Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Setting Up For The Second Half


    Nick Nelson

    On Sunday, the Minnesota Twins played their 75th game of the season. Quickly closing in on the halfway point, they are on pace for a 52-110 record. Even if the Twins manage to play .500 ball the rest of the way, they'll finish with 94 losses.

    It goes without saying that the remainder of this season needs to be focused on 2017 and beyond. Here are five steps that the Twins can take to better prepare themselves for the future.

    Image courtesy of David Richard, USA Today

    Twins Video

    1) Install Miguel Sano at third base.

    We've discussed this quite a bit around here, so I won't dwell. It is becoming increasingly clear that Sano should be in the team's plans as a third baseman and Trevor Plouffe – who is enduring a rough campaign – should not. Make the necessary moves to open up the hot corner for Sano, allowing him to regain his comfort level there ahead of next season when the games start mattering again.

    This, in turn, would keep right field open for Max Kepler, who has played well enough to stick.

    2) Roll with Eddie Rosario.

    Rosario was undoubtedly deserving of the demotion he received five weeks ago, but he has responded in a big way. The outfielder has multiple hits in 14 of the 35 games he has played in Rochester, reining in his K-rate and getting back to smashing hard liners all over the field.

    He still isn't walking much, and never will. But even with his ultra-aggressive ways, Rosario can be an impact player and he showed that last year. Bring him up and let him play his game over the final months. Maybe he proves himself to be the clear choice for left field next year. Maybe he builds some trade value for the offseason. Or maybe he reinforces the notion that he's going to be a fourth outfielder at best.

    Incidentally, Rosario has been playing center field regularly in Triple-A, which might put him in line to bump Byron Buxton, who still appears unprepared for MLB pitching.

    3) Return Trevor May to a starting role.

    Unlike many, I was not opposed to using May in a relief role this year. I felt he brought a much-needed strikeout mentality to the bullpen and could be a pivotal piece at the back end if the team contended.

    The most important factor, though, was that this decision was reversible if things didn't play out well.

    It is now safe to say that things have not played out well. During his first month in the bullpen, May was very much the dominating force we hoped he would be. Unfortunately, the fact that he was often Paul Molitor's only trustworthy option led to overuse. May appeared in 17 of Minnesota's first 32 games, seemingly throwing with max effort each time out.

    It's not clear that his unraveling performance and subsequent back issues were related to his usage, but given the fact that May had been operating under a starter's routine for essentially his entire career up until last July, that seems very plausible. Even looking past that element, the Twins are suddenly in need of quality starters given the dire state of their rotation, and May deserves a shot to bolster that unit.

    May made his first rehab appearance in Rochester as a reliever yesterday, which isn't the most promising sign, but hopefully the plan changes.

    4) Recall John Ryan Murphy.

    Murphy's numbers in Triple-A are far from great: he's batting .216 with a .599 OPS, though he's been trending up. The need to get him back on the roster has more to do with the circumstances surrounding him.

    This team has no real answers behind the plate after this year. Kurt Suzuki will be a free agent and likely won't return. Juan Centeno is has been fine as an interim backup but he's not a big-league player. The organization's prospects are not close. Right now, Murphy is the only credible option for 2017, whether we're talking starter or backup.

    We'll have a better idea of his true credibility if he gets a couple hundred plate appearances in the second half.

    5) Let J.T. Chargois loose in the bullpen.

    There's no way around it: Chargois' MLB debut was a complete and total disaster. In his lone big-league appearance on June 11th, he faced eight hitters and was charged with five earned runs on three hits, two walks and an HBP. He was understandably optioned immediately afterward, forced to sit on a 67.50 major-league ERA until he gets another chance.

    That chance ought to come soon. The level of dominance that the fireballing righty continues to display in Triple-A makes it hard to justify keeping him there. Chargois has a 0.48 ERA and 25-to-4 K/BB ratio in 18 2/3 innings with Rochester, and hasn't allowed a run or issued a walk in five appearances since being sent back down.

    Given the major question marks that the Twins now face at the closer spot, they need to begin auditioning potential options quickly. Presently, Chargois arguably has a better case than anyone else in the organization, but he needs to show he can get big-league hitters out. Call him up and lengthen the leash.

    What would be your top priorities for the second half of the season?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share

    Twins Top Prospects

    Jose Rodriguez

    GCL Twins - Rookie, OF
    Jose Rodriguez was the Twins Daily short-season minor-league hitter of the year. He is at the Dominican facilities for spring training now but will likely join Extended Spring Training in Fort Myers.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 4:27 PM, HitInAPinch said:

    Uff da, that's a tough one.  Well, you could market Buxton on prospect status, recent stellar performance at AAA and youth.  Maybe a couple prospects in return?

    I absolutely do not want to trade Byron Buxton, but if they did, I would expect/want nothing less than a Chris Archer/Steven Matz type of return.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 6:06 PM, Blackjack said:

    Not going to bother going back to 3 pages but the impression I got was that people were complaining about him pitching in relief again.

    Nick wrote, "May made his first rehab appearance in Rochester as a reliever yesterday, which isn't the most promising sign, but hopefully the plan changes."

     

    The relief appearance is a relatively small component of the complaint.  It's the larger plan (or lack thereof).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 6:06 PM, laloesch said:

    Why wouldn't the Twins trade Santana if the right offer came along and they could get something of value for him?  He's been busted for PED's, he's 33 and he's only under contract for two more years.  The Twins aren't going to extend him beyond age 35/36.  This team is a 100 loss team with or without him.    

     

    You literally replied to a post where I stated why the Twins wouldn't trade Santana right now.  

     

    Because they hardly have 5 working pulses to put in a rotation next year, and it's likely trading him would just cause TR to sign another mediocre at best veteran to a long term deal

    Edited by alarp33
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 5:45 PM, Thrylos said:

    .196 /.315/.304:

     

    Grossman's slash line the last 2 weeks

     

     .300/.345/.480:

     

    Rosario's slash line the last 2 weeks.

     

    Not arguing that Rosario has been hot and Grossman had cooled off.  However, Grossman is still taking walks, which is keeping his OBP at a reasonable level.  When Rosario slumps, he doesn't have his ability to work a walk as an option.  

     

    Rosario was .200/.218/.313 with the Twins this year.  With a similar batting average between the two of them- Grossman is a 100 points better than Rosario on OBP.  I think the stats make my point - Grossman is a far more consistent, if not as flashy presence in the lineup.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 6:26 PM, spycake said:

    Nick wrote, "May made his first rehab appearance in Rochester as a reliever yesterday, which isn't the most promising sign, but hopefully the plan changes."

     

    The relief appearance is a relatively small component of the complaint.  It's the larger plan (or lack thereof).

    Does anybody outside of the Twins really know what the plan for May is??  People are 'assuming' that the Twins are going to leave him relief just because he appeared in relief - but doesn't he have to appear in relief in order to work up to starting??

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 6:28 PM, alarp33 said:

    You literally replied to a post where I stated why the Twins wouldn't trade Santana right now.  

     

    Because they hardly have 5 working pulses to put in a rotation next year, and it's likely trading him would just cause TR to sign another mediocre at best veteran to a long term deal

     

    Is it illegal to disagree with your previous post?  

     

    "There seems to be a lot of people in this, and other threads that want to trade Ervin Santana.  I'm not a big fan of his, and understand he might have some value (at least compared to the Plouffe's, Suzukis, etc.).. but if he is traded, who in the hell is in the 2017 rotation?

     

    I count 7 pulses by the way (Milone, May, Berrios, Gibson, Nolasco, Hughes, duffey).  Not counting Dean or Darnell.

     

    And with the exception of Nolasco and Hughes the rest are a heck of a lot cheaper than Santana.  

    Edited by laloesch
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 5:45 PM, Thrylos said:

    .196 /.315/.304:

     

    Grossman's slash line the last 2 weeks

     

     .300/.345/.480:

     

    Rosario's slash line the last 2 weeks.

    Hmmm, my info says Grossman slash the last two weeks is: .167/.286/.215 (gives him a nice round number for his OPS: .500).

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 6/27/2016 at 6:45 PM, Blackjack said:

    Does anybody outside of the Twins really know what the plan for May is?? People are 'assuming' that the Twins are going to leave him relief just because he appeared in relief - but doesn't he have to appear in relief in order to work up to starting??

    No, he doesn't. It's the minor leagues.

    No reason he can't start and go 2 to 3 innings.

    Heck, even if he started and only went 1 inning, that would still be different. It's a different routine and mindset, starting vs relieving.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 6:28 PM, MileHighTwinsFan said:

    Not arguing that Rosario has been hot and Grossman had cooled off.  However, Grossman is still taking walks, which is keeping his OBP at a reasonable level.  When Rosario slumps, he doesn't have his ability to work a walk as an option.  

     

    Rosario was .200/.218/.313 with the Twins this year.  With a similar batting average between the two of them- Grossman is a 100 points better than Rosario on OBP.  I think the stats make my point - Grossman is a far more consistent, if not as flashy presence in the lineup.  

    Take away some speed and arm strength and add a little contact and Grossman is basically Aaron Hicks. Which isn't bad considering it looks like they were fleeced on the JRM trade. I don't mind him in the mix but certainly should not be considered an OF cornerstone at this point. Of course either should Rosario so I guess I don't really have a point....at least there are solid options for a 4th OF once they find 3 starters.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 7:17 PM, troyhobbs said:

    Take away some speed and arm strength and add a little contact and Grossman is basically Aaron Hicks. Which isn't bad considering it looks like they were fleeced on the JRM trade. I don't mind him in the mix but certainly should not be considered an OF cornerstone at this point. Of course either should Rosario so I guess I don't really have a point....at least there are solid options for a 4th OF once they find 3 starters.

    Aaron Hicks has a .609 OPS for the season. I don't think "fleeced" is the right word.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 4:34 PM, MileHighTwinsFan said:

    Not sure saying Grossman does not fit into the long term plans makes sense.  While not a flashy player - he is a mature and stable presence in the lineup right now.  He takes walks, can hit with power and is a solid if not stellar defender.  In many respects he is everything Rosario is not.  

    You could sub in Arcia's name for Rosario there too. It's kind of odd to me that so many people are convinced Arcia will be a late bloomer while ruling out the same possibility for Grossman, who is the same age Oswaldo will be next year. 

     

    They have very different standout skills. With Grossman, its patience and getting on base. With Arcia, it's power. Seems to be much more frequent that a guy develops additional pop in his mid-to-late 20s compared to developing patience. Perhaps we're seeing that with Grossman, whose 11 HR between MLB and AAA this year are already approaching his career high of 13?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 6/27/2016 at 7:22 PM, bluechipper said:

    Aaron Hicks has a .609 OPS for the season. I don't think "fleeced" is the right word.

    JR Murphy sits at .229.

    Thats OPS, not batting average.

    Too early to judge, but IF we did, the Yankees got the better by a landslide.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 4:20 AM, Dantes929 said:

    Yah kind of lost me by saying Rosario's D is iffy.      Did you get spoiled by the Gold Glove play of D. Young and Willingham?

    Dante, you've been in hell too long.

     

    Rosario's has a -4 dWAR in 2016.

    His routes are not crisp like Buxton's and Kepler's.

    Of course he is a world better than Willingham or D. Young, but that is like comparing hind steak to  chuck (I looked it up, okay).

    Rosario has zero plate discipline (18 walks in 154 mlb games) and for that to fly he had better hit like Tony Oliva or Vlad Guerrero, which he never will.

    So ... why bring him back up?

    More of the same.

    More of the same.

    More of the same.

    "Turn him loose, let him go ... let him say he outdrew me fair and square. I want him to feel what it's like to every moment face his death." (Brownsville Girl)

    Spare us the aggravation of waiting around for it to happen two, three, or five years from now.

     

    Edited by ScrapTheNickname
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 6:45 PM, Blackjack said:

    Does anybody outside of the Twins really know what the plan for May is??  People are 'assuming' that the Twins are going to leave him relief just because he appeared in relief - but doesn't he have to appear in relief in order to work up to starting??

    People are assuming it not just because he appeared in relief -- but because they also haven't said anything to the contrary.  Teams usually announce changes like this.  The relief appearance, with the 96 MPH velocity, AND the absence of an announcement strongly suggest that they are not changing anything in regards to May at the present time.

     

    Do you think the Twins are actively moving him back to the rotation right now and are just keeping it secret?  For what reason?  Don't tell me it's to boost the trade value of Santana, Nolasco, and Milone...

    Edited by spycake
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 7:29 PM, Nick Nelson said:

    You could sub in Arcia's name for Rosario there too. It's kind of odd to me that so many people are convinced Arcia will be a late bloomer while ruling out the same possibility for Grossman, who is the same age Oswaldo will be next year. 

     

    They have very different standout skills. With Grossman, its patience and getting on base. With Arcia, it's power. Seems to be much more frequent that a guy develops additional pop in his mid-to-late 20s compared to developing patience. Perhaps we're seeing that with Grossman, whose 11 HR between MLB and AAA this year are already approaching his career high of 13?

    I don't think (most) folks were necessarily convinced Arcia would be a late bloomer so much as why dump his potential for nothing when there were plenty of roster moves available that wouldn't have costed them a player.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 6:52 PM, laloesch said:

    Is it illegal to disagree with your previous post?  

     

    "There seems to be a lot of people in this, and other threads that want to trade Ervin Santana.  I'm not a big fan of his, and understand he might have some value (at least compared to the Plouffe's, Suzukis, etc.).. but if he is traded, who in the hell is in the 2017 rotation?

     

    I count 7 pulses by the way (Milone, May, Berrios, Gibson, Nolasco, Hughes, duffey).  Not counting Dean or Darnell.

     

    And with the exception of Nolasco and Hughes the rest are a heck of a lot cheaper than Santana.  

     

    You certainly can disagree.  You asked me a question "Why wouldn't the Twins trade Santana?" when replying to a post I wrote that laid out the reasons I wouldn't trade him. 

     

    Trevor May is not a starter according to the people in charge of this organization.  I hope there are new people in charge by this offseason, but for now there is no reason to assume he will be a rotation option.  

     

    Tommy Milone?  The guy who 6 weeks ago cleared waivers? You think the Twins are going to offer him arbitration and slot him into a rotation spot next season?  Say he stays in the rotation the rest of this season and pitches ok.. ~$6 million arbitration? NO

     

    What makes you think Nolasco or Hughes should be counted on for anything next season, let alone take up 40% of the starting rotation?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 7:38 PM, spycake said:

    People are assuming it not just because he appeared in relief -- but because they also haven't said anything to the contrary.  Teams usually announce changes like this.  The relief appearance, with the 96 MPH velocity, AND the absence of an announcement strongly suggest that they are not changing anything in regards to May at the present time.

     

    Do you think the Twins are actively moving him back to the rotation right now and are just keeping it secret?  For what reason?  Don't tell me it's to boost the trade value of Santana, Nolasco, and Milone...

    Also, during the game on Saturday, Terry Ryan mentioned Trevor May along with Ryan Pressly as guys who he liked when he was asked something about the bullpen.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 7:50 PM, alarp33 said:

    You certainly can disagree.  You asked me a question "Why wouldn't the Twins trade Santana?" when replying to a post I wrote that laid out the reasons I wouldn't trade him. 

     

    Trevor May is not a starter according to the people in charge of this organization.  I hope there are new people in charge by this offseason, but for now there is no reason to assume he will be a rotation option.  

     

    Tommy Milone?  The guy who 6 weeks ago cleared waivers? You think the Twins are going to offer him arbitration and slot him into a rotation spot next season?  Say he stays in the rotation the rest of this season and pitches ok.. ~$6 million arbitration? NO

     

    What makes you think Nolasco or Hughes should be counted on for anything next season, let alone take up 40% of the starting rotation?

     

    All of these questions are legit, but it doesn't matter what I think.  What matters is how the Twins have consistently used these pitchers up to this point. Santana, Nolasco, Hughes, Milone, Gibson have all been used as starters.   The results, putrid.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 7:29 PM, Nick Nelson said:

    You could sub in Arcia's name for Rosario there too. It's kind of odd to me that so many people are convinced Arcia will be a late bloomer while ruling out the same possibility for Grossman, who is the same age Oswaldo will be next year. 

     

    They have very different standout skills. With Grossman, its patience and getting on base.

     

    You realize the reason talk about Arcia differently than Grossman is because he actually has done it, right? Grossman's "standout" skill led to a .327 OBP entering this season.  

     

    Arcia's standout skill led to 34 home runs before his 24th birthday, and a 100 and 108 OPS+ season.  

     

    * I'm not trying to bash Grossman, I'd keep playing him for now.  For me Grossman > Rosario... but lets not act like this was Arcia vs Grossman here.  It was Arcia vs a 29 year old DH who's hitting under .200, Arcia vs DanSan, Arcia vs a Neil Ramirez.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 8:34 PM, Craig Arko said:

    I gotta say, I think it was mostly Arcia vs. Arcia. Sometimes we're our own worst enemy. And sometimes an external change is required to help with that. I feel it in my own job every day; I wouldn't much mind being traded to the Rays. :)

    You're not going to Tampa.  Your boss is smarter than that....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Are we really inserting Grossman into future plans here? The guy had a few good weeks, and will come back to earth (arguably, he already has).

     

    If he maintains that 1.000 OPS another month, I'll start getting serious about him. But, I'm not ready to have him block Rosario, Buxton, or even Walker quite yet.

     

    I know they can't....but if they could swap him for a serviceable veteran defense-only catcher for next year (hopefully in a back-up role), I would strongly consider it.

     

    This is one of the front offices major, and one of many, flaws. They keep these scrap heap guys who have a couple of good weeks around way, way, way, way too long, and block prospects. I'm guessing it all comes down to some ego-driven "we coached them up when nobody could" attitude, with a little Pohlad penny pinching sprinkled in.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Twins need to get down to 12 pitchers. They should have Rosario, Buxton, Kepler, and Grossman with Santana as the fifth OF/25th man. Whatever pans out from the four outfielders is the way it should be with Grossman certainly getting at-bats against every left hander and occasional starts against right handers. If Buxton truly isn't ready the DanSan can be the fourth OF with a starting trio of Grossman, Rosario and Kepler. I am on board with trades of Suzuki and Nuñez with Murphy and Polanco getting recalled. Again, just play it out and whoever is better gets the playing time. Finally, if Plouffe isn't traded, then Park needs to go down to Rochester, making room for Sano.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 6/27/2016 at 7:29 PM, Nick Nelson said:

    Seems to be much more frequent that a guy develops additional pop in his mid-to-late 20s compared to developing patience.

    I seem to recall Bill James long ago calling the ability to draw walks an old player's skill. Maybe that's not quite the same as patience, but it's on that spectrum.

     

    I don't have any stats to back it up one direction or the other, but I'd be more inclined to wait on a player who showed power in the minors, than to wait on a player who showed patience. All else being equal, which it never is. :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

      On 6/27/2016 at 9:53 PM, Darius said:

    Are we really inserting Grossman into future plans here? The guy had a few good weeks, and will come back to earth (arguably, he already has).

    If he maintains that 1.000 OPS another month, I'll start getting serious about him. But, I'm not ready to have him block Rosario, Buxton, or even Walker quite yet.

    I know they can't....but if they could swap him for a serviceable veteran defense-only catcher for next year (hopefully in a back-up role), I would strongly consider it.

    This is one of the front offices major, and one of many, flaws. They keep these scrap heap guys who have a couple of good weeks around way, way, way, way too long, and block prospects. I'm guessing it all comes down to some ego-driven "we coached them up when nobody could" attitude, with a little Pohlad penny pinching sprinkled in.

    yeah, a 1.000 OPS is reasonable expectation for him. :wacko:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All of the points in the article are spot on! I think we all can agree on that. Of course, other points I think we can all agree on is getting rid of both Nolasco, Jepsen and Plouffe...however it takes place. And Berrios and Polanco need to get up here and soon!

    Again, I think we all can agree on this.

     

    Once again, Dozier is an interesting topic. Whether traded now, or after the season, he could bring some actual value. I don't feel the Twins HAVE to trade him, but they should definately listen to offers. I'm now leaning to keeping him for the remainder of the season, play Polanco on a regular basis, and then decide the best course of action in the offseason.

     

    I also think you listen for E Santana and move him if a nice option comes along to do so. But I'm in no hurry to move him. At this point, Hughes is a complete unknown from stuff, to health, to role, and can't be counted on for anything at this point. He's also untradable. I think it is FAIRLY safe to pencil Duffy, Gibson and Berrios to next season'starts rotation. If Santana is gone, don't we end up needing another veteran to replace him?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...