Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Acquire Jake Odorizzi From Rays For Jermaine Palacios


    Seth Stohs

    According to multiple reports, the Twins have acquired RHP Jake Odorizzi from the Tampa Bay Rays in exchange for shortstop prospect Jermaine Palacios.

    Michael Pineda moved to 60-Day Disabled List to make room on the 40-man roster to make room for Odorizzi.

    Image courtesy of Derek Hamilton, USA Today

    Twins Video

    One day after Twins fans were frustrated by the signing of Anibal Sanchez, the Twins have acquired a hard-throwing right-hander from the Tampa Bay Rays.

    Odorizzi went 10-8 in 2017 with a 4.14 ERA for the Rays. In his four full major league seasons, he has had ERAs between 3.35 and 4.14. After compiling a 9.3 K/9 rate in his first full season, he has averaged 8.0 K/9 exactly in his last three seasons.

    The Twins acquired a guy who will be fit well at the top of the Twins rotation with Ervin Santana and Jose Berrios.

    Tweet from Twins PR director Dustin Morse:

    https://twitter.com/morsecode/status/965059891277762560

    The Twins gave up shortstop Jermaine Palacios. The shortstop had a return to prospect status in 2017 after a disappointing and injury-plagued 2016 season. He was just outside of the Twins Daily Top 20 prospect rankings, but was in most Top 30s.

    But the Twins have strong shortstop depth throughout the organization. Jorge Polanco is in the big leagues. Nick Gordon should spend most of 2018 in Rochester. And Royce Lewis and Wander Javier are high-ceiling prospects in the lower levels.

    ccs-19-0-80028600-1518923740_thumb.jpg

    Jermaine Palacios was appreciative of the Twins and excited about this trade. Here is what he told Mariana Guzman after the deal.

    One day after the Sanchez signing frustrated Twins fans, the Derek Falvey/Thad Levine Twins pulled off what appears to be a very good trade on its surface.

    What are your thoughts?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    They can have a league average or worse starting rotation and still be an above average team.

    Sure. But my point is, the goal shouldn't just be to be an above average team either.

     

    If my 3rd starter is league average, then sure by definition and averages, he's a "#3 starter", but my goal would be upgrade as many spots as I can. I'd want a solidly above average starter in that spot, with maybe a league average guy #4, and an almost league average guy #5.

     

    Probably not possible to have a step up at every position, but that wouldn't stop me from trying.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I know his peripherals will be different, but I get kind of a Tommy Milone type vibe in terms of overall results from Mejia. Like, capable of league average performances, but maybe not a ton of innings, and not a guy I'd trust in my playoff rotation. Still useful in the #5 spot while cheap, though.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    On the two-year anniversary of this trade, it was fun (in a train-wreck sort of way) to read through all the angst about Odorizzi.

     

    For those wondering, Palacios is still really struggling in the minors, with a .210/.275/.266 slash line between A+ and AA last year.

    It's always fun to go back and read this stuff. My in-the-moment take from two years ago:

     

    "I wanted something better than Odorizzi but straight up for Palacios?

     

    lol yes every day"

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The "hand-wringers" will always be there.  This sounds a lot like the Maeda comments.  Lets hope that Maeda produces as well as Oderizzi has for the Twins.  :)

     

    I agree the comments had the same tone, but the Twins also gave up a top 100 prospect for Maeda, while they gave up a borderline top-20 Twins prospect (from a position of strength) for Odorizzi. So in that sense let's hope Maeda produces even better than Odorizzi.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I agree the comments had the same tone, but the Twins also gave up a top 100 prospect for Maeda, while they gave up a borderline top-20 Twins prospect (from a position of strength) for Odorizzi. So in that sense let's hope Maeda produces even better than Odorizzi.

    It's not about an Odorizzi and Maeda performance comparison straight-up; money and contract length also play a role (money being the primary reason the Rays dealt Odorizzi in the first place).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    On the two-year anniversary of this trade, it was fun (in a train-wreck sort of way) to read through all the angst about Odorizzi.

     

    For those wondering, Palacios is still really struggling in the minors, with a .210/.275/.266 slash line between A+ and AA last year.

    I saw this headline, and thought the same thing- I remember that I had liked Palacios in those days, but wow, he's really fallen off a cliff. Not even among the TB top 50. 

    Right now that trade looks like robbery... I'm glad this was posted- maybe I can stop throwing up in my mouth a little whenever I think about Matt Capps.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Love seeing posts like this.    Lets everyone know where they stood at the time rather than where they remember they stood.    Don;t think I was on here in 2009 but would love to see where everyone stood on Mauer extension rather than where everyone said they stood.    I remember on the Trib pages it was over 99% for extending Mauer no matter the cost.   A few years later about 99% maintain that they were against the deal all along.   In this case, my memory was correct in that I liked the Odorizzi signing while also reminding me I would have preferred Cobb.   Is it too late to go back and edit?   Also the first time I marked like on a comment two years after it was posted.   Also makes me wonder what happened to jimmers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Love seeing posts like this.    Lets everyone know where they stood at the time rather than where they remember they stood.    Don;t think I was on here in 2009 but would love to see where everyone stood on Mauer extension rather than where everyone said they stood.    I remember on the Trib pages it was over 99% for extending Mauer no matter the cost.   A few years later about 99% maintain that they were against the deal all along.   In this case, my memory was correct in that I liked the Odorizzi signing while also reminding me I would have preferred Cobb.   Is it too late to go back and edit?   Also the first time I marked like on a comment two years after it was posted.   Also makes me wonder what happened to jimmers.

    Well since this board didn't exist until late 2011 it'd be a bit difficult to go back and look at that. I was part of the ESPN board at the time and I remember it being mixed. From what I remember most people considered it necessary to do but there were concerns that his value would plummet as soon as he was no longer catching, mostly from a power perspective. I was always a fan of the extension partly because I always loved Joe, even when he was underperforming I was glad he was representing our team because he is a local and a great guy

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Well since this board didn't exist until late 2011 it'd be a bit difficult to go back and look at that. I was part of the ESPN board at the time and I remember it being mixed. From what I remember most people considered it necessary to do but there were concerns that his value would plummet as soon as he was no longer catching, mostly from a power perspective. I was always a fan of the extension partly because I always loved Joe, even when he was underperforming I was glad he was representing our team because he is a local and a great guy

    On the trib boards I was the lonely voice in the wilderness saying it didn't make baseball sense signing him to an extension at or near market value after his MVP season.   It did make a ton of marketing expense with the new stadium and I wasn't against it because I was a fan of Joe's also and regardless of the contract he was still really good at baseball.    I also never complained about the deal afterwards.   The main problem I have with big free agency contracts is that you are paying them for good years they had with someone else.   At least with our own players the good years were with us.  Thanks for the history lesson on TD.     I thought I just discovered it after everyone else.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We could dredge up the volumes of pages on the Santana trade debacle, though. I’m quite certain that Johan, Terry Ryan, among others wish for a mulligan on that one. I think he’d still be pitching, putting the final touches on his Hall of Fame resume, if he had stayed in Minnesota.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...