Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Joey Self

Verified Member
  • Posts

    97
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Tutorials & Help

Videos

2023 Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Free Agent & Trade Rumors

Guides & Resources

Minnesota Twins Players Project

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Joey Self

  1. Gordon also proved in that series that putting him at second base was not a great option.
  2. Uh, not start Archer or anyone else that you know is not able to go a starter's load? If the order came from above him, then it's on the GM. That said, I traveled 15 hours last September to see the Twins play the Guardians Guardians in a five game set. When I made my plans to go, it was quite possible that the winner of the series would be in the driver's seat for the division title. In those five games, I saw Ober, Winder, Ryan, Gray and Varland start. I'd been watching all year, seeing how the starters were hurt and guys that didn't need to be there, were. Add to that an outfield of Cave, Celestino, and Wallner, and I knew the Twins were in trouble (they lost all but Ryan's start). And THAT said, my thoughts were directed more to 2023 than 2022. The mindset when the game starts needs to be to get as much from the starter as the game dictates, and not to use players that can't go deep. One exception is when an opener is appropriate, but even that presupposes the next man up is going to burn up some innings. JcS
  3. THIS! I understand--and like the research behind--the analytics on pitchers facing an order a third time. But since I've been watching the game--1966--pitchers went deeper into the game with regularity if they weren't getting shelled. JcS
  4. First thing I thought of when I saw this was "do not line up too many left handed hitters in a row, even against a righty." These days, since a pitcher has to face three batters, a lefty reliever needs to be sure of seeing at least one right handed batter. Polanco in the midst of some lefties would do that--and of course, provides a left handed bat when a slew of righties are due up. JcS
  5. Not sure how any of us could have a semi-intelligent guess as to how to answer the question before he throws in spring training. And as I shoot for at least semi-intelligent, I'll wait.
  6. I get 2021 was a disaster, but let's not forget that the Twins were in the division race as Labor Day approached in 2022. I drove from Western Arkansas to Cleveland to see them play the 5 game series with the Guardians in mid-September, but when I made the plans to go, I thought that series was going to be much more important than it turned out to be. Twins lost 4 of 5, but with guys like Cave, Celestino, Wallner, Contreras, and Billy Hamilton in the outfield, Gordon playing out of position at second, and four rookie starters in the series (Ryan, Winder, Ober and Varland), I couldn't really have expected much more. The injury bug bites all teams, but it bit the Twins hard last year while they were in first place. JcS
  7. I'm not too interested in the batting title, but rather comparing his BA and OBA to the league averages, and how productive his outs were--strikeouts don't move runners, but some outs do. And I knew he was playing hurt in the second half of the season. JcS
  8. Anytime I see a trade like this, I am reminded of the mindset of selling stocks. If I dump 100 shares of Apple, someone is buying them. I sell because I think they are going down, the buyer thinks they are going up. Some here think Arraez peaked last year. I don't, and obviously, the Marlins don't, or they wouldn't have traded for him. He's 25, and I have no reason to think that he won't do even better at the plate in the next 10 years than he did this year. BUT...I realize the Twins front office has to evaluate what his upside is as opposed to what they get for him, and *I* am not bothered by the $$$ that are in play. Still, all that said, I agree with the lady in THE PRINCESS BRIDE:
  9. As a proponent of the electronic strike zone, I do not want Altuve and Judge having the same zone. The computer should be able to make that adjustment, or a human make it. JcS
  10. It is, but (and I don't have to tell you this), it is a grind. I didn't realize how much I enjoyed NOT listening to people tell me how they have screwed up, or how much someone else had harmed them, until I got to stop doing it. I am 64, and would have gotten out of the representation game as soon as I thought I could; I may continue the ALJ gig until I die! :) JcS
  11. And even if it isn't perfect, the pitchers and the batters will soon figure out where the ABS is CONSISTENTLY wrong. It's the umps that have a moving zone over the course of the game, get fooled by catchers yanking the ball into the zone or give the vets calls the rookies aren't getting that are the biggest problem. The computer won't care what the score is, who is at the plate or what the catcher does after the ball crosses the strike zone. I'm more than ready for it. JcS
  12. And as a trial attorney for 38 years, I too compared judges to umpires or referees--I too wanted consistency on evidentiary rulings. I've even told more than one: "If it's a foul for the visitors, it's a foul for the home team. If it's a strike three inches off the plate for their pitcher, then it needs to be the same for mine. Give me consistency, and I'll adjust." Now that I'm a judge in workers' compensation matters, I try to apply the same standard for the claimants and the respondents. (I am not bound by the rules of evidence or civil procedure, but having practiced under both for so long, those are my guide in many rulings.) JcS
  13. For me, the question isn't "Is the technology perfected yet?" but rather "Is it better than we have now?" I think that answer is "yes." JcS
  14. I'm not sure why Gordon was listed as being "on the bubble" when below that, you told us he had no options. He's either on the 26 man roster or he's traded. No bubble involved when the team can't send him down. JcS
  15. Maybe not. I thought one of the bigger attractions to interleague play was having those teams play each other. JcS
  16. I've never cared for interleague play when the AL team couldn't use the DH in NL parks. Now, with uniform rules (or if there's differences in the leagues, it's so minor I can't think of them as I sit here), it's time to consider realignment. I did this about as fast as I could type it, and don't pretend it couldn't be improved: Northeast: Toronto Yankees Mets Phillies Boston Southeast Washington Baltimore Atlanta Tampa Miami North Twins Guardians Brewers Tigers Pirates Midwest Cardinals Royals White Sox Cubs Reds Southwest: Astros Rangers Colorado Angels Dodgers West: Seattle SF Oakland San Diego D'Backs The logic, or what little there was, intended to keep the NY, CHI and LA teams in the same division, so as to make it easier for fans of one team to travel to the other ballpark--same with WASH and BAL, SF and OAK. More ticket sales, better for the bottom line. Admittedly, AZ and COL presented a problem, as did dividing the two teams from Pennsylvania. But this is a framework of what could be. Now, if MLB expands to 32 teams, you'd have 8 divisions with 4 teams each, and many of the same problems in lining it all up. JcS
  17. My wife and I have watched the first two episodes, and so far, we agree that the first two seasons were better. It's still worth watching. JcS
  18. I just glanced through this thread, and didn't see the answer to this question (sorry if I missed it): Are the Red Sox now a likely bidder for Correa? JcS
  19. I drove from Western Arkansas for it! That and the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, and the Cleveland Art Museum and some other goofing around for five days.
  20. Agreed. I made the trip to Cleveland to see the Twins play 5 games in 4 days, and while I understand the fallacy of a small sample size, I got to see Varland, Ober, Winder and Ryan start the first four games. (Sonny Gray had the fifth and left after two innings.) With Mahle, Gray, Maeda and Ryan as the core, and those three other rookies plus Richardson, Sands and others, I think we have enough starters to resist trading one of the best hitters on the team. Now if it were Arraez for a catcher, I'd not be thrilled, but I'd understand it. JcS
  21. Wait. What? "He [Sanchez] struggled so mightily in New York that some Yankees pitchers notoriously asked not to have him behind the plate in games they started." Plural? I saw that Cole asked to have a different catcher--which was what I remember Greg Maddux doing for years with the Braves--pitching to Perez instead of Lopez. Was there another not mentioned in this article, because if not, the line should read "a Yankee pitcher asked to have another catcher in games he started."
×
×
  • Create New...