Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

A pitch clock is coming- pros and cons


Melissa Berman

4,236 views

 Share

Twins Video

Time flies while you’re having fun, but it’s not flying quickly enough, says the MLB.

During CBA negotiations, the MLB players union agreed to allow the MLB to ban shifts, to implement a pitch clock and to make bases larger (not XL pizza box size- from 15” to 18”) effective the 2023 season, subject to those agreements fitting into a total deal. Though the MLBPA appears to be on board with these changes, baseball fans as a whole are not known as being a particularly flexible folk that is eager to embrace change. Needless to say, these potential changes have sparked some conversation. 

Regarding a pitch clock in particular, there has been serious talk surrounding adding one for years now (since 2014 specifically), but it was ultimately not adopted in 2018 when the MLB implemented a host of other rule changes with the goal to increase pace of play. The MLB's plan is to implement a 14-second pitch clock with the bases empty and a 19-second clock with runners on base.

Here are the pros and cons of each side of the pitch clock argument as well as my personal take: 

Pros

It will speed up games and increase excitement- The paramount objective of the MLB adding a pitch clock is to improve pace of play, and there seems to be clear evidence that adding one would accomplish this goal. In 2021, a pitch clock experiment in low-A cut game times by 20 minutes using 15-second and 17-second clocks. In case you question if time in between pitches actually is the long game culprit here, a 2014 study found it was.

A number of extra seconds here and there for a pitcher to do his best Joe Nathan horse exhale doesn’t seem like much, but when around 280-300 pitches are thrown per game, it adds up. These days, games are 20 minutes longer than they were a decade ago, when the average game length was 2:50. That’s a lot of time to be buying ballpark beers. The MLB clearly thinks the ever-increasing game length is a problem, wants to keep its fanbase engaged, and desires to reel in some of its younger fans (not that canceling games exactly accomplishes these goals, but that’s a separate matter entirely). The MLB has the oldest fans among the major sports, with an average age of 57, according to a 2017 survey by Sports Business Journal. (The average NBA, NHL, and NFL fans are 42, 49, and 50, respectively). Recapturing this younger demographic is crucial to the sport's vitality and despite what baseball purists would like to admit, these young fans are the future of the game. It’s the MLB’s hope that increased game speed might also make games more action-packed; games will theoretically be cramming more offense and more action into a lot less time. At the minor league level, albeit with a small sample size, they have seen more runs, higher batting averages, more homeruns, fewer strikeouts and fewer pitchers throwing ball four After this lockout, an increase in game action might be just what the MLB needs to return to relevance (or maybe they’ll just juice the balls again).

Existing pace of play measures are already in place- Adding a pitch clock isn’t exactly new territory in the MLB- there are already time parameters set up by the MLB for warmup pitches, inning changes, and limiting mound visits, so adding a pitch clock is the logical next step. In the minor leagues, pitch clocks of some sort have been in place for the last seven seasons- it had only been in Double A and Triple A before the 2021 season- and minor leaguers didn’t seem to think it was that big of a deal. In addition, because pitch clocks have already been around in some form for more than a handful of years, the number of MLB hitters who have never played in one of those leagues with a clock is now down to slightly more than two per team. The number of pitchers who have never pitched with a clock is around three per team. Of course though there are a number of veterans who have never stared down a clock, and they are vocal, but the times are a changin'.  

14/ 19 seconds is enough time for a pitcher to begin his delivery-  Assuming the MLB keeps with what was implemented in the minor leagues, the pitch clock will not begin to run until the pitcher has the ball on the mound. That should be enough time to check the count and outs, communicate with his catcher, and otherwise go through his established routine.

Cons

Decline in pitching statistics?- I’ll be curious to see what the effect of an MLB pitch clock is on pitching statistics. According to the Athletic, the average fastball velocity without a 15 second clock is 92.3 mph which is nearly the same as with one at 92.4 mph. However, this data comes from a relatively small sample size of minor league play. There’s also more to pitches than just speed- movement and quality of a pitch. Even if fastball velocity with the clock is the same, which in the MLB it very well might not be, it makes theoretical sense the break or movement of a pitch could be affected because of less recovery time and less time for pitchers to get set. After all, the minor leagues have already seen increased batting statistics like batting average and homeruns. Despite initial findings that velocity might not be greatly affected, clearly something is going on, unless all those statistics are flukes. Could a pitch clock lead to increased arm fatigue in pitchers or the need for pitchers with greater stamina?  All of these thoughts are cons if you’re ya know, a pitcher, or love a good pitcher’s duel. 

Hitters and pitchers shouldn’t be rushed- In the major leagues, every pitch matters and the pitch type is selected based on the batter and the current game situation. A catcher needs time to work through the current game situation, put down a sign, and potentially put down another sign if the pitcher shakes it off. It’s a chess match, and there is a lot to process. Minor leaguers report hitters too are impacted by pitch clock. Hitters are aware that every at bat is significant. Big leaguers, especially older veterans, have been raised with the idea that when you’re at the plate, it’s your time; they have established and ingrained routines which yes, might involve messing with their batting gloves between every pitch. Being held to a time clock would be a big mindset switch.

Pitch clocks are antithetical to baseball- Baseball is an inherently slower paced sport. There isn’t nonstop action and movement and an incessant flurry of scoring- try basketball or hockey. The fact that it is the only North American sport to be played without a clock is one of the things that makes baseball unique. And is 2 hours and 50 minutes that much different than 3 hours and 10 minutes? Because it’s inherently a slower paced sport, might the people who are bored at 3:10 still be bored at 2:50? Does shaving off 20 minutes justify potentially altering the feel of the game with its ebbs and flows of suspense? Arguably, it’s a case of the MLB adding more unnecessary rules to further regulate the game. Going to the ballpark is an experience, and people who go plan on spending their entire afternoon or evening there anyway. Also it may sound petty, but installing big blinking pitch blocks where batters and pitchers can each see them sounds like an eyesore.  

My take

I am such a devout baseball fan that I don’t mind the current length of games or pace of play. I enjoy the relaxed nature of the sport and how there isn’t an omnipresent clock incessantly ticking down like a football play clock. There are other pace of play measures in place and I’m of the opinion that those are enough. The MLB sure isn’t interested in cutting down commercial breaks to shorten game length, that’s for sure. However, now that the MLBPA is on board, I’m curious to see what effect it has on games once implemented, and maybe we won't even notice the change before too long. And besides, it *was* kind of nice walking out of Target Field at 9:30 p.m. on April 23, 2021 (2:17 game duration) when J.A. Happ had a no hitter going into the 8th inning and thus caused the game to go hyperspeed. Time will tell, but regardless, change is here- whether we like it or not.

 

Feature photo: Taylor Rogers warms up in relief of J.A. Happ on April 23, 2021

 Share

10 Comments


Recommended Comments

What is the proposed penalty if the pitch clock runs out?   

Will batters no longer be able to call time while at the plate?

Just wondering how these changes will work...

Link to comment

Baseball is my favorite sport and I'm old school.  Long games are driving me nuts and away at times from the game.  You state is there much difference from 2:50 to 3:10 and the answer is no.  But the 4+ hour games with every pitcher on the roster playing and batters constantly tugging at their gloves drive me nuts.  The changes being proposed will take some getting used to, but if the games can get done in 3 hours then I'm all for them.  When the game is getting to old school baseball fans then something is wrong.

Link to comment

I wish it wasn't necessary, but players are unwilling to go with a "spirit of the game" mentality.  It used to be that we could enjoy the quirky pitchers or hitters that took extra time but now it's the norm and it's just too much.  The most common comment of surprise I heard from the experiment in AAA was a sense of rhythm in the game.  I look forward to it.

Link to comment

They need to change dugout reviews. Allowing the Manager to stop the game, watch a review and then say: "Oh, never mind" once he sees he is wrong is ridiculous. The Umpires call it live speed. Let the Manager decide to challenge Live speed. Give him 2 a game. Period. Don't let him review it before he makes his decision!

Link to comment

I say this somewhat tongue in cheek, but why not give the pitcher some power back, if you are going to insist he change what may be his rhythm, and give him the decision exactly how fast to make the next pitch.  If a hitter steps out of the box, it is his choice and his risk; if the pitcher throws a pitch in that moment.........oh, well.  Keeps the game going and puts the hitter on the same plane as the pitcher.  The pitcher shouldn't be able to have his foot on the rubber and stare down the hitter for as long as he pleases, and the hitter shouldn't be able to choose the rhythm by going in and out of the box.  Once the hitter is in the box and the pitcher is on the rubber, game on.  Within a pitch clock, of course, or we are back to square one.  Would be fun to watch.

And, yes, these changes might just make it necessary to take prospects and stretch them out in the minors so they would have the stamina for the same number of pitches (even more??) in a shorter time span.  As someone who is old school myself, I can say from 55 years of watching the game that pitch counts and innings limits have hurt the game overall far more than a pitch clock ever could.  Throw the ball.........hit the ball..........catch the ball.........or run like hell until they chase it down.  It's a great game, if they would just go out and play it.  

Link to comment

One of the big reasons I like baseball is because it is NOT driven by a clock.  I love baseball because it's not like football, basketball, and hockey.     I like not being rushed through a game.

Link to comment
On 3/8/2022 at 10:49 AM, Jim B. said:

What is the proposed penalty if the pitch clock runs out?   

Will batters no longer be able to call time while at the plate?

Just wondering how these changes will work...

If it is like the minor league rule, assuming it is.  If the time runs out the umpire issues a ball to the batter.  Similar there was rules that made step offs limited per at bat when runner was on, and doing it too many times would result in a balk.  

To my knowledge there was no limit to hitters calling time, but that has always been up to umps if they want to grant it. I have seen times where batter steps out but no time is granted.  I would bet the ump will be less likely to grant the closer the clock winds down. 

Link to comment

Not a fan of the pitch clock, but also not a fan of watching someone like Alexander Colome get the ball back from the catcher, take off his hat, wipe his forehead, replace his cap, massage the baseball all while checking the sky in case Skylab is falling, finally looking to the catcher, deep inhale, exhale, shake off the catcher, wipe his cheek with his shoulder, nod the catcher, exhale again, step to the rubber and finally begin his windup....

Link to comment

I think this is good for all of the "pro" reasons listed in the article. It should make much more of a difference in game times than the 3-batter minimum has.

It also feels likely to increase stolen base percentages. Is there data on that from the minor leagues?

Link to comment

As a season ticket holder, I'm excited for the pitch clock. So many 7pm games going until well after 10pm makes it hard for me to stay and watch the full games when I have many friends along next to me. They have to be up for work the next morning and leaving at 10:30pm, either taking an express shuttle to a park and ride or an uber/drive back to my house gets them home and in bed close to midnight. Then there are the extra innings games... forget it. I've been to many games which don't end until after 11pm.

Considering there are already rules in place governing pace of play like the pitch delivery time rules and batters constantly stepping out of the box, it's clear the players won't follow the rules unless they're enforced in a consistent and obvious manner. Just like the "sticky stuff" pitchers were warned and warned about.

The extremely slow pace of play adds to the perception of baseball being boring and hurts the game's marketability as well.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...