Forgive me, but that doesn't look to me like a financial argument. It doesn't appear to have anything to do with "full P&L Responsibility" for a multi million dollar corporation.

 

That looks to me like a baseball argument..."we shouldn't have signed these guys, now, we should have waited and signed those other guys, later."

 

So that leaves me wondering whether your post is any different in substance than the other posts in these forums.

The parts about $50M, dead weight, underperforming assets and payroll allocation sound pretty financial to me...

 

To be perfectly honest, this feels like trying to discredit a dissenting opinion.

Are the Twins spending enough money? No. Not when 2 players say that spent part of the year injured as a reason why they underperformed and none of the medical or analytical staff could figure it our. They are not paying enough money somewhere

Are the Twins spending enough money? No. Not when 2 players say that spent part of the year injured as a reason why they underperformed and none of the medical or analytical staff could figure it our. They are not paying enough money somewhere

Need to pay for better a better medical team?