Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Did Nick Gordon’s Second Half Turn Him From Prospect to Suspect?


    Tom Froemming

    Baseball America released its Top 10 Minnesota Twins Prospects for 2018, and there was a familiar face who slid down the rankings. One year after being named by the publication as the team’s top prospect, Nick Gordon slotted in at No. 8. Did his poor second half cause Gordon’s prospect stock to slip?

    Image courtesy of Steve Mitchell-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Here’s a link to the Baseball America’s article on the list and the chat that Mike Berardino participated in. Just a heads up, most of this content is behind a paywall, but BA is outstanding and you should consider signing up for a subscription.

    The list itself is available to anyone. If you haven’t seen it yet, here it is:

    1. Royce Lewis
    2. Wander Javier
    3. Alex Kirilloff
    4. Stephen Gonsalves
    5. Brusdar Graterol
    6. Fernando Romero
    7. Brent Rooker
    8. Nick Gordon
    9. Blayne Enlow
    10. Tyler Jay

    This is a fun list, and I’m sure Berardino put a ton of thought and legwork into putting it together. There are a few surprises, but Gordon was certainly the biggest. Berardino was quick to point out in the chat that he did not compile last year’s list, so it's not really his job to rationalize the big dip from last year.

    Still, it’s a bit jarring to see Gordon so low, especially after he had his best offensive season.

    Gordon was also just 21-years-old throughout the entire season, three years younger than the average player in the Southern League. To put that into some perspective, when Brian Dozier was that age, he was still only a junior in college. Then again, Jorge Polanco made his major league debut at 20. Apples to oranges, I guess, but the point is Gordon is still quite young. Let's check out some of the numbers ...

    The Good

    -Gordon got off to an amazing start, hitting .315/.376/.504 (.880 OPS) in the first half.

    -He hit a career-high nine home runs in 122 games played. Coming into 2017, Gordon had just five homers in 293 career games.

    -He also posted a career best 9.2 BB%. Prior to 2017, Gordon had a career walk rate of 5.7 percent.

    -He hit the most line drives in the Southern League, registering a 28.0 LD%.

    -He stayed healthy, racking up 578 plate appearances. That was tied for the third most among all Double-A hitters.

    -He was ranked 19th on Baseball America’s Midseason Top 100 and 33rd on Baseball Prospectus’ Midesason Top 50.

    -Gordon also represented the Twins at the Futures Game, serving as the leadoff hitter and shortstop for the U.S. team.

    The Bad

    -Gordon had a terrible second half at the plate, hitting .221/.304/.305 (.609 OPS).

    -He was helpless against lefties, posting a .174/.273/.240 line (.513 OPS)

    -He had the worst strikeout rate of his career, 23.2 percent. Coming into the year, he had a 17.1 K%.

    -He was still only successful in 65 percent of his stolen base attempts (13-for-20), which is also roughly his career rate.

    -He committed 22 errors in the field, 19 at shortstop and three at second base (to be fair, Polanco made 30 errors in his age 21 season). Unfortunately, advanced defensive stats aren’t really a thing in the minor leagues yet.

    My Take

    Gordon probably isn’t as good as his crazy first half, but he’s definitely not as bad as his terrible second half. There are questions about his ability to stick at shortstop, but at this time a year ago I was basically having a panic attack thinking about Polanco being the Twins everyday guy there. Coaching can go a long way toward helping an infielder refine his defense.

    I have Gordon as my No. 3 prospect in the system, one spot ahead of Wander Javier, due in large part to the advances he made as a hitter. His power doesn’t stand out, but he took a huge step forward. He makes a lot of hard contact and is learning to draw more walks. With all that in mind, I didn’t see any reason to drop him in my rankings (though he slid down a spot from 2017 thanks to the arrival of Royce Lewis).

    It’s a lot easier to pin dreams on guys who haven’t even made it to full-season ball than it is on someone who’s played an entire season in Double-A. The closer a prospect gets to the majors, the more likely his flaws are going to be exposed.

    Gordon has some red flags, and I can see why someone would drop him down to the eighth spot. I don’t look at Berardino’s list and interpret it as a slam on Gordon, I see it as him being really high on the other six guys who follow Lewis. And there are plenty of good reasons to get excited about those players.

    What do you think? Is Nick Gordon’s glass half full, or half empty?

    The Twins Prospect Handbook has more prospect lists than you can shake a stick at, including every one of Seth Stohs’ rankings going back to 2006. Here is a link to the paperback, which is $15.99, and here is a link to the PDF, which is $10.99.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I don't understand what aspect of "human nature" would cause Levine to want to get rid of Ryan-era draftees. Wouldn't that mean they want to get rid of Buxton, Berrios, etc.? The players don't really have a personal connection to the previous leadership, so I think there's zero chance Falvey or Levine will treat prospects differently based on who drafted them.

     

    Of course, they may evaluate players differently, but that could work in either direction.

     

    I agree with the rest of your post, but that part was way off base.

    People do it all the time. A new boss comes in and clears out the old team, especially people that were particularly identified with the old boss. It’s not personal, it’s often not fully logical, but it’s just human nature, i.e., the new boss doesn’t even know why he rates the old team so low. Edited by Deduno Abides
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Glass is half full and half empty.  Its up to Gordon to move the needle.    If he ends up being league average that is ok with me.   League average is underrated.  For example if we had  league average at 7 spots in the lineup but Buxton and Dozier were exceptional we would have well above average lineup.    I am still not sure what Gordon offers that Polanco does not.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    People do it all the time. A new boss comes in and clears out the old team, especially people that were particularly identified with the old boss. It’s not personal, it’s often not fully logical, but it’s just human nature, i.e., the new boss doesn’t even know why he rates the old team so low.

     

    This is completely different - your analogy works with the front office, but not with the players, especially not minor leaguers. What you're saying is more akin to a new plant manager throwing out his production equipment because it was already there when he arrived. Zero chance this is a thing for the Twins.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    People do it all the time. A new boss comes in and clears out the old team, especially people that were particularly identified with the old boss. It’s not personal, it’s often not fully logical, but it’s just human nature, i.e., the new boss doesn’t even know why he rates the old team so low.

    Name 1 baseball team that turned over most of their organization in 2-3 years with a change of leadership

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Name 1 baseball team that turned over most of their organization in 2-3 years with a change of leadership

    If you’re willing to change “most” to “a bunch,” I’d start the list with the Astros, Cubs and Dodgers. Management almost always tries to bring in its own guys, e.g., Giminez, Napoli and Darvish at the major league level. In football, Bill Parcells was the epitome of this change.

     

    Regardless, we’re getting a little off topic. I propose that new management sometimes subconsciously rates some of its players ahead of some of the players it inherited, and that such a psychology may affect internal ratings of Gordon. If other TD participants think that never happens in any organization and didn’t happen here, OK.

    Edited by Deduno Abides
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In my 2017 Twins' top 60 prospects' list, I had Gordon listed at number 5, up from number 9 the season before.  And here is what I wrote specifically about him (link here) : 

     

    ETA: 2018

    Nick Gordon was drafted by the Twins as the 5th overall player in the 2014 draft from Olympia High School in Orlando, FL.   He started his pro career in 2014 playing for Elizabethton hitting .294/.333/.366 (101 wRC+) with 11 BB and 45 K (17.6 %), and 11/18 SB (61%).  In 2015 for Cedar Rapids, he hit .277/.336/.360 (104 wRC+) with 39 BB and 88 K (16.5 %), 25/33 SB (76%).  There was incremental improvement on the base paths, but in general similar results.  At this point he exhibited some gap power (23 doubles, 7 triples and 1 HRs in 535 PAs, 0.083 isoP), but it does get neutralized against LHPs (.264/.325/.291; only extra base hits were 3 doubles in 110 PAs against LHPs.)  He started the 2016 season in Fort Myers, where he made a leap forward hitting .291/.335/.386 (112 wRC+) in 116 games (493 PAs), with 17,6 K% and 0.095 isoP, stealing 19/32 bases.  His BABIP (.353) was close to his .333 and .352 of the previous 2 seasons, which means that a BABIP around .350s is not out of question.  He continued in the Arizona Fall League, where he hit a very impressive .346/.418/.444 (144 wRC+) in 21 games (91 PA), but inflated due to an unsustainable .475 BABIP.

     

    Gordon's glove is about average at SS, and he projects to stay in the position.  His bat still projects as a major league average, however he was again neutralized against LHPs (.220/.276/.254 in 118 AB in Fort Myers last season.)   He had good speed, but not great base stealing instincts that need a lot of work.  His season at Fort Myers and his success in Arizona are promising, but the ones who were hoping for a star with the 5th overall pick would be disappointed at Gordon, because he does not project as one. Gordon is a non-roster invitee in the Twins Spring Traning, but not MLB-ready at this point.

    Likely 2017 path: Starting AA Chattanooga shortstop

     

    This season he was worse against LHPs (.174/.273/.240), had concentration lapses on the field, the range issues continued at SS.  This off-season instead of trying to address his weaknesses and becoming a better ballplayer, he started making music, so his priorities are not the way they should be with a "top prospect".  And talking about a guy who never bettered a .749 OPS in the minors.

     

    Have not finished my 2018 prospect list yet, but methinks that Mike was generous with Nick Gordon in the BA list.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Regardless, we’re getting a little off topic. I propose that new management sometimes subconsciously rates some of its players ahead of some of the players it inherited, and that such a psychology may affect internal ratings of Gordon. If other TD participants think that never happens in any organization and didn’t happen here, OK.

     

     

    You seem to think that the front office views prospects as their subordinates, which simply isn't the case. There is no connection at all to a typical office environment (except of course within the front office itself). Though there is a human element involved at some level, to Falvey and Levine prospects are basically just assets. They couldn't care less about who brought them into the org. Whether you believe it or not, that's unquestionably the way it is.

    Edited by drivlikejehu
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You seem to think that the front office views prospects as their subordinates, which simply isn't the case. There is no connection at all to a typical office environment (except of course within the front office itself). Though there is a human element involved at some level, to Falvey and Levine prospects are basically just assets. They couldn't care less about who brought them into the org. Whether you believe it or not, that's unquestionably the way it is.

    Hey man, you’re entitled to your opinion, but I think the sports internet would blow up if any executive ever said anything like he considers all prospects as “basically just assets.”

     

    Also, we’re off-topic, so I’m going to self-moderate and not discuss this issue further. You can post more if you want, but if you’d like to discuss it more start another thread. Thanks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The question I posed during the season when he was HOT (and he was really hot) and basically an untouchable prospect was if he was actually that good (SSS). Weren't his K rates, BAPIP and L/R splits warning signs in the 1st half? I don't have his full 1st/2nd half splits but I remember there being warning signs.

     

    I think the question should be 'Did Gordon's 1st half lead many to overrate him?'

     

    No doubt he is a good prospect and a better one than a year ago. I would also probably bump him up a few places on a Twins prospect list but I think he became very overrated at midseason. Many considered him untouchable for Sonny Gray for example. That (say Gordon and Gonsalves) would be considered a great trade now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I get this from a team perspective, and it's fair. 

     

    In the league sense though I don't buy it, and is why I included those rankings. He was a leadoff man so of course he's getting more plate appearances than most.

     

    I'll single out the Total Bases. Of the top 40 in the southern league last year, only 4 players played fewer than 100 games. In the top 16 nobody had fewer than 119. 

     

    Of the guys that "played [the] full season at one level" he is a standout in a lot of categories. It doesn't matter that they are the "counting stats" in this view (at least to me :))

    I think this works for the majors, but you also have to look at which players moved on and which players moved into the league.

    I was completely for drafting Gordon and have been on his bandwagon the last few years, but some of his shine has went away for me. He is 22 and looking at repeating AA (it seems to me most super studs have seen the majors by 22, I could be wrong on that)  and we still are not sure of his position. So I have no issue with him falling a bit in the Twins prospect list, but that is also why I am fine with trading him for pitching.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think this works for the majors, but you also have to look at which players moved on and which players moved into the league.

     

    There's very few that come up as what I'd call "standouts" of these guys in my comparison: Ronald Acuna, Nick Senzel, Rudy Flores, Colin Walsh, Dalton Kelly, Kevin Madrano, Andy Wilkins.

     

    Only Acuna and Senzel are worth talking about, and I don't think anyone would argue Gordon above them in a prospect comparison. I know what you're looking for, but that argument isn't there.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It really is not about attacking the messenger (reporter in this case), everyone should have a list that reflects their own evaluation, but rather this is a fun list because it raises questions and therefore gives us the fun of speculation and discussion. I have no dislike for any of our MN reporters, the more articles the better for me.

     

    Gordon at 8 is fine with me. I think his second half decline raised questions about the validity of the first half. Each year the reviews and reports seem to have a slightly less optimistic look at Gordon. It appears to me, if I combine the various TD and other reports that he will be a fine average major leaguer, but not a star. Which is fine, but it is nice to know that we actually have some others in the system now that have higher potential.

     

    ​My biggest question in Kirilloff. I want to hope, but I need a full season of ball to see where the injuries have put him. I am much higher on Rooker.

    i like Rooker a lot, but he’s 23 with one professional season under his belt. Let’s see if he slows down when/if he gets to Nooga.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Warning: not expert commentary!

     

    I saw a few snippets of video of Gordon batting this winter. He looks bigger and like he’s attacking the ball.

     

    End warning.

    How does a bigger-and-stronger Gordon impact his ability to remain at SS, do you suppose?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How does a bigger-and-stronger Gordon impact his ability to remain at SS, do you suppose?

    Other than improving his overall value, who knows? Sticking at shortstop will probably depend on three variables:

     

    1. His glove.

    2. His bat.

    3. Who else is on the team.

     

    For example, if his bat is good and his defense is good enough, he’ll probably stick at shortstop, unless someone with a better glove and a good enough bat pushes him to second. Bobby Grich, a great fielder, was moved to second because the Orioles had a superlative fielder at shortstop and thought they could survive Belanger’s weak bat (which they did).

     

    The Twins could also go down the path of thinking that Polanco has a good bat and good enough glove, with Dozier and other candidates to play second (Luis Arraez) and seem Gordon’s highest value to be as a trade chip, regardless of any improvement he shows, other than as it affects his trade value.

     

    Things will shake out in 2018.

    Edited by Deduno Abides
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    i like Rooker a lot, but he’s 23 with one professional season under his belt. Let’s see if he slows down when/if he gets to Nooga.

    I agree, but I think his age and experience have him ready for a fast rise.  I would love it.  But all of minor league experience is filled with pitfalls and obstacles.  Good luck Rooker!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm surprised to see Tyler Jay at #10.   I'd probably have him fringe 20 at this point.  The kid's stock has just plummet the last two seasons.  I'd put Lewis Thorpe in at #10 or Zach Littell.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, now we know why Gordon had a rough 2nd half, obviously he was working on his new rap album!  http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2018/01/12/264649332/nick-gordon-dees-brother-and-top-prospect-in-the-twins-organization-launched-a-rap-album      Maybe he can record new walk-up music for Mauer in spring training.

     

    It sounds like that episode of Friends when Ross said he was going to spend his summer vacation “working on my music.”

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...