-
Posts
408 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About MileHighTwinsFan
- Birthday 11/01/1965
Social
-
Twitter
PlayinCatch
MileHighTwinsFan's Achievements
-
Hunter McCall reacted to a post in a topic: Give Joey Gallo a Chance
-
Give Joey Gallo a Chance
MileHighTwinsFan replied to Hunter McCall's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
All I know is that when he was at his best, he was one of those guys you didn't want to pitch against late in the game. If he can approach that level, I think people on the right field plaza better have their heads on a swivel. -
wabene reacted to a post in a topic: Will José Miranda Make the Twins' Opening Day Roster?
-
rambis26 reacted to a post in a topic: Will José Miranda Make the Twins' Opening Day Roster?
-
4twinsJA reacted to a post in a topic: Will José Miranda Make the Twins' Opening Day Roster?
-
MileHighTwinsFan reacted to a post in a topic: Will José Miranda Make the Twins' Opening Day Roster?
-
I think a big variable will be the new CBA and the way it addresses service time. If it is status quo and the Twins can save a year of service time by keeping him in St. Paul for the first 2 months of the season, then it is highly likely he starts in St. Paul. If by the end of May he has replicated his 2021 results, the Twins will have little choice but to bring him up at that point. I don't believe that making a trade to specifically make room for Miranda makes sense - there are more important reasons to make trades, like getting controllable arms. If a trade for an arm makes room for Jose, so be it. These types of things tend to work themselves out one way or another. I am confident that we will see plenty of Jose Miranda at Target Field next summer. The rest are just details.
-
Major League Ready reacted to a post in a topic: How Much Can The Twins Spend This Offseason?
-
MileHighTwinsFan reacted to a post in a topic: It’s Time to Pay Jose Berrios
-
How Much Can The Twins Spend This Offseason?
MileHighTwinsFan replied to John Bonnes's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
So much of next year depends on Buxton and Berrios and whether they sign extensions or are traded. Until that point, all of this is just a snap shot observation based on current information. I think the piece does suggest some stark realities for this club's prospects for competitiveness next year. Their inability to sign high impact arms through free agency does not bode well for next year. We have learned that the team is not competitive for top end starters and that the relief pitching market is a crap shoot. All of this suggests that the team is really dependent on the development of the arms in their system. Next year may be more about building for 2023 with the hope that their young arms emerge next year - but probably not being high impact contributors until 2023. That reality speaks volumes about how the team will look at the current roster, which in my opinion, means dealing some very valuable assets to get high impact arms that have years of team control ahead. As a result, I don't see Garver, Buxton and Berrios all being on the roster next year. I suspect one or more will be playing elsewhere next April - if not sooner. -
MMMordabito reacted to a post in a topic: The Replacements: 3 Key Injury Substitutions on the Twins Roster
-
glunn reacted to a post in a topic: The Replacements: 3 Key Injury Substitutions on the Twins Roster
-
The future is now for Randy Dobnak. His extension signaled that he is in the Twins' plans as a member of the Twins' rotation. Maeda's injury gives him the chance to lock-in a rotation spot permanently. I think Shoemaker will need to continue to prove he is worthy of a spot and Happ needs to prove he can be consistent. If the Twins do return to contention - and that is a big if - I would not be shocked to see Maeda get moved to the pen to bolster the bullpen, much like he did for the Dodgers. If the Twins are contenders or pretenders at the All-Star break, either way, I expect Dobnak will be in the rotation moving forward.
- 17 replies
-
- randy dobnak
- luke farrell
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Dman reacted to a post in a topic: Are the Minnesota Twins Setting Up Ryan Jeffers to Fail?
-
It is still way too early. I am fairly certain that over the course of the season Jeffers will get his fair share of ABs vs. lefties. While I hope for real production out of the catcher position this year, I am much more interested in how our two catchers are calling games and getting called strikes for their pitchers. It may be a coincidence, but the two most dominant performances of the season - Berrios' start vs. the Brewers and Pineda's performance vs. Red Sox - have come with Jeffers behind the plate. I think the determining factor of who will get the lion's share of ABs this season will depend on Garver's and Jeffers' defense, not their offense.
-
Report from The Fort: Leading Questions
MileHighTwinsFan replied to John Bonnes's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
I think the answer will be, it depends. I expect a far more fluid lineup from day to day. When Arraez is in the lineup, he is a logical choice. Polanco, who has a career OBP of .335 and OBP above .340 during his last two full seasons could find time there. Kepler will undoubtedly see time there as well. Even Garver, if he returns to 2019ish form, could get a shot in lead off against lefties. If the name of the game these days is flexibility, then I expect it will extend to the lead off spot.- 22 replies
-
- luis arraez
- rocco baldelli
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Not to throw a wet blanket on this idea - but Baez had an absolutely abysmal 2020. His 2020 numbers were truly horrendous: BA - .203 OBP - .238 OPS - .599 WAR - .9 There was talk that Javy's struggles had a lot to do with the rule changes that did not allow players to watch in game videos during games. If that rule continues in 2021, it would be a pretty risky to trade away prospects for a one-year rental on a player whose game was devastated by the rule changes.
-
This may not be a very popular take, but I wonder why Hill did not get the nod over Berrios in the Houston series? Berrios' is a very talented, but extremely inconsistent starter. Meanwhile, as the story points out, Hill brings a depth of experience and frankly has been pitching better than Berrios of late. Berrios' two previous playoff starts were unsuccessful and his high walk percentage could spell trouble in a high stakes game 2. I know that Berrios has been the face of the rotation ever since he joined the big club and at times he has looked every bit the #1 starter we hoped for - but in a very short series, it seems like Hill would have been a safer option. If the thought is that Hill would be the first option in the event of an extremely early exit for either Berrios or Pineda, I can understand having someone with his experience right the ship. On the other hand, having a veteran starting pitcher with an injury history having to quickly warm up is probably not ideal. I suspect Hill's pregame routine is part of his success and the short amount of time available to warm up could be a problem. Conversely, the much younger Berrios would likely be able to get ready faster. I know this is all a moot point given that Hill pitched yesterday. Let's hope Berrios brings his "A" game on Wednesday and make this comment worthy of derision by Twins' Daily nation.
-
I think the Twins' approach is very clear, keep the competitive window open for as long as possible. Falvey and Levine are on the record that staying competitive year in and year out is the goal. I am perfectly comfortable with the approach of the Twins' this off season. They are confident in knowing that they have a competitive team that has a very good chance to be in the hunt in July for a playoff spot. Using the gambling metaphor, it makes little sense to put all your chips in the middle of the table on the first hand. The goal is to stay in the game for as long as you can and then make the big bet when your odds are far better. I would much rather have the team start the season confident that they will compete, then make targeted investments at the deadline to address obvious needs that will improve their odds in the playoffs. Trading top assets for a pitcher in December makes little sense to me if it turns out you are 7 games out on July 31 and have your two top pitchers on the injured list. Those bets can look better if the team is 10 games up and simply retooling for a playoff run. Keeping the team competitive over time means that every season you have more chances to make the deadline deal and make a push. We also know that top notch starting pitching does not come cheap. I would rather the Twins accumulate as much young pitching talent as they can and hope that one or more break out to be the true ace they need. I would hate to sell young pitching talent to acquire an aging, injury riddled veteran with a high price tag. I stand in favor of Twins keeping the window open for as long as possible and making their bets when the payoff is likely the greatest.
-
MileHighTwinsFan reacted to a post in a topic: Front Page: The Royals Problem: Just How Much Are You Willing to Give Up to Win a World Series?
-
MileHighTwinsFan reacted to a post in a topic: Front Page: The Royals Problem: Just How Much Are You Willing to Give Up to Win a World Series?
-
MileHighTwinsFan reacted to a post in a topic: Front Page: The Royals Problem: Just How Much Are You Willing to Give Up to Win a World Series?
-
I am no expert, but have worked with high school players a little. To me the key issue is where his hands are and how the whipping motion generated from his start will result in a very long swing. Cody Bellinger had a similar problem when he reached the majors. His athleticism allowed him to have some success, but eventually he started to struggle. He made some significant adjustments before last season and became an MVP worthy player. Plenty of time for Royce to make the necessary adjustments to hit at the major league level. I expect big things from him this season now that he will be working with top notch hitting instructors.
-
If Falvey and Levine are to be believed, I would say it is premature to think that Sano is destined to be the every day first baseman. During the season ticker holder fan forum earlier this week. Falvey and Levine said that they would like to keep Sano at third as long as possible and have asked him to commit to improving his defense there. They like his athleticism and his arm at 3rd. They also said that it is not out of the question that they will bring back Cron on a more team friendly deal. They will continue to monitor his rehab and continue to consider him an option The last piece of information that they shared is that the plan for Garver is for him to catch a bit more than last year, but on off days from behind the plate he would be placed in the field or at DH. With Marwin Gonzalez a viable option over there as well, I would not be surprised if the Twins staff first base by committee with Gonzalez, Garver, Sano, Cron or a similarly priced free agent signing (Eric Thames). My sense is that they are saving every nickel for a big time arm either through free agency or trading for a big name (Darvish, Price, Eovaldi) from a team that is looking to dump payroll. As much as I love Donaldson and Rendon, I don't think it is in the cards.
-
This article got me thinking about the evolving skill set required of all infielders in an analytics driven world where an infielder might find himself at various positions on the field on any given pitch. Should we be developing infields with players that possess a different set of skills and deploy those skills in the manner that makes the most sense on any given pitch. Will we get to a point where the notion of a shortstop, third baseman and second baseman are irrelevant and we position infielders on pitches to play to their unique strengths. In the case of Polanco - having him on the left side of the infield against pull heavy left-handers makes sense because of the range he has over Arraez in terms of covering more territory while the other players overshift to the second base side. However, it may make more sense to put Arraez at third against pull heavy right handers so that he can use his arm from 3rd to make a play. Seems like the days of pigeon-holing players into a defined "position" makes no sense and instead we should focus on filling out infields with the requisite skill sets to defend against any given hitter.
-
It will be a good night if Garver, Cruz or Sano hit bombas in one of their first couple at bats, all the better if it happens with Polanco on base. My money is on Garver, who seems to be able to get to high fastballs a bit better than Cruz and Sano. I expect Twins to be very aggressive and I would not be surprised to see Rosario surprise by jumping on a first pitch fastball. If Twins can get to the 5th inning with the lead - the bullpen can take it from there. Not expecting much from Kepler or Cave, but could see Gonzalez be a factor in a clutch situation. I expect a strong performance from Berrios, but I worry about our infield defense. A great performance can unravel quickly with an error. Give the Yankees any opening and they are sure to capitalize. I will be watching how they pitch Gardner. He is the one holdover from the previous set of ALDS debacles against the Yankees and I could see pesky at bats from him that will spark the offense. If they keep Gardner off the bases and keep Judge in the park, I expect a Twins win.
-
His stuff was legit last night. His ability to locate pitches down in the zone and then bring heat up in the zone was impressive. I don't know any major league line up that is going to square him up if he is able to consistently execute that approach. His demeanor suggests that he can handle the biggest stage in the game, Yankee Stadium. I would love nothing better than to see him get a Game 2 start and watch the Bombers fizzle.