Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Additions By Subtractions?


    Tom Froemming

    It was a shock to see the Twins elect to designate Byungho Park for assignment. There was plenty of speculation over who would be removed from the 40-man roster to make room for Matt Belisle, but nobody suggested it would be Park, who was just signed last winter.

    Image courtesy of Jennifer Buchanan, USA Today

    Twins Video

    Looking at some of the other moves made under Derek Falvey, maybe we should have known better. It's becoming clear a goal of this offseason has been to eliminate redundancies.

    Last offseason, the Twins were faced with the challenge of figuring out what to do with Miguel Sano, thanks in large part to the assumption Park would take over at DH. The team could have been faced with a similar situation this year, but among Falvey's first moves was to non-tender Trevor Plouffe. Boom, problem solved. For better or worse, the team is now firmly committed to Sano at third base, his natural position.

    It appears, for now at least, the same could be said in regard to Kennys Vargas at DH. It remains to be seen whether or not the team signs a veteran slugger such as Mike Napoli, but it's clear now they have made the decision to prioritize Vargas over Park.

    There was really no reason to make that call this early, especially since Vargas has another option year. But the previous regime was criticized for dragging its feet in regard to making a decision on Plouffe's future, so it's difficult to argue with this move. As unnecessary as it seems, it does provides clarity.

    Of course, it's entirely possible Park remains in the Twins organization. But at that point he will no longer be on the 40-man roster, creating an even greater obstacle for him to return to Target Field. Regardless of any unforeseen additions, Vargas will not have that same issue.

    There have been a couple of other, minor moves this offseason in which Falvey and Co. have made tough decisions on similarly skilled players.

    It was unlikely both Adam Brett Walker and Daniel Palka were ever going to coexist, given their similarities. Walker had a crazy ride on the waiver/DFA roller coaster before landing with the Braves. That leaves Palka as the team's lone young slugging outfielder in Triple A.

    Behind the plate, the careers of Mitch Garver and Stuart Turner were intertwined, but much like with Walker/Palka, it was clear at some point the team would have to pick between the two. Turner was selected in the Rule 5 Draft by the Reds and will compete for the backup catcher spot in spring training.

    Turner has a realistic opportunity to break camp with the Reds, but if he's returned to the Twins it's more clear now than ever that he's behind Garver in the catching pecking order. Given the team's new depth behind the dish, Turner may even have to go back to Double A if he's returned to the organization.

    It never seems to be a good thing when an organization loses a player and receives nothing in return, which could be the case with Park. But sometimes such a departure can create huge opportunities just by opening up playing time for other guys in the org.

    So, looking ahead, what could be next for the Twins' roster makeover? Overshadowed by the Park DFA was the news that Trevor May is going to be given every opportunity to be a starting pitcher this season. With May in the mix, the Twins have no shortage of starting pitching options. Somebody will more than likely be pushed to the bullpen (Tyler Duffey?).

    With the addition of Belisle, however, things are looking very competitive among the reliever corps, as well. Some time between now and Opening Day, it's entirely possible we'll see another surprise move or two by the front office in order to provide clarity on the pitching staff.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Park was not the reason Sano was relegated to RF. Plouffe was. The Twins are bound and determined to play Sano in the field. I can't find the quote, but Falvine or Molly reserved the right to play Sano in RF.

     

    Park and Vargas are not redundant. I think the Twins want a regular DH. Both have MiLB options. Both can play in Rochester if necessary. Neither is the 40th man on the roster. Danny Santana is.

     

    So this is either a way of saving Pohlad money. Or it's an attempt to free up a spot on the 40 man roster. In either case I think they chose poorly.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I still like the signing of Park for the simple reason that the Twins went out in the IFA Market and competed against everyone else and completed a deal. 

     

    The Twins could have spent this time evaluating other talent that could fill a position of need. There weren't just two options -- spending time evaluating Park or hovering around the margarita machine in the front office. A pretty good third option would be spending time evaluating pitching talent.

     

    And this third option probably should have been the first option.

     

     

    I was also never concerned about the logjam because there is no logjam unless multiple players actually perform at a major league level 

     

    A logjam can also prevent the team from ever being able to figure out who can perform at a major league level. I think many of us predicted this exact thing would happen last year when Park was signed -- either Vargas or Park would get cut without being properly evaluated.

    Edited by Doomtints
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    A logjam can also prevent the team from ever being able to figure out who can perform at a major league level. I think many of us predicted this exact thing would happen last year when Park was signed.

     

    I liked the signing as it was going a different route, but this idea was also my caveat to it. It didn't fully make sense from a roster standpoint unless Plouffe was gone, at a minimum. 

     

    That never happened so they pidgeon-holed themselves out of the gate and things just got worse from there.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    How long does the DFA period last, when the player may be claimed?  Is it 10 days?

     

    I understand their reasoning, but I would still hate to lose Park.

    I think teams have 7 days to make a claim?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think teams have 7 days to make a claim?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball_transactions#Waivers

     

    I think it's only 3 days.

     

    The business about 7 is the obscure case where a team might DFA but not waive the player right away: since DFA has to be concluded within 10 days, they can't delay starting the waiver process for longer than 7 of those days.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...