Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • What to Make of Carlos Correa's Ankle Issue


    Nick Nelson

    The Twins have done the unthinkable. After seemingly looking in from the outside on the shortstop's market all winter, they swooped in this week and snagged Carlos Correa away from the Mets.

    The reason Correa was available to the Twins, and the reason his contract with Minnesota is structured as it is, boils down to an ankle concern that will weigh heavily in the fate of this blockbuster move.

    Here's what we know about it.

    Image courtesy of Kamil Krzaczynski-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

     

    I doubt anyone needs a recap at this point, but to quickly summarize: Nearly a month ago, Carlos Correa reached agreement with San Francisco on a historic 13-year, $350 million contract that would have made him one of the highest-paid players ever. It was the culmination of a lengthy gambit by Correa and Scott Boras, which included signing a short-term deal with the Twins last offseason and waiting out the shortstop market this year.

    Or so it seemed. Just ahead of Correa's deal with the Giants being made official, San Francisco balked at something in his physical, leaving the deal in doubt. The issue at hand, evidently, was an old ankle injury from 2014 that had required insertion of a metal plate in his lower leg.  

    Wasting no time, Boras quickly pivoted and got in touch with Mets owner Steve Cohen, swinging a late-night agreement for 12 years and $315 million less than 24 hours after the Giants deal fell through.

    That the agent was so eager to strike another agreement – for a whopping 10% less than San Fran's original offer – was somewhat alarming. More alarming was what came next: in spite of Cohen's impulsive and free-spending ways, and in spite of Correa's flagged ankle being a known factor, the Mets still ran into significant reservations upon their own medical inspection.

    The Mets and Correa spent nearly three weeks haggling over details and protective language in the contract. In the end, they could not reach an accord. 

    And so along came the Twins, who weren't quite willing to stick with their original offer of 10 years and $285 million in light of all the new information, but won the day with a reduced six-year, $200 million guarantee featuring vesting options that can push the total value to $270. The Mets, evidently, offered $42 million less in guarantees and only WITH the caveat that Correa pass new physicals annually.

    The Twins outbid the Mets considerably, making it a fairly easy decision for Correa. Yes, the Mets whose ultra-rich owner was clearly adamant about acquiring the star shortstop and has shown an appetite for risk. They couldn't stomach it.

    The Twins, in this case, had greater appetite than the Mets for assuming financial risk in order to acquire proven starpower. It feels weird to type that sentence but it's true. Granted, Minnesota's final framework with Correa does add some new protections compared to the first offer, with four fewer guaranteed years. The shortstop will need to prove he can stay healthy if he wants to be making the big bucks into his late 30s, and it seems that was going to be the case wherever he signed.

    But why? Why was Correa such a special case at a time where decade-long contracts are being handed out by MLB teams with seemingly reckless abandon? It comes back to that ankle, which is now a focal point going forward for a Twins team already plagued by health question marks.

    What do we know about it? Not much, other than that whatever the doctors from the Giants and Mets saw spooked them big-time. Correa's 2014 injury, and the plate insertion to address it, were no secret going in. Still, something popped up on closer inspection that wound up costing Correa some $150 in guaranteed money over the course of a month.

    I'm not going to pretend to have any expertise on this matter. But I will make an observation. While it's true that Correa has never missed time or received treatment for the old injury as a big-leaguer, that's not to say it hasn't affected his play. 

    With the benefit of hindsight, we can point to some evidence that Correa has potentially been acutely aware of his ankle being a risk point.

    Thinking back now, I'm struck by an article Phil Miller wrote for the Star Tribune last April detailing how Correa -- despite his solid speed -- had attempted zero steals in the previous two seasons, and seven in the past five, due to concerns over getting hurt.

    "It's a decision I had to make. Every time you steal a base, there's a greater risk of injury, right? The tag can take you out, hitting the base, you can twist your ankle, break your hands," Correa said at the time. "It's higher risk for little reward. I realized that I'm more valuable offensively and defensively than I am trying to steal bags."

    Sure enough, when Correa did attempt one single steal during 2022 season, in mid-September, he jarred his ankle. The shortstop looked visibly scared as he quickly collapsed on the ground and grabbed for his leg. He later admitted as much, telling reporters, "He just hit my plate. … Just kind of felt numb, vibrating. So I was just waiting for it to calm down. It was a little scary, but when I moved I knew I was good."

    The ankle was not an issue thereafter. Correa missed no time and played out the remaining two weeks without incident. And yet, given what we now know, the moment foreshadowed a tumultuous offseason ahead for Correa. Did he stir up or exacerbate the injury in some way? Was this simply an early sign of the underlying issues coming into play as San Francisco and New York fear? We don't know. 

    The upshot here, theoretically, is that Correa has been managing and mitigating the problem for years. Seemingly there is no reason he can't continue to do so at least for the next few. We're talking about a supremely intelligent and dedicated athlete who knows how to take care of himself. 

    With that said, the Mets couldn't sell themselves on C4 despite knowing about all of these qualities and being highly motivated buyers. It seems likely he would've chosen New York if they could've surpassed Minnesota's offer even on the six-year term, but the Mets wouldn't do it. 

    The Twins, already fraught with as much pivotal injury risk as any team in baseball, are now taking one of the most publicized high-risk gambles in the history of free agency. They said from the start they were serious in their desire to bring back Correa and now they've proven it resoundingly by outbidding a skeptical field for a player now labeled as damaged goods.

    We'll see if more details and information come out in the coming days about the specifics of Correa's ankle, and why the Twins were ultimately much more willing to live with the risk.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Its 2 issues,  either concerns the plate will need to be replaced in 5-10 years,  or the more likely outcome,  there is signs of arthritis already beginning to show on the MRI that would potentially limit his ability several years down the road.  I would say the most likely outcome isn't the concern in 1 year or 3 years.  The concern starts creeping up around that 6-8 year window,  hence only being guaranteed 6 years by the Mets and only receiving 6 years from the Twins.  A couple doctors came out earlier and said if he was able to pass physicals,  then the plate was likely holding up well, the concern with the surgery is then arthritis and especially with an athlete,  that would be putting extreme stress on the joint and ankle it would like become an issue down the road.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The issue of the ankle is one that there is lots of talk, lots of information spread, but very little relevant information known (as it should be, because of HIPAA). So, the Twins have the information and decided to go ahead with this deal. We, as fans, have to trust what they are doing. We'll see what happens 2 or 3 years down the road.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The most unlikely has happened if this pans out -- the Twins front office comes away with a win in off-season trading.   Correa is a great ball player who will be an anchor for this infield AND a team leader.   I liked hearing, for example, that he helped Miranda in the offseason.   So, ok, the journey to this deal was meandering to say the least, but this is positive news for the Twins and the weary fandom in an otherwise bleak off-season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I LOVE that he wants to avoid unnecessary injuries!  Maybe some of that prudence will rub off on Buxton.  That could be worth the cost of his contract alone!  And I don't think his caution about stealing bases necessarily reflects concern about his ankle plate.  The issues he mentioned -- hard tags, hand injuries, and twisting ankles -- are genuine risks in and of themselves.  I am always especially appalled to see people slide in hands-first.  I remember Cuddyer tearing up his hand that way, just when he was on a tear.  It's so easy to hyperextend your thumb or get stomped by spikes.  Buxton's speed is too good a weapon to shut down completely, but I hate seeing him slide head first, especially the way he dives so hard.  But even sliding feet first, he injured his knee in 2022 and it lingered for months.  I don't think Correa is being a worrywart, or revealing some unique hidden fragility, I think he is just being smart.  I hope his vaunted leadership applies here, too!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is just a risk the Twins almost had to take.  They need to plug the hole at short for the next 2 to 4 years and Correa fills it.  He can be an elite bat with the bad ankle and can play elite defense at short on the bad ankle. He can run the bases on the bad ankle.  If stealing bases aggravates it then don't steal bases.

    I am not a doctor but he is only 28 and odds are the plate should be fine the next 4 years.  Any player can have a serious injury at any time although Correa may be slightly more predisposed to injury I don't think it is a huge deal and neither did the Twins or the Doctors they used.  The Twins bought 6 years of Correa's prime and gave themselves a way out as he ages.  I think they did just fine.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I suspect he broke a screw or loosened the hardware on that awkward slide last season. This would explain why he passed his physical when the Twins signed him last year, and why he can’t pass a physical this year—this would be a new x-ray finding. He doesn’t have any ongoing symptoms or limitations currently, so there is no indication for an operation to remove the hardware and introduce surgical risk at this time, but there is concern for future instability and need for operative management.  

    Alternatively, this was a known concern last year, and why he settled for the contract that he did.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was completely against the Twins taking on Paddack, knowing full well that NYM rejected him because of the medicals & also receiving the same medicals & knowing his history. I don't have the same hesitancy with Correa but I'm concerned about this FO lack of concern about such things. Also maybe it was the reason HOU didn't sign him. But we have him for 6yrs. with his prime ahead of him. Go Twins!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    With limiting the risk really to 6 years, this is a good deal in my opinion.  He has been playing with this issue for years, and still putting up the numbers he has.  If he has big regression down the road you are only on the hook for a couple of years.  This was the exact kind of deal I wanted them to try to get without all the stuff going on.  It protects them later into the deal if he has regressed, for any reason health or just production, but will also keep him locked in if he is still producing at a high enough level. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    24 minutes ago, Post-Concussive Blues said:

    I suspect he broke a screw or loosened the hardware on that awkward slide last season. This would explain why he passed his physical when the Twins signed him last year, and why he can’t pass a physical this year—this would be a new x-ray finding. He doesn’t have any ongoing symptoms or limitations currently, so there is no indication for an operation to remove the hardware and introduce surgical risk at this time, but there is concern for future instability and need for operative management.  

    Alternatively, this was a known concern last year, and why he settled for the contract that he did.

    That's a lot of speculation. As far as we know, he hasn't actually failed a physical, just had something show up that made teams concerned further out on these really long deals. There's been nothing that says he can't pass a physical this year, just that they think he's at risk for something 6+ years down the line.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1. Buxton most recently injured himself by sliding into 2B feet first. If Correa wants to slide in head first then that's what he should do. 

    2. Upper management has enough faith to know how the chemistry of Karma works. Money spent on an injured player is never truly lost. It will always come back to the team in some way, shape or form.  The money could come back as an over-performing prospect who plays at a value worth millions more than he's being paid. Or it can come back in other ways through a combination of insurance policy money & other good trade deals.

    3. No team wants to throw money away, but they don't want talent to get away that can save their franchise from becoming irrelevant either. Perhaps Correa can help pave the way to a world series. 

    4. Correa can always take some drugs to manage his "future" arthritis. He just needs to hang in there to collect his checks for as long as he can manage to perform..

    5. Baseball injured him so the MLB can pay him. He deserves a portion of the profits that he has helped to build for the game & owners so far during his fairly young & exciting career without all of the red tape caused by doctors prognosticating his future ailments.

    6. His salary comes from revenue sharing & TV money in part, which teams inherit from other teams & the league to help grow the sport and keep it alive. Carlos is alive and helping to grow the game just fine for the foreseeable future. It's a business decision and a lot of jobs depend on having talented players on the team like Carlos. Either go with the flow of available talent or the FO can spend its money elsewhere. But fans want to see talent on the field for their money and since Correa is willing to sign then he's like Neo from the Matrix, he's the one. Don't let the machines get him!

    7. He's a good role model and he can sell stuff. Lot's of stuff! Is there something wrong with his ankle?

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I love this deal as it stands, sign him and lets move on. The Twins gave him the end of year physical and it didn't stop them from offering 8 years earlier this offseason, all I'm hearing now is coulds and maybe's. If he should be good for at least 3 to 4 years as some here are speculating, then that works perfect for the bridge to Lee and Lewis. Maybe we move to Correa to third by then and it will be less stress on ankle.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I love this deal.  I went to school with a lot of Mets fans, and all afternoon I have received messages from them hating what has happened with his ankle.  They know they are stacked, and they are missing a top notch shortstop in their lineup.

    It's also crazy to think that in 6 years, having Correa for right around $30 mil a year is going to seem like a steal compared to what contracts are in the future.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, rwilfong86 said:

    What to make of it? Nothing. It is an 8 year old injury that everyone knew about and other than one incident sliding into 2nd it's never caused him any issue in the majors.

    I mean everything you're saying makes total sense. But then why wouldn't the Mets, who care not about money and clearly wanted him very badly, come within even $40M of the Twins' guaranteed offer? After another adamant big spender backed away? That's what I'm struggling to connect. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Nick Nelson said:

    I mean everything you're saying makes total sense. But then why would the Mets, who care not about money and clearly wanted him very badly, come within even $40M of the Twins' guaranteed offer? After another adamant big spender backed away? That's what I'm struggling to connect. 

    Correa was always a luxury want, not a need for the Mets. Boras likely called them because he knows Cohen doesn’t give a F about the money. Somebody probably talked some sense into Cohen and said you can spend $400 million on Machado next season who's a better fit at 3B. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, Nick Nelson said:

    I mean everything you're saying makes total sense. But then why wouldn't the Mets, who care not about money and clearly wanted him very badly, come within even $40M of the Twins' guaranteed offer? After another adamant big spender backed away? That's what I'm struggling to connect. 

    The Twins AAV has ALWAYS been the highest offer. The Mets and Giants just won him over in the years. Now that they have injury concerns, the Mets had to back off the years.

    In any case, both this year and last, the Twins, and their unusually ample near term salary space,  have consistently been the team most interested in a high AAV short(er) term deal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, Nick Nelson said:

    I mean everything you're saying makes total sense. But then why would the Mets, who care not about money and clearly wanted him very badly, come within even $40M of the Twins' guaranteed offer? After another adamant big spender backed away? That's what I'm struggling to connect. 

    The rumored Mets offer, half the years for half the dollars of their previous agreement, seems inexplicable. The value a player gives is highest in the early years of a long contract. If you trim off half the years, you need to trim less than half the money. That makes their offer nearly an insult.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's cool that the Twins went all in and got him, he will definitely help in the here and now.  I have a couple of concerns.  Mainly, the Twins have a bunch of middle infield prospects who are now basically blocked.  Lewis, Lee, Martin, etc .....  So these guys may rot in the system because there might not be any opportunities for them. Second, he should be a huge asset for the Twins, say 3 - 4 years down the road the Twins are in last place and put him and a bunch of other guys up for trade at the trade deadline.  I'm assuming that the Twins would get lowballed because of all of this nonsense.  So I think he won't have big trade value even though he's valuable.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's certainly a risk but a degenerative problem with his leg is much more worrisome for a 10+ year contract than a 6.  The vesting option years and pretty team friendly, if he is hitting those he is still playing well and they will happily sign that check.

    Somewhat like the Buxton deal they are eating injury risk to get "dior" at an outlet price. They do seem to see it as a market inefficiency they can exploit.  So far it has netted them Cruz as an incredible signing and Donaldson that didn't really work out.  Buxton and Correa are more extreme cases on great deals, results tbd. It has also blown up in their faces on multiple pitcher trades.  It is a gamblers strategy but if they hit and get a healthy year out of multiple pieces they have top level talent that would not have otherwise been available to them.  

    Honestly I am amazed the Met's did not match or beat this offer.  I think either they got cold feet realizing they had signed him to play 3rd already decreasing his value or tin foil hat time, the other owners told Cohen to knock it off and stop making them look bad.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Twodogs said:

    It's cool that the Twins went all in and got him, he will definitely help in the here and now.  I have a couple of concerns.  Mainly, the Twins have a bunch of middle infield prospects who are now basically blocked.  Lewis, Lee, Martin, etc .....  So these guys may rot in the system because there might not be any opportunities for them. Second, he should be a huge asset for the Twins, say 3 - 4 years down the road the Twins are in last place and put him and a bunch of other guys up for trade at the trade deadline.  I'm assuming that the Twins would get lowballed because of all of this nonsense.  So I think he won't have big trade value even though he's valuable.  

    I don’t really think they’re blocked. Lee or Lewis can play 3rd with Miranda becoming the DH. Martin will move to the OF, likely. Lewis could also play OF. Remember, Polanco will likely be gone before too long. And there is always trading one of them away for pitching. And Correa may need to move off SS in a few years. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Twodogs said:

    It's cool that the Twins went all in and got him, he will definitely help in the here and now.  I have a couple of concerns.  Mainly, the Twins have a bunch of middle infield prospects who are now basically blocked.  Lewis, Lee, Martin, etc .....  So these guys may rot in the system because there might not be any opportunities for them.

    If there are positions it's good to have a surplus at, SS ranks right up there with CF and C.

    Trading for other needs gets easier with top prospects at premium positions.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, ashbury said:

    The rumored Mets offer, half the years for half the dollars of their previous agreement, seems inexplicable. The value a player gives is highest in the early years of a long contract. If you trim off half the years, you need to trim less than half the money. That makes their offer nearly an insult.

    That and the requirement of an annual physical.

    It’s almost like they wanted him to say no.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I know we have a new training staff. Here's hoping we amp up the investment in them, considering our the MO is to spend on players with injury risk. It's the humane approach, but will also help the team moving forward. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...