Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • entries
    891
  • comments
    3,675
  • views
    1,591,026

What If Brian Dozier Is Done?


Ted Schwerzler

2,145 views

 Share

Twins Video

Recently, Fangraphs released their yearly ZiPS projections for the Minnesota Twins. As with most years, the results weren't incredibly favorable. On the offensive side of things, the projections see Minnesota hitters in a relatively good light, it's the pitching where the most is left to be desired. There's one player though that provides a pretty big potential cause for concern.

 

Enter Brian Dozier.

 

On the surface, things aren't all that bad for Dozier. Projections have him as a repeat 3.0+ fWAR player with over 20 homers and 30 plus doubles. From a statistical standpoint, that would once again put the Twins second basemen among the best in the big leagues at the position. It's never really been about what Dozier has done though that is the concern. Instead, it's what may come, and when.

 

If there's something that stuck out to me more than anything in the ZiPS projections provided by Fangraphs, it goes well beyond any statistical numbers. Comparisons are a fickle science (and they really aren't a science at all), but the name next to Brian Dozier's made me pause. Dan Uggla.

 

Unfortunately, it isn't 2010. If it were, we'd be talking about the .287/.369/.508 slash line Uggla. The Florida Marlins (that's right not Miami) second basemen that launched 33 homers and drove in 105 runs. No, it's not 2010 though. Instead, this Dan Uggla is the guy who hasn't sniffed the Mendoza Line since 2013. He hasn't hit more than 10 doubles in a season since 2012, and a 16 home run output a season ago was about the only thing that's gone right for a guy who's bounced between three teams in two seasons.

 

So what does that have to do with Dozier? Fangraphs still sees the Twins second basemen contributing a .244/.318/.437 slash line. He's still projected to be one of the best players in the Twins lineup. Heck, Dozier is coming off of his first season an an All-Star. Again, it's probably not as much about what is, as what's potentially to come from the Mississippi product.

 

A season ago, Fangraphs wrote about the concerns for Brian Dozier as a hitter. He's consistently been a dead-pull guy at the plate, and barring adjustments, he's struggled for periods relying on fastballs. That may have not been any more prominent of a narrative than it was a season ago.

 

In 2015, Dozier pulled a ridiculous 60.2% of balls he put in play. using the opposite field 19.7% of the time during his career, his 15.6% in 2015 was a new low. What Dozier did do a season ago was strike the ball more effectively, generating "hard" contract 29% of the time. Regardless of what his efforts generated, Dozier experienced a different approach by opposing pitchers for the first time in his career.

 

After seeing less than 60% of pitches be fastballs for the first time in 2014, pitchers threw Dozier a career low 53.2% pitches of that variety. He was also dealt a career high 11.3% of pitches registering as changeups. A significant shift in philosophy when it comes to getting Dozier out, pitchers saw what could be the beginning of a concerning trend for the Twins All-Star second basemen.

 

Having made some adjustments, but undoubtedly going through growing pains, Dozier struggled. For the second season in a row, he faded down the stretch, but it's the final numbers that may be the most concerning. Being pitched differently, Dozier owned a 21.0% strikeout rate, the highest of his career, and a 4% jump from where he was during his debut season of 2012. As expected with the increased strikeout rate, Dozier whiffed a career high 148 times, and set a new Twins record (don't worry, Miguel Sano will likely break it in 2016). In and of itself, that's an issue. Combined with the fact that Dozier walked just 61 times, generating an 8.7% walk rate (a nearly 4% drop from 2014), it was a less than perfect storm.

 

Steamer projections actually see Dozier producing a better average and on-base percentage in the year ahead, albeit with decreased power totals, but he'll be entering his age 29 season. Five years in the big leagues under his belt, it's fair to assume there's one or two more worth of solid production in him. What's unfortunate is that leaves the Twins with a question in 2018.

 

A season ago, Minnesota inked Dozier to a four-year, $20 million extension. It's a low risk deal that bought out arbitration years from the Twins best player. Should things play out as they are trending however, Minnesota may be looking at needing to re-up with a player that has exhausted what capable production, and going forward is exactly as predicted.

 

For now, the toughest part of the equation is what to do with the prospect waiting in the wings, Jorge Polanco. No doubt not a shortstop (seriously look at those numbers), Polanco is a major league ready bat that could be counted on at second base. The Twins don't have room for him, and asking him to bide his time for two more years could stunt development. As a trade chip, there's no doubt positive there, but that also leaves the Twins exposed in regards to Dozier's situation.

 

In short, Brian Dozier is going to remain a productive member of the Twins (and arguably one of the team's best players) for at least the next year. What could happen beyond that point is a scary downturn that the Atlanta Braves know about all too well. Dozier has had the deck stacked against him before, but unless pitches continue to come in high and tight, adjust to the slow paced, corner dusting changeup is going to need to be his next feat.

 

For more from Off The Baggy, click here. Follow @tlschwerz

 Share

9 Comments


Recommended Comments

Of course, as we all well know, this is still purely speculation. Dozier could continue being a quality defensive 2B with big production for several years.

 

However, should his career path resemble "Uggla, the sequal", the Twins will be replacing a lot of his power and production with the addition of Park, the promotion of Kepler, and the continued development of Rosario, Sano and Buxton. (There are other possible as well).

 

The concern, IMHO, would be WHEN said sequal would take place. Polanco would not be the same player as Dozier, but everything about him seems to state that he would be quality defensively, that he would hit and have at least a decent OB%, that he should provide quality gap power with some HR capability and good speed. But would he still be with the Twins when this proposed slide of Dozier's take place?

Link to comment

 

Of course, as we all well know, this is still purely speculation. Dozier could continue being a quality defensive 2B with big production for several years.

However, should his career path resemble "Uggla, the sequal", the Twins will be replacing a lot of his power and production with the addition of Park, the promotion of Kepler, and the continued development of Rosario, Sano and Buxton. (There are other possible as well).

The concern, IMHO, would be WHEN said sequal would take place. Polanco would not be the same player as Dozier, but everything about him seems to state that he would be quality defensively, that he would hit and have at least a decent OB%, that he should provide quality gap power with some HR capability and good speed. But would he still be with the Twins when this proposed slide of Dozier's take place?

 

Thanks for stating the speculative sense of this, I think sometimes that gets lost.

 

I'd agree with you that the biggest issue could be what the Twins do to hurt Polanco if he doesn't play in MLB earlier than 2 years, and how he hurts the Twins if he's traded.

 

As far as Park/Kepler/etc replacing Dozier's power, I'm not sure it's that cut and dry. The Twins needed to add a Park type, despite Dozier's contribution. I don't forsee Rosario continuing to be effective on his current path, and it will be Kepler replacing him at some point.

 

Essentially, the Twins probably need to decide what to do with Dozier before that decision is made for them.

Link to comment

Thanks for stating the speculative sense of this, I think sometimes that gets lost.

 

I'd agree with you that the biggest issue could be what the Twins do to hurt Polanco if he doesn't play in MLB earlier than 2 years, and how he hurts the Twins if he's traded.

 

As far as Park/Kepler/etc replacing Dozier's power, I'm not sure it's that cut and dry. The Twins needed to add a Park type, despite Dozier's contribution. I don't forsee Rosario continuing to be effective on his current path, and it will be Kepler replacing him at some point.

 

Essentially, the Twins probably need to decide what to do with Dozier before that decision is made for them.

To address your last paragraph first, the Twins have little history of doing anything about a player in a Dozier like situation until something forces their hand.

 

My take on Dozier is there are only going to be two versions available. The current Dozier, but which will be far less than first half Dozier but not as bad as second half Dozier. A few less SO, and a lot less HR's. The other version has him changing his approach, significantly lower his SO's, and hitting maybe .275? But his HR's become a thing of the past. Why? First off, he has no "natural" power. Second, he sat on high inside FB to pull them severely. If he changes his approach, those pitches will get by him. He can't do both.

 

I don't think the Twins year is now. They have too many issues, especially on the mound, to be legitimate. It would be the perfect time to sell as high as you can with him. Or trade Polanco. Having both is a waste of a resource. BTW, I don't think it's fair to disregard Park in the race for the SO crown. I fear he will give Miguel all he can handle! :)

Link to comment

I'd agree that Dozier's power is generated through selling out to completely tank the ball. It's something the Twins have become ok with due to the power production. As you've suggested, salvaging his later career may be best done by a change of approach (something that I'd agree, won't be forced).

 

You're right in that Dozier and Polanco are mutually hurting each other. One is lulling the Twins into a false sense of security, while the other will soon be wasting key development time at higher levels. It's an unfortunate situation that may not have the best ending.

Link to comment
I'd agree that Dozier's power is generated through selling out to completely tank the ball. It's something the Twins have become ok with due to the power production. As you've suggested, salvaging his later career may be best done by a change of approach (something that I'd agree, won't be forced).

 

You're right in that Dozier and Polanco are mutually hurting each other. One is lulling the Twins into a false sense of security, while the other will soon be wasting key development time at higher levels. It's an unfortunate situation that may not have the best ending.

And in my mind, an innovative team would take advantage of those artifificially inflated Dozier numbers, and sell as high as possible to someone who needs help at that position. To me that is one of the FO largest detriments. They don't/won't take advantage of an opportunity to move someone on the upside.
Link to comment
And in my mind, an innovative team would take advantage of those artifificially inflated Dozier numbers, and sell as high as possible to someone who needs help at that position. To me that is one of the FO largest detriments. They don't/won't take advantage of an opportunity to move someone on the upside.

 

I'd agree with that wholeheartedly.

Link to comment

What is stopping the Twins from using Polanco as their utility guy in 2016 and moving on from Nunez??  That way they could get a good look at what they have (or don't have) in Polanco and put them in a much better position to evaluate at the conclusion of the 2016 season.  It's not always a bad thing to have players locked up for a time.  If the Twins were to decide to trade Dozier, they would be offering a player with a "fixed cost" to another team and the certainty that the team acquiring him would have him for several years.

Link to comment
What is stopping the Twins from using Polanco as their utility guy in 2016 and moving on from Nunez??  That way they could get a good look at what they have (or don't have) in Polanco and put them in a much better position to evaluate at the conclusion of the 2016 season.  It's not always a bad thing to have players locked up for a time.  If the Twins were to decide to trade Dozier, they would be offering a player with a "fixed cost" to another team and the certainty that the team acquiring him would have him for several years.

 

My two best answers to your question are: A) The Twins and B) I don't know. With what Minnesota has on the farm, I wouldn't have tendered Nunez

Link to comment

Dozier's 2014 production would be just fine. I don't know if it was postseason pressure, injury, fatigue or pitchers figuring him out, but he was poor in the second half of the season. I still think he is a top-tier second baseman and not one easily replaced. I don't think the Twins want to waste Polanco's development and service time by setting him on the bench. They have hope for Santana coming back and being an asset as a utility guy to start the season and trying to get at-bats for both DanSan and Polanco would be difficult at best.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...