Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Who's to Blame for The Twins Missing Out on Correa..... Again?


Hunter McCall

1,785 views

 Share

Twins Video

At the beginning of the offseason, Carlos Correa and Scott Boras publicly expressed Correa's interest in staying in Minnesota on a long-term deal. Correa went as far as to say that he was there and all the Twins had to do was pay up. There were soundbites of Byron Buxton and Rocco Baldelli pleading with the front office to keep Correa around. Of course, this was all before Correa signed a 13-year $350M contract with the San Francisco Giants. Upon Correa's signing with the Giants, many people in the Twins community were rather upset, and not without reason. It's frustrating to hear a top tier free agent say he wants to play for your team and all they have to do is pay up only to see him sign a massive deal with one of the biggest market teams in the league. Over the course of the next week, that sadness and anger slowly subsided for many fans, as the focus shifted back to the Twins and how they were going to construct the roster going forward. Who in their right mind wants to sign a 28-year-old short stop with an extensive injury history to a 13-year deal anyway?

The grieving process had seemingly reached the "acceptance" stage. The signing of Joey Gallo gave Twins fans something new to argue about, and it appeared everyone had moved on. That was of course until the Giants canceled their introductory press conference with Correa yesterday morning. The speculation and conspiracy theories began to run wild on Twitter and across the internet, but it still seemed a little silly and far fetched. How can it be a full week later, on the day of the press conference, that the deal between Correa and the Giants had fallen through? Then the Associated Press dropped a bombshell story detailing the reasoning for the cancellation as an injury that popped up during Correa's physical with Giant's team doctors. Wow! What a change of events! The Twins might really have a shot to land Correa again! Nope. They would see a second opportunity fall by the wayside as the New York Mets would slide in and swipe Correa for $315M over the next 12 years. What a bummer. Fire Derek Falvey right!?

Relax. Let's take the blinders off and think about this for a minute. Carlos Correa chose to take a 12-year $315M deal with the New York Mets. The Mets have a shortstop in Francisco Lindor, so by signing with the Mets, Correa has agreed that he will move to 3rd base. It is commonly known that position players, especially all-star short stops who have won a platinum glove just two years ago, don't usually enjoy being asked to change positions. Players as good at the position as Correa normally see this as a slap in the face, and will laugh at any deal that requires them to give up their position. Playing short stop is the alpha male position. He's the dude of the infield. It's rare to see as willing a shift off the keystone as we've seen with Correa signing with the Mets less than 24 hours after the deal with the Giants fell through. After all, the Twins offered a 10-year $285M contract for him to play short stop for the team he claimed to love and want to remain a part of. So why would he take less money per year to play for the Mets?

He didn't want to play for the Twins. There it is. I said it. Maybe it's time to at least consider this thought as a possibility. Maybe Correa and his agent, who is among the best negotiators in sports, used the Minnesota Twins. Maybe there was only one team last year willing to give him what he wanted in his prove it deal last year, so he decided he would head up north for one summer and play in Minnesota. Maybe him and Boras constantly sang their praise of the Minnesota Twins as a technique to get other teams to raise their offers and start a bidding war. Maybe all of this worked. Think about it, the two teams he decided to sign with are two of the biggest market teams in sports. They constantly shell out as much, if not more money than any team in the league. They're almost always competitive. If he was to eat up almost $30M per year with the Twins, would they be able to field a consistently competitive team over the course of a 10-13 year contract when their payroll sits at around $160M? Maybe, but aren't the odds of success better with a team who's payroll is approaching half a billion dollars?

This isn't even to mention the sketchiness of the mystery injury that ultimately led to the Giant's deal falling through. Correa came into Minnesota with a history of injuries and IL stints. This was the reason for the 3-year deal with all the opt outs. If he got hurt, he could just try again the next year, all on the Twin's dollar. What could the Giant's doctors have found that would have caused them to back out? It must have been severe in their eyes to cause them to let go of one of the biggest free agents on the market. This mysterious injury should be a major red flag that would cause pause to anyone, except Mets owner Steve Cohen apparently, until they got their hands on him for their own extensive medical evaluation.

As the dust settles on what was a shocking and unique change of events, Twins fans again find themselves angry. But I ask, are we aiming our displeasure at the right people? Correa chose two huge market teams over the Twins, and the one he ultimately ended up with won't even allow him to play the position he won a platinum glove at just two years ago. In my opinion, they used the Twins as leverage to get what Correa ultimately wanted, a long-term deal on a big market team. We shouldn't fault the front office for not raising their offer from 10-years $285M after Correa had a foggy medical evaluation. If the events that transpired yesterday resulted in the Twins raising their original offer, I would find that quite concerning. Raising their offer would have been negligent and down right bad business. Correa had his chance to come back to the Twins and play short stop, and at the end of the day he chose to take less money per year to play 3rd base for the New York Mets. Maybe we should stop pointing the blame at the front office for their inability to convince Correa to stay, and redirect it at Correa and Scott Boras for just flat out not wanting to be in Minnesota long-term.

Maybe I'm way off here, but I agree with the front office for not going 12 or 13 years, especially after the shady medical evaluation done by the Giants. Let me know what you think, and as always, Go Twins!

 Share

10 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are lots of maybe's involved. Maybe he never really wanted to be in Minnesota. Maybe his physical was far worse than we will ever know. Maybe by going somewhere else he did the Twins a favor by not getting stuck with a real albatross of a contract. Maybe Twins management really did know how bad his physical could be and decided to swing for it anyway. Maybe Correa agreed to thirdbase because he won't be playing shortstop for too many more years. Probably a few more.

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, gman said:

There are lots of maybe's involved. Maybe he never really wanted to be in Minnesota. Maybe his physical was far worse than we will ever know. Maybe by going somewhere else he did the Twins a favor by not getting stuck with a real albatross of a contract. Maybe Twins management really did know how bad his physical could be and decided to swing for it anyway. Maybe Correa agreed to thirdbase because he won't be playing shortstop for too many more years. Probably a few more.

There's plenty of unknowns, but in my opinion, Boras and Correa used Minnesota as a pitstop to get him a long term contract with a big market team. It's not a knock on him, he was great for the Twins when he was here. It hurts a little bit, but that's the name of the game. I just think doubling down on blaming the front office for not inking Correa is rather redundant. This contract he signed, in my opinion, just screams that he never intended on being in Minnesota long-term like he claimed he wanted to be.

Link to comment
35 minutes ago, Hunter McCall said:

There's plenty of unknowns, but in my opinion, Boras and Correa used Minnesota as a pitstop to get him a long term contract with a big market team. It's not a knock on him, he was great for the Twins when he was here. It hurts a little bit, but that's the name of the game. I just think doubling down on blaming the front office for not inking Correa is rather redundant. This contract he signed, in my opinion, just screams that he never intended on being in Minnesota long-term like he claimed he wanted to be.

I agree, but I'm not sure why you quoted me?

Link to comment

Joe Mauer signed an 8 year 180 million dollar contract and almost everyone hated him for it around here during his last 3 - 4 years.  And Joe is a hometown hero.  Are you telling me that the people that are pissed off about not signing Correa to this really long term contract wouldn't be on here in like 4 - 5 years saying that because of Correa the Twins are not able to compete?  I mean I'm ok with the big money long term deals, but I just remember all of the anger slung at Mauer in his last few years that I don't think TwinsDaily would be able to handle all of the hypocrisy had they actually signed him.

Link to comment

Highest annual value matters on short contracts. Highest total value matters on contracts that will last to the end of the player's career. The Twins simply were outbid by millions.  Blame the system that's been set up.

Link to comment

It's a weird situation, 10/285 doesn't get any of the top SS in this FA class, something they repeatedly said they were in the market for. Maybe the Twins aren't as high on these players as the rest of the league but it doesn't really add up. Maybe there's a longer play here but selling that they're spending big and their best offer doesn't cross 300 million that doesn't make sense to me. 

Link to comment

One thing does remain true is that paying Correa $35 million/ year for the last several years of his contract, while his skills diminish, would hamstring the Twins. So would that have been worth it for the first six or seven years of his contract?

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...