Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • entries
    891
  • comments
    3,675
  • views
    1,591,615

On Foul Balls, Netting, And Distractions


Ted Schwerzler

1,414 views

 Share

Twins Video

For months, players, fans, and Major League Baseball have been discussing the options in regards to fan safety at the ballpark. Most notably, the expansion of netting from behind home plate has become a topic of interest. Now Major League Baseball has issued their new fan safety recommendations.

 

In the release, the following recommendations are issued:

  • Clubs are encouraged to implement or maintain netting that shields from line-drive foul balls all field-level seats that are located between the near ends of both dugouts and within 70 feet of home plate.
  • Although Clubs already provide warnings to fans about the dangers posed by batted balls and bats entering the stands and the need to pay attention to the action on the field during each at-bat, the Commissioner's Officer recommends that Clubs continue to explore ways to educate their fans on these issues and is providing Clubs with resources to assist them in this area.
  • The Commissioner's Office will be working with the Clubs and online ticketing sellers to identify ways to provide customers with additional information at the point of sale about which seats are (and are not) behind netting.

Ok, now we have the basis for our discussion. First and foremost, this is something I can get behind as long as the changes end at the current state. Per the recommendations above, no netting would extend the length of the dugout, and therefore, would leave those seats still unobstructed. Therein lies my biggest concern for going overboard with netting and safety measures.

 

In recent years, we have seen a handful of fans be struck with batted balls or bats flying into the stands. Handful is a reflective term noting that out of the millions of people that experience baseball games in person each season, less than a full percent have ever been seriously injured. That's not to make light of the situation, but instead to provide some perspective. More fans have died in recent memory, from falling from areas in stadiums with less than secure railings or overhangs. We aren't talking about some sort of epidemic.

 

Looking at the problem that faces Major League Baseball as it pertains to fan safety, we find a situation in which the consumer is asking for protection from themselves. Regardless of how many fans have been hurt, each situation is a direct outcome of a buying decision. As has always been the case, each ticket comes with a disclaimer full highlighting the inherent risks of being present at a baseball game. This is also voiced at each game as a reminder prior to first pitch over the stadium public address system.

 

Generally, the thought process behind buying seats close to the dugout or down the lines is one of increased fan interaction. Whether it be for a close up field view, the opportunity for autographs, hoping to interact with a player, or snagging a ball, those reasons would seem to influence the purchasing decision. Knowing full well the tickets carry a premium price for those reasons, the expected experience should be what each fan has come to understand.

 

While it's not fair to categorize every incident as the outcome of a fan or group not paying attention, or simply not reacting, it's also not fair to do the opposite. In an age where cell phones, conversations, food, beer, and otherwise have all taken away from paying attention to the action, responsibility should not be shifted. Again, when buying your ticket, you know what and where you are paying for.

 

With the latest safety recommendations, baseball has gone above and beyond to protect fans from themselves. The seats in question have been unprotected for years. While the game has gotten bigger, faster, and stronger, it has not done so exponentially so quickly that the sport hasn't handled it. Instead of looking at the unfortunate instances as the outliers they have come to be, baseball has taken a step to improve fan safety while not diluting the product being purchased.

 

At some point, as a whole, we need to take more ownership for our own safety and actions. Unfortunate circumstances take place, and while not all things are preventable, there's also a point in which prevention measures overstep sensibility as well. For now, this is a good move for baseball. As the call for netting past the dugouts or even from foul pole to foul pole comes to fruition, sensibility needs to win out.

 

For more from Off The Baggy, click here. Follow @tlschwerz

 Share

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

Great topic. For years I have wanted to do some research, background, and cite some statistics and do a fuller type of article on this. But this is good. I would take it further than you. Yes the liability is on the fans but:

1. I don't think fans realize how badly they can get hurt. 

2. Everyone who gets hurt was not "on their cellphone, they should know better." That's the stuff you hear from naysayers. In fact from what I've witnessed a few times, it's just the opposite. People are just enjoying themselves, talking, and they don't watch every pitch. And they don't know how quickly those balls can get to you. Ever had a foul ball come straight at you? You spend too many wasted fractions of seconds trying to figure out where its going, before you realize its coming right at you! That's why they say outfielders have the biggest trouble with the line drives hit right at them.

3. There must be some good netting MLB can order. Before too long, people will forget it's there. I bet there's strong material you can't even see. I find it hard to believe the only option is the yellow, rope-thick stuff strung from foul pole to foul pole, obstructing everyone's vision. That's what the critics want you to think. 

 

Anyway, got a little off track but again, great topic!

Link to comment

Appreciate the response. Would suggest that equally as important as how badly someone can get hurt, is how little risk there is to actually getting hurt.

 

As I alluded to, the percentages is fraction points, and less likely than falling and dying from a less than safe part of the stadium.

 

There's little doubt in my mind that I'd grow accustomed to any new safety measures. My stance is more rooted in the fact that overprotection is often to a detriment of the masses, caused by the few and far between, and reflective of our society as a whole. It's an ownership thing. Baseball teams could offer every fan down the foul line a helmet, but should they really have to?

Link to comment

 

Appreciate the response. Would suggest that equally as important as how badly someone can get hurt, is how little risk there is to actually getting hurt.

 

As I alluded to, the percentages is fraction points, and less likely than falling and dying from a less than safe part of the stadium.

 

There's little doubt in my mind that I'd grow accustomed to any new safety measures. My stance is more rooted in the fact that overprotection is often to a detriment of the masses, caused by the few and far between, and reflective of our society as a whole. It's an ownership thing. Baseball teams could offer every fan down the foul line a helmet, but should they really have to?

Agreed.  It's another example of complete over-reach which has become all too common in today's society.  Sure, some fans will get hurt, no doubt, and not always because they're on their cell phone.  But should we also be warning fans they have a better chance of being hurt by the light rail just outside the stadium?  

Fans should know the inherent risk of sitting close to the field.  I love being close to the field, for the view, and also the opportunity to get a foul ball.  Our season tix are just to the left of the netting, BECAUSE OF THE NETTING!  We could've gone behind home plate many times, but stayed away from it because we didn't want to watch the game through the net.  

Link to comment

 

Agreed.  It's another example of complete over-reach which has become all too common in today's society.  Sure, some fans will get hurt, no doubt, and not always because they're on their cell phone.  But should we also be warning fans they have a better chance of being hurt by the light rail just outside the stadium?  

Fans should know the inherent risk of sitting close to the field.  I love being close to the field, for the view, and also the opportunity to get a foul ball.  Our season tix are just to the left of the netting, BECAUSE OF THE NETTING!  We could've gone behind home plate many times, but stayed away from it because we didn't want to watch the game through the net.  

 

Appreciate your comment and it's essentially a summary of my thoughts and feelings as well. You can protect people from a multitude of things, and you can post all the warnings in the world, but some things should be common sense and ownership should be internal. You sit close to a baseball, pay attention to what enters the stands.

 

I'm glad you bring up the netting behind the plate too. I had some nonsense type replies on twitter regarding the seats behind the plate being the best in the park and behind netting. There's netting behind the plate because there is a 100% chance that on every pitch a ball is being thrown or batted right at you, that's common sense. I, like you, also choose not to sit behind the plate for the sate of the unimpeded view.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...