Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Manager Paul Molitor Fired


    John  Bonnes

    USA Today's Bob Nightengale is reporting that Minnesota Twins manager Paul Molitor has been fired and a press conference this afternoon has been scheduled to announce it. Molitor managed the Twins for four seasons, two of which they exceeded expectations and two of which they did not. They finished this year 78-84, a disappointment after making it to the postseason last year with an 85-77 record.

    Twins Video

    The team's 2017 season earned Paul Molitor Manager Of The Year Award honors, and a winner for this last season has not yet been announced, meaning he is still the reigning Manager of the Year. But his position as the Twins manager has been in doubt each of the last three seasons.

    In 2016, the Twins dismal start led to the dismissal of General Manager Terry Ryan, which would often mean a change in manager as well. But Twins ownership announced that any new GM would need to retain Molitor as manager.

    Which, of course, meant that questions emerged during the 2017 season as to whether new CBO Derek Falvey and GM Thad Levine would retain Molitor after their inaugural season was over, especially since Molitor's contract would also conclude after the 2017 season. A strong finish in 2017 and the resulting Manager of the Year award convinced both sides to extend the contract through 2020, though the amount of the contract was not announced.

    This year's disappointing start led to a trade deadline selloff when the Twins were out of the race by mid-summer, but there had been very little speculation that a coaching change was imminent.

    Comments from the Twins:

    “I would like to thank Paul for his tremendous dedication to the Minnesota Twins over his last four years as manager of this club,” said Twins Executive Vice President, Chief Baseball Officer Derek Falvey. “Paul’s roots here run deep and his commitment to the organization, his staff, and the players is special. I have every hope and desire that he remains a part of this club for many years to come.”

    “The importance and contribution of Paul Molitor to the Twins, our community and Major League Baseball cannot be diminished,” said Twins Owner Jim Pohlad. “On behalf of our family, I offer thanks to Paul for his four years as Twins manager and look forward to the continuation of our relationship with him.”

    Comments from Paul Molitor:

    “I was informed today that the Twins will seek a new manager for the 2019 season and I fully respect that decision. I will forever be grateful for the opportunity they gave me to serve in the role as manager for these past four years. I’m going to consider their genuine offer to serve in a different capacity to positively impact the Twins from a different role. Special thanks to my coaches and players I have had a chance to manage and I certainly appreciate the tremendous support I received from all of Twins Territory.”

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    God bless you Paul Molitor! You will always be a Minnesota hero to me. Best wishes on your new role within the organization. Yep, I'm a homer.

    I don't think you need to be termed a "homer" to appreciate Paul Molitor for his accomplishments, or even for his demeanor through the years as a primary face of the franchise.  I both admire Molly....and feel that, at this time, there should be better manager options available for this team.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good luck to Paul, the decision is justifiable though.

     

    I don't know who the next manager will be, but I'm sure of one thing: fans here and elsewhere will have no trouble finding all sorts of issues with their management choices.  They'll be wrong all the time and we'll make all sorts of assumptions about their motivation styles, in-game decisions, and use of veterans.  As it ever shall be.

     

     

    Edited by TheLeviathan
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Good luck to Paul, the decision is justifiable though.

     

    I don't know who the next manager will be, but I'm sure of one thing: fans here and elsewhere will have no trouble finding all sorts of issues with their management choices.  They'll be wrong all the time and we'll make all sorts of assumptions about their motivation styles, in-game decisions, and use of veterans.  As it ever shall be.

    Fan is short for fanatic you know!  :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes, a player/manager counts against the 25. Not sure if there's a loophole around that, like if your manager only played occasionally and you could 'option' the player to the minors while the manager stays with the MLB team...even though it's the same person.

    He'd have enough years of service that he could refuse the assignment. :)

     

    What if they put him on waivers, though, and someone claimed him?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Unless you are contending for a title or a playoff spot.

    Usually.  But this year would have been the exception to even that axiom.  The Twins last 9 series included 20 games against the likes of Texas, KC, Detroit, and the White Sox.  Don't think it would have mattered much if those teams had 'been trying' or 'playing it straight'....which they clearly were not.

     

    If ever there was a year when September records and statistics can be ignored completely...this would be it regarding the Twins.  The Twins need to overhaul in a fairly major way.  The manager should be just the first step.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Usually.  But this year would have been the exception to even that axiom.  The Twins last 9 series included 20 games against the likes of Texas, KC, Detroit, and the White Sox.  Don't think it would have mattered much if those teams had 'been trying' or 'playing it straight'....which they clearly were not.

     

     

    Would the Twins not also fit into that same category though? In that context, it seems to be apples to apples in my mind. 

     

    Not that it matters in the end though. My initial comment that sparked this was a one off quip in a half joking/half serious post. I'm not taking much stock in anything since the trade deadline.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I wonder what, if anything, making this move now signals about the FO feelings on where the organization is and how they'll approach FA this offseason.

     

    My initial thought was that they wouldn't make a change if they weren't going to push to be competitive immediately next year.  But after the press conference I'm not as sure.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Fine, whatever, I've had enough of your fancy, big city baseball lawyering. 

    But now I'd actually kinda want to know how that would work.  I imagine that if he were optioned, he'd simply be ineligible to play and the same rules for minor league transactions would dictate. 

     

    This has been kinda fun in a silly sense. Who knew that baseball rules could be so fun?!

    Edited by wsnydes
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    But now I'd actually kinda want to know how that would work.  I imagine that if he were optioned, he'd simply be ineligible to play and the same rules for minor league transactions would dictate. 

     

    This has been kinda fun in a silly sense. Who knew that baseball rules could be so fun?!

     

    Well, I did...you did, too, apparently :)

     

    And that's what I would assume, too, re: options. Same would go for a DL stint, I'd imagine.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good move for the team. I have nothing but good things to say about Molitor as a person, as do all of us, but he was only about 75% of a baseball manager. I hope he sticks around.

     

    I imagine Jeff Banister, fired a couple of weeks ago by the Rangers, will be the next Twins manager.

    Taking out the obvious connection between him and Levine, why else would we want him? Texas is trending in the wrong direction.

     

    It also appears Bannister did very little to develop their young players like Mazara, Odor, and Calhoun.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    IMO, this was the correct move.  I felt like the Twins got to the WC last year in spite of Molitor, not because of him.  Don't get me wrong, I loved the guy as a player and he's been a terrific baseball ambassador not just for MLB but for Minnesota as well.  I never felt like he had a good feel for a situation, especially when it came to handling a pitching staff.  How many times would we rant and first-guess in gameday threads about decisions that went awry.  The percentage of decisions that went wrong, I believe, outweighed those that went right.  

     

    However, this organization is still trying to dig out of the mess that Bill Smith and Terry Ryan 2.0 created with their trades and their rushing certain players through the minor league ranks.  The current GMs made a nice attempt at bringing in some FA talent for this season and it just completely backfired.  Lynn was terrible, Morrison was even worse, Odorizzi was average at best, Duke and Reed were pretty brutal.  Unfortunately, it left us with a fire sale at the trading deadline and the only significant piece that came back was Tyler Austin.  Let's hope that the farm system that has been growing over the last couple of years can yield a bumper crop for 2019 because I'm not sure that many will be confident in the FA market this year...unless Bryce Harper likes cold springs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Taking out the obvious connection between him and Levine, why else would we want him? Texas is trending in the wrong direction.

    It also appears Bannister did very little to develop their young players like Mazara, Odor, and Calhoun.

     

    Banister (we will have to learn how to spell his name!) was hired by the Rangers because he is an "analytical yet personal" manager. He purportedly was to use "analytics" to make his decisions while using his people skills to mentor.

     

    Banister is exactly what this front office says they are looking for.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Banister (we will have to learn how to spell his name!) was hired by the Rangers because he is an "analytical yet personal" manager. He purportedly was to use "analytics" to make his decisions while using his people skills to mentor.

     

    Banister is exactly what this front office says they are looking for.

    Except for a track-record of putting that skill-set towards winning...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with the move.  I'm not suggesting that it was all Paul's fault, but I find it somewhat damning that so many players regressed this year, some quite badly.  Not only did most of the young core fail to improve, but seasoned veterans had miserable drop-offs as well.

     

    For no particular reason, I like Carlos Beltran as a candidate.  I know the Yankees seriously considered him last year despite his lack of experience, plus he is held in extremely high regard by most of the Latino baseball community.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm glad this happened, I want this FO to do its thing and see what happens. I did get frustrated with Molitor as a manager. He is articulate though albeit with a unique style. Thoughtful. I find that refreshing in sports especially when compared to a guy like Zimmer who seems to wear his butchery of the English language like a badge of honor.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think the criticism of his bullpen management is overblown. With that bullpen you are going to always be on the edge of overuse because there were only a couple of guys that were any good. More accurate blame would be to the front office for not bringing in better pitchers

    Nope, it's on Molitor. Yeah, he could have used better talent but so could every manager.

     

    If you burn out your two best pitchers by the end of May, your depth just got worse.

     

    Make the best of what you have. Molitor burned through pitchers at a rate that virtually guaranteed a shoddy bullpen by midseason because he'd run all his good pitchers into the ground already.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Scioscia and Showalter are exactly what I don't want. I'm not looking for a manager that hasn't modernized. Might as well keep Molitor if those are the guys who replace him. They are the same manager in my opinion. 

     

    Hyde, Geren, Pat Murphy are guys that I hope they took a long look at. Never discussed philosophy with any of them so I won't offer strong opinions on any of them but I do know that they currently exist in the philosophy I'm hoping for. 

     

     

    I always though Showalter was at the head of the analytics charge even as early as the 90s when he was with the Yankees. His issue was over-analzying everything, at least when he was with the Yankees.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...