1Bs and OFs and not enough 40 man spots, while the Marlins are blessed with an abundance of pitchers in their farm system. The Twins should have pushed harder with the Ms to get more immediate major league help- Anderson would have been a nice throw in, Smith should have been brought up for a more robust deal. At least they were/are talking with one of the right teams to get a good deal from.

     

    Regardless, on first impressions, the Twins still made a good deal here- but not nearly enough unless there're more impactful moves coming.

    This pretty closely tracks how I'm viewing it, after a night's sleep. A week ago I was saying I don't mind an overpay, because 40-man adds are looming and it's a false economy to haggle too much.

     

    I just didn't expect to overpay for Sergio Romo.

     

    And, it's an overpay, tacitly acknowledged by both sides, due to the inclusion of "an arm" and the ever-popular PTBNL, in return for what looks like a good bat.

     

    Maybe I'm mis-under-estimating Vallimont, but the one scouting report I saw says his fastball sits in the low-90s, not mid-. A draftee from a small college, he's unlikely to have any significant impact in the majors. Which... can be said of nearly every pitcher drafted, but there are shades of likelihood. I'm going with "just an arm" until I see reason to change my mind about that. Maybe the coaches at Ft Myers or Cedar Rapids spotted something when he pitched against them that made them report, "he's just the kind of guy we could get an extra 3 MPH from".

     

    I doubt that Diaz would have been a key as part of a package to making a bigger trade, so I guess I have to wait until after the deadline to try to infer whether this was the right use of him as a trade chip. If another trade does happen, involving us giving up as "a sweetener" a player I prize more, I'd have to wonder. That's really the only reason I care.

     

    I want careful preservation of assets, I want aggressive use of those assets now - it's a fine line.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Feels like a lot of you are conflating “this trade” with “overall deadline”.

     

    This is a good trade. We bolster our own with a legit mlb arm. We get a flier and PTBNL. For a really solid, but ultimately depth piece.

     

    By itself this is a case of trading surplus for an area of need. A prospect for a veteran PLUS a prospect.

     

    It’s clear Falvey is turning over every stone he can. It’s likely that more moves are coming. Independent of that, this is a *good trade*.

     

    The overall outlook will of course look better if we land one or more better arms. But whether or not we land better arms has nothing to do, IMHO, with whether this is a good baseball trade for our favorite 25.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like the trade, although would have liked it better if Romo were left handed.

     

    Have thought for awhile that the Twins need to make two moves for the pen.  One is for a top late inning guy who will be around for longer than this year.  The second could be a veteran rental, preferably a lefty.  Will Romo fill this second slot?  Or are two more moves on the horizon?  

     

    Love how Diaz has been hitting this year, yet see him on the bubble of whether or not he would make the cut and get added to the 40-man.  The way I see it, there are 11 or 12 good candidates to add with anywhere from 6-8 at the most spots that will be available.  So up to half those prospects may be at risk come the Winter meetings, unless moved elsewhere.  Hopefully, a few more will move to new homes before Wednesday.   

     

    Getting a good prospect like Villamont, who is in his second year, seems like a fair trade considering that the Twins needed to thin their group of 40-man eligible players.  Adding the PTBNL evens out the added risk of Vallimont being further away from making it.  Getting Romo seems like a big win for the Twins...at least to me. 

     

    Don't know why there is a PTBNL involved?  That often happened in the past with August trades where player X couldn't be moved until after the season.  Don't know why it happened last night other than the deal was done quickly and the Twins wanted time to scout certain players.  Does anyone know any other reason why a PTBNL would be included?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I wouldn't have hated Diaz for Vallimont straight up.

     

     

    Maybe the Twins wanted Vallimont, but the Fish said, "Well, then you have to take Romo off our hands."  :)

     

    "If we're going to take Romo, then you have to give us someone else ... One of these guys .... We'll give you a few days to think about it."  :)

     

    Vallimont = Rule 5 Eligible 2021

     

    Good move.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I feel the opposite. Despite Cleveland closing the gap, I want some focus put on the postseason along with also winning regular season games.

     

    And Romo lines up really well against the Yankees and Astros, particularly the Yankees.

    Totally agree with your points, Brock.  They were among the reasons I like this trade.  I also believe the Twins need to add a lefty to their pen, someone who can come in for a couple tough left handed hitters.  All I was saying is it would have been nice had Romo also filled that need as I now fear if they only do one more move it won't be for a lefty.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My first thought was: why trade for Romo when Belisle was available. Okay, that's a stretch, and a poor comparison, but like many others I'm hoping that this is not the only bullpen addition that the Twins make this month. I didn't view Romo as the playoff-type stopper that we need in the pen, but on further reflection I like the idea of getting a veteran with playoff experience, and his track record in that respect is good, Plus, he certainly HAS been pitching very well in the past month or so. If he's riding a hot streak, let's make sure his seat is a comfortable one.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The range of opinions on this trade are kind of fascinating. You've got people calling Romo now the 22nd best arm in our MLB bullpen and others saying he's just better than the worst option in our bullpen. You've got people calling this an overpay because of Diaz's future value and seeing little value in Villamont, while others are thinking it's good value because they see a small downgrade to Villamont and us losing Diaz in the offseason due to the 40-man crunch.

     

    I think it's a decent, but not transformative addition. Feels like Romo is a  replacement for Blake Parker, someone who can hammer RH hitters, maybe step into the overrated closer role and add some veteran presence to the pen. 

     

    It shouldn't be the end, but it's a good start.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I feel the opposite. Despite Cleveland closing the gap, I want some focus put on the postseason along with also winning regular season games.

     

    And Romo lines up really well against the Yankees and Astros, particularly the Yankees.

    Where is the support for lining up well against the Yankees? They crush righties as a team with a team OPS+ of 120 and are league average hitters against lefties at 101. Yankee right handed batters have been destroying right handed pitching at 133. In the last series weren’t lefty AAA call ups Smeltzer and Thorpe pretty effective?

     

    I think Romo helps the team in the regular season schedule of AL central but costs the Twins the game in the playoffs.

     

    This doesn’t change their need for a late inning right handed reliever that can put out a fire or a pitcher that can get a left handed hitter out in the middle innings. I am worried it changes their motivation to go find those two pitchers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Totally agree with your points, Brock.  They were among the reasons I like this trade.  I also believe the Twins need to add a lefty to their pen, someone who can come in for a couple tough left handed hitters.  All I was saying is it would have been nice had Romo also filled that need as I now fear if they only do one more move it won't be for a lefty.

    I suspect we see one of three things happen to fix the LHP situation, in order of likelihood:

     

    1. The team lets it run with Thorpe or Smeltzer and hopes for the best

    2. Trade for a starter, bumping Perez to the bullpen

    3. Trade for another LHP

     

    With Rogers as your best bullpen piece, picking up one more good reliever allows Rogers to play in more of a lefty specialist role (put him in against a tough lefty late in a game but then leave him in for 2-3 more outs because he's that good), which mitigates the need for a dedicated LH specialist (though it'd still be nice to have one).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think there’s a distinction between two minor leaguers, and a minor leaguer plus a PTBNL. The PTBNL doesn’t always result in a player? It’s a minor point.

     

    The PTBNL will be a 145 pound 16 year old kid from the D.R. that will eventually make Luis Arraez look like a soccer player. That's how these things always play out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The PTBNL will be a 145 pound 16 year old kid from the D.R. that will eventually make Luis Arraez look like a soccer player. That's how these things always play out.

    you never know how these things turn out. It might be that the player to be named later is David Arias, later named David Ortiz.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This pretty closely tracks how I'm viewing it, after a night's sleep. A week ago I was saying I don't mind an overpay, because 40-man adds are looming and it's a false economy to haggle too much.

     

    I just didn't expect to overpay for Sergio Romo.

     

    And, it's an overpay, tacitly acknowledged by both sides, due to the inclusion of "an arm" and the ever-popular PTBNL, in return for what looks like a good bat.

     

    Maybe I'm mis-under-estimating Vallimont, but the one scouting report I saw says his fastball sits in the low-90s, not mid-. A draftee from a small college, he's unlikely to have any significant impact in the majors. Which... can be said of nearly every pitcher drafted, but there are shades of likelihood. I'm going with "just an arm" until I see reason to change my mind about that. Maybe the coaches at Ft Myers or Cedar Rapids spotted something when he pitched against them that made them report, "he's just the kind of guy we could get an extra 3 MPH from".

     

    I doubt that Diaz would have been a key as part of a package to making a bigger trade, so I guess I have to wait until after the deadline to try to infer whether this was the right use of him as a trade chip. If another trade does happen, involving us giving up as "a sweetener" a player I prize more, I'd have to wonder. That's really the only reason I care.

     

    I want careful preservation of assets, I want aggressive use of those assets now - it's a fine line.

     

     

    I'm not sure if it's an overpay or not. The FO guy for the Marlins described Diaz as "the best left-handed power hitter in the minor leagues", hyperbole most likely, but if not, it's an overpay.

     

    I believe the MLB pipeline report on Vallimont mentioned that he hit 98MPH on the gun at some point in a short stint at Mercyhurst, so who knows, maybe our amateur scouts, who have some history with that DII program, have a book on Vallimont that makes them think he can be developed into something.

     

    We should cheer for this FO to be aggressive traders. We have lived with a long history of passivity. Of letting prospects run their course and become free agents, get scooped up via Rule 5, or have the luster fade. Our own people should be the first to know. We should be better at trading a guy like Oswaldo Arcia before the rest of the league ALSO sees that his knucklehead syndrome is a limiting factor. I want a FO that's not afraid to lose a trade here and there.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...