That's fair and I apologize. I like to use exercises like this because I am interested to see how other people will interpret the statistics. Ryu is E. For Pineda, I omitted 2018 because of the TJ and included 2016 instead. I definitely should have mentioned that. The same concerns that are valid for Ryu are also valid for Pineda. Has Pineda ever been an above league average pitcher for a sustained sample size? Pineda is C and is clearly weaker in my mind. Odorizzi is B. Before last year, Odorizzi was decidedly average. He, MadBum and Pineda are all the same age. Why is it impossible for MadBum to bounce back yet we are counting on Odorizzi and Pineda to demonstrate sustained success for the first times in their careers at the same age? MadBum is A as was correctly guessed. Personally, I would rather have that stat line than B or C. I also think there is something to be said for postseason experience that can't be quantified. Berrios is D and is a stud. The other point I'd like to make is Berrios, Odorizzi and Pineda is all well and good but that's assuming they're all healthy and available.. I really would like to have at least four established starters for contingency purposes in the playoffs. For me I'd go Ryu, Berrios, MadBum, Odo, Pineda