Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Narrative: Have the Twins Promoted College Pitchers Slowly?


    Seth Stohs

    Sometimes narratives, baseball or other, get into circulation, and once they do, it seems that they are hard to get rid of. I have probably (unfortunately) started some, and I am sure that I have passed along some without doing any research. Of course, I think we all agree that a little data to either support or disprove any narrative should help. Today I am going to address one of those narratives and let you decide.

    Image courtesy of Seth Stohs, Twins Daily (photo of Cole Sands)

    Twins Video

    The Narrative: The former Twins front office leadership was slow to push pitchers up the ladder, especially in their first full professional season.

    The 2019 Case: In 2019, Twins right-handed pitcher Cole Sands made his professional debut. He had been the Twins fifth-round draft pick in 2018 out of Florida State. After being drafted, he was shut down. He began the 2019 season in Cedar Rapids. He went 2-1 with a 3.05 ERA. After eight starts and just 41 1/3 innings with the Kernels, he was promoted to Ft. Myers. With the Miracle, he made nine starts and went 5-2 with a 2.25 ERA in 52 innings. He ended the season with one start at Double-A Pensacola in which he gave up two runs in four innings. He threw a total of 97 1/3 innings in his first full season.

    I have seen it written or spoken about in a few places over the last couple of years that under the previous regime, the Twins would likely not have pushed a college pitcher like Sands quite as quickly. Is that true? Is that a fair critique?

    Obviously there is no perfect way to analyze this. Pitcher development (like hitter development) is very much dependent upon the individual.

    However, I wanted to go back several seasons and find out if the previous Twins regime had any (or many, or lots, or no) cases that fit the model that we saw in 2019 with Cole Sands.

    What are those qualifications to meet? So I went back through all of the Twins drafts from 2001 through 2019. I looked for these two things from each pitcher drafted out of college. If, in his first full professional season, the pitcher did one or both of them, I included him.

    1. Did the pitcher reach AA (or AAA)? Sands made one start at AA, or
    2. Did the pitcher pitch at three or more levels? Sands pitched at Low-A, High-A and AA.

    With that, let’s take a look at the Twins history this century.

    CURRENT REGIME (2017-2019)

    • Cole Sands (5th round, 2019) - Pitched at three levels. Reached AA in 2020.

    PREVIOUS REGIME

    • Tyler Jay (1st round, 2015) - Pitched at two levels, High-A and AA in 2016..
    • Nick Burdi (supp 1st, 2014) - Pitched at two levels, High-A and AA in 2015.
    • Jake Reed (5th round, 2014) - Pitched at two levels, High-A and AA in 2015.
    • DJ Baxendale (10th round, 2012) - Pitched at two levels, High-A and AA in 2013.
    • Pat Dean (3rd round, 2010) - Pitched at three levels, Low-A, High-A and AA in 2011.
    • Logan Darnell (6th round, 2010) - Pitched at three levels, Low-A, High-A and AA in 2011.
    • Kyle Gibson (1st round, 2009) - Pitched at three levels, High-A, AA and AAA in 2010.
    • Billy Bullock (2nd round, 2009) - Pitched at two levels, High-A and AA in 2010.
    • Carlos Gutierrez (supp 1st, 2008) - Pitched at two levels, High-A and AA in 2009.
    • Matt Garza (1st round, 2005) - Pitched at four levels, High-A, AA, AAA and MLB in 2006.
    • Kevin Slowey (2nd round, 2005) - Pitched at two levels, High-A and AA in 2006.
    • Brian Duensing (3rd round, 2005) - Pitched at three levels, Low-A, High-A and AA in 2006.
    • Glen Perkins (1st round, 2004) - Pitched at two levels, High-A and AA in 2005.
    • Scott Baker (2nd round, 2003) - Pitched at three levels, High-A, AA and AAA in 2004.
    • Jesse Crain (2nd round, 2002) - Pitched at three levels, High-A, AA and AAA in 2003.
    • Adam Johnson (1st round, 2000) - Pitched at three levels, AA, AAA and MLB.

    CONCLUSIONS

    While this doesn’t dispute the studies done five years or so ago stating that the Twins were among the slowest, if not the slowest, to promote pitchers to the big leagues, this does show that the previous Twins regime was not afraid of pushing college pitchers quickly through the lower levels of the minor leagues. In fact, it happened most years.

    This isn’t a scientific study. I have done nothing more than a quick search of Twins draft picks in Baseball-Reference, so it’s possible that I am missing something. Please feel free to let me know.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

     

    Question: Were all these pitchers listed shut down as soon as they were drafted for the remainder of the year or did some of them go on to pitch some professionally in the year they were drafted?

     

    It varies. Without going back in again, most of them got a few innings either in ET or Low A that first year. Kyle Gibson signed late and had the forearm issue, so he didn't. A few of each. 

     

    The point really is just that Sands got to AA in his first full season as a pro... Lots of Twins pitchers have done that over the years. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I’m not sure you can really compare all college pitchers.

     

    Did they leave college at 19 or 22? Did they pitch at a high-end program or a community college in Alaska? Did they have a college program that ran them into the ground or is their “arm mileage” low?

     

    There are other factors as well. Was the guy ever good enough to make it to the majors in the first place? Where were they drafted? Obviously, there is more pressure to advance a top 5 pick than a guy drafted in an obscure late round. Who’s ahead of them in the pecking order, both minors and majors? Is the major league team competitive?

     

    Another input into the process: the developmental staff. A high end staff gets the player ready for advancement earlier. If you spend two decades teaching hitters to slap the ball into the opposite gap....of course you’re going to screw guys up (see Ortiz, David). It may look like they aren’t “ready” to advance, when really they’re being held back by poor coaching.

     

    I don’t think there’s any doubt that the previous regime advanced all players, not only college pitchers, on a different timeline than some other clubs. It’s the nature of the small vs. large market salary cap-less system (poor developmental staff aside). When you’re small, you don’t want to burn a year for a marginal role. You know you’re not resigning the guy, so you want to hold off until the player is nearest his prime as possible. A year too early hurts the team....not the player.

     

    On that note, speaking of narratives, I think this system has created one. It’s that players need lengthy periods of development. If they’re exposed too early, you’ll crack them like an egg destroying their career forever. There are parallel dimensions in which a player is a hall of famer if given adequate developmental time against 19 year olds, or a total bust if not cooked long enough. I’ve never bought any of that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just wanted to thank you for this Twins Daily website. This is literally one of the few things that takes me away from the current events. Thank you and keep up the great work! Let’s all be good to each other. This too shall pass.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I’m not sure you can really compare all college pitchers.

    Did they leave college at 19 or 22? Did they pitch at a high-end program or a community college in Alaska? Did they have a college program that ran them into the ground or is their “arm mileage” low?

     

    I 100% agree... the only thing that we have is that these guys were all drafted in the first five rounds of the draft (except Baxendale, but he was an exception). If they're in college and drafted lower than that, they most likely will need to move a little bit slower. All of these guys were drafted after their junior year of college, so they were all approximately 21 (with some plus-minus to it). I would say that all of the pitchers included were from good to very good baseball programs. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Another input into the process: the developmental staff. A high end staff gets the player ready for advancement earlier. If you spend two decades teaching hitters to slap the ball into the opposite gap....of course you’re going to screw guys up (see Ortiz, David). It may look like they aren’t “ready” to advance, when really they’re being held back by poor coaching.

    I don’t think there’s any doubt that the previous regime advanced all players, not only college pitchers, on a different timeline than some other clubs. It’s the nature of the small vs. large market salary cap-less system (poor developmental staff aside). When you’re small, you don’t want to burn a year for a marginal role. You know you’re not resigning the guy, so you want to hold off until the player is nearest his prime as possible. A year too early hurts the team....not the player.
     

     

     

    I'd still contend that the Twins helped David Ortiz develop pretty well .He was a pretty good player with the Twins who just took off later (in some ways because o the things he learned, and in some ways because he put a huge chip on his shoulder).But that's a different story.

     

    I don't think that the small market/large market has anything to do with what I found in the research above. Now, maybe it has something to do with when a team is willing to call a guy up. The guys in the list above that continued to develop at AA and AAA got to the big leagues pretty quickly and were on some winning teams. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There is no doubt that the Twins have slowly promoted college pitchers.

     

    From 2013 to 2019 there were 15 pitchers that the Twins drafted that made their MLB debut.  Of those 15 pitchers only 3 of them made their debut at age 24 (Duffey, Vasquez, Curtiss).

     

    Most were 25 years old (Gibson, Rogers, Poppen, Sleger, Chargois, Acther, Darnell).  Hildenberger and Wheeler were 26.  Eades, Wimmer, and Dean 27.

     

    While to a degree most of the names on here made the MLB level for just a quick show they did not have the talent to remain in the league, we have to also remember that the Twins pitching staff was pretty limited throughout most of this time frame.  The other factor is that despite having good minor league statistics a lot of these players were still slowly moved through the system.  

     

    But, a guy like Hildenberger was virtually unhittable as a minor league player at every level.  When he got to the Twins in 2016 as a 26 year old player, he pitched very well with a 3.21 ERA and 9.4K/9.   His arm did not hold in after his rookie season with the Twins, but when you are moved so slowly it doesn't give you much of a chance for second chances either.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Whether they were promoted to fast, or not, what I took from this post is that only 7 of the 16 who did move fast made it to the big leagues for more than a few games.  So less than half of the best of the entire organization made it.  Of those 7 four had very good careers (five if you would include Gibson),  albeit there were no ACES.

     

    Don't know if you are up north or in the Twin Cities, Seth, stay safe.  

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There is doubt we have moved our college pitchers too slowly. Let's see how they compare to the other 29 teams before we draw any faulty conclusions. It's very common for fan bases to feel prospects are not moved quickly enough. Very common.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    There is no doubt that the Twins have slowly promoted college pitchers.

     

    From 2013 to 2019 there were 15 pitchers that the Twins drafted that made their MLB debut.  Of those 15 pitchers only 3 of them made their debut at age 24 (Duffey, Vasquez, Curtiss).

     

    Most were 25 years old (Gibson, Rogers, Poppen, Sleger, Chargois, Acther, Darnell).  Hildenberger and Wheeler were 26.  Eades, Wimmer, and Dean 27.

     

    While to a degree most of the names on here made the MLB level for just a quick show they did not have the talent to remain in the league, we have to also remember that the Twins pitching staff was pretty limited throughout most of this time frame.  The other factor is that despite having good minor league statistics a lot of these players were still slowly moved through the system.  

     

    But, a guy like Hildenberger was virtually unhittable as a minor league player at every level.  When he got to the Twins in 2016 as a 26 year old player, he pitched very well with a 3.21 ERA and 9.4K/9.   His arm did not hold in after his rookie season with the Twins, but when you are moved so slowly it doesn't give you much of a chance for second chances either.

     

    Some of these examples kind of make my point. First, I will definitely agree that Hildenberger could have and should have moved up faster, but he was like a 22nd round pick who had one good college season, his fifth year, so the age thing doesn' matter in that case. 

     

    Guys that get drafted at 21, if they're in the big leagues at 23, that's an exception.  

     

    Of that group above that you mention, there are a lot of similarities that can explain why they weren't called up until 25 or older. Gibson was certainly on the fast track until Tommy John surgery. JT Chargois missed two years with injury. Many were late round picks, likely because they weren't as advanced at 21 and eventually did get it. Andrew Vasquez was a late-round pick who struggled to throw strikes the first two seasons of his pro career. Many of the guys that debuted at 27 maybe just didn't develop in the upper levels.  In some cases, the argument isn't so much if they were called up too late but if they should have been called up at all. 

     

    My point is that they aren't afraid to push guys to AA which is generally where even the top college guys start to see some struggles. 

     

    And ultimately, it is an individual's development. There is no cookie-cutter timeline. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guys that get drafted at 21, if they're in the big leagues at 23, that's an exception. 

    Guys who get drafted and make it to the majors are the exception, period. Our interest is mainly in the exceptional players. We didn't seem to come away with many.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Some of these examples kind of make my point. First, I will definitely agree that Hildenberger could have and should have moved up faster, but he was like a 22nd round pick who had one good college season, his fifth year, so the age thing doesn' matter in that case. 

     

    Guys that get drafted at 21, if they're in the big leagues at 23, that's an exception.  

     

    Of that group above that you mention, there are a lot of similarities that can explain why they weren't called up until 25 or older. Gibson was certainly on the fast track until Tommy John surgery. JT Chargois missed two years with injury. Many were late round picks, likely because they weren't as advanced at 21 and eventually did get it. Andrew Vasquez was a late-round pick who struggled to throw strikes the first two seasons of his pro career. Many of the guys that debuted at 27 maybe just didn't develop in the upper levels.  In some cases, the argument isn't so much if they were called up too late but if they should have been called up at all. 

     

    My point is that they aren't afraid to push guys to AA which is generally where even the top college guys start to see some struggles. 

     

    And ultimately, it is an individual's development. There is no cookie-cutter timeline. 

     

    I dont think that the data supports your claims. 

     

    If you look at the college pitchers drafted in the first rounds since 2009 (Gibson's year) here is the age they made their MLB debut:

     

    2009

     

    Strasboug  21

    Minor 22

    Leike  22

    Storern  22

    White  22

    Jenkins  24

     

    2010  

     

    Pomeranz  22

    Harvey  23

    McGuire  28

    Sale  21

     

    2011

     

    Cole  22

    Bauer  21

    Jungman  25

    Bradley 26

    reed   24

    Barnes  24

    Anderson  26

    Meyer  25

    Gilmartin  25

     

    2012

     

    gausman   22

    Henry  23

    Wacha  21

    Stroman  23

     

    2013

     

    Gray  23

    Shipley  24

    Gonzalez  22

    Gonzales  23

     

    2014

     

    Rodon  22

    Nola  22

    Freeland  24

    Hoffman  23

    Beede   25

    Newcomb  24

    Finnegan  21

    Fedde  24

    Weaver  22

     

    2015

     

    Tate  25

    Fullmer  22

    Buechler  22

     

    2016

     

    Quantill  24

    Dunn  23

    Zeuch  23

    Lauer  23

     

    While this is not a perfect study because MLB debut might not be a full measure and there may be typos and other issues in presenting the data, it is clear that the Twins have been slow to move college level pitchers.

     

    Most of the college drafted pitchers who are relatively successful in the minors make the major leagues before the age of 24.  Some are held up, like Kyle Gibson was, with arm problems or minor league struggles, but those are rarer.  

     

    And, as I point out many times over, the Twins throughout this period struggled with their pitching stagg.  Yet, they moved their college arms stepwise through the system that other organizations would no have.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Based on Seth's data, I don't see how people can say they moved college pitchers too slow, I think it points out how how bad the Twins were at drafting really good college to top end major league pitchers, or to give them the benefit of doubt, how they were too successful to draft a few of the top end pitchers.

     

    On a side note, rushing pitchers that aren't great doesn't make them great.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is an interesting topic, but the stats prompt what may be a far more important question: Why do so many young pitchers blow out their TJ ligament?

    Are there examples of power pitchers that never had elbow trouble?

    If so, what were they doing different?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Randy Dobnak undrafted college pitcher In 2017 moved pretty fast from independent ball to the majors.

     

    I am confident now that if pitchers perform well and remain healthy they will move up.

     

    The previous group was unable to provide the major league team with pitchers. It may have been an inability to recognize talent or an inability to develop talent. It doesn’t matter how fast or slow they move if they don’t have the talent or don’t know how to use it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...