Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Acquire RP Shaun Anderson from Giants for OF LaMonte Wade


    Nick Nelson

    Another day, another move.

    After agreeing to terms with free agents Nelson Cruz and Alex Colomé on successive days, the Twins struck their first trade of the offseason Thursday. The team announced that it has dealt outfielder LaMonte Wade Jr. to the Giants for right-handed relief pitcher Shaun Anderson.

    Image courtesy of Chris Brown-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Shaun Anderson was a third-round draft pick out of the University of Florida by the Red Sox in 2016. He went to San Francisco in the 2017 Eduardo Nunez trade ahead of the deadline. Anderson debuted for the Giants in 2019, making 16 starts and 12 relief appearances with a 5.44 ERA. In 2020, the right-hander moved to a full-time relief role and had more success, with a 3.54 and 18 strikeouts over 15 ⅓ innings, although his 12 walks were concerning.

    Standing 6-foot-4 and weighing around 230 lbs, the 26-year-old Anderson leans heavily on a high-powered slider (surprise!), which he threw 53% of the time last year. The pitch limited opponents to a .108/.164/.243 slash line. Obviously it's the kind of project the Twins like to take on, and have had success with. The Matt Wisler comparisons are natural enough (especially given that Anderson is coming from the team that just signed Wisler), and it's easy to see a similar scenario playing out here.

    https://twitter.com/dohyoungpark/status/1357507395547709440

    Anderson also throws a fastball in the mid-90s and has mixed in the occasional changeup, although it'd be no surprise if the Twins have him drop the third pitch. He has options, so there's no assurance he'll start on the big-league club.

    LaMonte Wade Jr. is a very solid player, capable of playing all three outfield positions and bringing exceptional discipline at the plate. Unfortunately he was hopelessly buried on the depth chart in Minnesota, even with Eddie Rosario out of the picture. In San Francisco he figures to get more of an opportunity, and reunite with former Twins farmhand Jaylin Davis.

    https://twitter.com/SethTweets/status/1357538628663009282

    We'll have plenty more information and analysis soon, so be sure to check back. For now, let's hear your initial thoughts and reactions in the comments.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY

    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers

    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums

    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    I don't know what to do but shake my head.

    Twins sign a milb/AAAA journeyman with high BB rates and limited to poor success and turn him in to a solid 60 game contributor. They aren't certain about his future, or his arbitration numbers, and dont like him not having options.

    Now, they trade a 5th/6th OF who probably doesn't figure in any plans beyond 2021 for a similar version of Wisler...with options...who has just begun to transition to the pen. Same age or younger, just as good of stuff, cheaper, has that option, perhaps even better floor and ceiling...yet to be determined...but the forward thinking Twins are suddenly backward thinking here?

    My bad. I forgot it's wrong to question any move this front office makes.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    .....17-years ago, the Twins acquired another RH from the Giants who was also only one season removed from transitioning into a reliever's role.  He was a couple years older, but also threw in the upper/mid 90's.  Now he's in the Twins HoF.  Come on lightning!  Strike twice!!!    

     

    Seems like a long long long time ago now. I immediately thought about the most recent trade for a pitcher with SF, and that Dyson really sucked (intended). I'm thinking hasn't the FO learned its lesson about trading with SF for a damaged reliever.

     

    I also wonder how many pitchers you can have throwing the same mix of pitches, the same mid 90s fastball and slider, before it works against you and gives the opponents pitching familiarity.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Question away, but comparing Falvine to previous regimes (Ryan/Smith?)? You lose me there. Completely different experience.

    They're definitely making moves and changes that will hopefully lead to something, but until they do something that actually gets this team over the playoff hump, it's the same thing in a shinier package.

     

    Is it better to get swept every year playing "new school" or get swept every year playing "old school"? Or is it basically the same thing?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Too bad to lose Wade, but I guess we'll see what Anderson turns into. I thought Wade's plate discipline skills were a good complement to the Twins offense, and he might take over from Cave as the main 4th outfield option at some point.

     

    I liked Wade as a 4/5th OF, but his only real advantages over Cave are his batting eye and shorter service time.  Larnach, Rooker, Lewis or Celestino would all likely jump him if injuries required a regular fill-in at the major league level.

    Eventually any of those guys might have jumped Wade to fill in as a regular, yes, but other than Rooker they might not get pushed to that extent early this season. (Though this move probably makes Rooker more likely to open the season in the bigs.) I wonder if another backup OF option is coming, maybe on a non-roster invite.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not concerned about losing Wade but I am concerned about acquiring Anderson. I'm not going to take any stock into 15 innings of 2020 but he looks like he walks too many and gives up two many home runs.

     

    They traded for him to pitch him and a 1.53 career WHIP does not excite me.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I looked at some of Anderson's highlights. Does anyone else look at this guy and see the body of a starting pitcher? He's 6'4" and 228, and somewhat slow to the plate. Seems very deliberate, kind of a Michael Pineda type.

     

    I think the Twins are kinda taking a flyer on a guy with potential to see if our pitching coach can polish him up a bit. I'm thinking if he has a good year, he could be competing for a #4 or #5 starting spot in 2022.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Meh. If a guy is still a "project" at 26, is he actually a project or is this simply what he is?

     

    I know everyone is in awe of this front office and the "Magic" Wes Anderson, but the jury is very much out for me.

     

    Like it or not, they haven't produced any more results than the previous regimes have.

    Wade's 27, and if he isn't a project then he's a career backup outfielder. Agreed, we didn't get a shoo-in for the the top half of the bullpen, but I think the cost was pretty reasonable.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's amusing to me that many assume Twins coaching will automatically improve the new pitcher. A tweak here and there, voila! A reliable reliever or possibly even a productive starter. 

     

    Wade, however, is what he is. SF has obtained a good OBP, no power, steady but limited defender. 

     

    I wonder what SF thinks Wade can be with a tweak or two?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wade is a replacement level player....so getting anything for him that can help at the major league level is a good deal.  Hope he does well in SF....ready for the the season!!  

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    They're definitely making moves and changes that will hopefully lead to something, but until they do something that actually gets this team over the playoff hump, it's the same thing in a shinier package.

     

    Is it better to get swept every year playing "new school" or get swept every year playing "old school"? Or is it basically the same thing?

    Old school got to the playoffs, new school got to the playoffs. That is a far better than the Mariners this century. They have gone as far as the A’s this century. They have done better than the Padres at getting to the playoffs. Complain all you want about lack of playoff success, that is the nature of baseball. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Great seeing this FO actually get something for a player who would need to be taken off the 40-man at some point this year.  

     

    Is Anderson the next Joe Nathan? Unlikely, but who knows. But it is great getting a pitcher with MLB experience for the bullpen or a future spot in the rotation. Love how they are adding competent depth to the pitching staff. Saw the walks in only a few innings last year. Does anyone know if walks were a problem in 2019 when he was starting?

     

    Expected the FO to exchange a fringe player from our 40-man for another piece to the 2021 puzzle. Will there be more?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    While I like Wade and think this might work out for him, I think there was zero room for him after 2021 with the Twins without a serious jump. Instead, we get a live arm just transitioning to the pen with potential.

    Probably good for both teams, but think the Twins "win" this one on initial speculation.

     

    You could be right.  The trade does appear to be a wash the more I look into it.  I just like Wades odds better.  He was never below an 800 OPS through AA.  He did struggle in AAA (700 OPS) and MLB ( under 700 OPS avg.) so as the pitching got better he had a harder time making good contact.  Having a good eye at the plate should help him though as he adjusts to the pitching at the higher levels.  He hasn't had a ton of MLB at bats.  His kryptonite though is power.  He is OBP over power and likely always will be.  In todays game that can be a liability that keeps him in the 4th outfielder position.  Still I think he has a chance for greater impact than the pitcher we received in trade but that is just my opinion.

     

    Anderson who was a starter had OK numbers coming up but his K rate was never great. The higher the level the higher his hits allowed and WHIP so he gives up a lot of contact and knows it so tries to dance around the zone.  He does appear to have an elite slider but right now it looks like he needs his fastball to improve as he is giving up too many hits and too many walks.  Granted those numbers were better at the lower levels of MiLB ball but very concerning when it comes to MLB ball.  He looks kind of like Poppen to me at this point although his slider is probably better.

     

    While the Twins did well with Harper and Wisler (in a shortened season)  It seems there might be limits to what they can achieve with these types of players.  Once teams figured out Harper he was far less effective and the Twins let Wisler walk for peanuts so they seem to understand the limits of what these guys bring.  Harper had a decent K rate last year but his ERA was 7.61 with 1.61 WHIP.  If he wasn't hitting with his breaking stuff guys waited for his fastball and that was that.  Yeah his K percentage was decent but you need two good to very good pitches to make it.  I am not sure Anderson has that.

     

    Relievers that make it have to have a pitch that they trust they can put in the zone and dare the batter to make solid contact.  Right now the numbers don't show that to be the case.  He was a starter though so he does have three pitches to work with so that might help. Can the Twins turn him around and make him better I think they can but I am not sure they can make these cast off types last for long.  If they can help him find another gear and get the walks under control then I am happy to agree with you but I think that is a lot of ifs.  I mean I think Colina and Chalmers likely have equal or better stuff than this guy.  If they can't fix those guys how are they going to fix Anderson?  

     

    I like Andersons potential I really do and I agree with you that there was no room for Wade. Carrying 7 outfielders on the 40 man was a burden so the Twins are better off this way.  I just believe in Wade soo much and know more about him that I believe the Giants will get the better end of this deal in the end.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I like Wade, he was our best CF replacement. I'm happy for him that he should get more playing time, wish him well

     

    Don't agree... Much better off with Kepler given our depth of corner OFers. They can also keep Canterino at AAA and use him if Buxton goes down for a prolonged period.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good luck, Wade, Jr!  

     

    I do think this is a solid move.  They dealt from depth (especially the L/L outfield pile) and acquired a bullpen arm that can ride the LRT between St. Paul and Minneapolis for two years, if necessary.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Guy struggles as a starter for the Giants.

     

    Then starts to look good as a reliever.

     

    Then gets traded to the Twins. 

     

    So help me, but if he stands on the mound and does the bpbpbpbpttt thing before he pitches, I think we got us a keeper. 

    IALTO

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Don't agree... Much better off with Kepler given our depth of corner OFers. They can also keep Canterino at AAA and use him if Buxton goes down for a prolonged period.

     

    That 99 from CF should be interesting....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Likely because they feel Wade’s value is only going to depreciate if he stays in Minnesota.

    That was my initial reaction too - that a year from now, the guy we got is more likely to retain (small) non-zero trade value than the guy we gave, if we had kept him.

     

    After looking more at Anderson I'm now thinking he's pretty likely to have no value in a year, either. Still, that makes it potentially an even trade. And for once we get pitching in return for a position player, instead of what seems like always the other way around.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That was my initial reaction too - that a year from now, the guy we got is more likely to retain (small) non-zero trade value than the guy we gave, if we had kept him.

     

    After looking more at Anderson I'm now thinking he's pretty likely to have no value in a year, either. Still, that makes it potentially an even trade. And for once we get pitching in return for a position player, instead of what seems like always the other way around.

     

    My thoughts exactly. Take a flyer on a guy that might pay dividends at a useful position while giving away a guy who will only lose value in the coming months because there just isn’t room for all the OF in the upper system.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...