This is asinine. The thread is overwhelming opposed to the signing, but a small group of us like it and that makes us sycophants? How about trying to engage earnestly with other posters you disagree with, instead of just being a butt about things?
For example, I think Gallo is a clear upgrade over Kepler. Ever wonder why Kepler, despite his reputation, doesn't win GGs? That's because they've been going to Gallo, instead. Kepler is very good in the OF, Gallo is probably better. I also think a cursory look at bbref will show anyone that Gallo is just the better offensive player. There's room to quibble on style and future projections. But I believe, to date, there's not much debate. That's why they're 'hell bent on trading him,' they've already shown that for a slight bit more money, they can improve.
Post-Hot Stove, this is the sort of move they can and should make to spend the money they have, regardless of what could have been done previously and our sentiments about that.