Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • The Twins Need to Set a Carlos Correa Contract Deadline


    Cody Christie

    Carlos Correa is one of the biggest keys to the Twins' offseason plan. So does the team need to set a deadline for whether they are in or out on Correa?

    Image courtesy of Bruce Kluckhohn-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

     

    With the Winter Meetings starting this week, the hot stove might begin to heat up. Plenty of the biggest free agents and their representatives will be traveling the halls in San Diego. Scott Boras, who represents Carlos Correa, is usually one of the most active people at the annual event. Besides Correa, he represents other top free agents like Xander Bogaerts, Brandon Nimmo, and Carlos Rodon. Boras can see how the market plays out for his top clients, but the Twins might not have the time to wait on a Correa decision. 

    Minnesota has payroll flexibility this winter, with around $50 million in payroll to spend. The Twins will likely get outbid for Correa's services, and the team will have to pivot to other options. However, the Twins might end up with no viable free-agent options if Correa's contract negotiations drag out over the next few months. Some top free agents like Jacob deGrom and Jose Abreu are already off the market, and other names may sign as more conversations occur at the Winter Meetings. 

    Last winter, the market didn't play out in Correa's favor. He switched agents, and the lockout forced him to wait until spring training started to ink a deal. Correa can choose to be patient this winter to see what clubs miss on Aaron Judge before turning their attention to the other top names on the market. Correa likely wants a decision sooner rather than later, but he's expected to sign a contract covering the remainder of his career. It must be a good fit from the team and player's perspective. 

    Derek Falvey and Thad Levine have proven the ability to be patient and let the market play out in their favor. However, that strategy almost didn't play out in their favor last year as Correa fell into their laps as spring training began. In previous offseasons, they had made offers to some of the top free agent starters like Zack Wheeler before signing Josh Donaldson to a multi-year contract. Thankfully, the team was able to jettison the Donaldson contract, but this winter might be the time for the Twins to change their off-season strategy.  

    Internally, the Twins should set a deadline to sign Correa so they have enough remaining time in the offseason to make moves that put themselves back in contention. The AL Central is one of baseball's worst divisions, and Minnesota has finished below .500 in two consecutive seasons. Things will be challenging for AL Central clubs, with MLB schedules becoming more balanced next season. According to the preliminary ZiPS projected standings, FanGraphs expects the Twins to finish 81-81, one game behind Cleveland for the division title. Obviously, a player of Correa's caliber can be worth enough WAR to push the Twins to another level. 

    According to reports, the Twins have made multiple contract offers to Correa from six to ten years in length. It's certainly good that Minnesota's front office is engaging him in contract talks, but the team can only afford to see so many free agents sign with other clubs. Bogaerts seems like the player the Twins will turn to after Correa, and the team may need to pivot to him at some point in the coming weeks. If Correa returns to the Twins, it would be in the team's best interest to have a deal in place before the end of December, so the front office can continue to improve the roster around him. Otherwise, the team may be left without few moves to make. 

    Do the Twins need to set a Correa contract deadline? How long can they wait for him to make a decision? Leave a COMMENT and start the discussion. 

     

     

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 minutes ago, ashbury said:

    Levine: "Mr Boras we need a decision from your client. Otherwise, we'll have to turn to our second choice."

    Boras: "Which one, Correa, then Bogaerts? Or Bogaerts, then Correa?"

    Ha!  Yes.  Boras is in a good place here -- which is not good for the Twins.  I know they won't, but I would be giddy if that situation played out and the Twins said "neither" and signed Trea Turner.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, bap3141 said:

    Okay, then I suppose you could replace Correa with Trea in that scenario.  The point is, I don't see it working out as a viable strategy to wait -- I think the SS market will move fast.  And I would rather that the Twins not be in reactionary mode, 

    I think that's what everybody is saying. It's what I've been saying anyway.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, nicksaviking said:

    I think that's what everybody is saying. It's what I've been saying anyway.

    Maybe I missed something in the thread (possible), but I didn't get that from this comment:

     

    "I suppose it is semantics. My deadline would be, "whenever there are only two of the four free agent shortstops left". If not earlier."

     

    If we both agree that we don't want to see the Twins in a reactionary mode, then I don't believe this is the approach to take. Again, I could be missing some context here.  If we both agree that once one Correa or Trea signs, then the others will follow suit rather quickly, I wouldn't want to take this approach.  I likely just didn't really interpret the part where you said, "If not earlier" ... with that I agree 100%.  Earlier!  Please. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, ashbury said:

    Levine: "Mr Boras we need a decision from your client, so we're preparing our final, best offer for his consideration. Otherwise, regrettably, we'll have to turn to our second choice."

    Boras: "Which one are you speaking of? Correa, then Bogaerts? Or Bogaerts, then Correa?"

    Yeah, Boras has a good situation going, but he wouldn't be acting as a good steward of both of his clients futures if he gambles with Bogaerts interests to leverage a better deal for Correa.

    And Bogaerts was his client long before Correa. If a team was willing to make Bogaerts a deal he wants, no way Boras is telling Bogaerts, "Please hold, I'll get to you after I satisfy my most important client". I know it's atypical, but think Correa gets done first.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, nicksaviking said:

    Yeah, Boras has a good situation going, but he wouldn't be acting as a good steward of both of his clients futures if he gambles with Bogaerts interests to leverage a better deal for Correa.

    And Bogaerts was his client long before Correa. If a team was willing to make Bogaerts a deal he wants, no way Boras is telling Bogaerts, "Please hold, I'll get to you after I satisfy my most important client". I know it's atypical, but think Correa gets done first.

    I've never heard a word suggesting Boras has ethical problems, so any joking I do is based on the premise that he's kind of neutral about everything aside from getting the best dollar value for each client. In essence, my joke was him saying, "meh, you tell me."

    When we say "Boras", we really mean the big operation he has built. I'm sure he puts in significant time with each of his biggest clients, but surely he farms out much of the work to his subordinates, and when any ethical situations arise he makes sure there are sufficient firewalls between the two handling things for them, and then signs off on the final agreement.

    If, say, Bogaerts becomes a little irritated by spring that somehow Correa's contract ending up costing him money, he can console himself that it was just the market, and not Boras himself. Or, of course, vice versa. I doubt either will wind up thinking they would have done better with different representation.

    I think highly of Boras.  I think he'd make a great Commissioner, except he would never take the cut in pay.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    NO.  Just sign the best players available and if we run out of money before the Boras show down so be it.  Fix the team - we have enough needs.  I am glad you said it was an internal deadline because trying to hold out against Boras and play hardball does not work.  Just tell him to call when he is getting close to having Correa sign and if we still have the money we can jump in.

    Just remember that Correa was a wonderful and highly overpaid player next year who did not even lead us to 500.  We can sign him again and still be 500 if we do not construct the entire roster correctly.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Nashvilletwin said:

    2. You are correct - nothing happens at the top of the market until Judge signs. Buyers and sellers are waiting to see what kind of ammo that gives to their arguments.

    I agree that the team that signs Judge will likely not be able to sign other high end free agents, but I'm not so sure "nothing happens" is the case.  If a team needs a SS, they won't really care if Judge has signed. 

    Yes Judge is the top of the market, but several major free agent signings have already happened with Verlander, deGrom, Abreu and now Trea Turner all signing - likely for either more years or more $$ than anticipated.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, puckstopper1 said:

    I agree that the team that signs Judge will likely not be able to sign other high end free agents, but I'm not so sure "nothing happens" is the case.  If a team needs a SS, they won't really care if Judge has signed. 

    Yes Judge is the top of the market, but several major free agent signings have already happened with Verlander, deGrom, Abreu and now Trea Turner all signing - likely for either more years or more $$ than anticipated.

    Yep - I was wrong.  Turner dropped today. Two of the others were pitchers and Abreu is a two year deal - so those weren’t really in my thinking. But Turner certainly was. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Fire Dan Gladden said:

    May be semantics here, but that is not setting a deadline, that is moving forward.  If they could sign Bogaerts today (for right contract), and Correa is still undecided, they would sign Bogaerts.  Nothing to do with a deadline.

    Boras takes the approach that the market is irrelevant.  He knows what he wants his players to get and he usually gets it somewhere.  Very rarely do things not work out for him.

    If it is Correa or nothing, the Twins may have already tipped their hand.  But they will not go back to Boras and say "too late"

    Right, and negotiation with Bogaerts and having Farmer already on the team can give the Twins some leverage on the negotiation w/ C4.

    Something like: ”look, we’d rather sign you, but if we can’t figure this out, we’ll go w/Bogaerts that we are close on a deal with”.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Correa is not coming back unless we offer the most $$, which is highly unlikely. This constant waiting with baited breath by Twins Twitter etc. is over the top. There's a 98% chance he's gone and that's been the case for months.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 hours ago, Original_JB said:

    Well, Boras is no dummy, and I'm sure that having the Twins essentially begging to have him back at some "bottom of the market" price with a variety of year length contracts, has him thrilled, and in no hurry.  If the Twins feel they want one of the other 3 FA SSs at all, they should go about their business and make offers to them. That said, unless it is an overpay, I think everyone is waiting for the Judge contract to drop and everyone falls into line after that. Will the 'non-Correa' SSs stand around and wait to see what he gets before signing? Again, unless it's a "market rate" or big overpay (like Texas did with Seager and Semien) I'm not sure. But the Twins certainly shouldn't sit on their hands waiting. If one of the other 3 bite on a reasonable deal and it's an upgrade from where you're at, make the move, and maybe give Correa a "right now, yes/no" option, before making the signing.

    I wonder what ethical considerations Boras has in representing both Correa and Bogaerts? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Per the Athletic via ESPN, San Diego offered Trea Turner a contract larger than the $341m Lindor got from the Mets.  Turner turned it down to stay closer to family in Philly.

    If this is accurate, this Twins ability to sign Correa may be a lot lower than most of us think...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Don’t look now but what we feared might be happening. Haniger has signed along with several of the better pitchers.   Signing Correa would be fun but this team has holes in addition to SS. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Linus said:

    Don’t look now but what we feared might be happening. Haniger has signed along with several of the better pitchers.   Signing Correa would be fun but this team has holes in addition to SS. 

    They were never getting deGrom or Verlander. Rodon wants a six year deal. None of the other starting pitchers who've signed are better than Gray and Ryan. No interest in guys like Taillon or Walker.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, nicksaviking said:

    They were never getting deGrom or Verlander. Rodon wants a six year deal. None of the other starting pitchers who've signed are better than Gray and Ryan. No interest in guys like Taillon or Walker.

    Disagree. They need to add 120 innings plus of good pitching so those were viable targets. Haniger was the best choice to add a right handed outfielder and Josh Bell was a great fit at DH.  They could get the innings by adding two bullpen arms better than Jax but they don’t do that either. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, Linus said:

    Disagree. They need to add 120 innings plus of good pitching so those were viable targets. Haniger was the best choice to add a right handed outfielder and Josh Bell was a great fit at DH.  They could get the innings by adding two bullpen arms better than Jax but they don’t do that either. 

    Outside of Verlander, has any pitcher signed that you can feel confident about giving you 120 good innings? There's just not that type of pitcher available this year.

    Quintana, Taillon and Walker have been average to terrible the years leading up to  2022. Few things are as frustrating as seeing a veteran pitcher have one bounce back year and the league assumes that's the new normal. It's not; history shows they're much more likely to be average to terrible again. I'd be more than happy if the Twins never gave out a multi year deal to one of those kinds of pitchers ever again.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...