Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Select Keoni Cavaco with 13th Overall Pick


    Cody Christie

    In Monday night’s first round, the Minnesota Twins had the 13th overall pick and used it to select Keoni Cavaco, a high school third baseman. Minnesota drafted him as a shortstop. He has big power, a great throwing arm, and the ability to stick on the left side of the infield.

    Image courtesy of © David Berding-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Minnesota was picking near the middle of the first round so there were plenty of options available. Cavaco turned 18 on Sunday and comes in at 6-feet-0 and 185 pounds. He bats and throws right-handed. He comes from East Lake High School in Chula Vista, California. It's the same high school as former number one overall pick Adrian Gonzalez. He is currently committed to San Diego State but the 13th pick is slotted to receive a $4.2 million bonus.

    Cavaco wasn’t well known entering this past spring season. He wasn’t invited to many of the summer showcase events. These events allow scouting departments and front office personnel to see top-tier players face some of the best young pitchers. MLB.com ranked him as the 28th best prospect in the draft.

    https://twitter.com/betsyhelfand/status/1135715288559837184

    In the fall, he was invited to a showcase. At the Angel Elite showcase, he was able to really exhibit some of his power potential. He has the potential to be a five-tool player as he has a very strong arm so this should help him to stick at third or short. He’s athletic, has great hands with a good set-up at the plate. Also, he has shown some speed as he can get home to first out of the box in less than four seconds.

    https://twitter.com/BaseballAmerica/status/1135705853632372736

    Being the 2019 draft season’s biggest riser, means there are some things still to work on. There are some questions surrounding his hit tool, especially since he wasn’t part of the summer showcases. It’s tough to know what he would do against that level of talent, but the Twins believe his power tool will continue to grow. Minnesota drafted him as a shortstop, but many think he might have to end up back at third base.

    Minnesota could save money on signing Cavaco because of where he was projected to be drafted. This could be used to offer over-slot deals to other picks. Besides the 13th pick, the Twins have a pick in the competitive balance round (39th overall), which is sandwiched between the first and second round. The club’s second round pick is 54th overall.

    https://twitter.com/MillerJohnP/status/1135708352158167040

    Feel free to discuss and check back as there is more to come…

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    The Twins entire draft pool is $9.9 million. That's the best $9.9 million they'll spend all year. That'll primarily be spread that across their first 10 round's worth of picks and it will buy them control of those players for years upon years upon years.

     

    All those players and all those years of team control for much less than the total amounts I'm sure either Kimbrel or Keuchel will sign for.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm ok with this pick b/c most of the guys I wanted were gone by then. Obviously, questions about HS players hit tool can be pretty damning but they had questions about Adell and the Angels are thrilled that they picked him.

     

    Twins have always liked toolsy HS guys and they've had some success with them so let's hope this one works out. Excited about our next few picks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Think of the draft pools as potential spending. If they don’t sign a guy, they no longer have the potential to spend the amount slotted for that pick.

    Yes, I understand that.

    A couple of posters are claiming that a team is not allowed to spend draft pick savings on a free agent.

    Edited by Mr. Brooks
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Exciting and intriguing pick! Totally trust Falvine/Scouting staff...overlooked by major media and it seems most other MLB teams. Cool!

    Question on pronunciation? Cavako or Cahvahco?

    Go Twins 2019!!!!!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't know. Call Falvey

    Earlier you said they can't spend that savings on other things. Now you say you don't know.

    Why would I call Falvey about a rule that I'm quite sure doesn't exist?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Earlier you said they can't spend that savings on other things. Now you say you don't know.
    Why would I call Falvey about a rule that I'm quite sure doesn't exist?

     

    There is no savings. They are allowed to spend their own money up to their limit. It is an upper boundary. Drafted player bonuses, as Tom F said, are an incredibly solid investment. There is no incentive for teams to not spend money on prospects.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes, I understand that.

    A couple of posters are claiming that a team is not allowed to spend draft pick savings on a free agent.

    I think the confusion is coming by conflating draft spending with free agent spending. Teams can spend up to X, but failing to sign a guy means they can spend up to X-Y. What they do with Y is, to my knowledge, more or less unregulated with the exception that they can’t use it on their other draft picks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There is no savings. They are allowed to spend their own money up to their limit. It is an upper boundary. Drafted player bonuses, as Tom F said, are an incredibly solid investment. There is no incentive for teams to not spend money on prospects.

    Yes, I know. That isn't my argument. None of that is.

     

    Someone suggested that a team could spend less than their max and use the rest in free agency.

    Two posters are claiming that is illegal.

     

    I agree with you that no team would do that, but they are certainly allowed to if they wanted to.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the confusion is coming by conflating draft spending with free agent spending. Teams can spend up to X, but failing to sign a guy means they can spend up to X-Y. What they do with Y is, to my knowledge, more or less unregulated with the exception that they can’t use it on their other draft picks.

    Again, I understand that completely. A couple of other posters are suggesting that money can't be spent on anything.

    Also, nobody suggested not signing a pick. The suggestion was signing everyone under slot.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Again, I understand that completely. A couple of other posters are suggesting that money can't be spent on anything.

    Also, nobody suggested not signing a pick. The suggestion was signing everyone under slot.

    I’m trying to answer a question that you (apparently?) asked using hypotheticals. They could sign everyone under slot if they wanted to. The slots exist to limit what draft picks can make. You mentioned your “argument” in a different post. I’m not sure who you’re arguing with, because it isn’t me. Edited by prouster
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Again, I understand that completely. A couple of other posters are suggesting that money can't be spent on anything.
    Also, nobody suggested not signing a pick. The suggestion was signing everyone under slot.

     

    Seemed easier to use your quote.  :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Someone post some facts on this guy.

     

    I've seen 6'0, 6'1", 6'2" and his weight ranges from 175 to 190 lbs. 

     

    I know he's a pop-up guy, but is he growing with every posting?

     

    California prep player of the year. What he hit? How many SBs? What he do to win the prep award in our largest, most baseball friendly state?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Someone post some facts on this guy.

     

    I've seen 6'0, 6'1", 6'2" and his weight ranges from 175 to 190 lbs. 

     

    I know he's a pop-up guy, but is he growing with every posting?

     

    California prep player of the year. What he hit? How many SBs? What he do to win the prep award in our largest, most baseball friendly state?

     

    He probably is between 6'0" and 6'2" and 175-190. Pretty common for measurements, especially of HS kids to vary as they can 1. change and 2. aren't being updated regularly and 3. can be exaggerated a bit.

     

    As far as stats, amazing what a simple google search will do:

    https://www.maxpreps.com/athlete/keoni-cavaco/A83HM940EeW-8KA2nzwbTA/default.htm

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Seemed easier to use your quote. :)

    If you spend less than your allotted pool, intentionally, that is "savings".

     

    Again, I don't personally think anyone would do that, I was just responding to a couple posters who suggested it's not allowed. As far as I know, there is no such rule, as it would be not just difficult, but 100% impossible to enforce.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Fangraphs report:

     

    TLDR
    The best popup guy in the class, Cavaco went from on the radar to a likely day one pick with the progress he's made in February and early March.
    Full Report
    A growth spurt bouyed Cavaco's tools and draft stock, as he's this year's most prominent pop-up high school prospect. He may have the best frame in the entire draft but has already grown into considerable power, which he gets to in games despite an awkwardly-timed stride. At times clumsy on defense, Cavaco may still be growing into his new body. He may end up at second or third base (where he played as an amateur) or get a try in center field if his hands and actions don't improve. He's one of the draft's higher risk, higher reward prospects.

     

    https://www.fangraphs.com/prospects/the-board/2019-mlb-draft?sort=-1,1&type=0&team=

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Fangraphs report:

     

    TLDR
    The best popup guy in the class, Cavaco went from on the radar to a likely day one pick with the progress he's made in February and early March.
    Full Report
    A growth spurt bouyed Cavaco's tools and draft stock, as he's this year's most prominent pop-up high school prospect. He may have the best frame in the entire draft but has already grown into considerable power, which he gets to in games despite an awkwardly-timed stride. At times clumsy on defense, Cavaco may still be growing into his new body. He may end up at second or third base (where he played as an amateur) or get a try in center field if his hands and actions don't improve. He's one of the draft's higher risk, higher reward prospects.

     

    https://www.fangraphs.com/prospects/the-board/2019-mlb-draft?sort=-1,1&type=0&team=

     

    I hope his middle initial isn't....... "J(ay)". 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    John
    3:45 Is Keoni Cavaco an under slot pick? Seems like he got picked higher than he was on your and your competitors boards.
    Keith Law
    3:45 Don't think so - he had other suitors in the teens.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Interesting article on him on the Athletic. He didn’t attend any of the big showcase events, Perfect Game, Area Code games, so he was largely unknown. The Twins started going to all of his games this spring, 35 in all. They were really focused on him (which should be obvious that they took him earlier than he was projected.)

     

    We’ll never know, but wondering how many guys they would have taken AHEAD of Cavaco had they fallen?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is this draft considered weak for first rounders?

     

    Do teams still get a comp pick if they don’t sign their first rounder?

     

    Would it be to any team’s advantage to have drafted a college bound high schooler and not sign them?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is this draft considered weak for first rounders?

     

    Do teams still get a comp pick if they don’t sign their first rounder?

     

    Would it be to any team’s advantage to have drafted a college bound high schooler and not sign them?

    No. Every expert says no, don't do that. You lose a year of development. Next year, maybe the guys you want get hurt. No. Take a player you believe in.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...