Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • 4 Stories To Watch At The Winter Meetings


    Nick Nelson

    With Christmas only two weeks away, the Hot Stove has yet to heat up for Major League Baseball. But that's about to change.

    Two situations that have been holding up the offseason landscape – Shohei Ohtani and Giancarlo Stanton – have finally been resolved, and with the Winter Meetings set to get underway this week, the floodgates are going to open.

    Here are four (potentially) Twins-related storylines to track as the action unfolds.

    Image courtesy of Gary A. Vaquez, USA Today (Yu Darvish)

    Twins Video

    1) Darvish Market Heats Up

    In late November, Jim Bowden reported that there were six teams legitimately "in" on free agent starter Yu Darvish. It's reasonable to believe the Twins are one of those teams. Thad Levine, who has ties to the right-hander from his days in Texas, has called Darvish a priority.

    The 31-year-old makes plenty of sense as a fit for Minnesota. He'd fulfill their need for a frontline starter, and as one of the game's best strikeout pitchers, he aligns with the organization's growing emphasis on missing bats. But can the Twins swing it financially?

    Signing Darvish will likely require an investment roughly three times larger than the one Terry Ryan made in Ervin Santana, who became the franchise's biggest free agent splurge ever ($54 million) three years ago. But it's not like such commitments are unprecedented for the Twins; they did pony up $184 million to lock up Joe Mauer one year ahead of his free agency, and that contract is on the verge of expiring.

    The problem is that even if Levine is prepared to come to the table as a serious bidder, he'll face stiff competition for arguably the most coveted free agent on the market. However, it is worth noting that a few of the big-market heavy hitters seem limited or less urgent in their pursuit.

    The Yankees would be hard-pressed to go all in on Darvish after taking on Stanton's $250 million contract. The Dodgers must save up with an eye on re-signing Clayton Kershaw, who can opt out of his deal after next year. The Cubs appear to be focusing their attention on another free agent starter, Alex Cobb.

    2) Rays Trade Talks

    Speaking of Cobb, Tampa doesn't appear to have any intention of trying to bring him back, and in fact, it sounds like a bit of a fire sale might be in the works. Bob Nightengale of USA Today wrote the following: "The Rays, who have seen the disparity grow even greater in the AL East with Stanton coming aboard, are listening to anyone and everyone."

    It was reported earlier this offseason that the Twins had discussed Jake Odorizzi with the Rays, and plenty of other intriguing names could be in play. Their closer Alex Colome led the American League in saves this season and has three years remaining of team control.

    And of course, their ace Chris Archer would be the prize of all prizes. Can Levine muster an offer to make that happen?

    If it means giving up four of the team's top ten prospects, should he?

    3) Cole in the Stocking?

    Another noteworthy trade target is Pittsburgh's Gerrit Cole. The Twins have reportedly shown interest in the righty, who could conceivably slot ahead of Santana as Minnesota's No. 1 starter. He's two years away from free agency and in his prime at age 27. Because of these facts, Cole won't come cheaply, but he's more realistic than Archer.

    4) Rule 5 Rumblings

    The Rule 5 draft will take place on Thursday morning, giving teams around the league an opportunity to poach unprotected players from other organizations. The Twins have a few prospects who are candidates to get taken (I have a suspicion someone's going to grab Nick Burdi and stash him on the DL while he rehabs from Tommy John Surgery), but they also have flexibility to acquire someone, with four open spots on the 40-man roster.

    J.J. Cooper of Baseball America listed his top five Rule 5 candidates and, unsurprisingly, the first three are relief pitchers. Burch Smith, Mason McCullough and Cale Coshow all have big fastballs, and could be impact additions.

    It also bears noting that Justin Haley, Minnesota's Rule 5 pick from a year ago, is once again available. He pitched very well at Pawtucket after being returned to the Red Sox organization this past summer, posting a 2.66 ERA and 0.96 WHIP in seven starts.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Apparently Pirates will trade Cole for the following: 

     

     

    I wish we could substitute in Jorge for Jay . . . but, that's probably not realistic. Seriously have to consider doing this, if it is the offer.

    If this is the offer and the Twins haven't said YES I would think it's because they are in talks for someone else. Archer?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    On the possibility of the Twins signing Yu Darvish, every post or article I read mentions the "ties" that he has to Thad Levine from his days in Texas. But how much of a factor is that really? Just because Levine was in the front office at the same time, does that really signify some sort of strong relationship he had with Darvish?

    I've heard that Levine was very involved with the process of getting him signed, so the familiarity/affinity may be heightened. Berardino wrote the following in his latest at PiPress

     

    Levine earned Darvish’s trust during and after the recruiting process, when the Rangers committed $111 million to signing him at age 25. That included a $51.7 million posting fee to the Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters, a step that won’t be necessary this time.

     

    That bond between executive and player, Gimenez said, only grew stronger as Darvish made a “very seamless transition” to the majors, underwent Tommy John surgery and embarked on a lengthy rehabilitation process that saw him return to the mound in 2016. Levine was among Rangers’ front-office employees who took Japanese lessons and in general “offered a lot of different avenues for him to assimilate into our culture,” Gimenez said.

     

    Also it strikes me as really cool that Gimenez is apparently stumping for the Twins despite being a free agent. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If this is the offer and the Twins haven't said YES I would think it's because they are in talks for someone else. Archer?

     

    Well, I'd start with the ask. Honestly, given the Twins 40 man situation, those players are going to add more pitching to the 40. I've got to think the Twins would hope to send someone like Slegers or Jorge over as a piece for no other reason than that they have way too much pitching on the roster.

     

    As well, Archer is probably a better fit. He's younger, done well in the AL East, so more of a sure thing I guess, has more control. Yes, he costs more, but I have to think that it also means a package centering say Gordon, Gonsalves, Jay, and maybe a guy like Jorge. Perhaps not, who knows, but that frees up some 40 man space too so they can add some hitting if they want it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cole is a good SP but it would take him and Kershaw to give us a chance to win the division so we would be expending considerable assets trying to get a wildcard. The wildcard used to mean you earned a playoff series. Now it means you get a one game shot at getting a playoff series.

     

    In addition, the contending teams have better #1s so we would still be poorly positioned for a playoff run. Plus, we would still need a major overhaul of the BP to be even close to most of the contender's bullpen. So, expending good assets for 2 years of Cole makes no sense to me.

    So.... blow it up then?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think Cole plus Lynn, and Santana not regressing would give us a legit shot at the division. (Assuming we add legit bp help.)

    We wouldn't be the favorites, but we'd be close enough to win it 30% of the time, IMO.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cleveland's strength is its pitching. Pitching is historically more volitile year over year than hitting and more affected by injuries. They could have one pitcher get injured and one play like crap and all of a sudden they start to look pretty normal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Cleveland's strength is its pitching. Pitching is historically more volitile year over year than hitting and more affected by injuries. They could have one pitcher get injured and one play like crap and all of a sudden they start to look pretty normal.

    Indians have had either the #1 or #2 rotation the AL five years running.  And overall in that time frame, they have been number one.

     

    Conversely, a team like the Red Sox, often known for offense, has bounced all over the rankings on offense in the last five years. 7th in 2017, 1st in 2016, 8th in 2015, 10th in 2014, and 1st in 2013.

     

    Or, our offense was 9th in runs scored the first half of last season, and 1st in the 2nd half.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    So.... blow it up then?

    There is absolutely no inference we should blow it up.  My position has been consistent.  Continue to develop and acquire young talent until we are actually seriously positioned to contend. (ie Houston)d)   We have a long ways to go to develop the starting rotation and bullpen of a contender.  Cole would help but our pitching staff as a whole would still have a long ways to go to be on par with teams that are serious world series contenders.

     

    Our strength is our young core which still has plenty of question marks.  Santana, Dozier and Mauer could all be gone next year.  This team is by no stretch of anyone's imagination in a window of contention and we do not have the revenue to buy it.  Trading away long-term assets for players with 2 years of control is a great approach to mediocrity.  It only makes sense when you need a final piece and we are not close to that point. Cole and the assets we gave up for him will be long gone when we are there or could have been there had we not given away the assets that landed him.

     

    Get Darvish and then trade for Archer if you are going to push in your chips. At least then you have 4 years to enjoy a better team and if the rest comes together we probably contend for a couple years. 

     

     

    Edited by Major Leauge Ready
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I mean, if you think there is a decent chance Gonsalves or Romero is going to be an Archer (or even Cole) level pitcher, then yeah, I agree.  But Gonsalves looks like a 4-5 type and while Romero has the upside of a front-line starter, the actual odds of that happening are probably less than 20%, plus he may not even be suited for a starting role. He's never pitched more than 125 innings, and the one time he pitched that many innings, he got hurt/warn down at the end of the year.  Archer gives you an ace for 4 years, and Cole a #2 for two years. With injury risk there is no sure thing, but those are much more of a guarantee of a #1-#2 pitcher than Gonsalves/Romero. That's why you might trade Romero or Gonsalves, plus something more (and for Archer, probably a lot more).  Also, let's say you trade one of Romero or Gonsalves for 2 years of Cole.  By 2020, when Cole is a FA, both the other of Gonsalves/Romero and Lewis Thorpe may be ready to join your rotation. And tons of money is opening up from the Santana, Mauer and Dozier contracts expiring next year, so you may also have enough to get another FA pitcher next year or in 2020, if you don't this year. Meanwhile, having Cole means you have a good starting pitching rotation the next two years, rather than a mediocre one. We don't want to wait until 2020 to be a contender, but without beefing up our rotation for 2018-19, we aren't realistically contenders. And I don't think you can count on Gonsalves or Romero to add what the rotation needs to  this year, and likely not even next year. Obviously it all depends on the total amount the Pirates (or the Rays) ask for, but I would not make trading Romero or Gonsalves off limits. I might even trade Lewis for Archer, if the deal was good enough (say, Archer for Lewis plus a 6-10 level prospect - which the Rays likely wouldn't do anyway).

     

    People need to slow down on the Gonsalves train.  The guy might end up being good, but he's only pitched 22 innings in AAA so far.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If we signed Darvish, we could afford to trade top pitching prospects for Archer. So a package of Gonsalves, Jay, Gordon, and Kohl and maybe someone else could be enticing.

     

    With a rotation of Darvish, Archer, Santana, Berrios and Gibson/ May / Mejia, plus still have Littell, Sledgers, Jorge, and Romero and Thorpe still on the farm.

    Edited by Brandon
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If we signed Darvish, we could afford to trade top pitching prospects for Archer. So a package of Gonsalves, Jay, Gordon, and Kohl and maybe someone else could be enticing.

     

    Or, the Rays could just take Kohl Stewart in the upcoming draft for free....

     

    I'd think Archer would cost two of their top pitching prospects, whatever hitter the Rays wanted, and one more mid tier player. Me? No way Jay is on that list if I'm the Rays. I take Gonsalves, the AA pitcher they most want, Lewis, and Kiriloff. Archer is practically signed for free, compared to what a pitcher of his quality costs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...