3 Questions Facing Twins Catchers During the 2020 Season

Yes to the baseball reference numbers for Garver. Regression or not, I'd take those numbers any day. Not that I necessarily agree with that much regression.

The Castro vs Avila comparison is interesting as they are similar players in regard to overall production, but are not the exact same performers category to category.

Despite the results of almost 50-50 split time between Garver and Castro last season, and the time off/rest for both, I think it could easily be argued some of that was veteran vs youngster and Garver could easily increase his time behind the plate another 10-20% without some fatigue wear down.

I think we're going to be just fine at catcher in 2020.

Garver will not regress, but be a bit better, if he stays healthy. He is smart, calculating and has been working on it this off season. I'm on the record with this call for Garver. Maeda with be better but Garver gets worse? Not buying.

Garver will not regress, but be a bit better, if he stays healthy. He is smart, calculating and has been working on it this off season. I'm on the record with this call for Garver. Maeda with be better but Garver gets worse? Not buying.

Garvers mind set will make him better. Most definitely on defensive, it`ll be hard to match his #s offensively w/ the less lively ball but comparatively he should maintain aproximately the same level. I prefer Astudillo as the extra bench because of his versatility. Him as an extra catcher is a big advantage. If he can show he can improve his plate discipline while playing in the bigs he stays if not he goes down to begin with

2021 - it will be Garver and Jeffers - then the catcher position will really have an offensive advantage over other teams.

Garver will not regress, but be a bit better, if he stays healthy. He is smart, calculating and has been working on it this off season. I'm on the record with this call for Garver. Maeda with be better but Garver gets worse? Not buying.

Agreed completely. The idea that guys will regress after career years is overblown, especially when they have such a small sample size to compare their career year to!

Garver did not hit many cheap homers last year. His swing is so powerful for how compact it is that when he makes contact, it is loud. I would bet on him out-producing last season assuming he stays healthy and gets the same opportunities before I would bet on him regressing.

I think Avila's role is dependent on if they carry a 3rd catcher on the roster, as he's the most likely PH candidate in close games. Related, it depends how much they trust Austudillo catching in close games.

2021 - it will be Garver and Jeffers - then the catcher position will really have an offensive advantage over other teams.

And Rortvedt by 2022 at the latest?

And the solid and versatile Astudillo more than likely still around?

Depth of talent is a fun problem to have.

Do both Cave & Astudillo have options left? If so then they could be shuttled back & forth based on matchups & needs throughout the season. 

Rortvedt will need to be on 40 man roster after this season, Jeffers after 2021 season. Will be interesting to see who Twins call on if injury occurs. Can't see them utilizing Astudillo as half of 50/50 or 60/40 catcher rotation. Rortvedt seems more advanced defensively especially throwing out basestealers, LH batter, Jeffers more advanced hitter, good pitch framer, RH batter.

While it's not a given for player's to regress after such a breakout year, breaking down Garver's year shows he is a good candidate. 

 

It's no secret that Garver raked against LHP.  His slash line looked: .321/.434/.736/1.170 which is unbelievable.  36% of his PA were against lefties, which is a good 7-9% more in favor from what a guy who plays everyday usually see.  Using him more often will result in more PA against RHP which should bring down his overall line,  

 

You also have to keep in mind he got a lot of rest throughout the season last year.  He started 76 games at catcher and while we all expect and hope he starts more often than 1/2 the time, using him more will probably tire him out a bit more as well. 

 

I think expecting the rate numbers to go up as he plays more often is just asking for disappointment.  Now, i don't expect him to fall off a cliff or anything, but an OPS of around .850 would still be dang good asset. 

I understand what you are saying, and I understand why the assumption is that Garver's numbers will regress, along with many others who all had career years last year. I just don't think you can look at a guy who has played a grand total of 218 regular season games (and 3 post season games) and say definitively that he has had his best season and will therefore regress.

Every career year looks like a candidate for regression until that player improves upon it. My original point was simply that I would bet on Garver having a better year in 2020 than he did in 2019 before I would bet on him having a worse year.

While it's not a given for player's to regress after such a breakout year, breaking down Garver's year shows he is a good candidate. 

 

It's no secret that Garver raked against LHP.  His slash line looked: .321/.434/.736/1.170 which is unbelievable.  36% of his PA were against lefties, which is a good 7-9% more in favor from what a guy who plays everyday usually see.  Using him more often will result in more PA against RHP which should bring down his overall line...... 

 

That is the popular opinion based on the conservative and common process of projection that is often used. But my bet is that Garver will not fit in your/the box. People were saying the same thing about Kepler not being able to hit lefties, so don't let him play against lefties. I contended all he needed was more at bats against lefties, and he would be fine and improve. Garver knows his weaknesses, and will be improving them. Baldelli has already said that he doesn't expect a huge difference in his time behind the plate. I bet there is some more though. We will see who's projection is right at the end of the year. So while it's also not a given for players to keep improving once they hit their stride, I like that he is a good candidate to improve as he progresses this year.

Glad to see Harper gone. I will also be happy for the Twins when swing-at-everything-mediocre-at-every-position Astudillo is gone. I wish them well carrying on their career, elsewhere.

There's always the exception to the rule, like Brian Dozier in his prime was much better in MLB than his minor leage career. But, while I think Garver is somewhat like Dozier in that he will be a better MLB player than MILB, I think there's definitely some regression coming. Especially if the ball doesn't carry like it did last year. I think he'll still be good and I'd be more than happy with a catcher with a .800+ OPS.