Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Byron Buxton Agrees to a Contract Extension with the Twins


    John  Bonnes

    Earlier, Ken Rosenthal reported that the Minnesota Twins were "closing in on" agreement on a contract extension with Byron Buxton. Now, Jeff Passan is reporting that an agreement is in place for over $100M and will keep Buxton under team control through the 2028 season. 

    Buxton represents one of the biggest pivot points of the Twins’ offseason and perhaps several seasons into the future. When healthy, he’s performed at an MVP level, most recently posting a 1005 OPS in 235 AB in 2021. However, his career with the Twins has been uneven, and not just because of the usual hype around a #1 overall prospect.

     

    Image courtesy of © Dan Hamilton-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Since Buxton first joined the team in 2015, he’s only had one year with 500 plate appearances, and indeed only one with over 331. His injuries have ranged from seemingly self-inflicted problems due to his aggressive defense in center field, to worrisome nagging injuries like hip strains and foot injuries, to flukey injuries like a broken finger from being hit by a pitch.

    On the other hand, he’s been absolutely elite defensively throughout his time with the Twins, and recently his offense has reached a similar level. This year he hit .306 with 19 home runs in just 61 games, a pace that makes him a 50-home run threat over a full season. He’s also only 27 years old, entering the peak period of many players' careers.

    He is due to be a free agent next offseason, compelling the Twins to either sign him to an extension or trade him this offseason, lest they risk having him leave next year for nothing more than a compensatory draft pick. That urgency is further heightened by the threat of an impending work stoppage starting as soon as Wednesday night. If an extension or trade iss not made by then, there is a chance any such move would be delayed until some unknown point in a potentially compressed offseason, or thwarted altogether.

    A deal would likely represent the biggest deal the Twins have made since they signed Joe Mauer to a contract extension in 2010 for $184 million dollars. That deal was also for a rare talent who contributed defensively, was at the peak of his ability, and on the verge of free agency. 

    The deal with Mauer aged poorly, as leg problems and concussions limited his ability to stay at catcher and stay in the lineup. With Buxton having more health questions, the reality is it makes him more affordable; it’s unlikely the Twins could complete a deal without the built-in discount his health history affords them. 

    The Mauer deal also took place as the Twins were completing a run of division-winning seasons and trying to lengthen their competitive window. Twins’ management’s next to-do for this offseason is to find some starting pitchers whom Buxton’s Gold Glove can assist with his range in center field. While the size of Buxton’s deal is likely significant, the Twins entered the offseason with as much as $50M or so to spend on free agents. A deal with Buxton is likely to maintain that capability.

    Indeed, Ken Rosenthal has just published contract details:

    The extension  guarantees $15M per year (except this year, when he still would've been under arbitration) plus very large bonuses for MVP bonuses and a series of $500K bonuses if he stays healthy for over 500 plate appearances. It is a very creative contract. I can't think of any that has had a bonus structure remotely similar to it. The deal essentially rewards Buxton extra money for staying healthy for a full season, handsomely for MVP-caliber production, but still guarantees him base salary commensurate to a top center fielder. 

    If the Twins had traded Buxton instead, it would be hard for them to pretend that they could expect to be competitive in 2022. They would have lost their best offensive and defensive player, while also trying to replace 60% of their starting rotation. Retaining Buxton keeps the option of competing in 2022 alive. It should also make him one of the core pieces of the next competitive Twins team. Further pieces will still need to be assembled, but the deal represents a serious effort by the Twins to compete by locking up high-end home-grown talent for a long time.

    We'll add details as they emerge. In the meantime, give us your initial thoughts below. 

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    So, correct me if I'm wrong, but if Buxton gets 625 PA every year and wins the MVP award every year,  the Twins will pay him a total of 173.5 million dollars over the course of the contract.  That would come to approximately 24.75M per year for a MVP winner 7 consecutive years.   LOL.  Team friendly you say.  Oh yeah.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Heiny said:

    So, correct me if I'm wrong, but if Buxton gets 625 PA every year and wins the MVP award every year,  the Twins will pay him a total of 173.5 million dollars over the course of the contract.  That would come to approximately 24.75M per year for a MVP winner 7 consecutive years.   LOL.  Team friendly you say.  Oh yeah.

    On the other hand, if he never gets another PA in his career,  he still makes 100M.  Yeah, I'll still take my chances with the Pohlad's money.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    27 minutes ago, Heiny said:

    So, correct me if I'm wrong, but if Buxton gets 625 PA every year and wins the MVP award every year,  the Twins will pay him a total of 173.5 million dollars over the course of the contract.  That would come to approximately 24.75M per year for a MVP winner 7 consecutive years.   LOL.  Team friendly you say.  Oh yeah.

    Yes.  He could also continue to play 40% of the time and the deal is a failed gamble.  It is an entirely plausible scenario that we look back in remorse at this.

    But the right attitude is to look at weighing the upside vs downside.  Both are very real, but the gamble is worth it IMO.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, mnfireman said:

    Now let's see him penciled into the #2 spot 145 games a year for the length of the contract (allows for 1 IL trip). 

    Heck, I'd be happy with 2 trips and 130 games?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, TheLeviathan said:

      It is an entirely plausible scenario that we look back in remorse at this.

    You maybe, but not "we."

     

    There is no chance I look back on this with remorse. None. There is absolutely NOTHING the Twins could have done with $100m this offseason that would have been money better spent. 

    If Buxton never gets another PA, I won't complain. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You won't have remorse that Buxton couldn't live out that contract or be what we hoped he could be?  That sounds implausible.  We could look back in 5 years, not with remorse that we did it, but with remorse that it didn't work.  

    I would hope any Twins fan would be upset that we never get another PA out of Buxton.  That's demonstrably bad for us as fans, for the team, and for Buxton himself.

    You can acknowledge downside or failure in a move without regretting the decision.  Those are not mutually exclusive.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We are looking at crystal balls into the future play of Byron Buxton, all due to the injuries and games missed. His talent is unmistakeable and irreplaceable though and my bet is taking the over at 130 games per year for the contract. I love that Buxton bet on himself with incentives. The Twins must be thrilled and the teams reportedly in discussions to acquire Buxton must be bummed.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Richmond Dude said:

    Not only good for the Twins, but shows a lot of character in Buxton.  I'm sure he could have gotten more on the market, but although I'm a Vikings fan, I always respected that Tom Brady took lower contracts to ensure there was money left for the Patriots to sign players around him, Yes, baseball doesn't have a salary cap, but we all know there are realistic limits that each team will spend.  Buxton left space for the team to build a winner.   And if Buxton gets the serious payday from the bonuses, it means that not only was he healthy, but likely that we're winning, too.

    If Buxton was worth high dollars on the open market, teams would have been offering the Twins something good to trade and Buxton would have been shipped. Nobody really wanted Buxton that bad outside the Twins.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is wonderful news for the fans, for Buxton and his family and their financial future, and for the team.

    My favorite feature in the full no trade clause.  This reinforces that Buxton was absolutely truthful in his stated desire to remain with the Twins for his career.  What a wonderful Holiday present for all of us.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Now, get the new hitting coach to teach Kepler how to bunt and go the other way.  Arraez, Polanco, Buxton, Donaldson, Kirilloff, Garver and the Sanó we saw at year’s end can be one hell of a lineup.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    53 minutes ago, TheLeviathan said:

    Yes.  He could also continue to play 40% of the time and the deal is a failed gamble.  It is an entirely plausible scenario that we look back in remorse at this.

    But the right attitude is to look at weighing the upside vs downside.  Both are very real, but the gamble is worth it IMO.

    40% of the time at the level he's at now is just about worth the $15 million.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, bean5302 said:

    If Buxton was worth high dollars on the open market, teams would have been offering the Twins something good to trade and Buxton would have been shipped. Nobody really wanted Buxton that bad outside the Twins.

    Who knows about the rumors (see the copy/paste below), but I am feeling it was very likely that a number of teams were talking with the Twins and had their hopes up. Buxton is a rare talent. Byron took a bet on himself signing for incentives. A good deal all around.

    According to informed sources, The Marlins were in on trading for Byron Buxton right up until he signed the deal to stay with the Twins.. The Marlins made a “strong” trade offer, but not one that could persuade the Twins to part with the center fielder. The Marlins could have matched the terms of the Twins ’ financial commitment should their trade efforts been successful. The Marlins weren’t the only team to be interested. - FWIW - mlbtraderumors

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

    I'm surprised about so many of the aspects of this contract. First, that the Twins were able to convince him to accept big MVP bonuses and not plate appearance bonuses, ensuring that performance, not health, will escalate the contract. Second, no opt out or anything, full no-trade clause (good for Buck!).

    Remember, Buxton *should* be a free agent *right now* but the front office hosed him very intentionally. Byron appears to be a very forgiving man and we should all be thankful for it. This is a very team-friendly contract.

    I'm hearing there are PA bonuses too starting at half a million for 502 and going up in half million increments topping out at $2.5 million for 625 PA

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, TheLeviathan said:

    You won't have remorse that Buxton couldn't live out that contract or be what we hoped he could be?  That sounds implausible.  We could look back in 5 years, not with remorse that we did it, but with remorse that it didn't work.  

    I would hope any Twins fan would be upset that we never get another PA out of Buxton.  That's demonstrably bad for us as fans, for the team, and for Buxton himself.

    You can acknowledge downside or failure in a move without regretting the decision.  Those are not mutually exclusive.

    I'd certainly be sad if Buxton gets hurt. 

    That has zero to do with "remorse" over the contract. I won't feel any differently about it even in the extreme possibility he never gets another PA.

    They HAD to sign him, he signed for a bargain, and I'm really glad they worked it out. It's a fantastic outcome for my favorite club. Nothing will change that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

    I'd certainly be sad if Buxton gets hurt. 

    That has zero to do with "remorse" over the contract. I won't feel any differently about it even in the extreme possibility he never gets another PA.

    They HAD to sign him, he signed for a bargain, and I'm really glad they worked it out. It's a fantastic outcome for my favorite club. Nothing will change that.

    Agreed. It was the right decision. I guess we could be disagreeing over the pedantic meaning of regret.

    If only we could, as Chief is, enjoy them doing what most of us wanted, and not get all, something, about the future...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Love love love this deal. It's more than I would have given him at the break, but dude just keeps bringing it. And like someone mentioned above, I love him betting on himself getting those all star votes. im not a gambling man, but he's going to reach some of those incentives. it'd be more bizarre that he stayed healthy for a whole season than not activate one of his incentives. 

     

    Woo woo! Start of the offseason

     

    Oh yeah, December is the day after tomorrow. And then baseball goes into a kinda void, but I hope the women and men that write here keep making interesting stuff for us.

     

    Gracias dios. Vamos!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, Heiny said:

    So, correct me if I'm wrong, but if Buxton gets 625 PA every year and wins the MVP award every year,  the Twins will pay him a total of 173.5 million dollars over the course of the contract.  That would come to approximately 24.75M per year for a MVP winner 7 consecutive years.   LOL.  Team friendly you say.  Oh yeah.

    In the scenario you describe, Buxton plays full-time for the next seven years and wins seven MVPs.

    From 2015 to 2021, Mike Trout won 3 MVP awards while earning $187mm guaranteed (including his last couple of arbitration years, I believe), with the Angels on the hook for a massive guaranteed contract for him at $37mm/year for the next decade or so.

    So yeah, seven consecutive MVPs at $25mm per year, with no financial commitment beyond those MVP years is VERY team friendly.

    We should be so lucky that Buck achieves all of those incentives.  He will have out-performed Trout at his peak.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Another possible player to look at would be ARod.  From 2003 to 2009 (age 27-33) he won three MVP awards while earning $175mm guaranteed.  From 2004 to 2009 he only won two MVPs while earning $186mm, and he was locked in to long-term guarantees at $33mm/year through 30s.

    If Buck wins 2-3 MVP awards, the deal will be a huge steal without the typical albatross contract accompanying that kind of performance.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That no-trade is also a good move on Buxton's part to protect himself against the Twins deciding to trade a very team-friendly contact for a big return a few years in. He could demand a restructuring, which sort of gives him an opt out in the event the Twins aren't competitive (despite his performance) and are considering a rebuild.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, dxpavelka said:

    I'm hearing there are PA bonuses too starting at half a million for 502 and going up in half million increments topping out at $2.5 million for 625 PA

    Yeah, there are, what surprised me is that they start at 500 PAs and not something like 300 PAs, which definitely favors the Twins over Buxton (like pretty much everything in this contract does).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Agreed. It was the right decision. I guess we could be disagreeing over the pedantic meaning of regret.

    If only we could, as Chief is, enjoy them doing what most of us wanted, and not get all, something, about the future...

    Considering the future is how you make assessments about value in a contract.  We need pitching but are you going to do cartwheels if we give Scherzer 14 years and 280M?  Or how did your reaction to the Siemien contract change when you saw that it was 7 years?  

    Having a rational conversation about this contract is hard right now because people are willing to say things as objectively preposterous as "If Buxton never has another PA, I won't complain".  Now part of that kind of nonsense is just poor reading comprehension.  No one is talking about using hindsight to look back and want to undo this deal, but assessing why it exists today requires the willingness to see the upside and downside in a contract. 

    The same people who were wagering beer that Buxton was a 30M AAV guy are of course going to look at this differently because they were so, so wrong three months ago that of course this looks differently.  It's part of a longstanding TD phenomenon in which Buxton is reality-proof.  If that's your approach to the player your assessment of this deal is going to be similarly blinded/non-rational.  If people want to be naively joyful, go ahead, but then they should just check out of the rational part of the discussion.  Which is totally fine to do sometimes!

    To that end, al I was saying to the poster above, and it's still true now, is that the reason this deal is what it is relates to Buxton himself.  Had he gone through another year of injuries he would've seen a fraction of this kind of guaranteed money next offseason.  He's taking 100M in guarantees with incentives in part because he likes it here and also in part because his agents/reps clearly question how much will be out there in the future.  Which means that there is also that downside here now that we've made this guarantee.  We may see that his injuries persist and this contract ends up not paying off the way we hope.  In 6 years we may have remorse that it didn't pay off.  Not that we shouldn't have signed it, just remorse that this talented kid never did pay off on all that potential.  We may also look back and see this as the move that won us a World Series because we got a star at a discount rate.  Both possibilities are very, very real and that's why this deal looks the way it does.  I get being euphoric because it's Buxton.  At the same time, that's also not a real fair way to assess this move.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...