Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • 2022 MLB Draft Day 2 Thread


    Jeremy Nygaard

    The Twins added three players on Sunday night and will add seven more on Tuesday. This article will be updated with each Twins pick, so check back often. 

     

    Today's portion of the draft, which will include rounds 3 through 10, will begin at 1 p.m. CT.

    Keep up to date with the new Twins Draft Tracker

    Yesterday, the Twins added these three players, and the Twins are thrilled with Day 1!

    But before we get to the player, here is an interesting new rule that will put these drafted players on the field much sooner than in the past. 

    1 (8) - Brooks Lee, SS, Cal Poly
    21 years old. 6-2, 205. Switch-hitter.
    Hit: 60. Power: 50. Speed: 45. Field: 50. Arm: 55
    Slot money: $5,439,500
    Profile / Draft Tracker / Rapid Reaction Video / Draft Article 

    2 (48) - Connor Prielipp, LHP, Alabama
    21 years old. 6-2, 210. Left-handed pitcher.
    Fastball: 60. Slider: 70. Change-up: 50. Control 55.
    Slot money: $1,621,900
    Profile / Draft Tracker / Rapid Reaction Video / Draft Article 

    CB (78) - Tanner Schobel, SS, Virginia Tech
    21 years old. 5-10, 170. Shortstop.
    Hit: 50. Power: 40. Speed: 50. Field: 50. Arm: 50
    Slot money: $1,001,500
    Profile / Draft Tracker / Rapid Reaction Video / Draft Article 

    3 - With their third-round pick in the 2022 MLB Draft, the Minnesota Twins chose SS Carlos Correa. OK, that's not officially how it works, but when the Twins signed Correa in March, they forfeited their third-round pick in this draft. I would say that's another excellent choice. 

     

     

     

     

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 hour ago, DocBauer said:

    FWIW in regard to Daulton Shuffield:

    5' 9" and 170lbs. 23yo, so he's older than most to be sure.

    He was named a 2nd team All American by "Collegiate Baseball Newspaper" who I've never heard of, but assume it was, obviously, for Div II, which is where I believe Texas State plays at. He was also named the Sunbelt Player of the Year. 

    He set a number of school records, FWIW, but this is his 2022 year:

    .378/ .444/ .668/ 1.113 

    He had 20 Dbls/ 5 tpls/ 13 HR/ 48 RBI

    And scored 78 R while being 16-19 in SB.

    Clearly an inexpensive signing with some athleticism and potential, but nothing to be excited for, especially considering age. But he's, at worst, a low level roster filler with some potential to help out somewhere. 

    Texas State is not DII....they were a very good D1 team who could've/should've beat Stanford to advance to the CWS.....they absolutely choked in game 3 of the series and Stanford advanced.  

    I noticed him during the series....he was clearly their best offensive player.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, roger said:

    I remain hopeful that they will get at least two catchers later today.  And hopefully, one of them will turn out to be both a good one and fast mover.

    I get it. But I think it is still best to choose the player whom the committee thinks is the best overall player. Trades can be made from a position of strength for a position of need.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, James said:

    One can never have enough shortstops apparently. 

    If a player is capable of playing SS at the college level he is almost certainly capable of playing 2B and 3B. That can be sorted out by the player development staff, assuming they know what they are doing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, cheeseheadgophfan said:

    Texas State is not DII....they were a very good D1 team who could've/should've beat Stanford to advance to the CWS.....they absolutely choked in game 3 of the series and Stanford advanced.  

    I noticed him during the series....he was clearly their best offensive player.

    Thank you for the clarification! I should have remembered the Sun Belt was D1. Obviously my brain was on overload or needing a re-charge. 

    Thanks for your thoughts as well as the reminder.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, Dman said:

    OK my bad.  This is the Chirstian Encarnation-Strand pick from last year with less of a track record.  I like the risk reward here though at 6.  The Twins just can't resist a good utility infielder especially this late, lol.  I guess the pitching can wait until all the hitters are gone.

    Keep in mind no prospect is a utility guy for trading purposes!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, bunsen82 said:

    Another contact hitter .378.    Definitely a different draft in hitters,  going for high contact OBP players.  

    If you're not batting .350+ in college, you're probably never going to hit in MLB, so I wouldn't be all that impressed,

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, twinstalker said:

    If you're not batting .350+ in college, you're probably never going to hit in MLB, so I wouldn't be all that impressed,

    That's a lofty goal. Looking back at Twins draft picks, I don't see that as a very attainable goal. Larnach never hit .350. Neither did Spencer Steer, or Brent Rooker or Matt Wallner or Ryan Jeffers. So far, for the Twins, I've only found one recent college bat of note to do it, Encarnacion-Strand, and he only hit .358.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, twinstalker said:

    If you're not batting .350+ in college, you're probably never going to hit in MLB, so I wouldn't be all that impressed,

    Rucker and Larnach had 2 of the best college seasons of all time (granted at the D1 level) and they hist .387 and .348 respectively.  So anyone hitting over .350 in college is still impressive.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My eyes are on Jayden Hylton today. MLB lists him as the 114th ranked prospect. Well built and tall - 6'6", 220 lbs. BA .438, OBP .560. He's hit 4 HR and 5 triples against some of the best high schools in Florida, including Stoneman Douglass. Committed to Stetson, which doesn't seem like a school we can't entice him away from. 

    MLB posted a very nice feature of Jayden and his family. 

    Jayden Hylton's journey to the Draft (mlb.com) 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, nicksaviking said:

    That's a lofty goal. Looking back at Twins draft picks, I don't see that as a very attainable goal. Larnach never hit .350. Neither did Spencer Steer, or Brent Rooker or Matt Wallner or Ryan Jeffers. So far, for the Twins, I've only found one recent college bat of note to do it, Encarnacion-Strand, and he only hit .358.

    It's no fun if you spoil wild conjecture with facts.  ?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, NapoleonComplex said:

    My eyes are on Jayden Hylton today. MLB lists him as the 114th ranked prospect. Well built and tall - 6'6", 220 lbs. BA .438, OBP .560. He's hit 4 HR and 5 triples against some of the best high schools in Florida, including Stoneman Douglass. Committed to Stetson, which doesn't seem like a school we can't entice him away from. 

    MLB posted a very nice feature of Jayden and his family. 

    Jayden Hylton's journey to the Draft (mlb.com) 

    Good article. Says his brother goes to Stetson so there might be a draw there for him.

    Either way, I'd be happy to see the Twins able to sign any upside HS kid. Hylton sounds like a good one to gamble on.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, nicksaviking said:

    Also, ideally a good team would have utility players who could actually be full time starters for other teams.

    Or, grow into it.  Eduardo Escobar was a prime example, who we watched develop some power when initially there seemed to be no chance of that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...