Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Add Gordon, Wade, Arraez To 40-Man Roster


    Seth Stohs

    Tuesday night, the Twins announced that they have added infielders Nick Gordon and Luis Arraez and outfielder LaMonte Wade to their 40-man roster.

    On Monday night, Aaron Gleeman of Baseball Prospectus was the first to report Gordon and Wade being added. Later, the Twins Official website has added those two players to their 40-man roster .Arraez was not announced until Tuesday.

    In addition, Alan Busenitz has been granted his unconditional release so he can sign with the Rakuten Eagles in Japan. The Twins roster is at 38.

    https://twitter.com/DanHayesMLB/status/1065046179057160192

    Image courtesy of Seth Stohs, Twins Daily (photo of Nick Gordon)

    Twins Video

    When we considered which minor leaguers could be added to the 40-man roster, Nick Gordon and LaMonte Wade were the two players listed as "Givens." Luis Arraez was among the group of players in that next tier.

    Gordon was the Twins top pick in the 2014 draft out of high school in Orlando. He began his career in Elizabethton and moved up one level each season until he began 2017 in Double-A for the second straight year. He struggled offensively in the second half of his Triple-A debut. His shortstop defense continues to get very mixed reviews and he will most likely wind up at second base. He has been an invite to big league spring training the last two years.

    Wade was the Twins ninth-round draft pick in 2015 out of the University of Maryland. He put up strong numbers as well until struggling to some degree in his Triple-A debut in the second half of the 2018 season. Known for his patient approach and knowledge of the strike zone, Wade added some pop in his bat in 2018. He can play all three outfield positions. He went to big league camp in 2018 for the first time as a non-roster invite.

    Arraez has pretty much hit since joining the organization. If not for a missed 2017 season (torn ACL), he might already be in the big leagues.

    Also Dan Hayes noted that the Twins have traded Minnesota native and one of the top relief pitchers in the system Nick Anderson to the Miami Marlins for infielder Brian Schales

    https://twitter.com/DanHayesMLB/status/1065062752849461249

    Info on Brian Schales:

    Here is a list of other Twins minor leaguers who were not added to the 40-man roster. These players will be eligible to be selected in the December Winter Meetings.

    Right-Handed PItchers: Jake Reed, Cody Stashak, Johan Quezada, Andro Cutura, Hector Lujan, Ryan Eades

    Left-Handed Relief Pitchers: Tyler Jay

    Outfielders: Zander Wiel, Jaylin Davis

    Catchers: Brian Navarreto

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Nick Anderson traded to the Marlins for infielder Brian Schales.

    Dispatching a guy rather than let him be taken via Rule-5, for... who? An infielder who will not be considered by Rule-5 selectors? I'm not sure the point.

     

    MLBTR indicates "more to come". I hope so.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Claim Dietrich and pay him his $4.8M in arbitration

     

    EDIT: may have jumped the gun on this recommendation due to RBVS - RiverBrian Versatility Syndrome

     

    Does look like a possible Utility guy against RH guys who throw pitches sometime in a game

    Edited by tvagle
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I guess getting something for Anderson is nice, because the Twins probably weren't going to use him. It stinks to see Busenitz sent off to Asia already, but he just wasn't cutting it here. There goes the last piece of the Nolasco-Santiago trade... until Alex Meyer recovers from his shoulder surgery in 2020.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    2018 MiLB numbers in AA and AAA

     

    against RHP: .281/.391/.409

    against LHP: .189/.266/.297

     

    No. He does not hit LHPs.  He is pretty much an automatic out against them.  He does mash against RHP.

     

    The Twins already have 4 lefty throwing OFs on their 4 man roster.  How given is a 5th?  Or an 8th total OF?  Meanwhile the infielder roster, including 1B sits at just 5.

     

    It is a numbers game

     

     

    Then, of course, in 2017 he hit .313 against LHP with a .794 OPS (.809 OPS vs. RHP).  THen, of course, in 2016 he hit .315 vs LHP with a .893 OPS (.823 OPS vs. RHP).   Then, of course, in 2015 he hit .345 vs. LHP with a .966 OPS (.884 OPS vs. RHP).

     

    So, with the single exception of 2018 when he played hurt, he has actually hit LHP better than RHP.  I think that you can make some argument that the years previous to 2018 were at lower levels, but to claim he is "an automatic out against LHP" isn't true one iota until you cherry pick the statistics.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For $100,000 it's foolish not to take a rule 5 player. I haven't looked lately, but at one time Haley was on the best team in baseball. With us he was on the DL twice and couldn't seem to stay healthy. Injuries are part of the game, but the pick was a good one.

    Justin Haley threw 7.2 innings of mop-up duty for the Red Sox in June, was nowhere near their MLB roster in the second half of the season much less the postseason, and cleared waivers and was outrighted off the 40-man by Boston on Nov. 1st, before he elected minor league free agency on Nov. 2.

     

    So if you want him back, here's your chance! You can give him a spot instead of another Rule 5 guy.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They got a MLB player for $100,000. I don't follow every other team and really don't care what they do. If the search committee had picked me, I would always take a rule 5 player. Always.

    $100k seems cheap, but in modern Rule 5, you're not buying much. Take a look at the recent results:

     

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_5_draft_results

     

    The last couple years, it's like maybe 1 useful guy out of 18 picks.

     

    By comparison, there are quite a few far more successful/valuable guys signed on minor league deals every year -- like Brandon Morrow for the Dodgers a couple years ago, Kintzler for the Twins, etc. Dereck Rodriguez, even. And those guys actually cost LESS than $100k (not to mention not requiring a 25 man roster spot). You'd probably be better off trying to identify those guys and enticing them to sign with the roster spot you would have used on a Rule 5 pick instead.

     

    It comes down to, what's the best 40-man I can assemble in the offseason? And what's the best 25-man I can field to start the season? Talent can be scarce, but not so scarce that Rule 5 picks need to be part of those roster equations, at the low odds of recent Rule 5 results. There's enough potential/talent available, in free agency, trades, etc., that it's easy to see why it's preferable for most teams to opt against drafting/rostering Rule 5 guys.

    Edited by spycake
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    As a baseball nerd, I love Rule 5, and I love rooting for underdogs like Rule 5 picks, but honestly, I think I'd rather see my favorite team have a better plan for talent acquisition and roster construction these days.

     

    I just think there's no risk... Take a guy, and give him back... or turn him into Ryan Pressly. Either way I just mainly think it's silly to think that the team should just never take that option, whether they are a contender or not. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just think there's no risk... Take a guy, and give him back... or turn him into Ryan Pressly. Either way I just mainly think it's silly to think that the team should just never take that option, whether they are a contender or not.

     

    I don’t think it is a never nor is it an always,

     

    A rebuilding team can always find space. A contending team needs to find a player and role that fits the roster. In today’s game team’s utilize options to shuttle relievers. You don’t get options with a rule 5 player. If the Twins target a middle infielder that can compete with Adrianza for that bench spot it could be a fit. The back of the bullpen has to be flexible.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just think there's no risk... Take a guy, and give him back... or turn him into Ryan Pressly. Either way I just mainly think it's silly to think that the team should just never take that option, whether they are a contender or not.

    The risk is keeping good players off the 25 man roster for a year. Contending teams probably shouldn't hamstring their manager that way.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Then, of course, in 2017 he hit .313 against LHP with a .794 OPS (.809 OPS vs. RHP).  THen, of course, in 2016 he hit .315 vs LHP with a .893 OPS (.823 OPS vs. RHP).   Then, of course, in 2015 he hit .345 vs. LHP with a .966 OPS (.884 OPS vs. RHP).

     

    So, with the single exception of 2018 when he played hurt, he has actually hit LHP better than RHP.  I think that you can make some argument that the years previous to 2018 were at lower levels, but to claim he is "an automatic out against LHP" isn't true one iota until you cherry pick the statistics.

     

    Thank you. Thought my crazy memory had gotten even crazier. Lol

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm glad Arraez was protected. I get he's probably ONLY a 2B. And I know Polanco will probably slide to 2B this next season or in the next couple. And I also get it may have been bard for someone to stash Arraez.

     

    But even if the Twins sign a quality infielder, which they HAVE TO DO, you need depth. This kid has an undeniable hit tool. We are hurting for depth at the upper levels. I think this was smart.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I'm glad Arraez was protected. I get he's probably ONLY a 2B. And I know Polanco will probably slide to 2B this next season or in the next couple. And I also get it may have been bard for someone to stash Arraez. But even if the Twins sign a quality infielder, which they HAVE TO DO, you need depth. This kid has an undeniable hit tool. We are hurting for depth at the upper levels. I think this was smart.

    Or Arraez will hit .350 the first month at AA, then .350 at Rochester for a couple months before moving up to the Twins where he will do the same.  

     

    Yes that comment is unlikely.  Or is it?  This kid has hit well over .300 at every stop he has been at.

     

    As for all the pitchers that weren't added, the Twins must feel that none of them are better than the 10 prospects they already had on the roster...now 9 with Busenitz gone.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm glad they protected Arraez.  I'd have hated having to read the stories about the Twins finally paying their karmic debt for nabbing Santana in the rule V.

     

    The Rule V draft seems to be happening already, and instead of $100,000, the best(?) prospects will cost you a different, marginal, non-40 man prospect.  And save you the 25 man roster juggle.  Glad Busenitz and Anderson have found semi-stable spots where they'll get a chance to put some money in the bank for a while.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    gotta concur here. This team is where it is because they have utterly failed at picking high with those two picks. Not just a small fail, but complete so far. Maybe Stewart bounce back....but Jay will be claimed and they will have bupkiss to show for the 6th overall pick just a few years ago. 

    Just gotta say I love that word "bupkiss" that you used. That made me smile. Thank you!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Add

    Harrison Bader
    Paul DeJong
    Ian Happ
    David Fletcher

     

    And the fact that all but Swanson and Bregman were picked up after Jay and makes that pick pretty bad.

     

    Need to mention that several of the first round picks who did not make it to the majors are high schoolers, including Brendan Rodgers #15 overall prospect at MLB.com, for whom it is tough to make it to the majors 3 years after drafted

     

    The Twins' drafts have been pathetic.  Another data point: only Gibson is still with the team from the players who were drafted before 2012.   That speaks tons.

     

    How many of those players lost a year to injury?  I'm not trying to defend Jay as the next big thing, because he is not.  Just saying it was not a "shameful pick."  Saying that 8 players from the first round are playing right now doesn't mean all other picks are busts.

     

    You're forgetting Eddie Rosario from the 2010 draft. 

     

    Added data point: Bill Smith was GM for 2008 to 2011 drafts.  He was terrible.  He in no way reflects the generally decent drafter that was Terry Ryan or the new front office that I think had 2 amazing drafts.

     

     

    Edited by SomeGuy
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     perhaps... but it wasn't like that one surprised the pundits. Most mocks had him going in the top 10.

     

     

    It's hard to argue that Jay wasn't a mistake pick. It's also hard to argue that the pundits weren't too high on him, although his injury history explains some of his struggles. 

     

    But people don't place his selection into context either. Right now, 28 of the first 42 selections have not played MLB. Only 5 of the 42 have generated positive WAR so far. Benintendi and Buehler were both available, so yes, drafting either of those two at #7 or #24 would have been huge.

     

    But that's the nature of the draft. All teams have their occasional misfires, every one of them. Not an excuse, just an attempt to temper the criticism a bit. All teams miss on winners, all teams have prospects who fail them through no real fault of their own, and all teams over-estimate a ceiling or take a risk that backfires every once in awhile.

     

    I seem to remember comments about the Gibson selection at #22. The pundits had his ceiling, at best, as a #2, and some thought he was too safe of a pick. An example of the inept Twins picking a high floor guy instead of going for the marbles. Many people were castigating the Twins about his selection up until about a year or so ago. Some might still, despite the fact that only 4 of the 21 players selected ahead of Gibson (9.4) have generated as much WAR and two of those guys, Mike Minor (10.4) and Mike Leake (15.6), might have lower trade value than Gibson and could conceivably be passed by him in terms of WAR before it's all over.

     

    So personally, I'm not terribly distraught that Jay has been left unprotected. At least he's still in the hunt.

    Edited by birdwatcher
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This is the kind of thing that I'm glad we are starting to see. May end up being nothing, but if the Twins are pretty convinced Anderson won't be that pen guy we want, then get something for him. 

     

     

    Bingo. That was part of my biggest complaint about Ryan, not actively managing the player assets.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've defended the Jay pick plenty, and would continue to from a theoretical standpoint.

     

    On the other hand, it was ultimately a big fail.  And heads rolled.  And now the new guys are ready to move on.  As am I.  Which likely won't even happen--Jay will remain a Twins farmhand.

     

    Instead, take a look at the 2016 draft.  Are any of those guys taken before AK ranked higher than he is now?  I'm thinking not.  Of course, at least on MLB.com, Forrest Whitley, taken two picks later, is ranked higher...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Not worthy of being taken isn't exactly high praise.......when other players drafted those years are starring in the majors.....

     

     

    You make it sound like there's a whole slew of players from that draft starring in the majors when in fact only two players selected after Jay can be described as such. Two out of 36, mind you.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...